**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Mar 25 02:59:56 2021 Mar 25 08:07:07 anybody know a example to share a irq through multiple device drivers ? Mar 25 09:57:50 hi guys, we have a problem with beaglebone black. We are able to connect to it through web interface using linux, but using windows we have some problem, and we can't connect to it with web interface. any idea how to solve this problem? Mar 25 10:46:28 hi Mar 25 10:46:42 does anyone know what settings enable cpufreq ? Mar 25 10:46:49 in the kernel Mar 25 10:47:37 I am trying to read /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor Mar 25 10:47:45 but the cpufreq directory doesn't exist Mar 25 10:48:32 CONFIG_CPU_FREQ? Mar 25 10:48:35 in a older version of the kernel it exists Mar 25 10:50:07 CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y Mar 25 10:50:31 CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT is needed too Mar 25 10:50:58 ok that doesn't show up Mar 25 10:51:31 show up where? Mar 25 10:51:37 in my config Mar 25 10:51:44 meaning it isn't enabled Mar 25 10:53:34 well, enable it Mar 25 10:53:48 ofcourse :) Mar 25 10:57:07 mru: thank you! Mar 25 10:57:10 it shows up Mar 25 10:59:58 I have run olddef config And i think that might not have been smart to have done Mar 25 11:00:23 earlier I also figured out it had turned of mcasp support Mar 25 11:00:33 and now this was also turned off Mar 25 11:00:46 And i start to wonder what else is turned off ? Mar 25 11:04:02 which version is the old config from, and what are you using now? Mar 25 11:04:20 kernel version? currently 4.19 Mar 25 11:05:23 older one is 4.14 but before that i had 3.13 and used olddef with going to 4.14 too Mar 25 11:05:34 3.13 is _very_ old Mar 25 11:05:44 I am aware Mar 25 11:06:13 when making 4.14 I probably shouldn't have done olddef Mar 25 12:36:05 does one remember how to call clpru to also give me the .asm file for my code ? i had this before **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Mar 25 17:42:35 2021 Mar 25 17:47:11 GenTooMan: I am getting in my two hours! Mar 25 17:48:42 Here: http://docs.bela.io/Audio_2filterbanks_2render_8cpp-example.html#a10 is where I am at now to conjour up some source for communicating my strings to processing. Mar 25 20:06:45 zmatt you were totally right about connman, I used connmanctl and everything is working perfectly now Mar 25 22:31:29 connman is pretty cool tbh, less of a behemoth than networkmanager Mar 25 22:31:42 but then $sytemdphilosophy Mar 25 22:32:09 ? Mar 25 22:33:20 what do you mean? Mar 25 22:36:19 which part!? :D Mar 25 22:36:34 "but then $systemdphilosophy" Mar 25 22:37:01 systemd aims to be a complete systemdaemon .. hence its name. It wants ultimate control of anything it can get its bits on.. Mar 25 22:37:13 s/anything/everything Mar 25 22:37:43 so whilst it might be "featureful" the cost of this is complexity and size Mar 25 22:38:12 which goes against the *nix philosophy of being minimal and optimised Mar 25 22:38:26 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Mar 25 22:38:28 its how it is. Mar 25 22:38:54 but what were you trying to say about connman? Mar 25 22:39:02 from what I've seen .. connman doesn't aim to control all your networking devices all of the time Mar 25 22:39:30 oh it absolutely does, it is way less tolerant of manual intervention than systemd-networkd Mar 25 22:39:31 and all the associated networking stacks, etc. Mar 25 22:39:51 systemd-networkd != networkmanager Mar 25 22:39:56 afaik Mar 25 22:39:59 correct Mar 25 22:40:16 connman definitely wants total control Mar 25 22:40:19 so bringing that into the discussion/debate is tangential Mar 25 22:40:27 well, you were referencing systemd Mar 25 22:40:38 only its philosophy Mar 25 22:40:54 if anything has "systemd philosophy", it would logically be systemd-networkd... though I'm not sure I entirely agree with your description of its philosophy Mar 25 22:41:05 the idea of 'badging' all its subsystems I find .. interesting.. Mar 25 22:41:16 systemd seems pretty decent at not imposing policy and just offering mechanisms Mar 25 22:41:33 have you ever tried to customise something that systemd 'controls' ?! Mar 25 22:41:40 yes Mar 25 22:41:40 s/controls/owns/ Mar 25 22:41:55 the configs are littered all over the place, and obtuse in purpose at Best.. Mar 25 22:42:18 whilst it may be Possible, unless you're a systemd dev, its hardly intuitive Mar 25 22:42:19 I think I disagree, though it's hard to say with such a vague statement Mar 25 22:42:44 but then I am a hardened openrc/sysvinit guy :D Mar 25 22:43:02 yeah then I'm sure it'll be harder initially to get used to Mar 25 22:43:11 and granted, it has its quirks too :D Mar 25 22:43:20 anything new is harder and less "intuitive" than anything familiar Mar 25 22:43:26 naturally :D Mar 25 22:43:38 (since that intuition has been shaped by what one is used to) Mar 25 22:44:07 fair, although core philosophy of design does have an effect I believe.. Mar 25 22:44:08 I for one am very glad to have systemd instead of sysvinit, and I have heavy use of its facilities Mar 25 22:44:16 *make heavy use Mar 25 22:44:25 well, that's how these systems evolve :D Mar 25 22:44:40 or .. mutate, in some cases :D Mar 25 22:45:43 and I think every daemon written in C/C++ here currently is dependent on libsystemd :P Mar 25 22:46:09 I don't (or arent' aware of a) [have] need for much of systemd's 'facilities'/features.. else I would already be using them :D Mar 25 22:47:21 not to say that, like much of software, I could -find- uses .. lol. But I have enough of /those/ issues already LOL Mar 25 22:49:10 anyway, I'm still not quite sure why you dragged systemd into the conversation while talking about connman :P Mar 25 22:51:45 I was talking about networkmanager, which you've completely missed LOL, but anyway.. Mar 25 22:52:56 i'm honestly not sure which of those two is closer to having your idea of "systemd philosophy" Mar 25 22:53:32 I haven't really interacted with NM much in recent times Mar 25 22:54:28 no .. since systemd-* came about and went more 'in-lib' some of the other associated projects have been 'forgotten' about since they're effectively superceded by systemd-* Mar 25 22:55:01 but since systemd is a hard-dep on systemd-* .. the possibility of using outside is nil. Mar 25 22:55:36 anyway .. as you illuded earlier, this is a philosophical discussion which never really goes anywhere LOL Mar 25 22:55:52 +ideological/preferential/etc Mar 25 22:57:46 I'm mostly just confused because I still have no idea what you're even trying to say about connman and/or network-manager (hence I neither agree nor disagree since I don't know what I'd be agreeing or disagreening with) since each time I thought I understood what you meant you seemed to be contradicting my understanding thereof again... I think, I'm not even sure about that :P Mar 26 00:11:05 Well, I ruined the tank! Oh well...the electronics will make up for it. Mar 26 00:11:34 Metal, metal, metal w/out the proper machinery is not easy to handle. sheesh. Mar 26 00:21:39 I got some plates and connections. That is about it. I will add the tracked equipment later. THEN! On to the BBBlue and code source. **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Mar 26 02:59:56 2021