**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Nov 15 02:59:57 2021 Nov 15 05:33:41 hello, Nov 15 05:33:41 Are there any beginner-friendly projects that I could contribute to? Nov 15 16:29:24 any ideas why bitbake attempts to install a package that doesn't exist (in my case dtc-staticdev) Nov 15 16:29:52 it was empty, thus not packaged, but bitbake still pulls it in as a dependency Nov 15 16:35:49 davidlt: got a log showing that? being a staticdev, thats very odd Nov 15 16:37:48 rburton, I have an image with IMAGE_FEATURES = "dev-pkgs" Nov 15 16:38:01 thus I want all dev packages if those are available to be installed Nov 15 16:38:42 from the work directory I see that dtc-staticdev is empty, no package will be generated, pkgdata also doesn't have dtc-staticdev.packaged Nov 15 16:39:02 sure, but staticdev != dev, so that shouldn't be a problem Nov 15 16:39:10 but somehow it still being pulled in and then opkg fails, because it cannot find the package Nov 15 16:39:17 paste the log please Nov 15 16:39:41 opkg_prepare_url_for_install: Couldn't find anything to satisfy 'dtc-staticdev'. Nov 15 16:39:59 rm_r: Failed to open dir /blah/1.0-r0/rootfs//var/cache/opkg/volatile: No such file or directory. Nov 15 16:40:21 really looks like you're explicitly asking for dtc-staticdev to be installed somewhere Nov 15 16:40:26 It lists the package in "NOTE: Installing the following packages:" Nov 15 16:40:45 I am not, git grep on oe-core, meta-oe, etc didn't reveal anything too Nov 15 16:40:57 if you pastebin the whole log you can avoid having to copy individual lines and I can read the line i want Nov 15 16:41:47 apologies, but cannot copy the existing log as-is without some sanitization Nov 15 16:42:52 other existing staticdev package are being installed just fine :/ Nov 15 16:42:57 well the rootfs log has several separate install sections, there's the base file system from IMAGE_INSTALL and then the complementary install from eg dev-pkgs Nov 15 16:43:09 e.g. "xz-staticdev zlib-dev zlib-staticdev" Nov 15 16:43:53 so you're using staticdev-pkgs not dev-pkgs? Nov 15 16:44:06 no Nov 15 16:44:16 so you're explicitly installing xz-staticdev? Nov 15 16:44:18 dev-pkgs seems to enable both Nov 15 16:44:21 no Nov 15 16:44:36 populate_sdk_base.bbclass:COMPLEMENTARY_GLOB[dev-pkgs] = '*-dev' Nov 15 16:44:36 populate_sdk_base.bbclass:COMPLEMENTARY_GLOB[staticdev-pkgs] = '*-staticdev' Nov 15 16:44:37 I just add dev-pkgs to IMAGE_FEATURES Nov 15 16:44:38 it does not Nov 15 16:45:21 dammit Nov 15 16:45:33 huge apologies, git kunfu failed this time Nov 15 16:46:24 it is actually requested now that I am looking for a second time Nov 15 16:49:11 glad that's sorted then :) Nov 15 17:31:06 jonmason, thanks! Some other poor soul will read the gcc manual #optimizations, I've removed all Nov 15 17:31:53 let see upstream reactions Nov 15 17:33:02 I think this kind of overrides is taboo in OE as well as the machine-specific ones Nov 15 18:57:18 Dhruva gole: I would suggest to look at the weekly email on yocto mailing list about "Newcomer bugs" https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/55280?p=%2C%2C%2C20%2C0%2C0%2C0%3A%3Arecentpostdate%2Fsticky%2C%2Cnewcomer%2C20%2C2%2C0%2C86920031 also see https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Bug_Triage#Newcomer_Bugs Nov 15 18:58:58 ant__: yeah, that O4 was something Nov 15 18:59:19 I'm surprised they didn't unroll loops, etc Nov 15 19:04:53 -funroll-really-all-loops Nov 15 19:06:45 ah it was -funroll-every-loop back in 2005 :) https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-309752.html **** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Nov 16 02:59:57 2021