**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Nov 10 02:59:58 2011 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Nov 10 05:56:30 2011 Nov 10 10:36:18 hi ant_work Nov 10 10:36:29 sorry I missed your ping the other day, anything I can help with? Nov 10 10:36:53 hi Nov 10 10:37:19 I'm traveling a lot those days.. Nov 10 10:37:31 I tried to build w/out meta-oe Nov 10 10:37:47 and I have to say the results are more predictable... Nov 10 10:38:19 in fact I was thinking that we only have the klibc bits in meta-oe Nov 10 10:38:30 (class and recipe) Nov 10 10:39:46 now, while supporting meta-oe, I'm thinking that mayb we could pull back those in meta-handheld and be independent Nov 10 10:40:11 possibly, but my preferred approach would be to fix meta-oe Nov 10 10:40:44 look, I'm flying very low...aiming at core-image-sato Nov 10 10:40:55 are you able to narrow down the "unpredictability" in any way? Nov 10 10:41:01 almost Nov 10 10:42:00 apart udev and initscripts/systemd Nov 10 10:42:11 the actual problem is the X server Nov 10 10:43:30 the one in oe-core just lacks xf86-video-fbdev Nov 10 10:43:46 (and xinput and xinput-calibrator) Nov 10 10:43:50 from meta-oe Nov 10 10:43:52 that's all Nov 10 10:44:16 well, can we not try to get those moved to oe-core? Nov 10 10:44:33 the other in meta-oe has a different xserver-nodm-init and uses different -common Nov 10 10:44:54 the question as always with these things is "why?" Nov 10 10:44:58 heh Nov 10 10:45:12 iirc because of the 'no-cursor' option Nov 10 10:46:27 duplicated recipes just to remove the cursor...?? Nov 10 10:47:35 and rootless X maybe... Nov 10 10:47:51 but anyway, if we apply in meta-handheld this Nov 10 10:47:52 https://gitorious.org/shr/meta-handheld/commit/d3793e1c2e7b28ce798a6ca1c253bfca05a462b7 Nov 10 10:48:25 we then need xf86-video-fbdev Nov 10 10:49:13 and somehow the x scripts in oe-core are still pulling xtscal when tslib is 'deprecated' in favor of input events Nov 10 10:49:41 thus we could borrow the xinput-calibrator and its xinput dependency Nov 10 10:50:44 but the original issue is in the duplicate xserver-nodm-init Nov 10 10:51:22 and from the xserver-common vs. x11-common Nov 10 10:54:37 bluelightning: maybe ask Joshua? Isn't he working on x those days? Nov 10 10:55:28 not really... Nov 10 10:55:41 my suggestion would be to start the discussion on the mailing list Nov 10 10:56:14 the problem I have is I don't know a lot about X, particularly the details of the things you mention here Nov 10 11:01:26 I started a thread, I'll revive it Nov 10 11:01:52 imho we are half-way with the merge Nov 10 11:05:15 bluelightning: anyway the patch ^^ makes sense for meta-handheld (we discussed with RP too) Nov 10 11:06:55 ant_work: yep I'll take that patch Nov 10 11:07:30 thx Nov 10 11:07:42 I'l ltry to lure JaMa on the matter once he'll appears Nov 10 11:07:55 -s Nov 10 11:08:24 yeah, if I could have a pull request/patch(es) that would be good Nov 10 23:31:51 cd .. Nov 10 23:35:23 bluelightning: ping Nov 10 23:35:31 hi ant____ Nov 10 23:35:40 hi, I'm updating...can we avoid Nov 10 23:35:42 # Untracked files: Nov 10 23:35:42 # (use "git add ..." to include in what will be committed) Nov 10 23:35:42 # Nov 10 23:35:42 # ../bitbake/ Nov 10 23:35:42 # ../build/ Nov 10 23:35:52 gitignore? Nov 10 23:36:13 this is stock oe-core checkout Nov 10 23:36:24 hmm, I thought those were already in there... Nov 10 23:36:30 well, build at least Nov 10 23:36:47 I never git-added those dirsa Nov 10 23:37:19 in fact, to update bitbake you have to be in its dir Nov 10 23:37:40 what's in your build dir? Nov 10 23:37:58 andrea@mizar /oe/oe-core/bitbake $ ls ../build/ Nov 10 23:37:58 conf downloads pseudodone sstate-cache tmp-eglibc Nov 10 23:38:16 for whatever reason, we've chosen to be specific about the files we ignore under build/ Nov 10 23:38:31 probably one for the mailing list I'm afraid Nov 10 23:39:14 or maybe I did something bad when I cloned... Nov 10 23:39:37 (I'd exclude that) Nov 10 23:43:21 ok, I'll retry tomoorow Nov 10 23:43:34 rebuild launched Nov 10 23:43:38 god nite **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Nov 11 02:59:57 2011