**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Nov 03 02:59:58 2005 Nov 03 03:01:58 do13[offline]: ping Nov 03 03:04:30 Several patches in rmk's system or on LKML are going to conflict with ones I have in various stages of submission :-/ Nov 03 03:06:34 RP: time to get in first then :-D Nov 03 03:07:49 someone built x86/uclibc with OE? Nov 03 03:08:03 ages ago Nov 03 03:09:17 I cannot get gcc-cross-initial 3.4.2 Nov 03 03:09:20 3.4.4 Nov 03 03:09:36 hrw|work: you are plaing with an X86 build ? Nov 03 03:10:11 alan|laptop: I want to build rescue distro for own usage Nov 03 03:11:16 ok. I will try to build one for educationnal purpose : tes Nov 03 03:11:52 text processing + Net in schools on light hardware config. Nov 03 03:20:53 Hi. To get glibc to link on sh4 I needed to create a oetmp/work/glibc-2.3.5+cvs20050627-r0/libc/configparms with "no-z-defs=yes". Any suggestions on where to do this within oe? Nov 03 03:21:10 v8jlene: site/sh4-linux? Nov 03 03:24:04 hrw|work: So I should see what effect that has on the autoconf stuff and then try and put that entr in site/sh4-linux? Ok... gives me another option to look at. Thanks. Nov 03 03:24:59 v8jlene: site/* are config.cache files - keep all results of autoconf tests (iirc) Nov 03 03:30:43 XorA: Thx for /proc/sysrq-trigger info Nov 03 03:31:56 * XorA fails to alsa to work on git3 :-( Nov 03 03:31:56 chmod 222 /proc/sysrq-trigger in initscript make my machine quite maintanable Nov 03 03:32:03 hrw|work: cool Nov 03 03:32:45 atleast rebootable Nov 03 03:34:08 hrw|work: As far as I can tell configparms doesn't effect the output of configure. It's changes options that would normally go in config.make? Nov 03 03:34:40 v8jlene: dont know - I use already tested stuff usually Nov 03 03:38:26 hrw|work: Thanks. I don't see anyone else trying to build for sh4 so I think I'm on my own here ;) Nov 03 03:39:07 hrw|work: uclibc svn or 0.9.28 ? Nov 03 03:41:09 ade|desk: 0.9.28 Nov 03 03:41:27 ade|desk: gcc-cross-initial 3.4.4 fails on unable to find crt1.o Nov 03 03:41:40 ade|desk: so now I'm building glibc one Nov 03 04:09:59 lunch break! Nov 03 04:10:17 almost the best time of day Nov 03 04:15:36 god damnit Nov 03 04:15:43 another spam attack on the wiki Nov 03 04:26:47 hi Nov 03 04:38:35 hey magnet Nov 03 05:17:46 hi all Nov 03 05:20:12 hey dmunicio Nov 03 05:25:05 In conf/distro/openzaurus-3.5.4.conf, the line: DISTRO_VERSION = "3.5.4" is commented. Is this normal? Nov 03 05:25:49 Actually, that doesn't even matter - I don't seem to even be having this file read in at all Nov 03 05:26:52 I presume that setting DISTRO="openzaurus" (with no version) doesn't work? Nov 03 05:27:18 from looking at the check which is performed at the bottom of conf/distro/openzaurus.conf Nov 03 05:28:33 lardman|work: correct - versioned distro is much more usable Nov 03 05:28:47 Its probably not set so images in the wild don't get mistaken Nov 03 05:29:18 It's just that I don't seem to be getting a preferred version of something set in conf/distro/preferred-gpe-versions-2.7.inc Nov 03 05:29:29 so am trying to work back and work out why not Nov 03 05:29:57 lardman|work: Perhaps something else overrides it? Nov 03 05:30:22 RP: yes, I'll have a look through Nov 03 05:32:55 hmm, I pulled from koen's backup, it appears that it hadn't sync'ed the update (that's my guess) when I pulled, sorry for the noise Nov 03 05:42:49 he< Nov 03 05:44:58 j zecke Nov 03 05:52:03 What's the current OE version? I just pulled and updated and get: monotone: already up to date at 4741ce472626483ef14f4a9e8706f74f696beea4 Nov 03 05:53:26 hey zecke Nov 03 05:53:41 lardman|work: which branch? Nov 03 05:53:46 .dev Nov 03 05:53:56 no idea Nov 03 05:54:10 13:54 hrw@home:org.openembedded$ monotone heads Nov 03 05:54:10 monotone: branch 'org.openembedded.dev' is currently merged: Nov 03 05:54:10 4741ce472626483ef14f4a9e8706f74f696beea4 rpurdie@openembedded.org 2005-11-02T17:06:52 Nov 03 05:54:13 ah, so perhaps the change to gpe-conf hasn't made it into that branch? Nov 03 05:54:14 I don't work on .dev nowadays Nov 03 05:54:49 Shouldn't changes to the branch come back into dev? Nov 03 05:55:15 lardman|work: rather changes to branch should become from dev Nov 03 05:55:25 hrw|work: yeah Nov 03 05:56:08 hrw|work: you have .dev? Could go grep conf/distro/preferred-gpe-versions-2.7.inc for 'gpe-conf' please? Nov 03 05:56:14 s/go/you Nov 03 05:57:03 ok Nov 03 05:57:18 preferred-gpe-versions-2.7.inc:#PREFERRED_VERSION_gpe-nmf ?= "0.21" Nov 03 05:57:25 ops Nov 03 05:57:29 :) Nov 03 05:57:33 preferred-gpe-versions-2.7.inc:PREFERRED_VERSION_gpe-conf ?= "0.1.25" Nov 03 05:57:48 phew, not just me then Nov 03 05:58:28 so what's the fix for this issue then? the preferred version has been updated in the release branch, but not in .dev Nov 03 06:00:11 use the branch :) Nov 03 06:00:18 forever.... Nov 03 06:00:19 ? Nov 03 06:00:39 till the release or something Nov 03 06:00:43 the two will need to be merged at some point after the actual release Nov 03 06:00:58 no, they don't Nov 03 06:01:13 no, they don't, but that would be foolish Nov 03 06:01:23 when it's released we'll delete stuff from .dev Nov 03 06:01:28 replication of work, etc. Nov 03 06:04:55 is it only the conf files which are branched? why do I have a .bb for gpe-conf_0.1.26? Nov 03 06:12:45 what's the branch name? fam081oz354? Nov 03 06:12:52 oz354fam083 Nov 03 06:13:08 okay, and I can pull that from the usual places? Nov 03 06:15:29 yes Nov 03 06:15:45 cool, I've started it going Nov 03 06:15:47 thanks Nov 03 06:16:10 my dev images may as well benefit from the changes which have been made to the release brance Nov 03 06:19:14 hi Nov 03 06:30:02 koen: You should be submitting general changes to both branches IMO... Nov 03 06:30:22 Or only backporting changes to the release