**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Jun 20 02:59:58 2015 Jun 20 16:53:20 rohith: ping Jun 20 16:53:39 rohith: i'll be around for a few hours, ask whatever it's unclear for you Jun 20 17:06:35 vvu: let me know if you face any trouble to test the driver in bone. you can also try it in pc Jun 20 17:16:44 vmayoral|pc: pong Jun 20 17:17:04 rohith: yeap Jun 20 17:17:22 i wrote you an e-mail, go through it and let me know if there's something unclear for you still Jun 20 17:17:46 vmayoral|pc: Going through it now... Jun 20 17:21:16 vmayoral|pc: Okay, I won't touch the PRUs... Jun 20 17:22:13 For the vehicle code, what changes have to be made apart from adding the relevant cpp files to the vehicle folder? Jun 20 17:31:09 vmayoral|pc: ping Jun 20 18:04:32 vmayoral|pc: ping Jun 20 18:04:39 rohith: pong Jun 20 18:05:08 For the vehicle code, what changes have to be made apart from adding the relevant cpp files to the vehicle folder? Jun 20 18:06:04 that should basically be it Jun 20 18:06:13 Okay Jun 20 18:06:15 you probably also need to abstract the dynamical model of the submarine within the new vehicle Jun 20 18:06:33 which means, understand the OpenROV vehicle and port it appropriately Jun 20 18:06:40 Okay Jun 20 18:07:52 Understood the OpenROV code to an extent. The BBB runs nodejs and the Arduino based board connected to it is responsible for interfacing with the sensors. Jun 20 18:09:24 The BBB is connected to the webcam and uses socket.io and mjpeg streamer to relay the feed to a web browser on the host machine. Jun 20 18:11:31 vmayoral|pc: Since the submarine will not be using RC, uncommenting the lines where RC is declared in the code should do the job? Jun 20 18:12:57 rohith: my advice will be to forget about the camera aspects and focus on porting the vehicle code Jun 20 18:13:16 do not care for now about the nodejs code Jun 20 18:13:32 just focus on porting the code logic to the current existing APM logic Jun 20 18:14:15 No, I am not working on the camera part. Just the OpenROV steering, depth etc. Jun 20 18:15:08 I am also leaving out nodejs part. Jun 20 18:16:07 vmayoral|pc: To remove RC support, uncommenting the relevant lines should be sufficient? Jun 20 18:16:35 rohith: i don't understand your question. RC (PWM output) will be necessary to control the submarine. Maybe provide a code pointer? Jun 20 18:18:07 I meant that since a tether will be used to connect to the submarine and not a 433mhz or so radio, shouldn't it be commented out so that the APM does not keep looking for it? Jun 20 18:22:57 vmayoral|pc: ping Jun 20 18:24:22 rohith: I still do not understand what you mean. Provide a code pointer of what you'd like to comment Jun 20 18:24:33 Okay Jun 20 18:25:01 rohith: if your concern is on how to communicate with the vehicle through APM, there're several ways, all unrelated to RC input (which i believe is what you are referring to) Jun 20 18:27:11 vmayoral|pc: When I connected the Erle Brain to APM Planner, I got a "RC Missing" message. Jun 20 18:27:56 Abhishek_: did you run remoteproc driver on 4.1 ? Jun 20 18:33:09 vmayoral|pc: I'll search for a code pointer and get back to you later. Jun 20 18:33:48 rohith: that's totally unrelated to BeaglePilot2 Jun 20 18:33:59 Okay Jun 20 18:33:59 you are getting that because there's no RC receiver connected Jun 20 18:34:04 to Erle-Brain Jun 20 18:34:09 Yes Jun 20 18:34:15 but that doesn't avoid you from working with it Jun 20 18:34:35 having said that, please focus your time into submarine code port Jun 20 18:34:40 midterm is in a few days Jun 20 18:34:47 and as i shared, there's a lot to catch up Jun 20 18:35:25 reuse the existing sensor in Erle-Brain and the PixHawk Fire Cape (PXF) so that you don't need to code more drivers (e.g. pressure sensor) Jun 20 18:35:41 vmayoral|pc: Okay. Will focus on the submarine logic. Jun 20 18:35:48 rohith: great Jun 20 18:36:17 vmayoral|pc: Will try to use existing sensor libraries wherever possible Jun 20 18:36:34 Thanks for the help :) Jun 20 18:36:49 rohith: ping me either here or through e-mail if you get stucked Jun 20 18:37:05 generally it's best if you provide a code pointer within your working branch Jun 20 18:37:28 vmayoral|pc: Will do **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Jun 20 23:28:54 2015 Jun 20 23:32:44 azizulhakim: i just arrived from seaside Jun 20 23:32:51 will let you know how it behaves. **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Jun 21 02:59:58 2015