**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Apr 06 02:59:57 2021 Apr 06 04:39:15 * DhruvaGole[m] < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/UZHyTWMdTZOJosiUiCLdCVfY/message.txt > Apr 06 04:49:35 Essentially it means that with the help of DT Overlays, at the software level one can basically get good compatibility between AI and Bb blue/black even though they have diff am's Apr 06 04:57:14 * DhruvaGole[m] uploaded an image: (170KiB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/PBpCIvQTjeTAdGHqojpereMV/20210406_092648_1163952557289557376.jpg > Apr 06 04:57:23 Thanks a ton lorforlinux , I'm in! Apr 06 06:43:53 Did you close it lorforlinux ? Apr 06 06:49:47 Nope Apr 06 06:50:19 It might have rebooted itself due to heating issue Apr 06 06:50:29 I was just monitoring temperature Apr 06 06:50:32 It was in bounds Apr 06 06:50:52 * DhruvaGole[m] uploaded an image: (156KiB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/onMzVasCYbdmwvsXkGBAplcz/20210406_112034_5478051954634049888.jpg > Apr 06 06:52:40 I'll try to get the fixed ip tonight. Apr 06 06:52:44 lorforlinux since you're online I had a few doubts regarding your DT overlay last year project Apr 06 06:53:03 Yeah go ahead Apr 06 06:53:40 Were you able to actually test all the hardware on the BBAI? including servos, motors etc.. on the robotics cape ? Apr 06 06:54:12 Your overlay basically makes the BBAI look like a BB blue to any external cape right? Apr 06 06:54:19 I didn't get the robotics cape Apr 06 06:54:42 All the bone buses work though Apr 06 06:54:51 Okay Apr 06 06:54:56 Hey satacker Apr 06 06:55:17 I have to answer your questions as well Apr 06 06:55:23 If you had written all the DT overlays, then any library should be able to work just like it did on the BB blue/black right ? Apr 06 06:55:25 lorforlinux could u look at this Apr 06 06:55:25 https://forum.beagleboard.org/t/usb-configfs-in-device-tree/29020 Apr 06 06:55:50 Then why librobot control is having so many issues any ideas? Apr 06 06:56:32 That is correct, there are some small things that you have to change. Apr 06 06:57:07 Not really sure, it should be a very easy task with the compatibility layer in place. Apr 06 06:57:08 My doubt was that small things to be changed in DT files or the libraries? Apr 06 06:57:17 > <@satacker:matrix.org> lorforlinux could u look at this Apr 06 06:57:17 > https://forum.beagleboard.org/t/usb-configfs-in-device-tree/29020 Apr 06 06:57:17 On it Apr 06 06:57:43 Alright Apr 06 06:58:12 So you're very sure that issues aren't there in DT part Apr 06 06:58:36 * So you're very sure that issues aren't there in DT Overlays Apr 06 06:59:04 You have to write DT overlay for robotics cape and change the sysfs references in library. Apr 06 06:59:47 Perfect this was what I was wondering all along! Apr 06 07:00:09 Since I thought you'd already written the Dt Overlays Apr 06 07:00:35 Cuz in your proposal you said you would right? Apr 06 07:03:39 I pushed Overlays for the capes i had at that time Apr 06 07:03:58 okay, so my project is exactly a continuation of yours Apr 06 07:04:08 satacker any progress on the idea after the discussion? Apr 06 07:05:16 The cape compatibility layer update project this year and librobotcontrol should be one project i guess. Apr 06 07:05:30 I don't know what should i follow? Apr 06 07:05:47 As, You'll end up working on the compatibility layer update anyway. Apr 06 07:06:52 > <@satacker:matrix.org> I don't know what should i follow? Apr 06 07:06:52 > Should i follow rcn's suggestions for device tree node? Apr 06 07:06:52 It's his project idea and he's the mentor so, I believe yeah. Apr 06 07:09:29 Until unless someone wants to work on the compatibility layer update and can push good cloud9 examples, documentation, and demo videos kind of stuff. Apr 06 07:10:46 <@satacker:matrix.org> I don't"> The script