**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Sep 09 02:59:58 2010 Sep 09 07:53:18 Anybody opposing changing SMS refs to default to 8bit? Sep 09 08:15:18 akiniemi: You need to wait until Denis wakes up. I forgot to ask him yesterday. Sep 09 09:20:05 holtmann: shall i send current btio.[ch] patches to the mailing list? as I said in mail to u, it still has dependence on libbluetooth Sep 09 09:20:25 Send it to the mailing list. I really hope that I find a free minute to look at them. Sep 09 09:21:50 okay Sep 09 09:22:23 the patch is very simple and i touch the surface only Sep 09 10:11:51 Sorry about the spam... ;) Sep 09 11:56:36 akiniemi: No problem. The mailing list can take it ;) Sep 09 11:57:11 akiniemi: Push the Portuguese since I can't even tell if it correct or not. And I assume you tested it. Sep 09 11:57:42 akiniemi: I am just a bit busy with the ConnMan/oFono breakage. Sep 09 12:56:15 akiniemi: Go ahead and push the 8bit ref patch Sep 09 12:56:26 akiniemi: And the Portugese thing, since you're the expert there Sep 09 13:34:34 denkenz, holtmann: done. Sep 09 13:36:13 akiniemi: What is the patch 'Fix port number handling' trying to do? Sep 09 13:37:49 akiniemi: The reason that part is there is that 8bit and 16bit port numbers cannot be mixed and matched according to 23.040 Sep 09 13:38:14 Namely '0-239' are reserved, '240-255' available for applications in the case of 8-bit Sep 09 13:38:31 And completely different set of rules for 16 bit Sep 09 14:01:52 akiniemi: By any chance do you know if pessi is on holiday ? Sep 09 15:03:58 wagi: I just got my new Dell 5540, am I in for some pain? Sep 09 15:05:19 denkenz, I thought that gave it for free with all Dells? Sep 09 15:05:23 they* Sep 09 15:06:03 'they'? Sep 09 15:07:04 denkenz, Dell. I thought Dell gave some pain away for free with every Dell. Sep 09 15:07:07 "Pain Inside" Sep 09 15:08:02 Ah, well I don't have a Dell Sep 09 15:08:15 Just a rebadged Ericsson F3607GW, aka Dell 5540 Sep 09 16:44:22 denkenz: when setting Context.Active to TRUE, I sometime get D-Bus timeout, even though I eventually get a Context PropertyChanged signal. Any idea how that's possible ? Sep 09 16:44:58 sameo: Are you setting a long enough timeout? Context activation can take 30 seconds on some devices Sep 09 16:46:17 ok, 5 seconds is not enough then. Sep 09 16:49:21 (couple seconds for isimodem/n900modem). Sep 09 16:49:26 Btw, weird problem with isimodem and data connection: if one setted up user/password for APN, then data connection can't be established Sep 09 16:50:24 almost 40 seconds for my f3607gw Sep 09 16:51:01 sameo: Mine doesn't take that long usually, unless the signal is low Sep 09 16:52:33 yes, signal is weak for me here. Sep 09 16:55:12 denkenz: if some out of band process (settings UI) enables call-barring for roaming calls, should I expect dialer to still be getting the incoming call notice (PropertiesChanged signal) for it, or not? Sep 09 16:55:25 this is in 0.26, pre-api changes Sep 09 16:56:11 sabotage: If you are roaming and set call-barring for roaming, then you shouldn't get any signals Sep 09 16:56:20 However, oFono doesn't really control this, it is up to the network Sep 09 16:56:29 hmm Sep 09 16:56:56 so if I am getting the signal... could be phonesim not actually performing the "barring"? Sep 09 16:57:10 phonesim is nowhere near smart enough for that Sep 09 16:57:20 * sabotage getting bugs for things that I suspect are phonesim "features" Sep 09 16:58:18 Tell them I look forward to their phonesim patches Sep 09 17:00:29 heh Sep 09 17:01:12 ok, talked to mike l. and he admitted that in settings he's still