**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Nov 25 02:59:57 2014 Nov 25 09:56:49 morning all Nov 25 11:34:02 hi guys Nov 25 11:35:14 May I know, whether aplay opkg is available as an installer? Nov 25 11:40:13 ? Nov 25 11:42:59 wat? Nov 25 11:44:32 RP_: I am going to test the uboot-config patches today Nov 25 11:45:05 woglinde: I am planning to play a song in my arm based board having linux ported Nov 25 11:45:28 there is no aplay command found, instead aplaymidi is present Nov 25 11:46:36 otavio: sounds good, thanks Nov 25 11:47:15 RP: I am not sure this covered all use cases so I need to test it before commenting on it Nov 25 11:50:47 kanupatar: the package containing that is called alsa-utils-aplay Nov 25 11:52:50 kanupatar I would use gstreamer Nov 25 11:56:32 woglinde: bluelightning okay...can I get gstreamer opkg then? Nov 25 11:56:51 bluelightning: where can I download it? Nov 25 11:57:31 kanupatar uhm you might want read the topic Nov 25 11:57:37 of this channel Nov 25 11:58:21 this channel is about the meta stuff writing recipes and not about distros Nov 25 12:02:20 .. and especially not for providing arbitrary packages for arbitrary boards ;) Nov 25 12:09:20 just for the record, I still hate pyqt and sip Nov 25 12:14:24 * LetoThe2nd records Nov 25 12:14:32 Crofton|work: glad i could be of assistance! Nov 25 12:14:41 +1 Nov 25 12:14:55 jsut checking B!= S was really needed Nov 25 12:15:03 then must commit Nov 25 14:22:55 otavio: Hi, I am about to develop a custom motherboard for the imx6 module, which is very close to the wandboard, so I should probably use it as a base for futher development. Are there any reasons not to use the linux kernel mainline? Nov 25 14:27:52 stiandre_: lack of gpu and vpu support Nov 25 14:30:51 otavio: I see, thanks! Nov 25 15:32:44 hmm Nov 25 15:33:44 bluelightning: A recipe is appended multiple times from multiple layers like so: meta-oe-core/.../X.bb + meta-layer1/.../X.bbappend + meta-layer2/.../X.bbappend. Both .bbappend files append a file called FOO.TXT (with different contents) to SRC_URI. What decides which FOO.TXT will end up in ${WORKDIR} ? I kind of assumed that the priority was given by the order in which the different files-folders are mentioned Nov 25 15:33:45 I have a small question. When i try to make my image bitbake saids ERROR, and error comes from make " make[5]: LIBTOOL@: Command not found". It's when bitbake is trying to compile rpm recipe. Any suggestions? Nov 25 15:33:46 in FILESEXTRAPATHS, but it doesn't seem to be case. I'm seeing this behavior: if both layers append FOO.txt, FOO.txt from layer1 is used. If I delete FOO.txt file from layer1, FOO.txt from layer2 is used. Layer2 is mentioned first in FILESEXTRAPATH. Is this expected behavior? Nov 25 15:35:18 spaszkoPL: if your rpm recipe is unmodified that would be a bug... it sounds like a reference that should have been replaced hasn't been Nov 25 15:36:25 mago_: are any of those files in subdirectories underneath the directory which is next to the recipe/append? Nov 25 15:36:55 the files are in a directory called ${PN}, relative to each X.bbappend Nov 25 15:37:04 no subdirectories under that? Nov 25 15:37:09 no Nov 25 15:37:43 ok... so with no other information to go on that behaviour doesn't sound correct to me Nov 25 15:40:14 Today i've update my sources through oebb.sh and after that i have this error. I've don't touch rpm recipe. Anyway i have to look into it because i'm not sure that it's my mistake or repo mistake. Nov 25 15:40:50 spaszkoPL: try bitbake -c clean rpm rpm-native and see if it helps Nov 25 15:46:25 Unfortunately after clean and compile it again still not working. Nov 25 15:46:52 i have rpm_5.4.9.bb version of recipe Nov 25 15:52:51 spaszkoPL: what branch of angstrom is this on? Nov 25 15:53:39 angstrom-staging-yocto1.5 Nov 25 15:53:51 oe-core : angstrom-staging-yocto1.5 Nov 25 16:10:49 moin Nov 25 16:20:43 spaszkoPL: I guess my