**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun Feb 18 02:59:57 2007
Feb 18 13:12:53 <CIA-6> nbd * r6318 /trunk/target/linux/generic-2.6/patches/212-block2mtd_erase_scan.patch: (log message trimmed)
Feb 18 13:12:53 <CIA-6> Finally fix the pesky x86-2.6 block2mtd related crash (#1058)
Feb 18 13:12:53 <CIA-6> When erasing blocks, block2mtd checks the block on the physical disk
Feb 18 13:12:53 <CIA-6> to see if everything's filled with 0xff. When grabbing a page from the page
Feb 18 13:12:53 <CIA-6> cache, it initializes the limit as <start address> + PAGE_SIZE.
Feb 18 13:12:58 <CIA-6> Turns out that the pointer to the status page is (unsigned long *), and
Feb 18 13:12:58 <CIA-6> thus it adds (PAGE_SIZE * 4).
Feb 18 13:14:26 <nbd> ... and there was much rejoicing
Feb 18 13:19:55 <armijn> yay.
Feb 18 13:20:17 <nbd> such a long commit message for a one line change
Feb 18 13:20:18 <armijn> now we can all safely go to sleep
Feb 18 13:20:27 <nbd> but i've been hunting this bug for weeks/months
Feb 18 13:20:28 <armijn> without fearing the world will crash
Feb 18 13:21:03 <armijn> I've been sending 20 bugreports in the last day to GNOME, with just language/translation errors
Feb 18 13:21:23 <nbd> yeah, some translations are just weird
Feb 18 13:21:44 <armijn> my parents have their desktop in Dutch and it is sometimes very confusing
Feb 18 13:21:55 <nbd> some even look like some smart guy ran strings through an automatic translator and fed that back as his own translation
Feb 18 13:22:02 <armijn> so, I hope there will never be something like OpenWrt translations
Feb 18 13:22:15 <nbd> there are some for the old webif :)
Feb 18 13:22:19 <nbd> and for x-wrt webif as well
Feb 18 13:22:27 <nbd> but i don't think we'll do something like that again
Feb 18 13:22:36 <armijn> well, I know about some translations which were done by a 3rd generation Dutch Canadian or American or so
Feb 18 13:22:54 <armijn> who thought he could do it because of his heritage and a course at university or so
Feb 18 13:23:07 <armijn> of course, those translations were beyond poor
Feb 18 13:23:33 <nbd> our system doesn't really need locale stuff and we can leave the fancy webif stuff to x-wrt
Feb 18 13:23:41 <armijn> very smart
Feb 18 13:37:48 <[pjf]> nbd, any news on ar2313 support? :)
Feb 18 13:38:03 <nbd> [pjf]: works except for wifi
Feb 18 13:38:32 <[pjf]> great! will flash
Feb 18 16:07:28 <CIA-6> nbd * r6319 /trunk/docs/ (adding.tex init-scripts.tex): add documentation fixes from #1285
Feb 18 19:40:39 * pjf thinks openwrt devs should consider using --continue option in wget in scripts/download.pl (just restarted download of linux kernel at 96%)
Feb 18 20:49:08 <pjf> why the default linux kernel mirror is the us one? it's ignorance! :)
Feb 18 20:55:35 <Bartman007> <stupidamerican> pjf: nah, you are free to change it, but the US is the most important country in the world </stupidamerican>
Feb 18 20:56:41 <Kaloz> hmz
Feb 18 20:56:48 <Kaloz> anyone here has a di-624?
Feb 18 20:57:08 <pjf> Bartman007: was actually expecting such response ;-)
Feb 18 20:57:30 <Kaloz> specifically i1m looking for someone with a rev D1 or D2 :)
Feb 18 21:20:07 <jr-> kaloz. i have some di-624 model with 1MB flash. dunno rev but that's probably not model you're looking for :)
Feb 18 21:21:03 <Kaloz> jr-: you could be surprised
Feb 18 21:21:20 <Kaloz> jr-: theoritically the rev D stuff is the one with small flash
Feb 18 21:21:27 <Kaloz> jr-: and everyone says it's a crap :)
Feb 18 21:21:45 <Kaloz> i would appreciate if you could take a look at them :)
Feb 18 21:23:14 <jr-> kaloz. this one has 1M flash and 16M ram. runs threadx.
