**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Aug 24 03:00:04 2012 Aug 24 04:02:16 wb prpplague Aug 24 04:04:51 mranostay: thanks Aug 24 04:05:01 mranostay: got DSL problems since the outage last week Aug 24 04:05:10 mranostay: going to get uverse in a few weeks Aug 24 06:09:59 prpplague: wait you get internet in Texas?!? Aug 24 06:20:21 <_av500_> yes, once per week Aug 24 06:20:29 <_av500_> by pony express Aug 24 06:20:42 <_av500_> then you have a few hours to craft reply packets Aug 24 07:16:27 Hi, does anyone know how to completely disable the video output on the beagleboard, I guess I could remove the kernel modules, or is it as simple as changing the uboot boot arguments for the kernel... Aug 24 08:06:43 yegorich: is the other guy your brother? Aug 24 08:07:16 av500: who exactly do you mind? Aug 24 08:08:32 Alexander Aug 24 08:08:40 yes Aug 24 08:09:07 av500: do you know him? Aug 24 08:09:46 no Aug 24 08:13:40 *g* Aug 24 08:34:44 Hello, Can someone help me to boot the BBXM? I get a strange read through the serial: Unable to read "uEnv.txt" from mmc 0:1" Aug 24 08:39:09 pastebin a full boot log Aug 24 08:45:35 ohad: does your sd card have a uEnv.txt file in the boot partition? Aug 24 08:47:40 bobsickle,av500: I've just added uenv.txt. through the HDMI I can see it writes that the system is read-only. this is the serial output:(http://pastebin.com/H1ZjAjiV) Aug 24 08:51:02 so the kernel loads but it never boots properly? Aug 24 08:51:48 'cause it looks like it's reading uEnv.txt to me Aug 24 08:53:59 bobsickle" correct. When I use the demo image, I get the Angstrom logo. I've found this old post (https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/beagleboard/YNjba_HOGfU), and tried to set the uenv.txt as it suggested. BUT if you lok at the log you can see that "*** Warning - readenv() failed, using default environment" Aug 24 08:54:58 some things to check with uEnv.txt Aug 24 08:55:13 ensure that you are using a unix editor to make the file Aug 24 08:55:31 i.e. the correct new line characters etc Aug 24 08:55:51 and also that there is a new (empty) line at the end of the file Aug 24 08:56:06 allsey:checked. problem is not there. what should uenv.txt contain? Aug 24 08:56:07 uboot wouldn't parse my uEnv.txt without it Aug 24 08:56:37 uEnv.txt contains overrides of the environment variables in uboot Aug 24 08:56:53 if you do a printenv in uboot Aug 24 08:57:16 on a BBxM you don't need to play with the environment variables on the board Aug 24 08:57:25 you can configure any of those params in the uEnv.txt by writing env_variable=string_value Aug 24 08:57:28 just use uEnv.txt Aug 24 08:57:43 depends what kernel you are using Aug 24 08:57:59 the default ttyS2 is wrong for me, I needed to change it to ttyO2 Aug 24 08:58:44 but for the default factory config, the defaults in uboot are pretty much correct, i.e. you don't need a uEnv.txt file Aug 24 09:00:09 umm, I think the file still needs to exist Aug 24 09:00:18 on a BBxM anyway Aug 24 09:00:21 I tried mounting the demo image but agaIN - it wont load... Aug 24 09:00:57 ohad: what do you mean it won't load? If you're getting to the angstrom logo, it's loaded Aug 24 09:01:19 (over serial anyway) Aug 24 09:01:50 but the it halts Aug 24 09:02:21 the it? Aug 24 09:02:39 ohad: ignore: *** Warning - readenv() failed, using default environment Aug 24 09:04:08 av500: ok, i've deleted uenv.txt, but the system is