**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Jun 24 02:59:57 2019 Jun 24 05:55:29 DEX Launch bot was added by: DEX Launch bot Jun 24 06:02:57 Dex launch bot … That looks like spam lol Jun 24 06:03:25 Oh yeah it is it's icon is that stupid binance thing Jun 24 06:04:01 @UniversalSuperBox preemptive spam warning :) Jun 24 06:44:29 Hey guys, this seems to be a bug with Halium Jun 24 06:44:50 when i run halium setup stage, this happens Jun 24 06:44:53 * Danct12 sent a long message: < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/v1/download/matrix.org/JBwLmmmBovPUGOCCBwOJCVHM > Jun 24 17:59:24 ninja: error: 'vendor/motorola/msm8916-common/proprietary/bin/stml0xx', needed by '/home/rishiparmar/halium-7.1/out/target/product/osprey/system/bin/stml0xx', missing and no known rule to make it Jun 24 17:59:50 I am getting this error when making system image. Any idea how to resolve this? Jun 24 19:17:24 @Rishi Parmar [ninja: error: 'vendor/motorola/msm8916-common/proprietary/bin/stml0xx', needed b …], Edit msm8916-common.txt Jun 24 21:11:32 if you want to keep 32 bit packages in halium docs someone should email cannonical about needing them, because they just announced they are taking back their commitment to drop 32 bit packages but are only going to have 32 bit packages for required legacy stuff Jun 24 21:12:32 19.10 and 20.04 are going to only have legacy packages for required stuff, but they did say they will add to the list of supported packages as needed Jun 24 21:12:59 I'd say telling them in their community forums about AOSP requirements is the way to go Jun 24 21:13:19 in case a LXD container isn't enough Jun 24 21:13:21 Android build has long required x86_64 system though, are they needed? Jun 24 21:14:01 They aren't needed based on the small experience amount I have, I used the 64 bit versions and didn't have any related issues, but in the docs it says to use them and I assume someone has a reason for doing so Jun 24 21:14:02 @NotKit [Android build has long required x86_64 system though, are they needed?], the host still requires a handful of i386 packages Jun 24 21:14:24 could be it's a leftover from ancient times Jun 24 21:14:33 likely I think Jun 24 21:31:59 Well it was to be expected I would say. The installations of 32bit probably went down and down, and they will have less maintenance and issues by supporting only one arch. But we at ubports need to think about if ever we will support x86 mobile devices, in which case we probably will need to build armhf AND x86 AND arm64 one day = when we Jun 24 21:31:59 upgrade to 18.04 or 20.04. Quite a lot for a small org like us. Jun 24 21:34:25 aren't the atom based devices x86_64 though? Jun 24 21:34:57 I'm pretty sure they are 32 bit, although I'm not the one who has done the research lol Jun 24 21:35:42 I know the SoC's that tablets use are 64 bit, but they ship with 32 bit UEFI so you can't install 64 bit windows, but linux kernel supports mixed mode booting which can boot 64 bit kernel from 32 bit UEFI **** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Jun 25 03:00:38 2019