**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Apr 27 23:59:57 2005 Apr 28 00:00:39 Nite all. Apr 28 00:00:59 nite Beewoolie Apr 28 11:04:13 <[g2]> I'm forking OpenSlug I'm getting ready to send out the email Apr 28 11:04:38 What's the issue? Apr 28 11:07:30 uh Apr 28 11:07:46 aren't you the main openslug developer? Apr 28 11:08:02 <[g2]> jacques, yeah... :) Apr 28 11:08:05 I've never heard of the main developer forking a project before :-) Apr 28 11:08:19 * [g2] needs to be different :) Apr 28 11:08:59 qbot: fork [g2], please Apr 28 11:09:00 beewoolie-akf: i haven't a clue Apr 28 11:09:37 <[g2]> beewoolie-akf, ok so for the Machine Name: should I put Linksys NSLU2 ? Apr 28 11:09:50 Don't we already have one of those? Apr 28 11:10:09 I think I need more info on what, exactly, you are doing. Apr 28 11:10:15 <[g2]> nod, I'm doing a different one Apr 28 11:11:23 <[g2]> beewoolie-akf, you're BCC'd on the e-mail Apr 28 11:11:31 <[g2]> it just went to the yahoo group Apr 28 11:12:10 Are you talking about dropping the NPE support in the kernel? Apr 28 11:13:49 <[g2]> nod. Apr 28 11:14:10 I don't think you need a new ID for that. Apr 28 11:14:38 <[g2]> I was thinking to avoid some confusion Apr 28 11:14:43 we have an ID for NSLU2 Apr 28 11:15:15 <[g2]> a couple months from now or much later Intel may have a clean license agreement and we could release OpenSlug as a binary with Intel support Apr 28 11:15:26 The only reason to change IDs is if there is a material difference in the kernel. You can run either the freeslug kernel or the openslug kernel on the same hw. It would be advantageous to allow either without a bootloader change. Apr 28 11:15:40 <[g2]> but we still couldn't include binding it statically with the kernel like we can with other drivers Apr 28 11:16:45 NP. all I'm saying is that the ID can be the same. Look at it this way. I can build two different kernels for my 79520. One has drivers built in and the other has modules. Both work. Same ID. Apr 28 11:17:01 <[g2]> Well I'll probably link the USB stuff in statically, then the kernel can directly mount root via NFS Apr 28 11:17:16 <[g2]> We're are probably running out of room with Redboot Apr 28 11:17:34 Right. My concern is that an ID change will preclude users upgrading their kernel. Apr 28 11:17:47 I don't really me upgrade, actually, but changing it. Apr 28 11:17:52 <[g2]> I'll hold of on the registery for now Apr 28 11:17:52 s/me/mean/ Apr 28 11:18:02 Other than that, go for it. Apr 28 11:18:10 I'd be really happy to see a release. Apr 28 11:18:27 I think I even have a USB network adapter lying around Apr 28 11:18:31 <[g2]> I'll setup a poll on Yahoo Apr 28 11:18:43 that sounds useful Apr 28 11:18:43 <[g2]> To see what the interest is Apr 28 11:19:03 <[g2]> There's no need to release if ppl aren't interested Apr 28 11:19:12 let me take another side here. Apr 28 11:19:20 Why ask? Why not just do it? Apr 28 11:19:32 <[g2]> I am just doing it Apr 28 11:19:43 you *can't* release the Intel enabled kernel. so, release one that isn't and get on with it. Apr 28 11:20:14 <[g2]> Acutally, I can't release the Intel kernel but I too chicken Apr 28 11:20:33 <[g2]> I don't think it's wrong, I just to totally crystal clear Apr 28 11:20:44 <[g2]> so I'm avoiding the entire issue Apr 28 11:20:48 Huh? Apr 28 11:21:20 <[g2]> The Intel wrappers for CSR are supposed to be GPL Apr 28 11:21:22 BTW, I hope you are including support for the Linksys USB100M USB adapter. Apr 28 11:21:34 <[g2]> I don't have a USB100M Apr 28 11:21:44 <[g2]> dunno which chip's in there Apr 28 11:21:46 I just mean a driver for it. Apr 28 11:21:54 Hmm. I don't either. Apr 28 11:21:55 <[g2]> is it usbnet ? Apr 28 11:22:04 I don't know what that is. Apr 28 11:22:20 Let me plug it in. Apr 28 11:23:02 It's wimpy. 