branch Nov 03 06:30:40 (unless they're only hacks for the release branch) Nov 03 06:31:15 yeah, I forgot to push the change to preferred versions Nov 03 07:02:19 can anyone look at this bug for me? http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435 Nov 03 07:03:38 oris_wolfbane: well Nov 03 07:03:48 oris_wolfbane: I did not bother to look into it yesterday Nov 03 07:03:57 oris_wolfbane: as you specify no versions at all... Nov 03 07:04:18 zecke, its uptodate from svn and monotone Nov 03 07:05:17 BBFILES wrong? Nov 03 07:17:52 oris_wolfbane: well did you install a old bitbake Nov 03 07:18:01 oris_wolfbane: and are now running one from svn? Nov 03 07:18:02 Ciao all Nov 03 07:18:46 zecke, i deleted the entired drectory and then got the new one from svn Nov 03 07:18:49 hi Pigi Nov 03 07:19:04 hi hrw|work ! Nov 03 07:19:09 oris_wolfbane: well Nov 03 07:19:44 find / -name 'data.py*' Nov 03 07:19:48 find / -name 'data.py*' | wc -l Nov 03 07:24:50 any idea when openembedded.org will be back AFAIK ? Nov 03 07:25:36 Pigi: when kergoth changes the dns Nov 03 07:25:41 Pigi: try oe.handhelds.org Nov 03 07:25:43 heh Nov 03 07:30:08 zecke, 38 Nov 03 07:33:37 Which version is compiled when I only give the Name of the package but no version number? Nov 03 07:34:20 Cobelius: the one with the highest preference Nov 03 07:34:54 Cobelius: with is the highest version number, unless some .conf specifies that a certain version has to be used Nov 03 07:35:08 s/with/which/ Nov 03 07:35:38 suppose I have foo_1.0.bb and foo_1.1.bb Nov 03 07:36:16 bitbake will build 1.1 by default unless there is a PREFERRED_VERSION_foo = "1.0" somewhere, of the 1.1 .bb has DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1" inside Nov 03 07:36:30 s/of/or/ Nov 03 07:37:18 assuming both files are inside BBFILES Nov 03 07:37:42 okay thank you Nov 03 07:39:30 I suspect there are other ways to manipulate it, but these are the ones I know Nov 03 07:42:46 oris_wolfbane: 38? so much Nov 03 07:42:49 oris_wolfbane: which paths? Nov 03 07:47:40 zecke, just ran it again, now its 43, http://pastebin.ca/27488 Nov 03 07:48:21 kidding me? Nov 03 07:48:40 so you do not even have bitbake installed? Nov 03 07:50:12 zecke, i followed the instructions on the wiki to set the PATH Nov 03 07:50:34 oris_wolfbane: what has this to do with having bitbake installed? Nov 03 07:50:55 Running BitBake without installing it Nov 03 07:50:55 This is the preferred method of running bitbake. Simply set the PATH variable so that the tools are accessible (eg: export PATH=/stuff/bitbake/bin:$PATH). You will need to do this every time you start a terminal for development. (You can set this in your login profile, or perhaps use a script to set the necessary variables for using BitBake.) Nov 03 07:51:10 so i need to install it? Nov 03 07:51:21 oris_wolfbane: well, if you don't even find data.py you do not have any traces of bitbake Nov 03 07:51:27 oris_wolfbane: where did I say that? Nov 03 07:51:53 oris_wolfbane: start bitbake with python -v /path/to/your/bitbake whatever-you-wanted to create Nov 03 07:52:15 hrw|work: isn't it nice when people say 'this is so cool, I want to have it' and we can respond with 'it's been in OE for months' Nov 03 07:53:31 koen: its nice Nov 03 07:54:06 let's wait for the pdaX morons to start flaming in that thread Nov 03 07:55:31 koen: URI? Nov 03 07:56:22 http://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=15881&hl= Nov 03 07:57:07 oris_wolfbane: any updates? Nov 03 07:57:26 just ran that, http://pastebin.ca/27490 Nov 03 07:58:04 import bb.data # precompiled from /usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/data.pyc Nov 03 07:58:14 well you at least lied twice ;) Nov 03 07:58:42 zecke, how so? Nov 03 07:58:45 well your find should have spotted /usr/local/lib/py.../data.py Nov 03 07:58:55 and second you already installed a version of bitbake Nov 03 07:59:30 then how come the find didnt spot it? i could have installed bitbake long ago and forgotten about it Nov 03 07:59:32 do bitbake --version for me please Nov 03 07:59:55 this whole thing is a good reason why do put 'versions' into a bug report Nov 03 08:00:09 you think you run one version, but you simply don't ;) Nov 03 08:00:41 and it should not sound as harsh as it may sound Nov 03 08:00:58 you can either set the PYTHONPATH (or was it PYTHON_PATH) Nov 03 08:01:06 or remove the old bitbake installation Nov 03 08:01:22 BitBake Build Tool Core version 1.3.2, bitbake version 1.3.2 Nov 03 08:01:43 zecke, how do i remove the old one? Nov 03 08:02:28 sudo rm -rf '/' where '/' could be /usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb Nov 03 08:02:48 heh Nov 03 08:02:58 trying to punish lazy copy/pasters? Nov 03 08:04:07 koen: I didn't want to write lambda Nov 03 08:04:24 lambada! Nov 03 08:04:34 (\x -> (x+1)) Nov 03 08:04:47 (\x -> (x+1))10 Nov 03 08:04:54 gosh I love functional programming Nov 03 08:05:08 zecke, ive uninstalled as per your instructions and still no luck Nov 03 08:05:09 funcprog is pretty fun to do Nov 03 08:05:15 *without assignments* Nov 03 08:06:28 oris_wolfbane: well rerun the python -v thingie Nov 03 08:06:35 oris_wolfbane: and look from where it pulls data.py Nov 03 08:12:16 zecke, thanks alot, thats sorted it Nov 03 08:12:29 zecke, you have a paypal donate page? Nov 03 08:17:00 oris_wolfbane: not any more Nov 03 08:17:21 oris_wolfbane: I do this here free of charge, without even expecting to get anything out of it Nov 03 08:17:28 oris_wolfbane: I'm glad it works Nov 03 08:17:35 zecke, so am i Nov 03 08:17:48 zecke, thanks again Nov 03 08:18:10 oris_wolfbane: get back to us, with your next error Nov 03 08:18:17 lol Nov 03 08:18:21 oris_wolfbane: you might want to close the bug report if you want to Nov 03 08:18:29 s/your next/the next/ Nov 03 08:18:30 