**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Dec 03 02:59:56 2007
Dec 03 07:35:04 <slapin> hi, all! could anybody help me with gdbserver?
Dec 03 07:35:56 <slapin> I have a problem with it because host-side cross-gdb doesn not see target libraries
Dec 03 07:36:10 <slapin> only linker and uclibc.
Dec 03 07:36:39 <slapin> and no libstdc++, pthread, etc. (that is c++ binary)
Dec 03 07:36:47 <slapin> any ideas?
Dec 03 08:01:51 <jk-> 'set dirs' maybe ?
Dec 03 08:03:41 <jk-> or maybe it's 'set solib-search-path'
Dec 03 09:18:58 <slapin> jk-, and why it sees uclibc but does not see libpthread and libstdc++? my sigsegv occurs in one of these, and also it is unable to do a backtrace at place of sigsegv :( it happens before main()
Dec 03 13:04:42 <witchdoc_> hi
Dec 03 13:04:54 <wrt_> witchdoc_: huh?
Dec 03 13:07:38 <witchdoc_> wrt_: "asay" macro within irssi ;)
Dec 03 15:26:42 <dArk--> hi
Dec 03 15:26:49 <wrt_> dArk--: huh?
Dec 03 19:48:16 <CIA-24> nbd * r9651 /trunk/package/openswan/ (5 files in 2 dirs): update openswan to 0.4.10, reenable 2.6 support, sync with included openwrt packaging code (ported from wr to kamikaze)
Dec 03 21:21:20 <CIA-24> nbd * r9652 /trunk/package/kernel/modules/sound.mk:
Dec 03 21:21:20 <CIA-24> add i8x0 audio driver
Dec 03 21:21:20 <CIA-24> Signed-off-by: Jan Willies <jan@willies.info>
Dec 04 01:34:54 <CIA-24> nbd * r9653 /packages/net/kismet/ (3 files in 2 dirs):
Dec 04 01:34:54 <CIA-24> PATCH: upgrades kismet to 2007-10-R1
Dec 04 01:34:54 <CIA-24> This patch updates kismet to 2007-10-R1. I have been using
Dec 04 01:34:54 <CIA-24> kismet_server compiled from this on r9512 for about a month on a
Dec 04 01:34:54 <CIA-24> wgt634u with no problems.
Dec 04 01:34:55 <CIA-24> Signed-off-by: Russell Senior <seniorr@aracnet.com>
Dec 04 01:38:03 <nabcore> ejka; Do you think the patches in https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/2569 and the suggestion in https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/2791 are ready to be applied?
Dec 04 02:06:19 <Bartman007> damnit, I forgot about the 24c3, arg.
Dec 04 02:09:44 <nbd> but you're going to come, right?
Dec 04 02:09:59 <Bartman007> no, I can't.
Dec 04 02:10:14 <Bartman007> I was too busy with school, neglected to ask for time off from work.
Dec 04 02:10:38 <nbd> too bad
Dec 04 02:10:42 <Bartman007> I can swing a cheap flight (actually three) but I can't get time off work.
Dec 04 02:10:55 <Bartman007> ugh.
Dec 04 02:11:14 <nbd> are you sure you can't get time off work?
Dec 04 02:11:37 <nbd> just tell your employer it's important ;)
Dec 04 02:13:46 <Bartman007> I'll have to double check... Hopefully I can sneak it in.
Dec 04 02:17:39 <jk-> cool, what are you planning to speak about there ?
Dec 04 02:20:41 <nbd> i don't have a lecture this time, i just want an informal meeting with lots of people involved with or interested in openwrt
Dec 04 02:21:10 <jk-> sorry, "speak" in the general term..
Dec 04 02:21:16 <jk-> "chat about" :D
Dec 04 02:21:31 <nbd> well, whatever comes up ;)
Dec 04 02:21:41 <nbd> i'm sure there's lots of interesting topics to pick from ;)
Dec 04 02:22:15 <jk-> one idea..
Dec 04 02:22:31 <jk-> is there any "proper" way to do mulitarch/biarch on openwrt ?
Dec 04 02:22:45 <nbd> not yet
Dec 04 02:23:01 <jk-> I'd like to have an install that provides both 32- and 64- bit libc
Dec 04 02:23:25 <jk-> I'm happy to hack away on it, but if there's a general plan, I can work with that.
Dec 04 02:23:32 <nbd> no plan yet
Dec 04 02:23:34 <jk-> ok.
Dec 04 02:25:02 <jk-> was just thinking (initially) about a coupld of config options:
Dec 04 02:25:17 <jk-> CONFIG_UCLIBC_SECONDARY_TARGET=powerpc64-linux-unknown-uclibc
Dec 04 02:25:39 <jk-> CONFIG_UCLIBC_SECONDARY_LIBPATH=lib64
Dec 04 02:25:56 <jk-> ie "build target x, and put it in path y"
Dec 04 02:26:38 <nbd> the question is, do you need it all built in one pass?
Dec 04 02:26:45 <nbd> because it looks to me like a rather rare configuration
Dec 04 02:27:16 <nbd> and adding a 'second target' for some packages does not seem to fit into the design very well
Dec 04 02:27:32 <jk-> hm, i guess not.
Dec 04 02:28:04 <jk-> yeah, that's the problem - it doesn't fit well into the Makefile system :/
Dec 04 02:30:01 <nbd> if you have some ideas on how the makefile system could be changed to handle this better, i'm open for suggestions
Dec 04 02:31:31 <jk-> heh, I'm still getting my head around it at the moment, I'll let you know if I come up with anything.
Dec 04 02:31:37 <nbd> ok
Dec 04 02:31:59 <jk-> It is a pretty rare situation though, so I don't want to cause large infrastructure changes for something that's not going to get used much.
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Dec 04 02:59:56 2007