**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Sep 25 02:59:58 2012 Sep 25 07:11:01 morning! Sep 25 07:13:42 i am trying to build a linux module, but it's looking for a header that is not present in the sysroot, even if it is present in the linux source Sep 25 07:13:50 linux/bounds.h Sep 25 07:14:03 is it normal ? Sep 25 07:18:47 afournier: are you using denzil? it was fixed in master Sep 25 07:19:43 yes i am Sep 25 07:24:56 afournier: then backport those changes if you want Sep 25 07:25:07 yes i will Sep 25 07:35:45 good morning Sep 25 08:07:33 khem: that I figured, but there's a bunch of stuff i'm gonna have to figure out how to fill in.. such as TCMODE Sep 25 08:10:51 morning all Sep 25 08:17:43 morning! Sep 25 08:28:05 hello Sep 25 08:56:18 morning all Sep 25 08:59:09 hi silvio Sep 25 09:01:03 hi afournier Sep 25 10:14:05 morning all Sep 25 10:16:21 hi pb_ Sep 25 10:17:42 hi pb Sep 25 10:34:32 hi bluelightning, silvio Sep 25 12:10:23 Does anybody know why gettext-native depends on libxml2-native? Sep 25 12:58:20 pb_: nothing suggestive in git blame? Sep 25 13:45:30 hi JaMa Sep 25 13:46:05 what do you think of xinput-calibrator for resistive touchscreens? Sep 25 13:47:44 like touchscreen converted from tslib to evdev Sep 25 13:48:32 for instance the gta04 is like that Sep 25 13:49:04 and some people on a mailing list said it was better with xf86-input-tslib Sep 25 13:57:29 bluelightning: not really. as far as I can tell it's unnecessary nowadays. Sep 25 13:57:58 that line was added in aae5021101224344a2b1a3af5becf74291fbbfe5, "Add depends to gettext to avoid host contamination". Sep 25 13:58:29 but, subsequently, the configure arguments were changed to --with-included-libxml which makes it use a locally-bundled copy of libxml rather than the installed/sysroot one anyway. Sep 25 13:59:39 the thing that seems even more peculiar is that the target gettext depends on libxml2-native, which doesn't sound like an appropraite fix for "host contamination" in any event. Sep 25 13:59:43 hmmm I found that: Sep 25 14:00:02 http://lists.goldelico.com/pipermail/gta04-owner/2012-April/002228.html Sep 25 14:00:06 => tslib is better Sep 25 14:00:56 pb_: I dislike terse commit messages such as that one Sep 25 14:04:49 pb_: assuming libxml2-native only provides libraries and no utilities, definitely Sep 25 14:05:25 pb_: seems like it ought not to be needed anyway if we're explicitly telling it to use an internal copy of libxml2 as you say Sep 25 14:16:47 yeah Sep 25 14:25:27 I sent email to the list about it. Sep 25 14:29:29 yep, just saw that, thanks Sep 25 14:54:40 morning kergoth Sep 25 14:56:56 hey Sep 25 14:57:59 * sgw YPTM: Saul is on Sep 25 15:01:00 oops wrong channel Sep 25 15:01:53 i dont understand how sysroots/qemux86/kernel/ is populated, in the kernel.bbclass kernel_do_install there is "cp -fR * $kerneldir" so it should copy everything but include/linux/bounds.h is not present Sep 25 15:16:08 I think that might be one of the files that kernel.bbclass helpfully deletes for you. Sep 25 15:16:33 it's actually in generated/, right? Sep 25 15:44:29 does someone has busybox-only-image recipe? Sep 25 15:49:26 hrw: core-image-minimal should be busybox for the shell unless something else depends on bash, if that's what you mean Sep 25 15:51:31 you can use the VIRTUAL-RUNTIME vars to adjust what goes into core-image-minimal, iirc. e.g. tinylogin vs busybox, busybox vs sysvinit.. but you'd have to add extra bits to install an inittab for it :) Sep 25 15:51:32 bluelightning: but to build it I need libffi Sep 25 15:51:49 trying micro-(base-)image from