anyway, bitbake-mono is much faster Nov 03 08:18:53 koen: wasn't mono -v python bitbake already faster? Nov 03 08:19:41 no, C# is much faster Nov 03 08:19:53 Forth rule anyway Nov 03 08:36:02 hi Nov 03 08:36:41 hi Bernardo Nov 03 08:37:05 RP: I've been looking at that pdf you gave me the link Nov 03 08:38:15 (and found out I'm more a ignorant that I thought...) Nov 03 08:38:17 :) Nov 03 08:39:10 on the akita, it is using 4 bits sdio interrupt mode, right? Nov 03 08:39:34 Bernardo: welcome Nov 03 08:44:13 Bernardo: 1 bit sd mode ;-) Nov 03 08:44:27 We don't do 4 bit mode or sdio yet Nov 03 08:46:25 RP: ok... Time to re-read the doc... :) I was thinking the timeout and lost interrupt might be because of the extra 2 cycles needed for 4bit multi-block Nov 03 08:47:22 Bernardo: I don't claim to fully understand SD myself and have not read much of the doucment. I think the key point was there can be two interpretations of the timeout and we only use ones of them Nov 03 08:51:22 hi drw Nov 03 08:51:33 hrw|work: morning Nov 03 08:51:51 dark morning even Nov 03 08:59:31 somebody destroyed the Manual in the Wiki Nov 03 08:59:37 can somebody redo it? Nov 03 09:00:02 bleh Nov 03 09:00:04 | spectrum_cs.c:588: warning: implicit declaration of function `handle_to_dev' Nov 03 09:00:05 | spectrum_cs.c:588: error: invalid lvalue in unary `&' Nov 03 09:00:12 Cobelius: you can?! Nov 03 09:02:02 I should be ok now Nov 03 09:04:26 thank you Nov 03 09:16:07 anyone can tell me how can I set to set locale in oe...? I don't want all the locale packages compiled Nov 03 09:18:01 RP: ok, I'll keep studying it... Nov 03 09:20:05 RP: I've sent you the latest wm97xx touch screen driver for do13 to try on the tosa. Hopefully it will be ok. Nov 03 09:21:07 incinerator: going to EdLug tonight ? Nov 03 09:21:33 indeed Nov 03 09:21:42 heho, who are you? Nov 03 09:21:53 Liam Nov 03 09:21:58 well, coool Nov 03 09:22:08 didn't know there was an edlugger involved in the project.... Nov 03 09:22:27 I'll probably be at the Auld Hoose, as well Nov 03 09:22:38 I'm involved with the audio and touch screen side of things Nov 03 09:22:50 I'll also be at the Auld Hoose Nov 03 09:24:01 cool Nov 03 09:24:30 I haven't had the time to try out the oz rc yet, but I'll probably do that at the weekend.... Nov 03 09:24:42 if it's not good enough, I'll install the new cacko 1.23 ;-) Nov 03 09:32:42 03koen 07org.oe.oz354fam083 * rbc40dc55... 10/: familiar 0.8.3: prefer orinoco 0.13e since 0.15 doesn't compile Nov 03 09:33:13 later all Nov 03 09:41:30 koen: tried 0.15 for 2.4 kernels? Nov 03 09:42:05 will OE run on a 64bit athlon? Nov 03 09:42:43 hrw|work: yes, that have the error I pasted 40 minutes ago Nov 03 09:43:50 Cobelius: in 64 bit mode the compiled gcc could segfault Nov 03 10:20:35 What is the variable PREFFERED_PROVIDERS in local.conf doing? Nov 03 10:21:47 if multiple packages provide the same thing (e.g hotplug-ng and linux-hotplug both provide 'hotplug') you can select which one you want to use Nov 03 10:22:46 okay, thank you Nov 03 10:24:51 who added udev 071? it stars from PR="r5" instead of r0 Nov 03 10:24:54 starts Nov 03 10:26:10 hrw|work: http://cia.navi.cx/stats/project/openembedded/.message/6255755 Nov 03 10:26:29 rp.. Nov 03 10:37:11 RP: ping Nov 03 10:38:09 lrg: ping Nov 03 10:40:21 lrg, RP: turn on c7x0, connect via ssh over usbnet, run alsamixer, bump playback to 100 - noise from speaker even without doing something on c7x0 Nov 03 10:43:03 lrg, RP: if I turn on 'Output Mixer Line' noise will dissapear Nov 03 11:01:45 cu Nov 03 11:15:50 night Nov 03 11:28:08 hey guys, ive tryed to compile both nano and opie-image, and i get an error both times about noe being able to login cvs because anoncvs:anoncvs doesnt exsist, any ideas? Nov 03 11:28:19 s/noe/not Nov 03 11:35:40 Should bitbake have PN as an override when working out PREFERRED_VERSION? Nov 03 11:36:18 http://www.rpsys.net/openzaurus/temp/bitbake_preferred_pn_override-r0.patch ... Nov 03 11:41:22 03koen 07org.oe.oz354fam083 * r4cca22b3... 10/: bitbake.conf + other _cvs files: change cvs.hh.org to anoncvs.hh.org Nov 03 11:43:03 isn't pn always in overrides? Nov 03 11:43:20 * koen knows nothing about python or bb internals Nov 03 11:45:34 koen try setting CVSDATE_somepackage and then PREFERRED_VERSION_somepackage="cvs-${CVSDATE Nov 03 11:45:59 }" Nov 03 11:47:02 I know PREFERRED_VERSION_somepackage="cvs-${CVSDATE}" doesn't work Nov 03 11:47:15 this is why and the above patch fixes that Nov 03 11:47:29 ah, I see Nov 03 11:47:32 good job! Nov 03 11:47:45 I'll bugzilla it Nov 03 11:56:59 ~lart me Nov 03 11:56:59 * ibot gives koen a good seeing to Nov 03 12:01:19 03koen 07org.oe.dev * r9864f624... 10/: libmimedir: add 0.3.1 release and DP down the cvs one Nov 03 12:01:36 If a student says 'I always link to /usr/lib/libbluetooth.so, so why should I change the Makefile' one more time, I'll force him to eat the ipaq Nov 03 12:02:14 koen: Is there a webcam handy? :) Nov 03 12:02:32 :) Nov 03 12:03:31 * koen gives his mini-ipaq-cluster another try Nov 03 12:04:24 ~lart nfs Nov 03 12:04:25 * ibot chops nfs in half with a free Solaris 7 CD Nov 03 12:11:19 would ipkg benefit from using sqlite to store its metadata rather than plain files? Nov 03 12:13:59 I think so Nov 03 12:15:03 it would lose the hackable-text-file feature, though Nov 03 12:15:08 seems like it would be a lot quicker for most things, since it wouldn't have to parse everything all the time Nov 03 12:15:43 seems better to have decent performance and let the hackers use a little sql, or write a front-end to tweak it by hand Nov 03 12:15:59 indeed Nov 03 12:16:11 You would still need to walk the files looking for changes Nov 03 12:16:25 unless you added a seperate 'cache' mechanism Nov 03 12:16:40 which files? Nov 03 12:16:49 the .bbs