still not loading. I can see the Calipers logo, and about 50% loading, it stucks. Aug 24 09:04:12 uEnv.txt is complete optional Aug 24 09:04:32 ohad: pastebin a full boot log Aug 24 09:04:38 yours stops at the kernel for some reason Aug 24 09:05:21 after a while, it shows me a text console(which i cannot paster bin, since it's the HDMI output. I can only pasebin the serial.) Aug 24 09:05:41 yes, the serial Aug 24 09:06:48 * bobsickle wanders off Aug 24 09:08:55 av500: http://pastebin.com/UEvwkjUY Aug 24 09:09:27 yes, no kernel traces Aug 24 09:09:40 pastebin your uenv Aug 24 09:11:16 av500: uenv.txt http://pastebin.com/gW1YesKh Aug 24 09:14:27 ah Aug 24 09:22:11 What am I supposed to see at the end? I used to see an Ubuntu like desktop, and now I can only see a flickering screen... Aug 24 09:37:51 av500: have any idea what I should do next? Aug 24 09:51:48 http://www.mitydsp.com/products-services/cpu-engines/mityarm-3359/ Aug 24 10:03:57 mity, infested with mites? Aug 24 10:04:40 mite be Aug 24 12:00:52 @bobsickle, any idea why I can boot my beagleboard without a uImage file in /boot/? Aug 24 12:02:02 uname -a returns: Linux beagleboard 2.6.32 #3 PREEMPT Thu Mar 17 08:56:19 CET 2011 armv7l unknown Aug 24 12:05:42 allsey: because that's where uboot looks by default now Aug 24 12:06:04 oh, can? Aug 24 12:06:14 maybe you have an older u-boot Aug 24 12:06:17 thurbad: yes can Aug 24 12:06:34 and a uImage on the boot partition Aug 24 12:06:36 U-Boot 2011.03-rc1-00000-g9a3cc57-dirty Aug 24 12:06:58 nope there is no uImage binary on the boot partition Aug 24 12:07:08 I've cleared the trash Aug 24 12:07:22 checked the whole partition with ls -al Aug 24 12:07:33 pastebin your uboot environment Aug 24 12:08:32 http://pastebin.com/XYSvsbHi Aug 24 12:08:49 sorry about the garbled output, not really bothered to fix it Aug 24 12:10:37 you're sure there's no uImage in the rootfs? Aug 24 12:10:54 in the boot directory? Aug 24 12:11:31 haha, yes, I really am Aug 24 12:11:53 unless their is some weird caching I have never heard about Aug 24 12:12:44 it even says that it found the image http://pastebin.com/72ub5qy8 Aug 24 12:13:03 I wonder if my partitioning is corrupt and I'm seeing two different copies of something... Aug 24 12:16:04 have you put the card in a host system and run fsck on the second partition? Aug 24 12:16:50 I have not Aug 24 12:17:01 I'm not familiar with the fsck tool Aug 24 12:18:00 fsck is a filesystem checker, itwill check for corruption, mislinked files, etc Aug 24 12:18:25 ah excellent, this will be interesting... Aug 24 12:19:04 use umount /dev/sdX2; fsck /dev/sdX2 Aug 24 12:19:28 where sdX2 is your partition not the whole device Aug 24 12:19:56 probably need sudo on bot of those if not running as root Aug 24 12:20:19 cheers, one second... Aug 24 12:22:10 running the first fat32 boot partition doesn't return much info Aug 24 12:22:22 it says that there are 8 files Aug 24 12:24:20 Including directories I have: MLO, uEnv.txt, u-boot.bin, .Trash-1000/ .Trash-1000/files .Trash-1000/info .Trash-1000/expunged Aug 24 12:24:33 ... I can only acocunt for 7/8 of those files.... Aug 24 12:25:06 oh your host is a mac? Aug 24 12:25:59 Linux Amadeus 3.2.0-29-generic #46-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 27 17:03:23 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Aug 24 12:27:18 hmm, I thought the .Trashes .... n/m it says .Trash Aug 24 12:27:57 anyway, I