old OE Sep 25 15:52:16 on AArch64 we do not have libffi yet so no glib-2.0 and lot of stuff Sep 25 15:53:34 yeah, micro-base-image is fairly close to busybox only Sep 25 15:53:40 there's a meta-micro layer which works with oe-core, fwiw Sep 25 15:53:47 cool Sep 25 15:55:14 pb_: grabbed micro-base-image recipe Sep 25 15:57:43 hrw: what's the dependency chain there? Sep 25 15:58:52 bluelightning: ? Sep 25 15:59:08 bluelightning: ah, image Sep 25 15:59:16 hrw: the layer itself does not pull in libffi directly, so my question is what does? Sep 25 15:59:28 Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['core-image-base', 'packagegroup-base-extended', 'ofono', 'bluez4', 'udev', 'glib-2.0', 'libffi'] Sep 25 15:59:31 er, s/layer/image/ Sep 25 15:59:45 udev needs glib? sheesh Sep 25 15:59:52 you should be able to switch to mdev or something, no? Sep 25 15:59:55 or devtmpfs Sep 25 15:59:59 hrw: that's core-image-base, I was suggesting core-image-minimal Sep 25 16:00:20 bluelightning: will tell after kernel/bootwrapper rebuild Sep 25 16:00:25 kergoth: or manage without ofono, heh Sep 25 16:00:50 * pb_ fights a small pitched battle with boost Sep 25 16:00:55 Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['core-image-minimal', 'packagegroup-core-boot', 'udev', 'glib-2.0', 'libffi'] Sep 25 16:01:28 right, and if you really want to use core-image-base without those things, you probably want to remove bluetooth and phone from DISTRO_FEATURES Sep 25 16:01:56 hrw: ok, so it's udev Sep 25 16:03:18 anyway if all goes fine libffi/aarch64 should be written soon Sep 25 16:03:51 very good Sep 25 16:03:54 FYI I think udev itself doesn't actually need glib, only udev-acl Sep 25 16:04:07 but it's still a build-time dependency Sep 25 16:04:15 who came up with the name "AArch64" though? it's one of the ugliest I've seen in I dunno how long. Sep 25 16:07:02 ARM Architecture 64 - probably like IA32/IA64 Sep 25 16:07:22 AArgh64 is fine :) Sep 25 16:09:27 how do I find what libs a library depends on (by inspecting binary) Sep 25 16:09:56 readelf -d or objdump Sep 25 16:10:10 kergoth, thanks Sep 25 16:10:21 I was fishing for the right argument to readelf Sep 25 16:11:03 Crofton: objdump -X bin|grep NEEDED Sep 25 16:11:36 Crofton: objdump -X bin|grep NEEDED Sep 25 16:11:38 ops Sep 25 16:12:17 -X? Sep 25 16:12:54 s/X/x/ sorry Sep 25 16:13:06 yeah, just caught that Sep 25 16:17:18 just use "readelf -a", that works for any problem :-) Sep 25 16:56:06 bb all Sep 25 17:11:40 Crofton|work: readelf -d would dump small enough if you want to get DT_NEEDED Sep 25 17:19:55 have someone worked in winbind package for OE? Sep 25 17:28:20 otavio: is that separate from samba these days? Sep 25 17:29:04 bluelightning: in oe-core it is disabled; in Debian it is built in a separated binary package but from samba source package. Sep 25 17:29:20 otavio: you mean meta-oe ... ? Sep 25 17:29:29 yeah! sorry Sep 25 17:29:43 I guess we should just enable it and ensure it's packaged separately Sep 25 17:30:33 bluelightning: this is what I will do; but wanted to avoid to work on that if someone has done it already but did not send the patch ;-) Sep 25 17:30:49 otavio: fair enough :) Sep 25 17:38:01 bluelightning, thansks for find the satellite guys Sep 25 17:49:41 Crofton: np, it was totally by accident... Sep 25 17:50:16 I'm not 100% certain how to deal with them Sep 25 17:50:46 the name is unfortunate, but it would be good to steer them into working more with us Sep 25 17:50:57 yes, it's a tricky one Sep 25 18:16:00 re **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Sep 26 02:59:58 2012