**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Nov 09 02:59:58 2012 Nov 09 07:41:38 Helle everyone, I recently succeeded in building an rootfs for an olinuxino-imx233. But when i,ve got erverything set up I don't get a terminal over the serial line.. Does anyone know what goes wrong here? Nov 09 08:16:01 i'd like to build a system with a 2 partitions, a read-only one for almost everything, and a read-write one for database and other stuff, is it possible somehow to build one image on 2 partitions ? Nov 09 09:27:15 When working with a project, and u want to switch hardware, what layers need to be changed? I've got the BSP for both. can I just add the new BSP edit local.conf and start a build? Nov 09 09:31:33 koennie_: yes. if it's a new layers, add it to bblayers. then set the new machine in local.conf and run the build. Nov 09 09:33:13 Zagor, thanks I'll give it a try ;-) Nov 09 09:33:32 Hello everybody. I am newbie and I am not sure but I think that OE doesn't pass CROSS_COMPILE var with recursive make... Am I wrong ? Nov 09 09:39:34 if its not a kernel you probably need to explicitly export it in recipe Nov 09 09:40:00 I could be wrong but I dont think CROSS_COMPILE is in the standard exported vars Nov 09 09:48:11 Hi all Nov 09 10:27:46 XorA|gone: because I have a Makefile which call itself in another directory using $(MAKE)... but the other directory is not cross-compiled but just compiled normally Nov 09 10:28:33 you might need to play with -e Nov 09 10:29:13 I assume toplevel Makefile correctly receives CROSS_COMPILE? Nov 09 10:30:04 XorA|gone: yes it does Nov 09 10:30:39 try $(MAKE) -e to call sub file Nov 09 10:36:01 I got another problem with it... Anyway I think it's better to understand how the whole process works because I succeed to manually cross compile it Nov 09 10:45:29 The thing that I don't understand is, when I run CROSS_COMPILE=arm..... make it works.. but oe_runmake doesn't work and tells me " undefined reference to `main'" Nov 09 11:03:27 umm I think that OE overrides CFLAGS var in Makefile... Nov 09 11:03:37 sure Nov 09 11:04:38 it means that someone wrote a bad Makefile :) Nov 09 11:05:04 thats why you should better use autotools or cmake Nov 09 13:06:04 yes, I see Nov 09 14:15:05 I have a problem choosing QT version. Despite ANGSTROM_QT_VERSION ?= "4.8.0" beeing written, the 4.7.4 version keep beeing build. Nov 09 14:15:48 I can not find another line including ANGSTROM_QT_VERSION in the whole source (grep -r) Nov 09 14:15:53 any ideas ? Nov 09 16:45:40 Hi. I'm getting an error durring do_rootfs whose message is: Nov 09 16:45:42 resolve_conffiles: Existing conffile /rootfs/etc/fstab is different from the conffile in the new package. The new conffile will be placed at /rootfs/etc/fstab-opkg. Nov 09 16:46:02 (I replaced the full paths by ) Nov 09 16:46:19 Does it mean that there are two packages attempting to install /etc/fstab? Nov 09 16:48:55 mario-goulart yes Nov 09 17:10:05 I wonder why I was not getting that error before. I could identify the packages that try to install /etc/fstab and they haven't been modified recently. Nov 09 17:40:56 I have a Tiny6410 board (Samsung S3C6410) and a CMOS module (CAM130) OV9650 Nov 09 17:41:16 I can't find any driver for that CMOS module. Is there any? Nov 09 17:54:56 Is there a way to see what is dragging a package into an image? I'm looking at the files generated by "bitbake -g", but I haven't found any dependency rule that would make the package in question go into the image. Nov 09 17:55:44 That's related to the double /etc/fstab error I'm getting at rootfs generation. One of the packages is not supposed to be going into the image. **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Nov 10 02:59:58 2012