Nov 03 12:16:53 on the device you only have config files, lists and the status Nov 03 12:17:07 * CosmicPenguin somehow read OE instead of ipkg Nov 03 12:17:07 duh Nov 03 12:17:11 heh Nov 03 12:17:32 I either need more caffine or less crack Nov 03 12:17:37 probably both Nov 03 12:18:47 more of both! Nov 03 12:19:31 CosmicPenguin, installing FC4 x86_64 on an athlon machine we got from newegg Nov 03 12:19:41 excellent Nov 03 12:19:47 except for the FC4 part... :) Nov 03 12:20:06 good evening ! Nov 03 12:20:12 heh Nov 03 12:20:17 I know how to use it :) Nov 03 12:20:30 FC4 on x86_64 work good ;) Nov 03 12:20:47 hopefully oe works on it too :) Nov 03 12:20:49 FC working good? Nov 03 12:21:21 for me yes ... Nov 03 12:21:44 maybe cause i know the beast since long time ;) Nov 03 12:23:46 btw Hi koen !!! Nov 03 12:23:53 hey gremlin[it] Nov 03 12:24:45 at work i'm working on a communication program to field devices (PLC S7 from Siemens) Nov 03 12:25:20 at now using Simatic library but is really a bad library .. soon all with GPL software (libnodave) ... :) Nov 03 12:25:31 so i can run it also on an arm board ;) Nov 03 12:32:42 which kernel version does the ipaq-pxa270 build in org.openembedded.oz354fam083 use? Nov 03 12:36:02 hey Nov 03 12:36:10 hi zecke :) Nov 03 12:36:33 ~hail zecke Nov 03 12:36:35 * ibot bows down to zecke and chants, "I'M NOT WORTHY!!" Nov 03 12:37:06 thanks Nov 03 12:37:26 koen: I figure both GPE and Opie got a 'problem' due Maemo Nov 03 12:37:55 everybody is going 'wow maemo is cool'? Nov 03 12:38:14 koen not me Nov 03 12:38:14 right, If Nokia doesn't blow it Nov 03 12:38:16 and forgetting gpe+opie? Nov 03 12:38:32 it could be the Linux Mobile Platform Nov 03 12:38:57 hi zecke Nov 03 12:39:24 hildon + input methods is cool Nov 03 12:40:01 koen: well that is possible with Qtopia too ;) Nov 03 12:40:02 the browser, newsreader, mail app, video player and audio player suck Nov 03 12:40:22 koen: I was impressed when I entered the HEX WPA key Nov 03 12:40:26 koen: and the keyboard changed Nov 03 12:40:26 what rest ? Nov 03 12:40:29 the browser is opera Nov 03 12:40:47 woglinde: and it sucks big mammal ass Nov 03 12:41:19 koen hm, it is as stable as konqueror on the simpad Nov 03 12:41:48 it crashes everytime the sun shines? Nov 03 12:45:13 zecke hi Nov 03 12:45:14 zecke hi Nov 03 12:45:14 zecke hi Nov 03 12:45:18 *g* Nov 03 12:47:20 hi Nov 03 12:47:43 RP, mickeyl: 2.6.14-git3-r2 works ok with kernel-module-hostap Nov 03 12:51:56 when will the oe website return? Nov 03 12:52:35 Crofton: oe.handhelds.org Nov 03 12:53:25 thanks Nov 03 12:53:32 will openembedded.org return? Nov 03 12:56:26 will Nov 03 12:56:32 when kergoth updates the dns Nov 03 12:58:09 * Crofton searches for a trout Nov 03 12:58:42 open("/usr/local/projects/openzaurus/build/opie/lib/v5l/fast-mult/half/libcrypt.so.1", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) Nov 03 12:58:46 nice try on zaurus ;) Nov 03 13:07:18 Ciao all Nov 03 13:08:31 ciao Pigi Nov 03 13:08:43 mattina Pigi Nov 03 13:09:44 hi hrw. It's not morning here. At least "buonasera" :) Nov 03 13:09:52 ~ugt Nov 03 13:09:56 ugt is probably Universial Greeting Time. Created in #mipslinux, it is a rule that states that whenever somebody enters an IRC channel it is always morning, and it is always late when the person leaves. The local time of any other people in the channel, including the greeter, is irrelevant. Nov 03 13:09:57 ~ugt Nov 03 13:10:01 heh Nov 03 13:10:30 hrw, apologize then. Always something to learn :) Nov 03 13:10:35 np Nov 03 13:10:56 sharp-compat-libs suxx - dont support freetype Nov 03 13:20:59 hi hrw|tv, Pigi Nov 03 13:21:13 hi RP ! Nov 03 13:21:18 hrw|tv: Its good to know the in kernel hostap works. We should probably switch to that... Nov 03 13:21:39 Pigi: I'm afraid I've filed a bug against ipkg... Nov 03 13:21:50 argh... let me see Nov 03 13:22:44 Pigi: do you think storing ipkg metadata in an sqllite db would be a good idea? seems like it might make it go faster Nov 03 13:24:52 mreimer, I'm not really sure about that, as the biggest problem in actual ipkg is that he needs to read way too much data Nov 03 13:25:19 and I'm not sure that an sql engine would be more performant than reading from a flat file Nov 03 13:25:57 I was thinking that ipkg might have to read less data because it wouldn't have to read the whole flat file to get what it wants Nov 03 13:26:04 but you know how it works :-) Nov 03 13:26:59 the problem is a bit different. Ipkg ATM needs to read the whole data because he need to construct all the structure to check for dependencies and so on Nov 03 13:27:48 you can make it a bit faster by removing Source: and Maintainer: field from the lists Nov 03 13:27:49 I'm not sure about how much pointer lists are used by ipkg but, believe me, they are tooooooo much Nov 03 13:28:40 that's what I asked some times ago to oe builder/maintainer, they are unusefull information for ipkg itself Nov 03 13:28:58 how about recording the dependencies in the db? then you could just do "SELECT * from dependencies where pkgname = 'foo'" Nov 03 13:29:00 and are really big piece of file that needs a lot of realloc Nov 03 13:29:50 that could ( and probably would ) break the compatibility with dpkg, and also, how would you put that info's in db in a "ipkg update" for example ? Nov 03 13:30:20 yeah, gets messy. it might end up being as slow as monotone Nov 03 13:30:36 and what about reconstructing the db ?, and what if you choose to save some space by storing the db in a temporary space ( as actually is ) ? Nov 03 13:31:16 every rebbot you need to reconstruct the initial db, and also you need to keeb in sync that db with " status" file and /usr/lib/ipkg/info/* files Nov 03 13:31:24 s/keeb/keep Nov 03 13:31:46 you wouldn't need the status file Nov 03 13:32:15 you