**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Jun 25 02:59:59 2015 Jun 25 04:12:44 if not submodules then repo tool maybe Jun 25 04:13:12 ebadawy: how many external repos? just that one? Jun 25 04:14:15 submodules are okay, but the parent repo needs --recursive switch or you get an empty dir Jun 25 04:14:50 then you get to do the submodule init dance Jun 25 04:15:05 nerdboy: 4 till now Jun 25 04:15:21 "put your right branch in, take your left branch out..." Jun 25 04:15:43 then maybe a repo manifest is what you want Jun 25 04:16:15 nerdboy: u have come on the right time ,, there is another big issue I am facing right now Jun 25 04:16:20 "init each submodule and shake it all about" Jun 25 04:16:45 or is that "scream and shout"? Jun 25 04:16:58 forget about submodule .. I'm not sure that I am using rebase thing in the right way Jun 25 04:17:19 i.e. Jun 25 04:18:10 say there a commit i want to squash with another commit that is very far away in the log history Jun 25 04:18:27 so what I am doning is renase for 70 commit Jun 25 04:18:39 this coz to change the hash of all these commits! Jun 25 04:18:44 is that normal? Jun 25 04:19:18 ^^ rebase* Jun 25 04:20:02 probably, but i don't normally rebase much Jun 25 04:20:30 but that is the case with me! Jun 25 04:20:59 because of that I have changed the hash of commit that is not mine ,, https://github.com/jadonk/bone101/pull/20 Jun 25 04:21:13 and now the pull request is not mergeable Jun 25 04:22:35 jkridner: (when u come) ^ Jun 25 04:25:42 rebase rewrites a linear history Jun 25 04:26:00 merge does not Jun 25 04:26:00 don't get it? Jun 25 04:26:19 end result is the same, just histroy is different Jun 25 04:27:06 so how to resolve this "This pull request contains merge conflicts that must be resolved"? Jun 25 04:27:25 merge command literally merges in branch history from (sometimes) multiple branches with parallel changes Jun 25 04:27:54 rebase rewrites commit history so it's all "linear" Jun 25 04:28:19 conflicts will always need resolving Jun 25 04:28:20 oh, that's why it is changing the hashes? Jun 25 04:28:53 it sounds like you might want to try it a different way Jun 25 04:29:45 * ebadawy get confused each time using rebase! Jun 25 04:29:46 are you trying to pick out one commit 70-odd commits back from HEAD? Jun 25 04:30:29 let it be 'edit' Jun 25 04:30:44 which i assume you want next to some other commits? (not that i get why yet) Jun 25 04:31:17 that's it? edit one commit? Jun 25 04:31:52 yea, let's foucs on just 'edit' for now Jun 25 04:32:03 both commit message and "content"? Jun 25 04:32:09 yes Jun 25 04:32:20 or jsut content :) Jun 25 04:32:46 if you change public history it affects everyone with a clone Jun 25 04:32:59 what I did "git rebase -i HEAD~70 && git reset --soft HEAD^" Jun 25 04:33:26 that seems brutal Jun 25 04:33:45 why ? :D Jun 25 04:33:55 cleaner to revert the one commit and make new changes/new commit Jun 25 04:34:13 how to go back there then? Jun 25 04:34:45 you don't go back or change history Jun 25 04:35:20 one new commit reverts old change, second new commit fixes/extends it Jun 25 04:35:54 yea, but jkridner want me to change the commit it self Jun 25 04:36:18 the (second) new commit makes that change Jun 25 04:36:40 plus the original Jun 25 04:36:52 https://github.com/ehab93/bone101/commit/bd71f5ab6fe5089ba085823dcaee5491002cd433 Jun 25 04:37:12 ^ check this comment and tell me if I get him right? Jun 25 04:37:21 * nerdboy is still unclear on the driving requirement Jun 25 04:38:48 he does say "edit this commit" Jun 25 04:39:32 so, what I am doning meets what he want? Jun 25 04:39:39 but without clarification i would probably interpret as "make this change" Jun 25 04:40:39 ok I did a commit that do this change :) ,, https://github.com/ehab93/bone101/commit/bc0a92060b8fa5d4149c641a89622f8557c55176 Jun 25 04:40:45 made* Jun 25 04:40:55 changing history is bad juju Jun 25 04:41:43 to be avoided in general without special circumstances Jun 25 04:41:43 I think what he want is a clean history Jun 25 04:42:40 then i would think about making new/"clean" branch Jun 25 04:43:19 I did it also Jun 25 04:43:29 history is data, data is valuable, i can't throw it out or mangle it without serious coercion Jun 25 04:44:10 this is a second branch ,, have cherry picked this commit from the original one Jun 25 04:44:19 as for you, i would just make sure you know what he's asking for Jun 25 04:44:22 but here comes another modifications Jun 25 04:44:46 yes Jun 25 04:44:57 because i do not Jun 25 04:45:49 jkridner: could u please review this conversation when u come? Jun 25 04:48:38 * nerdboy takes responsibility for adding confusion Jun 25 04:49:18 sorry, i'm kinda particular about this stuff Jun 25 04:49:57 no worries, confusion is already there :) Jun 25 04:49:57 understanding requirements, using tools properly, not mangling data, etc Jun 25 04:50:03 sue me Jun 25 04:51:10 anyway, IV&V hat is permanent if you wear it long enough... Jun 25 04:52:20 few jobs are quite like calling the "emperor" naked in front of the Col. at monthly engineering reviews Jun 25 