cleared out the trash completely using a rm -rf on it Aug 24 12:28:08 so I try boot now Aug 24 12:28:20 did you check the second partition yet? Aug 24 12:28:31 I did, there were some broken inodes Aug 24 12:28:35 'k Aug 24 12:28:58 fsck still says that there are now 4 files on the partition Aug 24 12:29:12 I wonder what this 4th file is...? Aug 24 12:29:22 is just '/' counted as file Aug 24 12:29:24 the root folderi s probably what it's counting Aug 24 12:29:34 ah yep, that makes sense Aug 24 12:30:03 stilla file as far as linux is concerned Aug 24 12:30:47 haha, it's still booting! Aug 24 12:30:53 danm Aug 24 12:31:25 there is no NAND on the beagle xm Aug 24 12:31:33 so I can't be getting the image from there Aug 24 12:32:11 from the beagle what does ls /boot -hal show? Aug 24 12:32:26 and I don't think uboot can even mount / access a ext3 partition, so I doubt it booting from there Aug 24 12:32:28 one second Aug 24 12:33:28 whoa, what is this? Aug 24 12:33:57 what is mounted into the /boot dir?? Aug 24 12:34:12 if you checked /boot from your host that's the boot on your hard drive, not the SD Aug 24 12:35:02 nope this is the target I'm looking at Aug 24 12:35:28 http://pastebin.com/QWsK5cxB Aug 24 12:36:07 that would do it Aug 24 12:37:00 okay Aug 24 12:37:13 I think I have a significant knowledge gap here Aug 24 12:37:45 so there is a copy of these files that I thought strictly only lived on the boot partition of the SD card Aug 24 12:38:21 what does it show when you type mount Aug 24 12:38:21 and these files are stored inside the /boot directory Aug 24 12:39:04 one second - I'm bringing the target back online now Aug 24 12:39:15 no worries Aug 24 12:39:48 but even if these files are here in the ext3 partition, how could u-boot access them, does it even have the module/driver Aug 24 12:40:52 output of mount shows that there is nothing special about that /boot folder Aug 24 12:40:54 yes uboot mounts the partition specified as rootfs as / temporarily Aug 24 12:41:27 wow, I had no idea about this Aug 24 12:41:50 time to rtfm I guess Aug 24 12:42:09 in your case mmcroot=/dev/mmcblk0p2 rw Aug 24 12:42:55 that becomes the root later Aug 24 12:43:19 but it's really the samething Aug 24 12:44:17 interesting... Aug 24 12:44:45 did you have a reference for that info that I can look at or is that just experince? Aug 24 12:45:31 experience mostly Aug 24 12:46:17 you can read through the uboot code for the board where it's setting up the environment if you feel rambunctious Aug 24 12:48:20 well I wasn't planning on going that deep Aug 24 12:48:31 but surely there is a section in the das u-boot manual on this Aug 24 12:49:51 possibly Aug 24 12:49:58 I've never read it Aug 24 12:56:01 I dunno, this still seems strange to me, everywhere I read, it is stated that u-boot can read ext2 but not ext3 Aug 24 12:56:59 in which case, even if there is a uImage in /boot/uImage, u-boot couldn't access it Aug 24 12:57:48 although u-boot does say 'Loading file "/boot/uImage" from mmc device 0:2 (xxa2)' Aug 24 13:00:23 the beaglebone uboot has been patches to support ext2/ext3/ext4 Aug 24 13:03:00 koen: cheers, today has convinced me that must be the case Aug 24 13:05:35 koen: if I have a uImage in /boot/ is vmlinux required? Aug 24 13:06:18 you only need uImage Aug 24 13:06:25 cheers Aug 24 13:27:54 anyone here have experince dealing with the kernel panic that comes from not being able to