would, believe me. Is where ipkg stores information about installed, configured or unconfigured packages. Nov 03 13:32:33 Status file is ATM the most important information ipkg has about the whole installation Nov 03 13:32:35 all that would get stored in the db Nov 03 13:33:19 I know. I used to be an sql programmer years ago, but in our case I don't think we will get good things by using a db. Nov 03 13:33:26 but who knows :) Nov 03 13:33:42 I defer to your assessment, since you know how ipkg works :-) Nov 03 13:33:56 heh Nov 03 13:34:22 I'm not sure that after more than one year of fixing bug I do really know how does ipkg works ;) Nov 03 13:34:29 :-) Nov 03 13:35:45 At least you have a very healthy fear of it Nov 03 13:35:53 heh Nov 03 13:53:06 Pigi: What is needed is to eliminate the need for downloading, storing and parsing the meta-data on the device...a true client/server system where the server figures out all of the dependency/arch stuff and just feeds the device a series of packages to install (in dep order of course) Nov 03 13:53:49 (something I have been thinking about for about a month now) Nov 03 13:54:50 well, actually I haven't seen nothing like this yet. It could be an option but then every one maintaing a sel feed should "upgrade to that sistem". Nov 03 13:55:18 Btw yes it could be an option, but also writing a new package manager could be an option :) Nov 03 13:55:48 Pigi: could be :) Nov 03 13:56:30 ( this is something I'm thinking since when I started fixing bugs on ipkg ). Nov 03 13:58:10 new package manager...new bugs :) at least you would be more familiar with the internals Nov 03 13:58:24 that's the idea. Nov 03 13:58:49 I'm still learning a bit on how ipkg/dpkg works, the I could choose to make the bigstep Nov 03 14:00:09 any package manager is simple in concept, it's just all of those little details which are a pain and make it messy Nov 03 14:03:42 what I do really need Nov 03 14:04:15 atm is someone that help me create a new set of bb files for a gpe image that has less option then the original :) Nov 03 14:30:44 zecke: busy? Nov 03 14:36:37 hi pb_ Nov 03 14:36:48 hi pigi Nov 03 14:38:01 pb_: Does http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436 look like the correct thing to do? Nov 03 14:41:07 need a reboot. bbl Nov 03 14:45:13 re Nov 03 14:45:22 wb ... reboot velocissimo Nov 03 14:45:29 ... so fast reboot ;) Nov 03 14:45:54 heh I was playng with udev, while installing a new image and lost all my /dev/pty* :) Nov 03 14:46:09 RP: hey Nov 03 14:46:15 RP: busy and tired ;) Nov 03 14:46:30 hi zecke Nov 03 14:46:52 zecke: Ok. Was just wondering about the patch in the bug I mentioned above but it can wait Nov 03 14:47:16 RP: ah, well I clicked on the link from the mail... (bugzilla mail) Nov 03 14:48:43 the big bad update_data ;) Nov 03 14:49:11 and del localdata... ;) I have never used new, why del Nov 03 14:49:31 well that sounded negative where it should not sound that way Nov 03 14:49:36 the patch is correct Nov 03 14:49:56 RP, it seems that the compare_version function fails as you have two __almost__ incomparable versions for you ipks Nov 03 14:50:46 mickeyl: ping Nov 03 14:53:08 zecke: The idea was to get rid of it from memory as quickly as possible :) Nov 03 14:54:08 Pigi: Should it be comparing versions at all when you -force-downgrade? Nov 03 14:54:33 RP: what is memory (from a python point of view) Nov 03 14:54:37 let me explain. -force-downgrade is basically an hack of the previous code. Nov 03 14:55:30 RP: I have applied the patch, thanks. I'm going to ask mickeyl for an opinion on del Nov 03 14:55:43 zecke: Forgive a C user for not understanding python ;-). I presumed you'd free memory by removing a structue but I'll believe you if you say it doesn't make any difference... Nov 03 14:55:49 if the compare version says you are downgrading, then let's check if force.downgrade has been used Nov 03 14:56:19 RP: R+ Nov 03 14:56:22 sorry Nov 03 14:56:36 Pigi: It doesn't upgrade either though ;-) Nov 03 14:56:49 RP: I would expect the python runtime will delete localdata as soon as possible Nov 03 14:57:09 because the compare version says that the two packages are at the same version Nov 03 14:57:34 cya tomorrow Nov 03 14:57:42 zecke: ok, thanks Nov 03 14:57:49 koen|tv: ping? do you know a good time tracker for OS X Nov 03 14:57:51 Pigi: I think that function could use some work then... Nov 03 14:58:09 but in reality you have a very strange version in git-9 Nov 03 14:58:12 zecke: I'd also like to discuss splitting up fetch.py at some point - I have a git fetcher Nov 03 14:58:47 Pigi: What else would you call a directly pulled git version of the linux kernel though? :-/ Nov 03 14:58:50 I'm all for splitting. It should be as easy as dropping a .py into a subdir Nov 03 14:58:56 zecke: no, I don't use timetrackers Nov 03 14:59:11 Pigi: It also doesn't explain why --force-reinstall then gives errors... Nov 03 14:59:25 RP: I have taken too many classes this term though, I don't know when I will have time to do the split up Nov 03 14:59:25 for the same motivation Nov 03 14:59:28 zecke: I have a patch I'll sort out for tomorrow and bugzilla it Nov 03 14:59:32 RP : ar p kernel-module-snd-timer-2.6_git-r9_c7x0.ipk ./control.tar.gz | tar -zxO ./control | grep ersion Nov 03 14:59:39 Version: git-r9 Nov 03 14:59:45 RP: good :) Nov 03 15:00:12 koen|tv: I'm considering toying with the Data Model in XCode Nov 03 15:00:14 ipkg "thinks" that a versionshpuld always have a number in front ( like 0-git-r9 ) Nov 03 15:00:45 s/versionshpuld/version should Nov 03 15:01:03 Pigi: This also failed for 2.6.14-rc4 to 2.6.14-git3 Nov 03 15:01:03 cu Nov 03 15:01:25 I should look at you ipk to see that. Nov 03 15:01:25 cya Nov 03 15:01:33 s/you/your Nov 03 15:01:50 I don't have those ones anymore :-( Nov 03 15:02:03 :-( Nov 03 15:02:08 Pigi: And also, why didn't -force-reinstall work? Nov 03 15:02:21 let me check the code. Nov 03 15:02:32 RP, well, first of all: Nov 03 15:02:45 'night zecke Nov 03 15:03:11 when ipkg read the first ipk name, it thinks that all the other things after this name are packages, not option Nov 03 15:03:36 so: "ipkg install whatever.ipk -force-reinstall" wont never work Nov 03 15:04:12 it will " ipkg -force-reinstall install whatever ipk" or, at least ( but I'm not sure ) "ipkg instal -force.reinstall whatever.ipk" Nov 03 15:05:03 as a lot of unix command ( I'm sure I'm not telling you nothing new ) pretend to have options before command. Nov 03 15:05:03 Its error messages are very confusing then :-( Nov 03 15:05:16 I'd expect to see "could not find -force-reinstall",,, Nov 03 15:05:45 if you do strace -f some_command -o pippo wont work Nov 03 15:05:45 ( or it shouldn't at least ) Nov 03 15:07:35 I know, that could be the bug. Let's ask pb_ about the numbering schema ( he is my dpkg expert on call :) ) Nov 03 15:08:12 Pigi: ok Nov 03 15:08:35 pb_ have you read the discussion me an RP had about the numbering schema ? Nov 03 15:09:10 Pigi: no; can you summarize the discussion for me? Nov 03 15:09:28 sure. Nov 03 15:10:25 RP has file a bug about the -force-downgrade option not working. In effect it seems this way, but looking at his ipks, he have one that has Version git-r9 and another that has 2.6.14-git-r7 Nov 03 15:10:25 byeee i gooo Nov 03 15:10:33 Ciao gremlin[it] Nov 03 15:11:12 I wonder if "git-r9" is a "legal" version number or it needs to be preceded by a number at least ( as it seems in the code ) Nov 03 15:11:44 I think "git-r9" is legal, albeit unusual. Nov 03 15:12:23 then the verrevcmp function is wrong :( Nov 03 15:12:44 that is unfortunate. Nov 03 15:13:18 do you mind to give a look at that function with/for me a second ( if you have the time ) ? Nov 03 15:13:55 sure, I'll take a look at it in a little while Nov 03 15:14:46 sure, thanks. Nov 03 15:16:47 do13[offline]: ping? Nov 03 15:28:28 RP, from "debian policy manual" The upstream_version may contain only alphanumerics[31] and the characters . + - : (full stop, plus, hyphen, colon) and should start with a digit. Nov 03 15:28:47 so yes you're right ( and I'm wrong ) :) Nov 03 15:28:56 the bug is confirmed Nov 03 15:30:36 while for the second thing ( confusing error message ) the ipkg -h says "usage: ipkg [options...] sub-command [arguments...]" Nov 03 15:31:00 so, bug uncorfimed ( while I will try to give a better message if I have some spare time ) :) Nov 03 15:35:59 Pigi: If you look at the resulting error "Hi! Nov 03 15:36:00 > Nov 03 15:36:00 > Nov 03 15:36:06 oops :-/ Nov 03 15:36:44 I will, I will ( only I hav eno idea on how to compare two different entities :) ) Nov 03 15:37:15 what's the best way to convince oe to read a different h3900.conf file ? Nov 03 15:37:25 Pigi: If you look at the resulting error in the bug report "xxx_2.6.14-git1-r4.ipk No such file or directory", my point is that it doesn't really tell me I misplaced the -force-reinstall option Nov 03 15:37:43 Pigi: Place it in the directory with your local.conf? Nov 03 15:38:24 RP for the bug, I will be able to check at it if I can reproduce ( and will try ) Nov 03 15:38:31 RP for the conf, will it work ? Nov 03 15:38:53 Pigi: It should do but I've never tried it :) Nov 03 15:39:05 I will just now Nov 03 15:39:32 Pigi: Ok, I'll leave the bug with you. I appreciate ipkg is a pain and thanks for looking into it :) Nov 03 15:39:56 You're welcome RP. Nov 03 15:43:47 some one mentioned my name? Nov 03 15:48:29 RP, that's rather strange.... Nov 03 15:49:26 also if the debian policy manual says that the version __should__ start with a number, and not __must__ start with a number, the compare routine is almost the same on ipkg and dpkg Nov 03 15:49:49 I was hoping that in dpkg the routine could have helped me. Nov 03 15:51:01 and putting the h3900.conf in conf/local.conf don't work. It is not my night tonight :) Nov 03 15:51:56 RP what do you think anyway, git-r9 should be considered biggest that 2.6.14-git-r7 ? Nov 03 15:51:58 Pigi: the verrevcmp() functions looks ok to me. What do you think it is doing wrong? Nov 03 15:52:57 pb_ what is doing wrong is that ( it seems that ) comparing git-r9 and 2.6.14-git-r7 returns 0 ( as if they are equal ) Nov 03 15:53:43 this is because the ipkg_install return as error "the package is already installed in root" that is issued if pkc_version:compare returns 0 Nov 03 15:53:52 s/:/_ Nov 03 15:54:00 ah, that isn't good Nov 03 15:54:11 did you double check with "ipkg compare_versions"? Nov 03 15:54:12 indeed Nov 03 15:54:25 not yet Nov 03 15:54:30 might be worth a go Nov 03 15:56:25 or, alternatively, run ipkg under the debugger and call verrevcmp() by hand. Nov 03 15:56:41 from looking at the code, it ought to be able to tell that those two versions are different. Nov 03 15:57:54 it seems that ipkg compare_version isn't really working .... Nov 03 15:58:19 (though, as an aside, those two versions are sufficiently different that it doesn't make much sense to ask whether one is "newer than" the other.) Nov 03 15:58:29 oh dear. what does it do wrong? Nov 03 15:58:38 heh: Nov 03 15:58:56 root@h3900:~# ipkg compare_versions 2-6-14-git-r9 ">" 2.6.14-git-r7 Nov 03 15:58:56 root@h3900:~# ipkg compare_versions 2-6-14-git-r9 "=" 2.6.14-git-r7 Nov 03 15:58:56 root@h3900:~# ipkg compare_versions 2-6-14-git-r9 = 2.6.14-git-r7 Nov 03 15:58:56 root@h3900:~# ipkg compare_versions 2-6-14-git-r9 \= 2.6.14-git-r7 Nov 03 15:58:56 root@h3900:~# ipkg compare_versions 2-6-14 \= 2.6.14 Nov 03 15:58:57 root@h3900:~# ipkg compare_versions 2-6-14 \< 2.6.14 Nov 03 15:59:27 no result messages. Maybe I'm supposed to test the result code