**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Apr 20 03:00:02 2017
Apr 20 10:11:03 <cyborg-x1> Hi Guys I am currently doing a layer for compiling influxdb
Apr 20 10:11:28 <cyborg-x1> I found some issues using go - there is not common approach for go recipes yet
Apr 20 10:12:03 <cyborg-x1> there is oe-meta-go meta-golang and there are some recipes for go in meta-virtualization
Apr 20 10:13:29 <cyborg-x1> I think the best approach I have seen so far is oe-meta-go. The recipes can be keept relatively simple and it goes after the go guys seem to name their depens (repo)
Apr 20 10:16:12 <cyborg-x1> My layer is here: https://github.com/C-X1/meta-influx, I have 90 recipes for different go packages now and I think there should be some common approach to handle this somehow - is anyone interested?
Apr 20 10:56:26 <rburton> cyborg-x1: fwiw, the core go recipes are in oe-core in git master now, so the next release will have it
Apr 20 11:04:19 <cyborg-x1> So on what will it depend on? I just started a little discussion here: https://github.com/madisongh/meta-golang/issues/12
Apr 20 11:11:06 <cyborg-x1> rburton: Cause I got 90 recipes now in the style of oe-meta-go
Apr 20 12:56:11 <ilial> hello all
Apr 20 12:56:40 <ilial> how can specify a single patch from git as src_uri?
Apr 20 12:57:55 <ilial> wget saves a file named index.html?XXXXX, and bitbake says that the result of the wget doesn't exist
Apr 20 13:38:38 <rburton> ilial: from git? no.  if you have a web interface to the git repo then you can construct the right URL
Apr 20 13:40:21 <ilial> in my case it is like https://.../patch/?id=XXXXX
Apr 20 13:41:07 <ilial> if I wget such address, the result file is called index.html?XXXXX
Apr 20 13:41:35 <ilial> but the bitbake expects ?id=XXXXX
Apr 20 13:42:00 <rburton> pass &downloadfilename=mypatch.patch
Apr 20 13:42:06 <rburton> to get wget to rename it for you
Apr 20 13:44:30 <ilial> now it is expecting for ?id=XXXXX&downloadfilename=mypatch.patch :)
Apr 20 13:46:06 <ilial> got it
Apr 20 13:46:12 <rburton> i meant ; :)
Apr 20 13:46:19 <ilial> yes
Apr 20 13:46:25 <ilial> figured it 
Apr 20 13:46:33 <ilial> thank you very much
Apr 20 13:46:35 <ilial> !
Apr 20 13:47:24 <ilial> additional question: is there any way to skip the md5 and sha256 checking?
Apr 20 15:28:07 <vmeson> ilial: I'm not sure if it can be avoided but if you're attempting to defeat the checksum, you have a different goal than most users of oe-core...
Apr 20 17:17:26 <heeen> can devtool also just update the srcrev for things I can push to
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Apr 21 03:00:02 2017