**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Dec 20 02:59:56 2022
Dec 20 04:46:26 <Ch^W> Hmmm... it appears as if the systemctl implementation in  oe core does not actually reset things like the real systemctl command does. e.g. WantedBy= should reset the WantedBy list...
Dec 20 07:48:37 <mckoan> good morning
Dec 20 08:23:24 <mckoan> who is responsible for layers.openembedded.org ?
Dec 20 08:24:41 <mckoan> I added a new layer but I can't manage it.
Dec 20 08:24:59 <mckoan> And is not listed in the website
Dec 20 08:37:38 <JaMa> dv_: did you find the issue with addpylib? layerindex shows the same, but it might be old bitbake there https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/layerupdate/9403345/
Dec 20 11:44:38 <rburton> mckoan: what layer? I didn't get a notification that a new layer was added (they need to be approved)
Dec 20 14:22:24 <mckoan> rburton: hi, IIRC I added it on 3 October 2022, name meta-synwall
Dec 20 14:22:59 <mckoan> rburton: but is not listed. If I try to add it is refused because altready present (but not visible)
Dec 20 15:54:33 <skoink[m]> I saw some chatter about Bitbake earlier. There have been a few times when I've wanted to update Bitbake or patch my local copy without switching Yocto releases. Got any advice on a good way to structure that?
Dec 20 15:55:27 <skoink[m]> It would be killer if there was some kind of patch mechanism similar to bbappends
Dec 20 15:55:33 <skoink[m]> * to bbappends.
Dec 20 15:56:09 <JPEW> skoink[m]: If it's bitbake itself, you'll need to just have a local fork to do that. There's no "patching" mechnism like that for python code
Dec 20 15:59:28 <skoink[m]> Is it possible / easy to put a local Bitbake somewhere else and have it override the one that's in the poky repo?
Dec 20 15:59:51 <skoink[m]> * poky repo (but keep the rest of the layers)?
Dec 20 16:00:04 <skoink[m]> * poky repo (but keep the rest of the poky layers)?
Dec 20 16:00:15 <dv_> JaMa: yes
Dec 20 16:00:23 <dv_> JaMa: `openembedded-core/meta/conf/layer.conf:132: unparsed line: 'addpylib ${LAYERDIR}/lib oe'`
Dec 20 16:00:37 <JPEW> skoink[m]: Not that I know. If you want to do that, you're probably better off using split oe-core & bitbake instead of poky
Dec 20 16:00:58 <JPEW> (some would argue that you shouldn't be using poky anyway)
Dec 20 16:01:03 <dv_> although, wait
Dec 20 16:08:51 <dv_> JaMa: https://github.com/openembedded/bitbake/blob/master/lib/bb/parse/parse_py/ConfHandler.py#L195 <- baseconfig is set to False in my case
Dec 20 16:09:40 <dv_> what is this "baseconfig"?
Dec 20 16:11:10 <dv_> also note that I am using the ossystems base scripts, which call bb.parse.handle() with baseconfig set to the default value (which is False)
Dec 20 16:11:49 <dv_> here: https://github.com/OSSystemsEmbeddedLinux/meta-ossystems-base/blob/master/classes/layerdirs.bbclass#L7
Dec 20 17:10:22 <JaMa> dv_: otavio: iirc addpylib works only from layer.conf, so maybe this bb.parse.handle(layerconf, l) needs to be updated somehow as well
Dec 20 17:10:31 <dv_> otavio: adding `baseconfig=True` to the bb.parse.handle() call in the source I linked to fixes this. but I dont really see what the point of "baseconfig" is
Dec 20 17:12:31 <dv_> JaMa: I can't find docs about that argument ... do you know what it is for?
Dec 20 17:28:08 <JaMa> dv_: don't know, check the source.. but layerindex needed similar change in https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/58837
Dec 20 17:29:44 <JaMa> ConfHandler.py:# baseconfig is set for the bblayers/layer.conf cookerdata config parsing
Dec 20 17:40:30 <otavio> https://github.com/openembedded/bitbake/commit/afb8478d3853f6edf3669b93588314627d617d6b
Dec 20 17:40:45 <otavio> yes, it seem right. Set it to true
Dec 20 17:43:45 <otavio> dv_: are you preparing a
Dec 20 17:43:48 <otavio> PR?
Dec 20 17:44:35 <rburton> mckoan|away: probably as it uses main not master. Ask moto-timo to confirm that is a big problem.
Dec 20 17:55:32 <dv_> otavio: ok
Dec 20 18:06:06 <dv_> otavio: done
Dec 20 19:40:54 <moto-timo> mckoan|away: layers with "main" branch require a human to manually fix up the layerindex database... https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14982
Dec 20 19:42:02 <moto-timo> mckoan|away: so if _someone_ could go look at layerindex-web code and fix that _it would be great_.
Dec 20 19:44:48 <moto-timo> mckoan|away: also, having LAYERSERIES_COMPAT on "main" for dunfell and kirkstone is going to be the next problem
Dec 20 19:45:49 <moto-timo> mckoan|away: please make a 'dunfell' branch and a 'kirkstone' branch. this is what layer index understands
Dec 20 19:50:55 <moto-timo> mckoan|away: https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/updates/35822/
Dec 20 20:27:21 <moto-timo> mckoan|away: wrong bugzilla https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14989
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Dec 21 02:59:56 2022