12Mb device Apr 28 11:24:01 Still, it would be OK for a stop-gap and it is faster than my DSL. Apr 28 11:24:17 <[g2]> nod Apr 28 16:38:13 beewoolie: hey, whats the current status of the lh79520 support in 2.6 kernel? Apr 28 16:38:31 beewoolie: i see the logic pd board is registered under your name Apr 28 16:56:12 prpplague: I'd have to check it again. I think that I've done a complete port for that board. I don't know if I've published the patches, though. Apr 28 16:56:24 bbiaw Apr 28 16:56:29 beewoolie-afk: ok Apr 28 16:56:44 prpplague: Do you need it? Apr 28 16:56:56 beewoolie-afk: possible Apr 28 16:57:04 beewoolie-afk: just now looking at 2.6 Apr 28 16:57:07 Actually, I remember that there may be an issue with the CF driver. I don't completely remember, though. Apr 28 16:57:15 beewoolie-afk: still working with 2.4 Apr 28 16:57:54 There aren't many differences between the 79524 and the 79520. I think I got a wild hair and pushed through all of the necessary changes just to see if it all works. Apr 28 16:58:18 beewoolie-afk: i'll pull a copy of 2.6 and have a look Apr 28 16:58:29 beewoolie-afk: will you be around tomorrow? Apr 28 16:58:38 Usually. Apr 28 16:58:48 It looks like I may have done this in February. Apr 28 16:59:06 beewoolie-afk: so it should be in the standard 2.6 tree? Apr 28 16:59:27 Yeah, there is a whole bunch of 79520 specific files in the arch directory. Apr 28 16:59:29 No. Apr 28 16:59:35 None of this has been added to the kernel tree. Apr 28 16:59:40 ahh ok Apr 28 16:59:43 It may be in my patches, or it may not. Apr 28 16:59:50 I'll look at it later tonight. Apr 28 16:59:52 ttfn Apr 28 16:59:53 ok, then Apr 28 16:59:56 later Apr 28 17:00:57 beewoolie-afk: thanks Apr 28 20:06:23 get your toy, [g2]? Apr 28 20:06:31 <[g2]> a couple :) Apr 28 20:06:49 omi...I only heard about one Apr 28 20:07:13 or did you get 2 rv042s? Apr 28 20:07:19 <[g2]> I've taken them apart even before applying power :) Apr 28 20:07:33 <[g2]> actually, the rv042 and rv082 Apr 28 20:07:45 <[g2]> the mini-itx toy arrives next week Apr 28 20:07:52 why of course...gotta have a looksee Apr 28 20:08:21 I always like to rub elbows with rich people ;) Apr 28 20:08:21 <[g2]> the rv042 has an ixp425BB and the rv082 has an IXP425BD Apr 28 20:08:39 <[g2]> can you introduce me to some ? Apr 28 20:08:47 uh huh...I saw they were a bit diff last nite googling Apr 28 20:09:25 [g2]...meet [g2] who just dropped a bundle on assorted toys Apr 28 20:09:40 <[g2]> $156 for an RV042 is hardly a bundle Apr 28 20:10:33 you haven't looked at my checkbook lately, guess ;) Apr 28 20:11:18 <[g2]> well last I heard you were on a quite a spending spree getting toys Apr 28 20:11:41 but I shouldn't talk...I was seriously contemplating a 23" LCD just last week Apr 28 20:11:56 <[g2]> I'm gonna be doing some proof-of-concepts and some benchmarking Apr 28 20:12:10 <[g2]> at the Apple store ? Apr 28 20:12:10 but I had to pawn off stuff before I did....*lol* Apr 28 20:13:33 no....another Dell...won't buy their computers but I like their LCDs and they get here in one day...I am an immediate gratification sort of grrrl Apr 28 20:13:51 one of these is my next purchase - http://www.9xmedia.com/pages-Build_a_system/X-Top_Design_a_system-Configurations.html Apr 28 20:16:53 <[g2]> prpplague, what I start buying stuff like that you'll know I've made it :) Apr 28 20:17:55 hehe Apr 28 20:20:30 * kas11 pictures [g2]'s video wall displaying the output of a serial console Apr 28 20:23:58 16 ft x 9 ft video wall....2"x2" computer Apr 28 20:39:04 getting the Centos DVD on bittorrent...'tis nice to have the torrent hosted about 15 miles down the road...I was seeing 580+ KB/s within 20 sec of starting Apr 28 20:57:38 <[g2]> nite all Apr 28 21:23:26 damn, that sure is a friendly place...*not* Apr 28 21:25:01 * kas11 notes sarcasm dripping on the floor Apr 28 21:26:09 hmm? which place? Apr 28 21:26:22 * kas11 wishes she wasn't always biting her tongue *lol* Apr 28 21:27:15 [g2] had the temerity to ask about the build process in #centos Apr 28 21:27:16 * [g2] hugs kas11 Apr 28 21:27:27 <[g2]> actually -devel first Apr 28 21:27:50 * jacques is also trying to find a way to get some LCD goodness. Apr 28 21:28:36 * kas11 loves her 2001FPs Apr 28 22:22:07 ttyl **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Apr 28 23:59:57 2005