mount the rootfs Aug 24 13:29:49 yes, make the mount succeed Aug 24 13:30:00 (not really helpfull, but still accurate) Aug 24 13:57:52 koen: this is a known bug with the 3.0 kernel coming from the Yocto build system Aug 24 13:58:13 http://www.digipedia.pl/usenet/thread/18578/7775/ Aug 24 14:02:20 allsey: so use the angstrom buildsystem, that works Aug 24 14:02:59 rebuilding the console image now =D Aug 24 14:03:10 the 'yocto' support for beagleboard is a farce Aug 24 14:03:32 :/ Aug 24 14:03:57 the yocto people are intent on not using the official TI layer for beagl Aug 24 14:04:00 that been said, bitbake mentions that the angstrom meta data comes from the yocto project Aug 24 14:04:01 meta-angstrom = "angstrom-v2012.05-yocto1.2:a029f5f5d19f788e2ab17227f35350ff5b6ca125" Aug 24 14:04:08 allsey: yes Aug 24 14:04:13 not to be an ass, but is there a specific need that yocto addresses? Aug 24 14:04:21 thurbad: a ton Aug 24 14:04:22 nup Aug 24 14:04:28 just testing Aug 24 14:04:49 thurbad: but when people say 'yocto' they usually mean either 'oe-core' or 'poky' Aug 24 14:05:06 yep, pardon me, I did mean poky Aug 24 14:05:10 ah, haven't been following that closely Aug 24 14:05:39 so angstrom uses all the components from the yocto project, minus poky Aug 24 14:05:45 plus meta-ti Aug 24 14:05:59 (and other layers for BSPs, like the r-pi layer) Aug 24 14:07:11 they have a separate git tree from the main oe-core project as well, the latest version of angstrom in oe-core tree is 2010 Aug 24 14:07:12 thurbad: rule of thumb: anyone who mentions 'yocto' generally doesn't know what yocto is or does Aug 24 14:07:32 kinda kinda android porters? Aug 24 14:07:32 allsey: there is no angstrom in oe-core Aug 24 14:07:38 koen: does yocto support hardfp kernels? Aug 24 14:08:10 mru: it didn't support vfp or neon until very recently :) Aug 24 14:08:18 mru: it supports intel kernels, though Aug 24 14:08:24 koen: I checked out the oe-core tree a couple days ago, there is angstrom 2010.x under the distros Aug 24 14:08:41 allsey: there are no distros in oe-core Aug 24 14:10:01 allsey: tell me where you see angstrom in here: http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/conf/distro Aug 24 14:10:52 yep, sorry I meant in the OpenEmbedded repository Aug 24 14:11:04 oe-core is meant to be machine independent, right? Aug 24 14:11:14 right Aug 24 14:12:16 koen: cheers & thanks for clarifying that :) Aug 24 14:13:05 koen: ah, so it's like java Aug 24 14:14:56 mru: no, it doesn't have a coffee counterpart Aug 24 14:15:38 oe-core is that nasty Nescafe Decafe :-D Aug 24 14:16:29 * koen pretends to sit next to hrw and say "hey, it's beer:16 already" Aug 24 14:16:47 :-D Aug 24 14:34:00 hi.. im using beagleboard-xm rev.C. My board working correctly. when i connect to camera module, overvoltage led turn on. what can i do? Aug 24 15:09:29 nid start by waiting for a reply... Aug 24 15:09:55 thurbad? Aug 24 15:10:18 someone that asked a question then left ... I was being sarcastic :) Aug 24 15:11:54 Is there a detailed beaglebone specification document ? one which has all the registers and pins information. Aug 24 15:14:01 the beaglebone has no registers Aug 24 15:14:05 the cpu on it has Aug 24 15:14:09 and yes, there is a TRM for it Aug 24 15:14:20 TRM ? Aug 24 15:15:03 http://www.google.de/search?q=beaglebone+trm Aug 24 15:15:55 Thanks av, would that explain what the physical gpio are called on beaglbone