from shell Nov 03 16:01:31 yeah, it just sets the exit status Nov 03 16:01:49 I see. Nov 03 16:02:14 btw you're right when you says that it doesn't make sense to compare between two different entities Nov 03 16:08:30 pb_ here the results : Nov 03 16:08:32 ipkg compare_versions 2-6-14-git-r9 > 2.6.14-git-r7 Nov 03 16:08:32 0 Nov 03 16:08:32 ipkg compare_versions 2-6-14-git-r9 = 2.6.14-git-r7 Nov 03 16:08:32 0 Nov 03 16:08:33 ipkg compare_versions 2-6-14-git-r9 = 2.6.14-git-r7 Nov 03 16:08:34 0 Nov 03 16:08:36 ipkg compare_versions 2-6-14 = 2.6.14 Nov 03 16:08:38 0 Nov 03 16:08:42 ipkg compare_versions 2-6-14 < 2.6.14 Nov 03 16:08:44 An error ocurred, return value: 1. Nov 03 16:08:46 1 Nov 03 16:08:48 ipkg compare_versions git-r9 < 2.6.14-git-r7 Nov 03 16:08:50 0 Nov 03 16:09:21 yeah, I think those are all approximately correct. Nov 03 16:09:44 "2-6-14" and "2-6-14-git-r9" are malformed versions, and ought really to be diagnosed, but that's a minor issue. Nov 03 16:12:24 ok, thank, and sorry for disturbing Nov 03 16:12:29 thanks even Nov 03 16:14:47 any time Nov 03 16:15:30 pb_ another thing ( if I can ) . Nov 03 16:16:00 how can I say oe to use my own h3900.conf ( without overriding the original ) ? Nov 03 16:16:33 put it in conf/machine/ inside your build directory Nov 03 16:18:22 thx Nov 03 16:20:01 RP, we will discuss this bug further next time we meet. Nov 03 16:20:12 now it's really time to sleep. Nov 03 16:20:23 night all Nov 03 16:37:52 * france is away: Away Nov 03 17:40:30 Is there a tutorial anywhere on how to make .bb files? Nov 03 21:59:22 are there any good ways about to cut away ?(MACHINE = "spitz" | DISTRO = "openzaurus-3.5.4" | KERNEL_VERSION = "2.6") Nov 03 23:22:51 hi,guys Nov 03 23:24:18 whether the oz-3.5.4 should Sharp Zaurus SL-C3000 Nov 04 01:09:01 hello getlemen Nov 04 01:09:25 hey alan|laptop Nov 04 01:09:45 morning all Nov 04 01:09:54 yo koen Nov 04 01:10:17 hey RP Nov 04 01:12:53 | ERROR: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for task-bootstrap: Nov 04 01:12:53 | kernel-module-orinoco-cs kernel-module-spectrum-cs Nov 04 01:12:56 Any ideas? Nov 04 01:12:58 -_- Nov 04 01:14:57 It looks like your kernel config didn't build the internal orinoco and spectrum modules and your image seems to depend on those Nov 04 01:16:51 Can you please suggest how to remove those dependencies from the kernel config? Nov 04 01:17:05 Or remove them from the image. Nov 04 01:18:01 Actually, where is bbread supposed to be? I'm thinking that should display the configuration. Nov 04 01:18:26 $ grep -rI kernel-module-spectrum-cs * Nov 04 01:18:26 org.openembedded.dev/conf/machine/zaurus-clamshell-2.6.conf:BOOTSTRAP_EXTRA_RDEPENDS += "kernel-module-orinoco-cs kernel-module-spectrum-cs" Nov 04 01:18:48 I looked for kernel-module-spectrum-cs, and it only appears in that one file. AFAIK, I'm not building for a clamshell. Nov 04 01:19:17 Nor am I building a 2.6 kernel (any more). Nov 04 01:20:43 -e, --environment show the global or per-package environment (this is Nov 04 01:20:43 what used to be bbread) Nov 04 01:20:47 OK, /me tries that. Nov 04 01:21:51 $ bitbake -e task-bootstrap | grep orinoco | wc -l Nov 04 01:21:51 6 Nov 04 01:21:56 So it does appear a lot. Nov 04 01:22:40 $ bitbake -e task-bootstrap | grep kernel-module-orinoco-cs Nov 04 01:22:46 But that doesn't appear. Nov 04 01:37:45 xiaowen: It looks like you've changed from 2.6 to 2.4 but have some stale files somewhere Nov 04 01:37:54 Oh RP. Nov 04 01:38:19 Do you know how to get the 2.6 to build? That's what I really want. Nov 04 01:38:30 morning Nov 04 01:38:42 morning hrw|work Nov 04 01:38:43 Hi. Nov 04 01:38:47 xiaowen: KERNEL_VERSION = "2.6" in local.conf? Nov 04 01:38:49 hi hrw|work Nov 04 01:38:54 xiaowen: hi Nov 04 01:38:59 RP: I removed that to switch to 2.4. Nov 04 01:39:24 xiaowen: but you want 2.6 to build? Nov 04 01:39:36 RP: Yes, and I got that error when I had it set to 2.6. Nov 04 01:39:42 Same error. Nov 04 01:39:51 xiaowen: which machine? Nov 04 01:39:54 Then I removed it, and got that error again with 2.4. Nov 04 01:39:57 tosa Nov 04 01:40:10 tosa's defconfig probably needs updating Nov 04 01:41:07 you need to enable spectrum/orinoco/hermes in defconfig-tosa - copy how its done for c7x0 or cxx00 Nov 04 01:41:48 packages/linux/linux-openzaurus-2.6.14-rc1/defconfig-tosa? Nov 04 01:41:48 You'd still see the same error after switching as I guess you didn't rebuild from scratch Nov 04 01:41:52 yes Nov 04 01:42:06 Must I build from scratch? Nov 04 01:43:47 For a kernel 2.6 to 2.4 switch, probably yes Nov 04 01:43:54 Why is that? Nov 04 01:44:32 because its a fairly major change which major implications for the image Nov 04 01:44:40 s/which/with/ Nov 04 01:44:51 What implications? Hehe. Nov 04 01:45:16 I mean I can see some packages changing maybe, but my intuition is that not many? Nov 04 01:45:29 Since the system calls didn't change (much) I guess. Nov 04 01:45:38 hmm.. removing tmp/staging/arm-linux/kernel/, rebuild kernel, modules should work Nov 04 01:46:16 hrw|work: Things like meta-bootstrap will have different dependencies Nov 04 01:47:35 Do you happen to know what the configuration for orinoco is? I see hermes and spectrum. Nov 04 01:47:57 o.. yep. too much for newbie Nov 04 01:49:05 xiaowen: Sorry, just enable all the hermes and sprectrum options (orinoco = config_pcmcia_hemes) Nov 04 01:49:59 Good deal, thanks. And go back to 2.6? Nov 04 01:50:24 Well it's the 2.6 kernel config I'm editing, so yes I guess. Nov 04 01:53:03 How does it know to call the extra .ko that kernel compile spits out as kernel-module-orinoco-cs kernel-module-spectrum-cs? Nov 04 01:53:18 And where was it told that it should depend on those to begin with? Nov 04 01:54:15 conf/machine/tosa-2.6.conf:include conf/machine/zaurus-clamshell-2.6.conf