**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Mar 10 02:59:58 2014 Mar 10 07:40:14 panto: sorry i didn't replied, i was sleeping when you ponged, i wanted to discuss regarding usage of cregisters, i tried extern cregister void* Cx but i'm getting error " ';' expected for that line", i also tried compiling your testpru repository but getting same error, what am i missing here? Mar 10 08:40:52 sidbh, it works here Mar 10 08:41:25 are you using the same compiler version? Mar 10 08:41:52 mine is PRU C/C++ Compiler v1.0.0B1 Mar 10 08:45:15 yeah it is showing the same version here Mar 10 08:46:34 no sorry, it is 1.1.0.B1 Mar 10 08:46:34 are you compiling the same code I'm compiling? Mar 10 08:46:45 ah, that might explain it Mar 10 08:46:55 i'll share the README.txt Mar 10 08:47:06 put the new version somewhere too Mar 10 08:47:26 (of the pru compiler) Mar 10 08:48:51 i'll forward the jkridner's mail having the links to the new version, pls shre your mailid Mar 10 08:49:01 *share Mar 10 08:49:11 panto@antoniou-consulting.com Mar 10 08:49:16 it's all over the commit logs :) Mar 10 08:52:09 ok, thanks Mar 10 08:52:11 downloading Mar 10 08:53:19 it does say "The cregister mechanism supported in the 1.0.0B1 release is no longer supported." in the README Mar 10 08:56:22 err, are you using the ARM compiler? Mar 10 08:56:28 yeah Mar 10 08:57:06 the x86 version is 1.0.0B1 Mar 10 08:57:09 this is no good Mar 10 08:57:21 shoot an email to jkrinder Mar 10 08:57:28 or switch to using the x86 one Mar 10 08:57:47 pastebin the README someplace Mar 10 08:58:27 if you can't use direct register access then the new version of the compiler is useless Mar 10 08:59:52 don't you think the code should be supported by the latest version available out there, and btw another way to access the registers is also given in README.txt http://pastebin.com/dyHVRwpP Mar 10 09:00:13 but i'm unable to understand that part :) Mar 10 09:00:25 hmm, yeah, I see Mar 10 09:00:51 what a mess Mar 10 09:02:33 it became more confusing to me when i saw the usage of the extern cregiste... command at the end in an example Mar 10 09:03:19 use the x86 compiler for now Mar 10 09:03:36 there's nothing important changed from what I see Mar 10 09:04:00 do you have the 1.0.0B1 ARM compiler? Mar 10 09:04:46 no Mar 10 09:04:51 why do you use the ARM compiler? Mar 10 09:05:29 there's no reason to compile stuff on the bone Mar 10 09:06:25 ok i guess i will compile using x86 compiler for now Mar 10 09:06:59 I'll try to see what need to change to support the newfangled method Mar 10 09:07:11 that's beta compilers for you Mar 10 09:08:53 pls do try that, i guess we have to make our codes compatible with the latest version of compiler out there Mar 10 09:10:43 shoot an email to jkridner Mar 10 09:11:06 explain what going on and have him provide the latest version of the toolchain for all platforms Mar 10 09:11:45 ok i'll do that Mar 10 13:46:30 * jkridner look. Mar 10 13:46:39 s/look/looks/ Mar 10 13:46:55 PRU compiler? Mar 10 13:47:10 jkridner, yes Mar 10 13:47:19 yeah, I have one that runs on the bone. It is handy to me as the compile/load/run cycle is simple. Mar 10 13:47:32 I need the one on x86 Mar 10 13:47:53 oh, *you* don't have it? Mar 10 13:48:01 no Mar 10 13:48:02 I have it Mar 10 13:48:04 but Mar 10 13:48:05 I'll check the inbox for PRU compiler requests. Mar 10 13:48:07 ah, k. Mar 10 13:48:17 the latest version is only on ARM Mar 10 13:48:32 I need the same version on x86 Mar 10 13:49:23 and there's something changed/removed on the latest version Mar 10 13:50:16 I think it is covered in the README if I recall properly. Mar 10 13:50:33 I think I raised this issue once before Mar 10 13:51:13 well, the versions are different Mar 10 13:51:21 jkridner: it would be more viable to have all developments on the latest compiler version Mar 10 13:51:29 ah... 1.1 vs 1.0 Mar 10 13:51:44 I only parsed the 1. and B1 parts. :-) Mar 10 13:51:55 easy to get thrown off Mar 10 13:52:17 plus I don't think this change is well thought out Mar 10 13:52:26 the original way was easy to use Mar 10 13:52:33 this new method is a pain in the neck Mar 10 13:52:39 +1 Mar 10 13:59:22 jkridner: can you provide me with the 1.0.0B1 version of ARM compiler, maybe i can work with that until the cregister issue is resolved... Mar 10 14:12:34 I'm about to send out the 2.0.0.B1 version. Mar 10 14:12:49 nice!! Mar 10 14:13:46 hum Mar 10 14:13:49 2.0? Mar 10 14:14:10 wonder what's broken now? :) Mar 10 14:14:27 hahaha Mar 10 14:14:58 isn't it about time that gets released Mar 10 14:15:06 it's been baking for a couple years now Mar 11 02:01:21 yeah, it *really* needs to be released. **** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Mar 11 02:59:59 2014