**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Jun 24 02:59:57 2011
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Jun 24 03:19:19 2011

**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Jun 24 03:20:10 2011
Jun 24 15:35:19 <denkenz> fdanis: ping
Jun 24 15:35:32 <fdanis> denkenz: pong
Jun 24 15:36:01 <denkenz> fdanis: So looking at your patch, I'm a bit confused
Jun 24 15:36:11 <denkenz> is PTS expecting CCWA to be sent once only?
Jun 24 15:37:33 <fdanis> not clear, we've got a PTS test fail when sending +CCWA multiple times, and test is OK when we send it only 1 time
Jun 24 15:38:27 <fdanis> do you want I send you PTS traces of the failed test ?
Jun 24 15:38:41 <denkenz> That'd be helpful
Jun 24 15:38:59 <denkenz> However, I'm not liking the fact that we remove send_callsetup_notification
Jun 24 15:39:20 <denkenz> that one served the purpose that an incoming / waiting call is active before slc is setup
Jun 24 15:39:28 <denkenz> so eventually ccwa got sent
Jun 24 15:42:59 <denkenz> so we have to make sure we still do that somehow
Jun 24 15:44:51 <fdanis> yes, but when SLC is setup, we do not receice AT+CCWA=1
Jun 24 15:46:00 <denkenz> so we need to check either on ccwa going from 0 -> 1
Jun 24 15:46:05 <denkenz> or some other creative solution
Jun 24 15:47:32 <fdanis> do you think it will be ok if we send +CCWA just after we receive AT+CCWA=1 (in case of waiting call) ?
Jun 24 15:48:07 <denkenz> should be ok, we have to play with it
Jun 24 16:14:16 <fdanis> denkenz: I just tried to call notify_ccwa() at the end of AT+CCWA callback (after g_at_server_send_final), but I received the +CCWA before OK
Jun 24 16:14:16 <fdanis> I certainly missed something, do you have an idea ?
Jun 24 16:40:13 <denkenz> yes, the OK is sent afterwards
Jun 24 16:40:22 <denkenz> you will need to do the unsolicited in a timeout
Jun 24 16:41:24 <fdanis> ok
Jun 24 19:10:44 <aturley> hey
Jun 24 19:11:00 <aturley> i'm trying to use ofono, and i seem to have run into a problem
Jun 24 19:11:45 <aturley> my modem appears to be registering correctly, but it isn't listed when i run list-modem.
Jun 24 19:13:04 <aturley> here's the ofono output when i connect the modem: http://pastebin.com/HJWy82Gh
Jun 24 19:13:57 <aturley> i'm using ofono 0.40 right now, but i saw the same issue when i used 0.50 as well.
Jun 24 19:19:35 <denkenz> aturley: Is there a network interface created when you plug in the mbm card?
Jun 24 19:20:00 <aturley> no
Jun 24 19:20:02 <denkenz> according to your log there isn't, and all mbm hw I have does
Jun 24 19:20:17 <denkenz> Then you have to solve that first
Jun 24 19:20:50 <aturley> i thought i had to go through a few steps before getting to that point.
Jun 24 19:21:26 <aturley> so the network interface should show up first?
Jun 24 19:21:43 <denkenz> no, the mbm uses a usb ethernet or some other driver and creates an actual network device
Jun 24 19:22:00 <denkenz> this is later used for high-speed connectivity instead of ppp
Jun 24 19:22:56 <denkenz> oFono looks for that network device when detecting mbm, if it doesn't find one, it doesn't register mbm as a valid modem
Jun 24 19:23:34 <aturley> ok, thanks.
Jun 24 19:26:00 <denkenz> Check and make sure you have cdc_ncm compiled, or upgrade to a newer kernel
Jun 24 19:27:08 <aturley> i have 
Jun 24 19:27:11 <aturley> CONFIG_USB_NET_CDCETHER=y
Jun 24 19:27:11 <aturley> # CONFIG_USB_NET_CDC_EEM is not set
Jun 24 19:27:11 <aturley> # CONFIG_USB_NET_CDC_SUBSET is not set
Jun 24 19:27:11 <aturley> # CONFIG_USB_CDC_COMPOSITE is not set
Jun 24 19:29:45 <denkenz> maybe its not being loaded? I dunno
Jun 24 19:31:20 <aturley> ok, i'll keep digging.
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Jun 25 02:59:57 2011