Nov 04 01:54:28 OK, that explains the dependency. Nov 04 01:54:39 So how come bitbake -e didn't show it? Nov 04 01:55:10 Oh, that does. bitbake -e bootstrap-image doesn't. Nov 04 01:57:02 | ERROR: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for task-bootstrap: Nov 04 01:57:02 | kernel-module-orinoco-cs kernel-module-spectrum-cs Nov 04 01:57:07 I got the same exact error. Nov 04 02:01:23 xiaowen: you need to rebuild the kernel Nov 04 02:01:34 How do I rebuild? Nov 04 02:02:26 bitbake -b openembedded/packages/linux/linux-openzaurus_2.6.14-rc1.bb -c configure -f in this case Nov 04 02:03:18 Oh ... Nov 04 02:03:40 NOTE: package linux-openzaurus-2.6.14-rc1-r3: task do_configure: completed Nov 04 02:03:40 NOTE: package linux-openzaurus-2.6.14-rc1: completed Nov 04 02:03:46 So that redid the configure I think. Nov 04 02:04:03 If I do bitbake bootstrap-image, that'll start the actual rebuilding? Nov 04 02:04:09 correct. now run it without the -c configure -f bit Nov 04 02:04:15 Oh. Nov 04 02:04:34 hang on - run the command again without the -c onfigure -f bit Nov 04 02:04:38 NOTE: package linux-openzaurus-2.6.14-rc1-r3: task do_compile: started Nov 04 02:04:54 So the bitbake bootstrap-image started that too. Nov 04 02:04:57 Should I kill? Nov 04 02:05:18 depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /mnt/sbuild/oe/tmp/work/linux-openzaurus-2.6.14-rc1-r3/image/lib/modules/2.6.14-rc1/kernel/sound/pci/ac97/snd-ac97-codec.ko Nov 04 02:05:26 Tons of unresolved symbols ... Nov 04 02:05:39 I'd ignore them for now... Nov 04 02:05:47 I don't know how working the tosa 2.6 kernel is Nov 04 02:05:59 I guess a kernel build should not have finished in like a minute? Nov 04 02:06:24 it will have just rebuilt what it needed so don't panic yet Nov 04 02:07:16 How would I do a clean so I can build the 2.4 image? Nov 04 02:07:45 xiaowen: I think it safer if you start from scratch Nov 04 02:08:00 | ERROR: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for task-bootstrap: Nov 04 02:08:01 | kernel-module-orinoco-cs kernel-module-spectrum-cs Nov 04 02:08:06 Same error! Nov 04 02:08:30 clean the kernel, then rebuild it (use -c clean instead) Nov 04 02:09:23 $ ls /mnt/sbuild/oe/tmp/deploy/ipk/kernel-module-* | wc -l Nov 04 02:09:23 277 Nov 04 02:09:29 OK. Nov 04 02:14:51 OK, the compile of the kernel is done, packaging. Nov 04 02:15:39 $ ls /mnt/sbuild/oe/tmp/deploy/ipk/kernel-module-orinoco-*/mnt/sbuild/oe/tmp/deploy/ipk/kernel-module-orinoco-2.6_2.6.14-rc1-r3_tosa.ipk Nov 04 02:15:42 /mnt/sbuild/oe/tmp/deploy/ipk/kernel-module-orinoco-cs-2.6_2.6.14-rc1-r3_tosa.ipk Nov 04 02:15:43 It's finally there. Nov 04 02:16:10 * xiaowen makes bootstrap-image again. Nov 04 02:18:46 NOTE: package bootstrap-image-1.0: completed Nov 04 02:18:50 And that finished! Nov 04 02:20:18 morning all Nov 04 02:20:23 Hi. Nov 04 02:20:46 Thanks RP! Nov 04 02:21:15 hey ade|desk Nov 04 02:21:24 morning Nov 04 02:22:39 I have a bootstrap-image-tosa-20051104085125.rootfs.jffs2 and zImage-2.6.14-rc1-tosa-{date} with different date timestamps. Does that matter? Nov 04 02:23:00 Oh never mind, I have one that's the same. Nov 04 02:23:02 morning XorA Nov 04 02:23:18 (and ade|desk :) ) Nov 04 02:24:39 * xiaowen will install this tomorrow. Thanks again. Nov 04 02:27:31 RP: I have no luck with git3 alsa yesterday :-( Nov 04 02:29:03 meeting will be later Nov 04 02:29:12 alsa is noisy.. Nov 04 02:34:14 hrw|work: We probably just need to sort the mixer settings out Nov 04 02:34:42 XorA: No luck in what way? Nov 04 02:34:52 RP: you read my yesterday comments? Nov 04 02:36:22 hrw|work: about needing to enable the line mixer? Nov 04 02:36:29 yes Nov 04 02:36:35 hrw|work: That doesn't sound quite right, does it :-/ Nov 04 02:37:01 hrw|work: It is known that you'll get distortion on full volume Nov 04 02:37:19 RP: but I would expect distortion when playing.. Nov 04 02:37:20 the sharp driver protected this by having custom volume curves and limiting the allowed values Nov 04 02:38:42 ah.. Nov 04 02:39:07 hrw|work: I'll try and exeriment more with it soon - getting it working has been the main thing so far :) Nov 04 02:44:06 RP: in that the /dev/snd devices never get made Nov 04 02:46:37 XorA: did you modprobe soc-pcx2xxx-soc-i2s ? Nov 04 02:47:20 XorA: Its can also be a bit dependent on the module load order. make sure soc-pxa2xx-soc-corgi is the last one to load Nov 04 02:49:09 good morning guys Nov 04 02:49:16 hi Bernardo Nov 04 02:49:33 hi RP, how are things? Nov 04 02:51:02 * Bernardo doesn't understand why package manager won't see his oe generated feed Nov 04 02:51:31 Bernardo: ok, thanks. How's the akita kernel working? Nov 04 02:51:52 well, as long as I don't try to use my 1GB sd... :) Nov 04 02:51:59 hostap works fine Nov 04 02:52:33 in kernel or external one? Nov 04 02:52:40 I'm thinking on leaving the sd part for now and trying to build the rt2570 driver, to see if I can get 802.11g+wpa on my akita Nov 04 02:52:55 I think it's external, I didn't change your defconfig Nov 04 02:53:03 it will be then Nov 04 02:55:13 RP: does package_manager work for you? Nov 04 02:56:02 Bernardo: I don't have a working image at the moment Nov 04 02:56:10 :) Nov 04 02:56:21 Its just been hacked to death Nov 04 02:56:24 do you want me to put mine online? Nov 04 02:56:26 :) Nov 04 02:56:53 I do have the feed up on my webserver Nov 04 02:57:20 Bernardo: Its ok, thanks - I'll get a new working one built soon enough Nov 04 02:57:35 It just means I can't test things too much atm... Nov 04 02:57:37 ok Nov 04 02:57:45 * XorA kicks his Z Nov 04 02:57:53 XorA: what's up? Nov 04 02:58:07 it didnt suspend properly so its battery flat Nov 04 02:58:20 oops Nov 04 02:58:24 akita? Nov 04 02:58:36 Bernardo: boxer **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Nov 04 02:59:56 2005