Aug 24 15:16:10 I mean how to find there address Aug 24 15:17:37 OR, what processor BB uses? Aug 24 15:18:01 its all there Aug 24 15:18:11 yeah, Aug 24 15:18:13 i am not going to type what you can google Aug 24 15:18:17 Thanks av. Aug 24 15:18:27 np Aug 24 15:18:40 good day. Aug 24 15:19:07 av500 *g* Aug 24 15:20:34 that was quick :) Aug 24 15:20:44 yeah Aug 24 15:21:10 hm nokia will unveil windows 8 phone in two weeks Aug 24 15:21:14 jkridner: sorry for the lost sale .... Aug 24 15:22:03 * mranostay yawns Aug 24 15:22:10 Friday finally Aug 24 15:22:20 hehe Aug 24 15:22:21 ha Aug 24 15:22:26 finally? it's almost over Aug 24 15:22:29 we already have Aug 24 15:22:51 hm and no bada and tizen phone this year anymore Aug 24 15:23:42 mru: limey time don't count :P Aug 24 15:23:45 * mranostay ducks Aug 24 15:24:18 woglinde: is that a surprise? after their train-wreck-integration reprise... Aug 24 15:24:33 I suppose we could let friday protocols be in effect whenever it's friday _somewhere_ Aug 24 15:24:38 when is the martian friday? Aug 24 15:24:49 mru in some months Aug 24 15:28:57 wikipedia has orbital period and rotation period for mars, but it doesn't say how long a week is Aug 24 15:32:30 7 mars days, what else ? Aug 24 15:33:42 wouldn't that depend on the early schedule of the mars gods? Aug 24 15:33:45 heh Aug 24 15:34:06 well howdy prpplague Aug 24 15:34:13 greetings Aug 24 15:34:20 hi prpplague Aug 24 15:34:25 mars doesn't have moons, does it? Aug 24 15:34:28 you happen to know why E-ELC CFP annoucements got push another week? Aug 24 15:34:58 thurbad: two iirc Aug 24 15:35:58 mranostay: due to the co-location of the Linuxcon-EU, there is some scheduling details between the two that need to be resolved Aug 24 15:36:04 woglinde: greetings Aug 24 15:44:10 hm I will not make in to barcelona Aug 24 15:44:14 args it Aug 24 15:45:52 prpplague: like multiple speakers in both cons? Aug 24 15:46:28 mranostay: no, like one room scheduled to be used for both linuxcon and elc Aug 24 15:46:53 handbags at con :-D Aug 24 15:46:54 heh that could be a problem Aug 24 15:47:11 how to check what clockrate the beaglexm is running at atm? Aug 24 15:48:47 prpplague: hows it going? Aug 24 15:50:12 XorA: hey bud Aug 24 15:50:14 XorA: it goes Aug 24 15:50:30 prpplague: whats this about state of emergency in your locale??? Aug 24 15:50:33 prpplague: if you attend one conference can you 'sneak' into the others sessions? Aug 24 15:50:41 prpplague: hope this is over exaggerated news Aug 24 15:50:53 XorA: well it was an emergency two weeks ago, but i could not seem to find you, hehe Aug 24 15:52:35 prpplague: oops, it wasnae me, thats my story and I sticking to it Aug 24 15:54:44 XorA: the media never overplays anything :) Aug 24 15:55:12 XorA: see /msg Aug 24 16:10:25 arcanescu: cat /proc/cpuinfo Aug 24 16:10:47 that will give you a rough estimate that you can take with a grain of salt Aug 24 16:11:03 Processor : ARMv7 Processor rev 2 (v7l) processor : 0 BogoMIPS : 235.30 Aug 24 16:11:13 dont see anything with which i can guess something Aug 24 16:11:21 CPU implementer : 0x41 CPU architecture: 7 CPU variant : 0x3 CPU part : 0xc08 CPU revision : 2 Aug 24 16:11:24 thats it Aug 24 16:11:35 bogomips.... should be much higher than that Aug 24 16:12:22 well thats what i thought whilst looking at it Aug 24 16:12:25 can i increase this somehow? Aug 24 16:12:53 i ahve another beagle running on cat proc it