**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun Aug 26 03:00:00 2012
Aug 26 03:27:14 * ka6sox wants the new Hyde-Sneaker...
Aug 26 03:40:22 <rrix> wassat?
Aug 26 03:47:52 <fxspec06> it's a sneaker, duh
Aug 26 04:06:36 * rrix slaps fxspec06
Aug 26 04:08:12 * rrix is using innerHTML and <noscript> evilness to make pages indexable by Google and Enyo-ish
Aug 26 04:11:50 <fxspec06> i'm making this cool screensaver type fader kind
Aug 26 04:11:57 <fxspec06> for no reason other than it's kinda cool
Aug 26 04:15:24 <fxspec06> and it may or may not be in my new app
Aug 26 04:46:47 <fxspec06> wow, this was hard.
Aug 26 04:46:51 <fxspec06> but it looks really cool
Aug 26 04:47:01 <fxspec06> this code is horrible..
Aug 26 04:47:02 <fxspec06> lol
Aug 26 05:00:39 <fxspec06> https://github.com/fxspec06/fx.Fader
Aug 26 05:26:17 <rrix> http://jsfiddle.net/Xk6j2/ why doesn't this onclick work or even get hit? what am I missing?
Aug 26 05:27:27 <rrix> The callback isn't even hit
Aug 26 05:28:16 <rrix> Nor is ontap
Aug 26 05:28:59 <fxspec06> if i play with that it doesn't change it for you, right
Aug 26 05:29:15 <rrix> you have to fork it, I guess
Aug 26 05:29:20 <rrix> (I've never really used jsfiddle)
Aug 26 05:29:25 <fxspec06> ah i see, sorry never used it
Aug 26 05:30:01 <rrix> Me neither :)
Aug 26 05:30:06 <rrix> it supports enyo though ;P
Aug 26 05:30:48 <rrix> I should probably just make an onyx.LinkButton or something
Aug 26 05:30:55 <rrix> and use a themed a tag
Aug 26 05:31:00 <rrix> but that's so much work :x
Aug 26 05:31:31 <fxspec06> you can't do it that way i don't think
Aug 26 05:31:42 <fxspec06> you have to render, then do app.onclick = function(){}
Aug 26 05:32:18 <rrix> hmm, that's not horrible, I guess :x
Aug 26 05:32:18 <fxspec06> but that is not working, either..
Aug 26 05:35:40 <fxspec06> odd. i couldn't tell you
Aug 26 05:38:24 <rrix> Yeah me neither :\
Aug 26 05:39:23 <fxspec06> i think they needa update their enyo fiddling
Aug 26 05:43:37 <rrix> http://jsfiddle.net/Xk6j2/3/ appears to work :\
Aug 26 05:43:46 <rrix> using hasNode() seems like such an unnecessary hack though
Aug 26 05:54:08 <fxspec06> hmm, my image fader only works with an odd number of images
Aug 26 05:54:17 <fxspec06> o.O
Aug 26 05:54:43 <fxspec06> hasnode? ouch.
Aug 26 05:55:12 <rrix> Yeah
Aug 26 05:55:15 <rrix> It also doesn't work when I put it in to my actual app :x
Aug 26 05:55:41 <fxspec06> lol, i fixed that.. there was a dom node exception.
Aug 26 05:56:01 <fxspec06> h.o, i'll upload another..
Aug 26 05:57:31 <rrix> (in the time I've spent debugging this I could have made onyx.LinkButton :\
Aug 26 05:57:41 <fxspec06> lol
Aug 26 05:58:44 <fxspec06> https://github.com/fxspec06/fx.Fader/blob/master/fx.Fader.js
Aug 26 06:00:11 <fxspec06> oh man, this fader needs better code. >.< jeez. yeah, i think it may be time for bed.
Aug 26 06:00:33 <rrix> oh
Aug 26 06:00:43 <fxspec06> don't try five images, i think it only works with three
Aug 26 06:00:44 <rrix> when I call render() on the parent it's destroying the node
Aug 26 06:00:52 <rrix> duh
Aug 26 06:00:56 <fxspec06> hrm, really?
Aug 26 06:01:09 <rrix> Yeah
Aug 26 06:40:06 <fxspec06> i figured it out. i needed an extra switch
Aug 26 06:40:27 <fxspec06> you can't just swap the functions, you need to literally swap the images themselves
Aug 26 06:40:35 <fxspec06> and then increase..
Aug 26 06:41:57 <fxspec06> https://github.com/fxspec06/fx.Fader/blob/master/fx.Fader.js
Aug 26 06:45:58 <fxspec06> is there any way to detect whether the screen is turned on or not
Aug 26 06:49:48 <fxspec06> fader is really cool in card view, but i think it'd eat a lot of battery.
Aug 26 06:54:58 <fxspec06> ah, but it's too cool. i love it
Aug 26 08:32:33 <slcort> is there an easy/recommended way to "share" a component. e.g. a kind that has a "model" kind in it and two "view" kinds, where both views want to access the same model?
Aug 26 08:52:05 <slcort> or are there any existing samples you can think of that show a similar concept?
Aug 26 10:23:59 <rrix> Sigh, why are my strings being cut at 65365? Chrome's supposed to support larger strings :x
Aug 26 11:04:03 <rrix> there we go, nodeValue is busted
Aug 26 16:06:34 <EricBlade> hmm. performance of enyo 2 in jelly bean is .. about as bad as enyo 1 in gingerbread. at least, on this evo
Aug 26 16:13:51 <fxspec06> >.>
Aug 26 16:33:33 <fxspec06> if i plug my pre3 into the outlet and the touchstone, does it charge twice as fast? o.O
Aug 26 19:01:08 <PatrickC> join #androiddeveloperalliance
Aug 27 00:57:44 <slcort> is there any way to achieve something like the following (which doesn't work due to the $ hash not being set up yet): components [ { kind: "Model", name: "model" }, { kind: "View", model: this.$.model } ], i.e. initialize a component with a reference to another component?
Aug 27 01:36:00 <EricBlade> slcort: it would sense to me that the components that depend on the other component actually be within the other component, or that they are created or have their variables set after component creation
Aug 27 01:40:12 <slcort> EricBlade: agreed. i'm trying to write something where there are two "views", but i want them to only have one shared "model" where the data is stored. i'm not really sure of the best way to lay out such a system in enyo. will probably go with your second suggestion
Aug 27 02:33:21 <baboo> how do i know from another enyo kind when a pane is selected
Aug 27 02:37:30 <baboo> in enyo 2!
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Mon Aug 27 02:59:57 2012