**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Mar 24 03:00:01 2018 Mar 24 03:54:22 @ds2 what do you think about using the MQ-9 || MQ-5 instead Mar 24 03:54:43 of the ccs811 Mar 24 05:09:50 interms of accuracy Mar 24 07:29:32 HA HAH AH AHAHAHAH is what I think of MQ-XXX vs CCS811 Mar 24 07:29:56 these are not ideal for measuring to the ppm accurately Mar 24 07:30:07 the fundamental physical puts there response on a log curve Mar 24 07:45:00 yeah but again there's the price problem all the cheap sensors face this atleast after hours of searching on the internet i wasn't able to find anything that isn't industrial with a huge price tag and lead time Mar 24 07:45:32 i think it would be better to use indivisual reacting mq-xx than a single css811 that reacts to lot of things Mar 24 07:55:13 if you know a good sensor kindly suggest it @ds2 Mar 24 07:57:43 the mq-xx are no better Mar 24 07:57:55 they are all based on a similar principle Mar 24 07:58:18 cost is the issue... but NDIR ones are much more selective Mar 24 07:59:47 yup i do agree but cost and again this is a prototype platform so maybe for now its the best ting to go with such sensors,the sensly hat for rpi is a good example of this although it has a huge markup price,something of that sort i am planning to implement Mar 24 08:00:31 there's a 150$ limit i guess for beaglebone so i need to fir everything else too,the prudaq itself costs around 110+$ Mar 24 08:32:04 jkridner: cwicks: Wormo : Mar 24 08:32:04 https://www.elinux.org/BeagleBoard/GSoC/ModernSpeak-Spell Mar 24 08:32:05 Please take a look at my proposal and suggest me any improvements. Mar 24 12:12:35 @wormo updated the proposal with more info on prudaq and pru's Mar 24 12:12:59 i think this should be fine,kindly comment on it so that i can get the final pdf ready Mar 24 17:00:41 Please take a look at my proposal and suggest some edits please Mar 24 17:00:45 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rxHgY5UvItBI4vpkxpeh-HFBUyQcR62lNUeGeIl2UKI/edit?usp=sharing Mar 24 17:05:27 yatharth.mathur: google docs will mostly be ignored. Better to create the proposal on elinux.org Mar 24 17:06:04 Ohh thank you will prepare it on eLinux Mar 24 17:06:12 Thank you sir Mar 24 17:08:32 Can you guide me through it? Mar 24 17:08:38 On how to put up my proposal on eLinux Mar 24 17:10:07 yatharth.mathur: Create account. Mar 24 17:10:16 use this template - https://elinux.org/BeagleBoard/GSoC/ProposalTemplate Mar 24 17:10:29 and then create your proposal page Mar 24 17:12:05 btw .. the project looks to be too ambitious. GSoC is about 12 weeks. And thats not a lot of time. Mar 24 17:12:15 you need to discuss hardware requirements and a lot other things before finally submitting the proposal Mar 24 17:13:34 I see... Mar 24 17:13:48 Do you have any suggestions on who would be the best person to discuss this with? Mar 24 17:17:24 the point is, we do not know you, and you havent been around here very often, so Mar 24 17:17:24 Your proposal should have enough details that it convinces us that you can put it off. Mar 24 17:17:52 best : well, I have always believed that the mentors here know everything. Mar 24 17:18:17 So certainly a lot of them know a lot about hardware. Mar 24 17:19:32 try to be here, see when they are up, and ask them to go through your proposal Mar 24 17:19:41 all of them. Mar 24 17:20:46 Okay got it Mar 24 17:20:49 Thanks a lot Mar 24 17:21:22 The eLinux proposal, I am supposed to start a new discussion on the Beagleboard page right? Mar 24 17:25:12 Okay I got it thanks Mar 24 17:25:16 I'll be getting back to you.. thanks a lot for your help Mar 24 18:21:29 zeekhuge: https://elinux.org/BeagleBoard/GSoC/%22beagle%22bone Mar 24 18:21:37 Is this fine? Mar 24 19:46:17 yatharthmathur[m: the first couple weeks worth on your timeline really should have been included as proposal research during this time period, and things learned included in the proposal discussion Mar 24 19:49:40 at this point the level of proposal detail is "pet monitor... but on beagle" and the toplevel idea alone is not an indecator of succcess to someone trying to estimate chance of successful completion Mar 24 19:50:23 mentors don't know you like professors from school might Mar 24 19:57:39 jkridner: cwicks: zeekhuge : Mar 24 19:57:39 https://www.elinux.org/BeagleBoard/GSoC/ModernSpeak-Spell Mar 24 19:57:40 Please take a look at my proposal and suggest me any improvements. Mar 24 20:10:47 jm_donthineni: Will the TIesr work on PocketB out of the box ? or you need to do something to get it working ? Mar 24 20:16:08 Is it even open-source ? Mar 24 20:22:56 Oh ! it is - https://git.ti.com/tiesr Mar 24 20:47:55 zeekhuge: Yeah. I know that TIesr in supported on all C5000 Dsps. Mar 24 20:47:55 I will recheck if it works on pocketbeagle for sure. Mar 24 20:50:59 Yes. It works on all ARM based platforms Mar 24 21:03:02 zeekhuge: Yes. It works directly on all ARM based platforms Mar 24 21:08:58 Although I am not able to find any previous projects which used TIesr, the documentatiin of their repository says 'arm based platforms' Mar 24 21:09:47 Although I am not able to find any previous projects which used TIesr on pocketbeagle, the documentation of their repository says 'arm based platforms' Mar 24 21:10:42 Tiesr is mostly used for c5000 dsp processors Mar 24 21:31:00 really ? I actually found something - http://www.laplinker.com/2013/09/beaglebone-black-based-voice.html Mar 24 21:31:21 Oh ! did you know that PB is derived from beaglebone black ? Mar 25 00:55:41 Wormo: m_w: Any more suggested changes to my proposal? **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Mar 25 03:00:04 2018