advice would be to send a mail to the angstrom mailing list Nov 25 16:20:52 it's not a failure we've seen AFAIK Nov 25 16:33:50 ok i've done some changes to my repo, we will se because it's bitbaking. Nov 25 16:34:43 bluelightning: By the way do you know how to get rid of error "ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'virtual/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc${KERNEL_CCSUFFIX}'." Always i have this error when i'm bitbaking, but i can compile with this error. Nov 25 16:35:25 spaszkoPL: shtat sounds like a problem in the angstrom distro config, or perhaps a change you're making to the configuration Nov 25 16:35:55 s/shtat/that/ Nov 25 16:35:58 spaszkoPL: it sounds like KERNEL_CCSUFFIX is not set where it should be Nov 25 16:35:59 bluelightning: lib/bb/fetch2/local.py is responsible for selecting which FOO.txt to select based on FILESPATH, right? I noticed there are some useful debug prints in there, how do I get them to show up in output? I tried bitbake -D -D -D -D but still no "Searching for .." output Nov 25 16:36:47 mago_: you'll see them in log.do_fetch for the recipe (plus you may get it with -v, not sure, but the task log will definitely have it) Nov 25 16:39:40 I have this same problem https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/2013-January/002014.html Nov 25 16:40:22 in my oe-classic tmp/deploy/... I see an avahi-daemon_0.6.25-r13.0.9-1_armv7a.ipk but when I try to "bitbake avahi-daemon" I get a an "ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'avahi-daemon'". What's going on here? Nov 25 16:40:49 And as i see here is the patch for KERNEL_CCSUFIX issue https://www.gitorious.org/schnitzeltony-oe-meta/meta-ti/commit/9daa29790ddd699642c1689bc2cf7c77d18ed372 Nov 25 16:41:40 awozniak: avahi-daemon is a package, what you specify on the bitbake command line is a recipe (or a build-time target more correctly) Nov 25 16:41:57 awozniak: the avahi-daemon package is provided by the avahi recipe Nov 25 16:42:23 bluelightning: kthx. guess I'm just used to a more 1:1 mapping for these things. Nov 25 16:44:40 awozniak: we try to have a balance between not doing any more building than we have to and dividing the output of a piece of software such that you don't have to have components installed that you don't need Nov 25 16:45:49 cya Nov 25 16:46:48 bluelightning: so if i "bitbake avahi" avahi-daemon package gets built even if I don't RDEPEND on it? Nov 25 16:47:32 awozniak: yes, "bitbake avahi" will output all packages that the avahi recipe produces Nov 25 16:48:57 awozniak: but you usually only build individual recipes like that for testing purposes; usually there is a DEPENDS / RDEPENDS (or a package in IMAGE_INSTALL) that causes a recipe to be built Nov 25 17:05:34 bluelightning: it appears my problem is probably a misunderstanding of how the sstate cache works. It seems like Bitbake does select the correct file afterall, and it even falls back on the other layer if i remove the file from my "upper layer". The problem seems to be that bitbake doesn't notice when the file re-appears in the upper layer. I would assume that the sstate-cache would get invalidated if a SRC_URI Nov 25 17:05:37 file suddenly appeared in a FILESPATH which sits in front of the FILESPATH used to build the cached version Nov 25 17:31:09 mago_: remind me, which version of the build system are you using? Nov 25 17:31:21 we did fix something relating to that in the last dev cycle IIRC Nov 25 20:02:02 hi Nov 25 20:02:52 i try to optimize a bitbake recipe i created myself and therefore need to build it several times Nov 25 20:04:56 at the moment i just change the value of $PR - is there another way which keeps $PR e.g. deleting the output folder or some special parameter? Nov 25 20:05:27 +to enforce rebuilding Nov 25 20:24:09 in oe-classic, how do I get libdns_sd into my build? **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Nov 26 02:59:58 2014