**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Nov 19 02:59:58 2019 Nov 19 09:22:40 tylnesh was added by: tylnesh Nov 19 09:26:57 @ankaos [how fix this error], Didn't you read the pinned message bruh Nov 19 09:34:30 @Prince #X01BD [Didn't you read the pinned message bruh], Exactly! Nov 19 09:35:59 @rixchy [Exactly!], I have been following up with the group and everyone who is reporting bugs just screenshot or paste the error in telegram =_= no one is even reading the pinned message Nov 19 11:45:29 Nic264 was added by: Nic264 Nov 19 12:31:28 ohitsjulia was added by: ohitsjulia Nov 19 13:24:14 thelangosta was added by: thelangosta Nov 19 15:58:59 🇧🇾Turbo Диван was added by: 🇧🇾Turbo Диван Nov 19 16:23:20 @Prince #X01BD [I have been following up with the group and everyone who is reporting bugs just …], But TBH, sometimes, I do post screenshot logs, but I post them if they are not really long, and there's just no point in pasting them to pastebin. Nov 19 16:35:21 BTW, any fix for this error? `"security/built-in.o: In function `kvfree': … evm_posix_acl.c:(.text+0x45cf4): multiple definition of `kvfree' … mm/built-in.o:cma-best-fit.c:(.text+0x1d19c): first defined here"` Nov 19 16:35:32 [Edit] BTW, any fix for this error? `security/built-in.o: In function `kvfree': … evm_posix_acl.c:(.text+0x45cf4): multiple definition of `kvfree' … mm/built-in.o:cma-best-fit.c:(.text+0x1d19c): first defined here` Nov 19 16:42:02 @rixchy [BTW, any fix for this error? `security/built-in.o: In function `kvfree': … evm_pos …], Is this after apparmor patches? Nov 19 16:42:57 If its the one I remember it should be documented already. Kernel 3.4? Nov 19 16:46:21 @Flohack [Is this after apparmor patches?], Yep. Nov 19 16:46:28 @Flohack [If its the one I remember it should be documented already. Kernel 3.4?], And again, yep. Nov 19 16:46:47 Hm, let me look. Nov 19 16:47:43 Oh- I found the fix in the docs, sorry to waste your time! Nov 19 16:49:50 Np Nov 19 16:50:48 Manolo was added by: Manolo Nov 19 16:51:39 Os bq m5 ok for Ubuntu? Nov 19 16:51:49 [Edit] Is bq m5 ok for Ubuntu? Nov 19 16:57:52 https://pastebin.com/fn15A1jy Nov 19 16:57:53 Hm, I will be stumbling kernel/apparmor building errors for a few weeks minimum now. Here is a problem that I nee to crack for now: "init.c:101:15: error: 'SHOW_MEM_FILTER_PAGE_COUNT' undeclared (first use in this function)". Nov 19 16:58:52 @Manolo [Is bq m5 ok for Ubuntu?], https://devices.ubuntu-touch.io/ Nov 19 16:59:12 been trying to build the systemimage ,with export lex and make systemimage .didn't build hybris-boot cause i want UT Nov 19 16:59:41 @x [been trying to build the systemimage ,with export lex and make systemimage .didn …], What rootfs are you aiming for? Nov 19 17:00:16 ubuntu touch rootfs Nov 19 17:00:52 @x [ubuntu touch rootfs], Oh, sorry. Didn't read your message properly. Nov 19 17:00:56 Hm, okay. Nov 19 17:01:56 any idea of the cause and how to fix Nov 19 17:05:26 simpliest fix is probably to do userdebug build instead of user Nov 19 17:05:34 it does not matter for Halium Nov 19 17:06:01 which command do you use for setting up Android build environment? Nov 19 17:07:18 `source build/envsetup.sh` Nov 19 17:08:08 Well it shows up in telegram Nov 19 17:08:11 You did it Nov 19 17:08:28 @NotKit [which command do you use for setting up Android build environment?], source build/envsetup.sh Nov 19 17:11:25 and then? Nov 19 17:12:31 Run `hmm` Nov 19 17:12:52 For Android build environment, `hmm` is like `help` iirc Nov 19 17:13:32 that was addressed to x Nov 19 17:14:12 I'm just not sure if he uses lunch or breakfast