**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Apr 04 02:59:59 2012 Apr 04 04:36:32 printf("hello world"); Apr 04 04:37:50 I have a beaglebone that runs angstroms distrubition. When I assing a static IP by editing /etc/network/interfaces then /etc/init.d/networking restart, the board gets the static IP. however, when the board is boot, it gets IP from DHCP as it is configured by default. But the static IP settings are still on /etc/network/interfaces, and when /etc/initd./networking restart typed manually, the Apr 04 04:37:50 board gets the static IP. I found a short scripts that executes /etc/init.d/networking in the start up so the board gets the static IP. However, after using like this for 2 weeks, the board somehow restarted itself and it started to get IP from DHCP. I guess in the boot, it sets the default configurations for the eth0. does anyone have any idea what can I do to solve this problem? Apr 04 04:39:59 nds: ask on #beagle Apr 04 04:40:39 nds: did you try greping /etc for calls to a dhcp client? might be that it's hardcoded somewhere? Apr 04 04:40:58 like in rc.local or sthg like that Apr 04 04:41:00 I guess it is not the hardware problem, it is about angstrom? Apr 04 04:41:47 no I havent tried it Apr 04 04:41:47 I am new in linux, what command do I need to type? Apr 04 05:59:46 dm8tbr, what do you mean greping /etc ? how would you do that? sounds interesting Apr 04 06:43:04 avernos: cd /etc && grep -i dhcp -R *|less Apr 04 10:28:08 Are there any command line instant messaging clients available in the repositories for angstrom? Apr 04 10:34:41 there's irssi <3 Apr 04 15:14:27 I've got angstrom trees on two machines. On one building systemd-gnome-image involves 5910 tasks and on the other 4920 tasks. Is that wrong? I am personally somewhat surprised by this.. Apr 04 15:15:59 SlashV: was the one with less completely clean at the start? Apr 04 15:16:48 At one point yes, I seem to remember it started out with the same 5910 tasks, something happened.. Apr 04 15:19:02 what was that "something"? Apr 04 15:19:19 Nothing I am aware of obviously. Apr 04 15:21:21 Is there a way to 'reset' the bitbake runqueue without doing a completely new build? Apr 04 15:21:39 what do you mean by reset? what do you want to do? Apr 04 15:22:42 Get it back to doing 5910 tasks? I am worried it is somehow broken now. Or does it make sense that the number of tasks for a particular task would change? Apr 04 15:23:06 *target Apr 04 15:23:15 if it's not running some things it can only be because they have already been run Apr 04 15:23:57 when you said it started out with 5910, did you stop it in between that time and it now reporting 4920? Apr 04 15:24:01 They'd still a appear as tasks, just with the notification that this didn't need to be 're-run' Apr 04 15:24:48 No, it completed. Just did an update and removed rm_work from local.conf as far as I remember Apr 04 15:25:19 Ah, maybe the rm_work tasks have dissappeared Apr 04 15:25:21 ah right, that explains it - the removal of rm_work would account for around 1000 tasks not being needed Apr 04 15:25:38 since those would be do_rm_work tasks ;) Apr 04 15:26:14 Thanks for helping me think here. The day is getting long ;) Apr 04 15:26:30 np :) Apr 04 16:26:19 What email client can I use in Angstrom? Apr 04 16:26:27 I see no thunderbird or evolution in the repos Apr 04 16:42:34 I had to explicitly clean gettext-minimal-native and gettext-native and build in order to fix my tree, presumably due to openembedded-core: commit 5bcb68a232539cf11a30e3b812b2fbd6d7d76e35 Apr 04 16:45:48 SlashV: unfortunate, but yes I think that is needed :/ Apr 04 16:46:11 you didn't need to build them in order though, the one now depends on the other Apr 04 16:48:35 That sounds good. Don't really understand why the existing build broke because of it, but oh well **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Apr 05 02:59:58 2012