Feb 18 21:23:26 <Kaloz> jr-: i'm interested in the cpu :)
Feb 18 21:23:41 <jr-> some atheros soc 23xx. i'll check.
Feb 18 21:24:08 <Kaloz> jr-: theoritically rev D1 and D2 has AR2314, and as there are no infos on that one i would be happy to get my hands on one or just be able to support/detect it
Feb 18 21:25:03 <jr-> found board. dunno where case is. board has "A01" sticker and "Ver V1.2" silkscreened. it's 2313A
Feb 18 21:25:18 <Kaloz> then it's some rev C
Feb 18 21:25:34 <Kaloz> jr-: fyi theoritically rev C2 or what has 4/16
Feb 18 21:27:02 <jr-> mx 29lv800. that's 1 megabyte to me
Feb 18 21:27:35 <Kaloz> yeah, but yours can be either c1 or c3
Feb 18 21:27:47 <Kaloz> dlink is crazy when it comes to labelling hardware
Feb 18 21:31:16 <jr-> found case. it's rev h1 (fcc id ka2di624vc2)
Feb 18 21:31:46 <Kaloz> heh, that's another one then :)
Feb 18 21:32:12 <Kaloz> let's see... maybe di-524 rev D? someone? :)
Feb 18 22:25:35 <pauldotcom> I am trying to cross-compile some code that uses USB_ENDPOINT_IN as a request type
Feb 18 22:25:56 <pauldotcom> and I get an error "'USB_ENDPOINT_IN' undeclared (first use in this function)"
Feb 18 22:26:04 <pauldotcom> is this not a valid request type?
Feb 18 22:26:14 <armijn> sounds like a missing header file or so
Feb 18 22:26:18 <armijn> (first guess)
Feb 18 22:26:27 <pauldotcom> hrm, I am including usb.sh
Feb 18 22:26:31 <pauldotcom> er usb.h
Feb 18 22:26:38 <armijn> and is it in there?
Feb 18 22:27:19 <pauldotcom> oh, so there is now standard one in the headers for openwrt?
Feb 18 22:27:37 <armijn> I wouldn't know, I only hang around here because of all the cool kids...
Feb 18 22:27:42 <pauldotcom> lol :)
Feb 18 22:27:53 <pauldotcom> I looked at some of the other USB code
Feb 18 22:28:01 <pauldotcom> and it includes "linux/usb.h"
Feb 18 22:28:12 <pauldotcom> which seems to have many of the same declarations as I am using
Feb 18 22:28:20 <pauldotcom> but obviously different, hence the error
Feb 18 22:28:28 <armijn> is this a kernel driver or so?
Feb 18 22:28:41 <pauldotcom> stand alone
Feb 18 22:28:57 <armijn> ehr, but kernel space or user space?
Feb 18 22:29:00 <pauldotcom> its some crappy code to read from a wi-spy dongle
Feb 18 22:29:05 <armijn> ah
Feb 18 22:29:12 <armijn> you sure it doesn't use libusb or so?
Feb 18 22:29:12 <pauldotcom> user space I believe
Feb 18 22:29:15 <armijn> or should use it
Feb 18 22:30:09 <pauldotcom> I will check
Feb 18 22:30:20 <pauldotcom> its got its own TCPlib.h library
Feb 18 22:30:27 <pauldotcom> which I have not looked at yet
Feb 18 22:30:56 <pauldotcom> and the only include is the usb.h
Feb 18 22:31:01 <pauldotcom> which I changed to linux/usb.h
Feb 18 22:31:04 <pauldotcom> and still no luck
Feb 18 22:33:12 <armijn> $ rpm -qf /usr/include/usb.h
Feb 18 22:33:12 <armijn> libusb-devel-0.1.12-5.1
Feb 18 22:33:18 <armijn> so it might in fact be from libusb
Feb 18 22:33:34 <armijn> can this code be downloaded somewhere?
Feb 18 22:33:52 <pauldotcom> ahh, yes
Feb 18 22:33:57 <pauldotcom> I will do that
Feb 18 22:34:29 <pauldotcom> thanks
Feb 18 22:35:07 <wigyori> hi
Feb 18 22:35:13 <wrt> hello
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Mon Feb 19 03:00:00 2007