and which target Nov 19 17:14:42 breakfast ,target hltechn Nov 19 17:17:57 in the merkernel config check i had the selinux set to 'n' and the CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM so i set them to 'y' then went back and checked again i got selinux_bootparam 'Comment says: Required by hybris, SELinux needs to be disabled. Leave as not set, if you have unset AUDIT (read more about the CONFIG_AUDIT flag)' i have the audit fl Nov 19 17:17:57 ag set to 'y' and the rest then i set selinux to 'n' and tried to build but it failed Nov 19 17:18:07 again with the same result Nov 19 17:18:24 lunch Nov 19 17:18:57 lunch lineage_hltechn-userdebug Nov 19 17:19:23 kk just a sec Nov 19 17:19:44 command might be a bit wrong, but try doing userdebug build insteaf of user Nov 19 17:21:18 i will do it and report back if anything went side ways Nov 19 18:13:25 (Location, lon: 2.653156, lat: 39.578925) Nov 19 19:38:11 @x [i will do it and report back if anything went side ways], How did it go? Nov 19 19:49:16 How was called this .write file which we had to put in /data ? Nov 19 19:55:41 @rixchy [How did it go?], Well the output.. it just gave basic info phone , system ,same as you see in the beginning of mka mkbootimg Nov 19 19:56:02 @x [Well the output.. it just gave basic info phone , system ,same as you see in the …], Okay. Nov 19 20:11:57 I'm away from labtop right now but I will be providing the output very soon Nov 20 01:05:51 SomeIrrelevantPerson0000 was added by: SomeIrrelevantPerson0000 Nov 20 01:06:19 New to porting! No knowledge whatsoever. Lol Nov 20 01:07:32 My device that I'm targeting doesn't have a 12.1 or 14.1 lineage release. Only 16 unofficial. Am I still able to port? Nov 20 01:11:06 Yes but it will be more difficult Nov 20 01:13:36 For example by getting halium 8 working correctly Nov 20 01:16:51 Aye Nov 20 01:17:17 well, lineage 16 would be halium 9 Nov 20 01:17:28 but what did the device originally ship with? Nov 20 01:18:52 an existing lineage port is only a "booster" and not a hard requirement; if the device originally shipped with 5.1 or 7.1 and the kernel and device/vendor trees are available, it can be ported. it's just a bit more work if there's no lineage 14.1 build Nov 20 01:19:42 @dohbee [well, lineage 16 would be halium 9], Oh oops hmmm Nov 20 01:20:53 yeah, i don't know why lineage version doesn't match android version. 🤷‍♀️ Nov 20 01:21:05 Let me find out. I actually bought this device long ago. Nov 20 01:25:13 The shipped os is Lollipop 5.0 Nov 20 01:27:40 Anyway I can start and you point me in the right direction? Nov 20 01:27:57 I am really dedicated to doing this. Nov 20 01:28:48 then you should be able to port starting from the AOSP kernel/device trees, sort of like if you were making a lineage 14 port for the device Nov 20 01:37:29 Ok. Nov 20 01:38:23 I never ported anything in my life, wish me luck. Any help and pointers would be helpful. Nov 20 01:38:58 There are no dumb questions. Just ask if you run into anything. :) Nov 20 01:39:28 @SomeIrrelevantPerson0000 [I never ported anything in my life, wish me luck. Any help and pointers would be …], me either Nov 20 01:40:35 @UniversalSuperBox [There are no dumb questions. Just ask if you run into anything. :)], Thank you so much! Nov 20 01:55:42 Another question, Do I need to work on this via Linux OS? Nov 20 01:56:00 It will make your life far easier if you do Nov 20 02:16:45 I can do this is ubuntu bootable usb with persistence right? Nov 20 02:31:06 I wouldn't, it'd be very slow **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Nov 20 02:59:58 2019