shows 994 Aug 24 16:12:58 :/ Aug 24 16:13:14 mpurate in kernel bootargs should be able to up it.. if you're running a stock kernel Aug 24 16:13:23 its ubuntu Aug 24 16:13:37 let me try to set that in boot args i do set it on the other beagle Aug 24 16:14:25 I have gpio172_spi1_mosi set as an output gpio in u-boot, set to high, holding power on my custom board. When the kernel starts to boot, I don't get any boot msgs, but I see power shutoff. Aug 24 16:14:27 not sure if ubuntu will run at 1GHz on the beagle currently Aug 24 16:14:52 I can't seem to find what causes the kernel boot to change the gpio pin's state. Aug 24 16:15:18 chrisw957 what board Aug 24 16:15:27 thurbad: thats what i thought.... its ubuntu.... im using that only because of easycap drivers :/ Aug 24 16:15:32 which arent there for angstrom atm Aug 24 16:16:36 Its a actually a gumstix on a custom pcb. Aug 24 16:16:37 also check which governor the kernel is running Aug 24 16:16:55 thurbad on setting mpurate:1000 the bogo now shows 629.15 Aug 24 16:17:10 i think thats the max for buntu Aug 24 16:17:31 I thought ubuntu on xM went to 800 Aug 24 16:17:38 I'm requesting the gpio with gpio_request_one in my board file, which works fine. Aug 24 16:18:06 But something before that seems to be altering the pin. Aug 24 16:18:24 I have the kernel pin muxing turned off, I believe. Aug 24 16:18:27 you'd need to look into the kernel you're using Aug 24 16:18:59 the board file will override gpio muxing settings Aug 24 16:19:05 Any pointers on areas to look in. Aug 24 16:19:11 thurbad: should try mpu higher than 1000 ? Aug 24 16:19:33 for instance I think gpio 172 on the xM is the usb power state.. if memory serves Aug 24 16:19:53 arcanescu: no point in that Aug 24 16:19:56 If the config for OMAP_MUX is not set, then the mux code shouldn't be called and anything uboot does to the mux will not be screwed with. Aug 24 16:20:25 I don't think its used for anything on the overo. Aug 24 16:21:19 The OMAP_MUX statement should have ended with a question mark. Aug 24 16:21:49 thurbad: well than 600 it is Aug 24 16:22:13 arcanescu: check the governor that's in use Aug 24 16:23:41 thurbad: not aware of that.... ? Aug 24 16:23:46 means? Aug 24 16:24:01 it controls cpu throttling Aug 24 16:24:16 okay.... how do i check it? Aug 24 16:30:41 lemme check were that is... it's somewhere in the filesystem ~.~ Aug 24 16:31:11 sure thanks Aug 24 16:36:48 arcanescu try poking around in /sys/devices/system/cpu/ Aug 24 16:37:38 I don't have a kernel that has it enabled at the moment Aug 24 16:37:45 okay will do Aug 24 16:41:07 kernel documentation for cpuidle should describe it in better detail Aug 24 16:49:20 what was the option to clear shared state cache? Aug 24 16:49:39 -f -c clean -sstatecache ? Aug 24 16:49:50 by bash history has failed me Aug 24 16:53:59 * spacecolonyone found it: -c cleansstate Aug 24 16:54:46 pastebin! Aug 24 16:54:54 crap Aug 24 16:55:30 seems i was scrolled up Aug 24 17:05:18 <_av500_> mranostay: you can always shout "pastebin!" Aug 24 17:06:15 Hi guys with the setup-scripts, I've don't oebb.sh update and I'm noticing that some of the branches are behind head by X commits Aug 24 17:06:47 spacecolonyone: do a 'git pull' on the setupscripts repo to get better output for 'update' Aug 24 17:07:10 Is this because I made changes and need to manually fast forward or because a particular commit was checked out by the setup