**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Aug 11 02:59:56 2011 Aug 11 09:46:48 hi bluelightning Aug 11 09:51:31 hi ant_work Aug 11 10:07:19 interesting, new QEMU has collie support Aug 11 10:12:00 yes, lumag is back Aug 11 10:12:49 btw, what the plan to keep kernel updated? Which one to use? Aug 11 10:13:28 I'd prefer having only defconfig and maybe linux.inc in our layer Aug 11 10:13:45 (weel, and the couple of patches ofc) Aug 11 10:14:11 can we imagine using linux-yocto just providing defconfig? Aug 11 10:16:35 well I now have 3.0 from koen's hx4700 patches Aug 11 10:16:57 we could use linux-yocto I suppose Aug 11 10:17:13 I used it for sheevaplug with a defconfig, that worked fine Aug 11 10:19:42 à propos 4700, there were patches on lakml last days Aug 11 10:21:10 bluelightning: iirc there is any linux.inc for that kernel, just kernel.bbclass Aug 11 10:21:54 so we'll have to verify defconfigs again Aug 11 10:23:22 wrt hx4700 Aug 11 10:23:24 pxa/hx4700: Add PCMCIA/CF support Aug 11 10:23:28 ant_work: yes, linux.inc is gone for linux-yocto Aug 11 10:23:34 pxa/hx4700: Set DS1WM clock_rate Aug 11 10:23:44 Add Synaptics NavPoint (PXA27x SSP/SPI) driver Aug 11 10:23:53 the good thing is that linux-yocto will verify your config options and report incorrect/obsolete config options Aug 11 10:24:09 ah, interesting Aug 11 10:24:11 ah, ok, it will do the mangling instead of linux.inc ;) Aug 11 10:24:11 thx Aug 11 10:25:35 back to kernels, what is the expected 'scope' now? Aug 11 10:25:51 it happens meta-ti spreads its linux_3.x overall Aug 11 10:26:10 because the latest recipe lacks COMPAIBLE_MACHINE limit Aug 11 10:26:29 in that case just lowering the layer works but is lame Aug 11 10:26:36 *layer preference Aug 11 10:27:18 shouldn't we just be setting the preferred kernel version on a per-machine basis? Aug 11 10:27:24 then it's completely controlled Aug 11 10:27:49 ah, in oe-dev we left it float Aug 11 10:28:24 and DEF PREF was enough to mask it. It was sneaking in the preferred providers list, though Aug 11 10:29:53 so the issue is DEFAULT_PREFERENCE is too weak to override the layer priority now? Aug 11 10:33:22 it happens, yes Aug 11 10:34:01 hmm Aug 11 10:37:21 that ti kerlel has D_P -99 ! Aug 11 10:39:29 and still overrides? Aug 11 10:40:53 yes, with angstrom-scripts Aug 11 10:41:10 the created structure shows those cases Aug 11 10:42:02 again, I did not change layers preference Aug 11 10:43:42 brb rebooting Aug 11 21:46:26 hi bluelightning, Jay7 Aug 11 22:11:34 hi ant__ Aug 11 22:12:13 hi Aug 11 22:15:27 bluelightning: no answer about klibc license yet: http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/2011-August/003088.html Aug 11 22:38:02 ant__: hmm, only been a few days Aug 11 22:38:16 heh, I fixed now logo size Aug 11 22:39:24 http://paste.debian.net/125967/ Aug 11 22:39:36 sent to JaMa Aug 11 23:25:04 gn **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Aug 12 02:59:59 2011