that's currently being used has all the strings and function instances Apr 06 07:12:08 Okie, Sounds good to me 👍 Apr 06 07:12:12 Any suggestions, as you have already worked on device trees could you point out the cannot's of it for usb gadget since I am not able to find any example of such a configuration in device tree Apr 06 07:12:27 I'll go through your previous messages also. Apr 06 07:13:35 I never used usb with DT Apr 06 07:15:34 I guess you have to probably develop it from scratch if we both can't find any good info on it. Apr 06 07:16:43 Yes, also in general are device trees more of trial and error? Apr 06 07:18:23 Not really 🤔 Apr 06 07:19:45 Abhishek i will update the beagle config proposal Apr 06 07:19:45 (I hope i can target two statements) Apr 06 07:21:47 Because device trees are completely new to me and beagle config isn't mentioned in the ideas Apr 06 07:25:06 > <@satacker:matrix.org> Abhishek i will update the beagle config proposal Apr 06 07:25:06 > (I hope i can target two statements) Apr 06 07:25:06 yes you can submit upto 3 proposals Apr 06 07:32:19 So lorforlinux I feel like [my proposal](https://elinux.org/BeagleBoard/GSoC/2021_Proposal/DhruvaGole#Details_of_implementation) is more or less on the right track now, Is it ok to submit it now? If you have time then you can just let me know if there are any obvious mistakes just before I submit? Apr 06 12:08:13 * satacker[m] < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/KFipgTsZEIhPrTnbkzsYxBNv/message.txt > Apr 06 14:05:15 does anyone know why media upload on elinux does not work? Apr 06 14:05:27 cannot upload any .png Apr 06 15:24:02 jduchniewicz: Check this https://elinux.org/Help:Managing_files , it's working for me Apr 06 18:12:30 thanks, it helped :) Apr 06 18:22:28 ds2: I updated the proposal, however I am highly in doubt about the soundness of it all after checking if I can feed TIDL with YOLOv3 model Apr 06 18:22:59 ds2: I am using SDK verson 6.03 and the tool reports truthfully that it cannot convert ONNX model layers to TIDL Apr 06 18:23:37 ds2: apparently for the newer versions this is fixed, but will the SDK for totally different HW work with AM5279? Apr 06 18:23:57 ds2: the relevant info is: Apr 06 18:23:57 Import error: This ONNX model's topology is not supported. Please check TIDL User's Guide for supported network topologies. Apr 06 18:23:57 TIDL limitation: Reshape layer cannot be merged with layers other than InnerProduct or AveragePooling layer! Apr 06 18:24:02 Fails on: LeakyRelu, Padding in H and W axis, Concat, Shape, Gather, Reshape, Unsqueeze Apr 06 18:25:47 ds2: at this point I am quite concerned what to do. I probably require some help on this topic (can I use newer SDK - which has YOLOv3 support) and what should I do if it turns out my idea for the proposal is unsound Apr 06 18:34:22 ds2: maybe I can indeed try to deploy it in parts, but no idea how to do this... (split the network?) Apr 06 18:52:10 ds2: seems like I got myself into a rabbit hole (should have bailed out earlier from using TIDL) Apr 06 19:31:01 lorforlinux: https://elinux.org/BeagleBoard/GSoC/2021_Proposal/usb_configfs_in_device_tree Apr 06 19:31:01 Does this make sense? Apr 06 19:35:02 ds2: maybe I could somehow utilize the EVEs without TIDL, but no idea how to do that Apr 06 19:35:52 or should I totally ditch the idea and try to come up with a different proposal Apr 06 19:36:21 don't know what does the BB community require in terms of ML/DL Apr 06 19:36:37 as anything which would accelerate models would be nice IMO Apr 06 19:36:42 *that Apr 06 19:45:13 the most frustrating thing is that such elementary operation as LeakyReLu is missing from the SDK6.2 Apr 06 19:45:53 if we could use the newest SDK then we would be fine with most of the issues **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Apr 07 02:59:57 2021