scripts Aug 24 17:07:12 k Aug 24 17:07:34 I was up-to-date Aug 24 17:10:20 koen: this is what I'm talking about http://pastebin.com/dDdwE4gV Aug 24 17:10:36 my git-foo is not strong Aug 24 17:11:41 NB, I checked out master instead of angstrom-v2012.05-yocto1.2 just to give an example! Aug 24 17:18:04 how do I enable the Ethernet adapter on angstrom? It is wire-connected to my router. Aug 24 17:24:20 mru: you'd love the rpi case talk :) Aug 24 17:35:51 you're just trying to make me jealous Aug 24 17:36:12 almost without fail to get networking working on the BBxM I've got to login: rmmod smsc95xx; udhcpc -i eth1 Aug 24 17:36:50 the rmmod is done because routes default to eth0 regardless of the link status Aug 24 17:37:30 spacecolonyone: can you advice how to enable the etherent on the BBxM? Aug 24 17:39:04 ohad: if you are using angstrom, then in theory it should just work (my understanding), but if you are on a network with MAC auth, then you need to patch in support for a static mac address (the smsc95xx driver picks a random one). I use a USB-to-ethernet adapter Aug 24 17:40:17 but I've never been able to get it to "Just Work" at a minimum I've got to log in and do udhcpc -i eth1 to get it to request an IP. This should happen automatically, but it doesn't for me and I haven't been able to figure out why Aug 24 17:41:13 but even then I need to remove the kernel module for the onboard ethernet (most days) because routes seem to default to the onboard adapter (even w/o a link) Aug 24 17:42:00 and the busy box version of route doesn't follow the man page syntax for deleting a route on a specific interfaceface! Aug 24 17:42:18 Hope that helps, some Aug 24 17:42:36 spacecolonyone: thanks Aug 24 17:43:34 on the xM use usb0 Aug 24 17:43:51 thurbad: there is no usb0 Aug 24 17:43:59 ifconfig -a Aug 24 17:47:34 thumbad: I'll check for that in a minute updating atm Aug 24 17:49:22 thurbad: i have usb0, but no internet Aug 24 17:50:15 I use /etc/network/interfaces and ifup/down directly so your mileage may vary Aug 24 17:50:35 .... if you're using an X11 environment Aug 24 17:50:45 isn't there something called connman that people use as well? Aug 24 17:50:49 thurbad: my understanding is that that is not supported with angstrom/systemd Aug 24 17:51:11 http://www.gigamegablog.com/2012/02/06/beaglebone-linux-101-assigning-a-static-ip-address-with-connman/ Aug 24 17:51:14 not sure about systemd Aug 24 17:51:36 I have an early 2011 build Aug 24 17:51:58 thurbad: I've tried ifup usb0, but still no response Aug 24 17:52:03 wmat: yea. Actually my routing issue only seems to appear when using ifup/down. I suspect it is them not playing nice with connman Aug 24 17:52:17 ohad: what are you running Aug 24 17:52:44 Angstrom on BBxM Aug 24 17:53:21 ohad is usb0 configured in /etc/network/interfaces? Aug 24 17:53:54 ohad: systemd or sysvinit? Aug 24 17:54:34 if you are using systems then my understanding is you are using conn man, which means that interfaces file is ignored Aug 24 17:54:42 systemd* Aug 24 17:54:46 thurbad: i think so (pastebin of cat /etc/network/interfaces http://pastebin.com/QyE8Z1Cw) Aug 24 17:55:10 spacecolonyone: have no idea :-s Aug 24 17:55:19 try systemctl Aug 24 17:55:25 try running* Aug 24 17:55:39 if you get a list of serviced then you are using systemd Aug 24 17:55:44 services* Aug 24 17:56:03 yep got a load of output Aug 24 17:57:53 ok, then I don't think messing with