**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Mar 23 02:59:57 2011
Mar 23 10:06:49 <Trashw> Does ofono support the LTE?
Mar 23 10:09:27 <Jeevaka> Trashw: There has been some proposals from STE for IMS/LTE API
Mar 23 10:10:05 <Jeevaka> Trashw: note: its only proposal
Mar 23 10:10:15 <Trashw> Ok...
Mar 23 10:10:56 <Trashw> Is there any timeline?
Mar 23 10:11:57 <Trashw> What is the current status of ofono support?
Mar 23 10:12:26 <Trashw> What is the release version ofono support...with respect to 3GPP specs?
Mar 23 10:16:07 <Jeevaka> Since there is no TODO tasks submitted, I dont know the timeline.
Mar 23 10:17:12 <Trashw> Ok... So if a task is there in TODO then how do we find out the timeline...?
Mar 23 10:18:48 <Jeevaka> depending on the complexity scale atleast a rough estimate can be found. For more detailed information, task owner can be contacted
Mar 23 10:23:06 <Jeevaka> doc/features.txt will give an overview of the features support.
Mar 23 17:03:10 <fdanis> denkenz: ping
Mar 23 17:03:48 <denkenz> fdanis: pong
Mar 23 17:08:13 <fdanis> I may have found a problem in phone_number_to_string, its buffer length has not been updated after OFONO_MAX_PHONE_NUMBER_LENGTH move from 20 to 80, I do not know if this is intentional
Mar 23 17:09:09 <denkenz> probably a bug
Mar 23 17:10:22 <fdanis> Should I set a reference to OFONO_MAX_PHONE_NUMBER_LENGTH commit in the patch (sha1 or something like this)?
Mar 23 17:11:57 <denkenz> yep, just refer to the commit id that broke it
Mar 23 17:12:04 <denkenz> and yes, its a bug looks like
Mar 23 17:16:59 <fdanis> commit id is sha1, right ?
Mar 23 17:18:06 <denkenz> yep
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Mar 24 02:59:58 2011