**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Mar 02 23:59:56 2005 Mar 03 06:53:33 boole2: boo Mar 03 06:53:41 boole2: you make it back from nyc? Mar 03 09:14:14 prpplague: Yo! Mar 03 09:14:15 beewoolie_: greetings Mar 03 09:14:24 beewoolie-away: whats cookin? Mar 03 09:14:32 prpplague: Did you send the JTAG package? Mar 03 09:14:32 beewoolie-away: you make it back from nyc? Mar 03 09:14:47 beewoolie-away: negative, we found a problem with the assembly Mar 03 09:14:57 prpplague: I'm home. The problem with my server was that it was...powered down. Mar 03 09:15:07 beewoolie-away: one of the assembly folks put AHCT's instead of AHC's Mar 03 09:15:16 prpplague: OK. Good. I wouldn't want to think someone had kiped it. Mar 03 09:15:29 beewoolie-away: should go out tomorrow Mar 03 09:16:03 np/ Mar 03 09:16:32 beewoolie-away: we kept noticing the slew rate was kinda high Mar 03 09:16:48 beewoolie-away: went back and check, and had the wrong part on the board Mar 03 09:16:59 Nice work. Mar 03 09:17:38 beewoolie-away: started work on adding spi/mmc to apex this morning Mar 03 09:17:53 Nice. Mar 03 10:00:01 For your amusement: Mar 03 10:18:35 hehe Mar 03 12:57:48 // valid slot is 1 thru 3 -- valid irq is 1 thru 3 so valid indicies are Mar 03 12:57:48 // 1+1-2, 1+2-2, 1+3-2, 2+1-2, 2+2-2, 2+3-2, 3+1-2, 3+2-2, 3+3-2 Mar 03 12:57:48 // 0, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 4=1 Mar 03 12:57:48 // thus mod 3 we have a potential collision Mar 03 12:57:48 // if (slot > 0 && slot <= N2_PCI_MAX_DEV && pin > 0 && pin <= N2_PCI_MAX_IRQ) Mar 03 12:57:48 // irq = pci_irq_table[(slot + pin - 2) % 3]; Mar 03 12:58:24 may have something to do with your probs...or may be entirely spurious Mar 03 12:59:41 ah...interesting Mar 03 13:00:38 <[g2]> kas11, you think that's where the nobody cared is coming from ? Mar 03 13:02:27 is possible....the code doesn't seem to me to work for the case of max irqs = 3 Mar 03 13:04:52 I would just hand out IRQs on a first come first served basis...keep track of what is already assigned and pass out the next available Mar 03 13:06:08 you can put a debug statement before the return and see if the current code does the right thing...it sorta depends on what params are passed in Mar 03 13:07:09 whether something else makes sure the params don't cause the overflow is anyone's guess Mar 03 13:08:21 4 PCI ints is basically universal...so the code would work in the normal case Mar 03 13:11:40 <[g2]> I looked at the code a week or so ago and it started to make more sense to me :) Mar 03 13:12:26 <[g2]> kas11, do you follow the yahoo ml at all ? Mar 03 13:13:13 nope...unsubscribed from all of them ages ago Mar 03 13:13:40 <[g2]> there was a good low-level question about the clocking in there Mar 03 13:16:03 <[g2]> The thread starts here http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nslu2-linux/message/4671 Mar 03 13:25:48 any of you using the ftdi chipset yet? Mar 03 13:27:11 I bought a FT 2232 device I saw in the store. Mar 03 13:27:18 and got it to talk. Mar 03 13:27:22 (regular serial) Mar 03 13:27:27 in linux Mar 03 13:27:28 ka6sox-office: which one? Mar 03 13:27:37 don't have it here. Mar 03 13:27:42 left it at home. Mar 03 13:27:44 :P Mar 03 13:27:59 I have the 2232 board almost done in layout. Mar 03 13:28:02 with cpld Mar 03 13:28:18 bbiab...need to go to a client. Mar 03 13:34:54 dunno...the pxa255 at 400 mhz is 397...it is possible that the memory interface on the slug is way slow...but it is also possible that cpufreq is causing problems too...I have never looked Mar 03 13:36:06 kas11: just from personal experience you gotta have the freq's matched up properly with the ras/cas Mar 03 13:36:16 kas11: or else you get eratic behavior Mar 03 13:38:12 on the pxa255, the memclocks change with cpu freq...at 400 memclock is 100 mhz...I have no idea what goes on with the ixp420 Mar 03 14:14:05 ~quote scoxe Mar 03 14:14:07 SCOXE: 4.16 (4.25/4.07), 3/3/2005 3:59pm, Opened 4.09, Volume 13,923, Change +0.05 Mar 03 14:14:17 that is totally amazing Mar 03 14:15:05 which part, that theyre even trading, or that 14k shares were traded? Mar 03 14:15:27 the price Mar 03 14:15:39 up .05 after their latest press release Mar 03 14:15:54 that makes no sense to me Mar 03 14:16:06 Didnt see the press release. Mar 03 14:16:40 http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20050303161820784 Mar 03 14:17:36 what amazes me is how much they paid Darl to run it into the ditch Mar 03 14:17:56 yea, did you read the fine print? Mar 03 14:18:16 looks like they are gonna buy back some of the "employee distributed stock" Mar 03 14:18:28 doesn't that seem odd Mar 03 14:18:30 just noticed the salary and options... Mar 03 14:19:02 prolly means they are having trouble keeping troops Mar 03 14:19:38 "The Company may make a rescission offer to holders of certain shares " Mar 03 14:21:31 I was happy to see that we now have Sir Billy Gates...who sez BSODs don't pay Mar 03 14:55:34 hehe. Mar 03 14:56:18 "As he is American, he cannot use the Sir prefix, but can use the K.B.E suffix" Mar 03 14:56:31 Knight Commander of the British Empire. Mar 03 21:34:15 <[g2]> THIS IS COOL, even if it isn't true http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS8705350561.html **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Mar 03 23:59:56 2005