ifup/down or interfaces will do you any good :(, but really I'm not at the limit of my knowledge Aug 24 17:58:32 try udhcpc -i usb0 and/or udhcpc -i eth0 Aug 24 18:00:34 spacecolonyone: I get: "udhcpc: SIOCGIFINDEX: No such device" Aug 24 18:03:54 spacecolonyone: sorry, my mistake: sending discover... Aug 24 18:07:00 you pul an IP? Aug 24 18:08:36 spacecolonyone: don't know... I guess no. Aug 24 18:09:26 well, I'd suggest trying the other, I'm also assuming you've got it connected on a network that has a DHCP server and doesn't require MAC registration Aug 24 18:10:11 spacecolonyone: correct Aug 24 18:12:21 what interfaces do you see with ifconfig w/o the -a Aug 24 18:15:07 lo,usb0(http://pastebin.com/QyE8Z1Cw) Aug 24 18:15:46 wrong pastebin:http://pastebin.com/e6eRtESZ Aug 24 18:25:43 doesn't look like you've done ifup usb0 Aug 24 18:26:43 ohad: I'm out. I don't have usb0 Aug 24 18:27:32 if you're running with a static ip address and not dhcp, you'll need to specify your nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf Aug 24 18:28:13 thurbad: if he is on connman I don't think he can specify a static IP with the interfaces file Aug 24 18:28:29 is he using conman? Aug 24 18:28:29 thurbad: I think I did ran ifup usb0, when I run again I get: "ifup: interface usb0 already configured " Aug 24 18:29:01 thurbad: I have no vim, how can I manually set for dhcp, just to run upgrade? Aug 24 18:29:06 thurbad: my understanding is that systemd->connman Aug 24 18:29:25 vi isn't working? Aug 24 18:29:48 thurbad: oops, yes :) Aug 24 18:32:10 thurbad: repelace "iface usb0 inet static" with "iface usb0 inet dhcp" ? Aug 24 18:32:36 yeah Aug 24 18:33:51 thurbad: done, rebooted Aug 24 18:34:51 thurbad: after running modprobe g_ether i get usb0 when running ifconfig. still no ethernet lights Aug 24 18:36:03 what about ping? Aug 24 18:36:35 anyone have any insight into why bitbake reports this failing: .../setup-scripts/sources/meta-openembedded/toolchain-layer/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.bb, do_configure Aug 24 18:36:45 This is new after updating just now Aug 24 18:36:47 g_ether is for the otg connection If I recall Aug 24 18:37:16 it's usb to usb Aug 24 18:38:15 thurbad: no ping ( and there shouldnt be, I cant see the device on the router DHCP list, and there are no lights) Aug 24 18:39:35 ohad does lsmod show smsc95xx? Aug 24 18:40:43 spacecolonyone: no, this is what i get: http://pastebin.com/NYj6J4rL Aug 24 18:41:12 this is a beagleboardxm, right? Aug 24 18:41:47 try depmod -a and reboot Aug 24 18:41:55 then see what lsmod shows Aug 24 18:46:02 spacecolonyone: tried it, almost the same: http://pastebin.com/ik1mkWcg Aug 24 18:46:42 ok well you don't have a kernel module loaded for the ethernet adapter Aug 24 18:47:12 it is possible that it is compiled into your kernel, but I haven't seen any tools that would have done that. Aug 24 18:47:20 How did you get your system image Aug 24 18:48:08 spacecolonyone: http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/demo/beagleboard/Angstrom-TI-GNOME-image-eglibc-ipk-v2012.01-core-beagleboard-2012.01.11.img.gz Aug 24 18:49:15 Ok, we are now out of my realm of knowledge. perhaps koen will chime in at some point, considering where you got it I would have thought it would just work Aug 24 18:51:54 spacecolonyone: do you know where I can get an image that works? Aug 24 18:52:15 koen: can you help? Aug 24 18:52:54