allowing it to be set, even if the interface is not available Sep 09 17:01:24 he just swallows the dbus errors right now Sep 09 17:01:37 so I'm reassigning to him ;) Sep 09 17:02:30 yes, hot potato him ;) Sep 09 17:03:06 definately Sep 09 17:04:04 he openly admitted, in public even, that it should not let the user have the option to set something that the net/op does not implement Sep 09 17:08:15 holtmann: Wtf is -P? Sep 09 17:08:26 Disable plugin ;) Sep 09 17:08:41 Umm, its not in the options struct Sep 09 17:08:53 Crap. That only works for connmand. Oops. Sep 09 17:08:55 d, n, v Sep 09 17:08:58 Yeah ;) Sep 09 17:09:13 Something I have to fix actually. Damn. Sep 09 17:09:42 ConnMan is way superior in this matter. Sep 09 17:09:59 Heh, but you PolicyKit integration now ;) Sep 09 17:10:04 *whip* get cracking ;) Sep 09 17:11:02 *finally*, you've been promising that for ages Sep 09 17:11:26 I know. Another item off the list. We just have to define the proper constants to enable it. Sep 09 17:12:44 Actually all project got it now. Even BlueZ ;) Sep 09 17:22:30 denkenz: We still need the GetModems() changes. Sep 09 17:22:54 I know, I need to get past these last couple of patch reviews Sep 09 19:42:31 holtmann: The Manager API changes are in Sep 09 19:42:40 Nice Sep 09 19:42:55 sameo: So now we have to deal with the GetModems() change. Sep 09 19:51:23 denkenz: Should we do a 0.28 release. Sep 09 20:20:34 test some of the changes Sep 09 20:20:56 I did sanity checking here, but more testing would be nice Sep 09 21:31:13 denkenz: If you have nothing else pending then I am going to role 0.28 in a few hours. Sep 09 21:41:44 holtmann: Go for it Sep 09 21:44:14 No pending patch from you or the mailing list? Sep 09 21:49:02 Plenty of pending patches, but they can wait Sep 09 21:54:22 Okay. Sep 09 21:54:38 Do we wanna remove Modem.GetPropteries as Samuel pointed out. Sep 09 22:12:19 I don't think so Sep 09 22:12:32 We have PropertyChanged signals on that one Sep 09 22:12:47 And you can actually use the single modem object, just like a voicecall Sep 09 22:14:32 Okay. Sep 09 22:14:38 Then I am building the release now. Sep 09 22:32:39 Done. ofono-0.28 is out. Sep 10 00:22:56 holtmann: src/ofonod -P hfp Sep 10 00:23:04 holtmann: Unknown option -P Sep 10 00:23:54 -P option is not added yet to disable plugins Sep 10 00:27:01 denkenz: any comments for stk apps? Sep 10 02:29:07 zhenhua: Let me try to look at them in a bit Sep 10 02:29:29 balrog-k2n: Can't we use disconnect_reason for this? Sep 10 02:32:24 Otherwise we assume hangup succeeded Sep 10 02:32:28 Which it probably OK Sep 10 02:32:34 denkenz: yes, i guess we could.. i had the impression that drivers don't have to implement it though, and that it would be the longer way Sep 10 02:34:20 It is best effort Sep 10 02:36:16 balrog-k2n: Crap, can you rebase that patch, no longer applies :( Sep 10 02:38:29 oops Sep 10 02:40:18 http://www.openstreetmap.pl/balrog/Fix-sending-User-Cancel-response-to-Set-Up-Call.patch Sep 10 02:43:12 Patch format detection failed. Sep 10 02:44:00 "patch -p 1" should work, git-am probably won't Sep 10 02:44:31 Yeah ok, I fake your author info Sep 10 02:44:44 i find that cg-patch is more picky than than patch and git-am is even more picky Sep 10 02:47:21 i fixed the header now :) Sep 10 02:54:12 denkenz: i want to send out DUN patches asap with update btio.[ch] just sent to bluez mailing list. is that ok? Sep 10 02:54:30 sure send them Sep 10 02:57:12 now when i look at the patch, i'm not sure why i used vc->dial_req->call->vc instead of just vc **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Sep 10 02:59:57 2010