04:53:05 what is "IV&V hat" ??? Jun 25 04:54:25 20+ years of criticizing engineering/ops contractors and the govt... Jun 25 04:55:41 mostly it's always the contractor's fault but sometimes the govt let's them get away with crap for too long Jun 25 04:55:42 still don't get it ?! :) Jun 25 04:56:59 iv&v is mostly done on safety-critical stuff Jun 25 04:57:01 http://www.nasa.gov/centers/ivv/home/index.htm Jun 25 04:58:08 "404 The cosmic object you are looking for has disappeared beyond the event horizon" Jun 25 04:58:11 nasa has their somewhat idealized version, mostly we got stuck doing it after the fact Jun 25 04:59:04 i get pages... http://www.nasa.gov/centers/ivv/about/index.html Jun 25 05:01:51 what are u try to tell me there ,, it's 7 am and i haven't slept yet !! :D Jun 25 05:05:32 well, you got a cosmic 404 and i didn't!! mommy!! Jun 25 05:05:56 no got it now ,, it was missing 'l' for html Jun 25 11:58:59 * karki_ knew it was lua. Deep down I know it had to be. Jun 25 11:59:06 *knew Jun 25 12:59:09 Abhishek_: i'll try to get the overlay thing done Jun 25 13:04:42 Abhishek_: ping Jun 25 13:05:43 do you have a dts file which are able to compile and load using capemgr. i'll add pru to it Jun 25 13:18:17 shubhangi: Have a look at github.com/RobertCNelson/bb.org-overlays Jun 25 13:19:14 Abhishek_: i'll am giving you the overlay Jun 25 13:19:19 Abhishek_: just a minute Jun 25 13:20:01 * Abhishek_ has his intern project endterm presentation tomorrow Jun 25 13:20:23 best of luck Jun 25 14:34:15 vvu: azizulhakim; btw, what was the ffmpeg question? Jun 25 14:36:44 av500: is there any library for compressing audio video data in kernel space. ffmpeg is for user space. so can't use it in kernel space. Jun 25 14:37:54 nope Jun 25 14:38:35 anyway, the BBB does not really have enough CPU power to compress video Jun 25 14:38:42 other than something like RLE Jun 25 14:38:50 which you already do, no? Jun 25 14:39:11 for audio, you can go mono and drop bit depth Jun 25 14:39:37 from 16 bit stereo to e.g. 12 bit mono you get ~2.5 reduction Jun 25 14:40:02 if you resample down to e.g. 22khz you get another 2x Jun 25 14:40:18 there are resample libs you can use Jun 25 14:40:42 azizulhakim: but I would like to know what raw bandwidth you can achieve Jun 25 14:49:07 av500: will inform you today Jun 25 15:33:39 moin Jun 25 16:03:28 Abhishek_: ping Jun 25 16:03:33 try this https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bw03ajxXQwSoUXVfaU1RVk01RzA/view?usp=sharing Jun 25 16:04:10 better to upload as a gist Jun 25 16:05:02 Abhishek_: https://gist.github.com/shubhi1407/1abb1c8f8334a2551a98 Jun 25 16:06:45 confirm if it works Jun 25 16:09:41 had a look, but not home yet Jun 25 16:09:52 okay Jun 25 16:10:00 compiles fine Jun 25 16:10:50 reg #address-size was an issue .. you might have faced it too i guess Jun 25 16:11:02 the overlay should apply without errors Jun 25 16:11:04 some warning .. fixed it Jun 25 16:11:07 yep Jun 25 16:11:47 if you have a 4.1 tree, check arch/arm/boot/dts for device tree files related to the BBB, am335x-boneblack.dts Jun 25 16:13:06 yes, they were my reference Jun 25 16:13:27 by now i have all tress :p Jun 25 16:13:31 trees* Jun 25 16:15:40 cool, will let you know when I check Jun 25 16:19:08 jkridner: i'm not clear on exactly what ebadawy was trying to do Jun 25 16:19:31 can you explain your actual requirement? Jun 25 21:57:29 nerdboy: in respect to? his whole project or certain patches? Jun 25 21:58:19 nerdboy: I'm looking for ebhadawy to create patches where it is clear what I'm merging and isn't cluttering up an already pretty cluttered code base. Jun 25 21:59:27 I started pulling in some of his pre-req patches and I could probably pull in some of the more related, but I'm a bit concerned about some of the CSS changes wiping out the numbers I took straight from the board design. Jun 25 22:01:58 do you have a clean-ish branch now, or are trying to make one? Jun 25 22:02:47 i was just trying to figure out what he was trying to do... Jun 25 22:03:16 what and why Jun 25 22:05:10 mostly to avoid rewriting public history Jun 25 22:06:11 jkridner: got something i can look at to get a better clue? Jun 25 22:07:54 nerdboy: not sure what is needed. I'm merging into http://github.com/jadonk/bone101/tree/master Jun 25 22:08:17 I've been cherry-picking some of his patches off of https://github.com/jadonk/bone101/pull/20 Jun 25 22:08:56 what was the "edit this commit" comment about then? Jun 25 22:09:46 I've been asking him to rebase and squash some of his patches, including comments I've made on specific patches. Jun 25 22:10:13 some of my comments were against patches he's recreated now (so don't show the comments anymore unless you go to his gh-pages branch). Jun 25 22:11:13 are you seeing that some of my comments are unclear? Jun 25 22:11:27 * jkridner has to run to a meet-up at the local hackerspace. Jun 25 22:12:14 mostly i was unclear on what he was doing Jun 25 22:12:52 let me know (later) if you'd like me to butt in more, er, help... **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Jun 26 02:59:58 2015