**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Jul 24 02:59:58 2012 Jul 24 07:08:29 good morning Jul 24 09:48:14 can anyone help me .... my lpinfo -v doesnot work Jul 24 11:10:21 gm Jul 24 11:31:43 hi Jul 24 13:21:51 ericben: ping Jul 24 13:22:57 Hi all, Jul 24 13:22:57 I am updating the lttng-2.0 recipes. Currently the name of lttng-ust_2.0 recips is lttng2-ust_2.0.1.bb, which is different than the actual package name. Jul 24 13:22:57 (the reason it's different is that lttng-ust_0.xx is still around and is not compatible with lttng-2.0.) Jul 24 13:24:01 is there a way to keep using the correct name of the package in recipe name and still have both versions of lttng work correctly Jul 24 13:24:48 one solution that I trid is to add *PROVIDES += "lttng2-ust"* in the lttng-ust_2.0.x recipe and add a dependency of lttng2-ust in lttng-tools. This works fine, but I get a message that multiple bb files provide the same package. Jul 24 14:29:36 fusman: I think the recipe is OK using *PROVIDES, but by introducing multiple providers either the distro or your local config has to explicitly select one provider to get rid of this warning. Jul 24 14:29:59 Grep for PREFERRED_PROVIDER Jul 24 17:43:14 khem: around? Jul 24 17:44:27 what does GPIO bank mean? Jul 24 17:48:03 angs: doesn't sound like an OE question... try googling it Jul 24 17:49:00 (sorry, that came off as a bit rude, I didn't mean it that way) Jul 24 17:56:51 bluelightning: no problem:) yes it is not an oe question, I just wanted to ask it as oe users might know it. I searched it on google, but I could not see any explanation Jul 24 17:57:47 apart from a threat of TI webpage which was very brief reply Jul 24 18:26:31 bluelightning: whats up Jul 24 18:33:27 khem: the change to git for gcc has led to huge fetches... the mirror tarball for gcc here is 1.7G (!!) Jul 24 18:33:50 khem: assuming that's expected behaviour it doesn't seem very practical for users Jul 24 18:37:01 bluelightning: hmmm, Jul 24 18:37:07 thats huge really Jul 24 18:38:14 bluelightning: I think with 4.7.2 I will switch it to tar bases fetches or svn Jul 24 18:38:54 may be stick with svn is not a bad thing after all Jul 24 18:39:24 it was the svn 1.7 upgrade glitch we have Jul 24 18:39:35 not all svn repos are yet migrated to 1.7 Jul 24 18:46:30 glitch ? Jul 24 18:47:52 khem: presumably your downloads/git2_github.com.mirrors.gcc.git.tar.gz is the same size? Jul 24 18:50:40 bluelightning: yes Jul 24 18:50:45 1.7G Jul 24 18:50:51 thats unacceptable IMO Jul 24 18:50:58 when we have other alternatives Jul 24 18:51:49 git could still be used, but it might just be a case of not having all of the history in the repo to be cloned... Jul 24 18:53:39 does RDEPENDS works with PV ? Jul 24 19:47:01 Is there a libwebcam recipe somewhere? I can't seem to find it. **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Jul 25 02:59:58 2012