**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun Aug 28 02:59:57 2011
Aug 28 07:06:35 <kobe_> I have a question. I've made an console based image based on the Angstrom distribution. One thing I notice is that the screen goes black after a while if I don't use the system. If I type again, the display comes back. What process causes this and how can I turn off this behavior?
Aug 28 14:34:25 <woglinde> hiho
Aug 28 14:34:53 <woglinde> binutils changed 2.21.1 upstream
Aug 28 14:34:59 <woglinde> there is now only 2.21.1a
Aug 28 14:39:55 <ShiftPlusOne> That still hasn't been fixed?
Aug 28 14:40:13 <bluelightning> woglinde: can you just commit a fix? shouldn't be too difficult
Aug 28 14:41:11 <bluelightning> we're talking about oe-dev here right?
Aug 28 14:41:44 <woglinde> no
Aug 28 14:41:45 <woglinde> corew
Aug 28 14:41:53 <woglinde> remove your binutils.tar
Aug 28 14:41:59 <woglinde> and you will see
Aug 28 14:43:43 <bluelightning> right, I will come up with a patch
Aug 28 14:44:01 <woglinde> yes
Aug 28 14:44:08 <woglinde> I am testing here locally now
Aug 28 14:52:32 <bluelightning> hmm, can't find the release announcement :/
Aug 28 14:58:51 <bluelightning> Changelogs are identical too... I hate when people do that... :/
Aug 28 14:59:01 <bluelightning> seems to be just the addition of some cpu files
Aug 28 15:25:11 <woglinde> khem ping
Aug 28 16:20:58 <ShiftPlusOne> binutils still messed up =(
Aug 28 16:25:11 <woglinde> ShiftPlusOne bluelightning is making a patch
Aug 28 16:25:25 <woglinde> I have one locally here too
Aug 28 16:25:32 <ShiftPlusOne> ah ok, I'll just wait
Aug 28 16:25:34 <woglinde> rename all to 1a
Aug 28 16:26:12 <woglinde> and add S = "${WORKDIR}/binutils-2.21.1a" in binutils_2.21.1a.bb
Aug 28 16:27:47 <ShiftPlusOne> I am new to oe, so I think I shouldn't fiddle with things until I get a basic rootfs working.
Aug 28 16:29:14 <woglinde> yeah sorry
Aug 28 16:29:42 <woglinde> that you hit the oe when the state isnt the best
Aug 28 16:29:54 <woglinde> but next week it will be fixed
Aug 28 16:31:17 <ShiftPlusOne> week? there are more things that need to be patched?
Aug 28 16:32:09 <woglinde> no I meant no its weekend
Aug 28 16:32:12 <woglinde> so no patches
Aug 28 16:32:20 <woglinde> besides bluelightning
Aug 28 16:32:36 <ShiftPlusOne> ah ok, monday here.
Aug 28 16:32:45 <woglinde> hehe
Aug 28 16:32:47 <woglinde> okay
Aug 28 16:32:50 <woglinde> till later
Aug 28 17:12:09 <tasslehoff> How can I figure out from linux-omap_2.6.39.bb that it will fetch a tar.gz from http://www.angstrom-distribution.org instead of cloning a git repo? SRC_URI says protocol=git, so that was kinda what I expected :)
Aug 28 18:01:22 <bluelightning> tasslehoff: angstrom sets up its own PREMIRRORS
Aug 28 18:17:53 <tasslehoff> bluelightning: ah. never seen that feature before. thanks
Aug 28 18:18:45 <bluelightning> np
Aug 28 18:55:44 <woglinde> bluelightning patch done?
Aug 28 18:55:46 <woglinde> *g*
Aug 28 19:01:24 <kobe> Does anybody know when the next release of OE comes out?
Aug 28 19:02:20 <woglinde> kobe hm
Aug 28 19:30:38 <woglinde> hi florian
Aug 28 21:54:50 <kurtis99999> Hi! I'm trying to create a recipe to unpack some pre-compiled binary into target, but bitbake gives me error "No GNU_HASH in the elf binary". Could someone, please, help me with this issue?
Aug 28 22:04:40 <Crofton> there is an LDFLAG hack we use to work around that one
Aug 28 22:04:59 <Crofton> try searching the commit logs for GNU_HASH and see if you can find an example
Aug 28 22:05:50 <kurtis99999> well...i'm not trying to build it...binary file were already built by someone else and i'm trying to put this binary into my target file system
Aug 29 01:15:59 <darkopium> hi. is this the right place to be asking for help with openembedded build issues?
Aug 29 01:16:18 <housel> sure
Aug 29 01:17:02 <darkopium> thanks in advance. i'm trying to build libxslt, but it keeps referencing my host's libxml instead of building a staging version. is this normal?
Aug 29 01:17:52 <darkopium> i'm just getting my hands wet, so apologies for any references that do not make sense.
Aug 29 01:18:01 <housel> No, that sounds like a problem... oe classic or oe-core?
Aug 29 01:18:13 <darkopium> oe classic
Aug 29 01:19:03 <darkopium> i get the error "/usr/lib/libxml2.so: undefined reference to `gzopen64'"
Aug 29 01:19:34 <darkopium> i tried to do searches online, but couldn't find any solutions
Aug 29 01:22:11 <housel> Hmmm... there's nothing obviously wrong with the recipe, but I don't currently have an oe classic build on which to try it here
Aug 29 01:22:38 <darkopium> just to clarify, should i be using oe classic, or oe-core? 
Aug 29 01:23:11 <darkopium> i am working inside a 32bit virtual machine, on a 64bit host OS, so hopefully that isn't the issue
Aug 29 01:23:52 <housel> Depends on what you want to do... oe classic has a lot more recipes, but oe-core is getting most of the new development attention
Aug 29 01:25:19 <darkopium> i'm trying to build a minimal-image for a board, vortex 486 smb. it had been done using a very old oe version, and i got the configuration files, and tried to make the latest oe work with it
Aug 29 01:26:06 <housel> latest = 2011.03-maintenance branch?
Aug 29 01:27:01 <darkopium> i'm not very well versed in git. how would i find that information out?
Aug 29 01:27:15 <darkopium> i think i'm on the master branch
Aug 29 01:28:02 <housel> "git status" will tell you
Aug 29 01:28:42 <darkopium> All it says is "# On  branch master"
Aug 29 01:28:52 <housel> Then you're on the master branch
Aug 29 01:29:07 <darkopium> oh ok, I thought i needed a date.
Aug 29 01:29:27 <housel> I suggest trying "git checkout 2011.03-maintenance"
Aug 29 01:29:51 <housel> It gets more attention than master does
Aug 29 01:30:08 <darkopium> oh ok, thanks. I will give that a go.
Aug 29 01:47:12 <darkopium> how would i check out that maintenance branch? would "git checkout  2011.03-maintenance branch" work?
Aug 29 01:56:02 <kergoth_> darkopium: he just gave you the command to run. read it again.
Aug 29 01:58:04 <darkopium> thanks i have ran that. it didn't appear to have pulled anything from the repo, so i'm comparing the files now.
Aug 29 01:59:12 <kergoth_> why would it? it doesn't need to pull anything from the repo
Aug 29 01:59:22 <kergoth_> a git clone gets the entire repository, not just one branch
Aug 29 02:00:08 <darkopium> oh i see. okay so once i am on the maintenance branch, i can just work as normal, even though I had made changes to some files, it will use my modified files?
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Mon Aug 29 02:59:57 2011