**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Nov 29 02:59:58 2010 Nov 29 03:17:29 build #36 of ppc44x is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/ppc44x/builds/36 Nov 29 03:25:29 flyn * r24192 /packages/ (libs/libdmapsharing/Makefile net/dmapd/Makefile): Update dmapd and libdmapsharing to new upstream versions Nov 29 03:49:40 can someone please commit this trivial package patch? thanx http://openwrt.pastebin.ca/2005185 Nov 29 03:53:13 build #38 of orion is complete: Failure [failed shell_4] Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/38 Nov 29 06:03:50 <[florian]> cshore: pong Nov 29 06:04:15 [florian]: did you see my pm? Nov 29 06:05:39 <[florian]> cshore: yes I did Nov 29 07:38:15 cshore: it was intentional Nov 29 07:38:28 can someone please commit this trivial package patch? thanx http://openwrt.pastebin.ca/2005185 Nov 29 07:39:11 Kaloz: we still need ext3 for extroot for now Nov 29 07:39:34 Kaloz: ext4 module doesn't work with mini_fo Nov 29 07:41:32 cshore: how so? Nov 29 07:42:35 for example chown hangs on ext4 as an overlay over root with mini_fo Nov 29 07:43:15 ext4 is fine on it's own, and mini_fo for jffs2 over root works Nov 29 07:43:45 wondering how long can we keep mini_fo around Nov 29 07:43:54 Kaloz: ext3 doesn't have the problem Nov 29 07:44:08 Kaloz: well, we don't have a replacement yet Nov 29 07:44:38 Kaloz: but I think you're right, mini_fo isn't up to modern stuff Nov 29 07:45:10 no one? Nov 29 07:45:42 Kaloz: and the alternatives are all larger Nov 29 07:49:31 cshore: question is, how much larger are they Nov 29 08:00:10 nobody can commit that? Nov 29 08:18:01 is anyone even here? Nov 29 09:03:39 build #35 of rb532 is complete: Failure [failed shell_4] Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/rb532/builds/35 Nov 29 11:48:34 cshore: ping Nov 29 12:05:59 ping thepeople Nov 29 12:22:16 nbd: ping Nov 29 12:22:19 pong Nov 29 12:23:29 do you know someone who I could ask to solder pins to devices (for a small amount or donation to project of his/her choice)? I can't solder for my life ;) Nov 29 12:25:07 no idea Nov 29 12:25:32 you could ask around in c-base on wednesday Nov 29 12:25:49 usually there are a few people there that are good at soldering Nov 29 12:26:06 hm okay, I'll try that Nov 29 12:34:06 mirko_: I couldn't by chance ask you? ;) Nov 29 12:46:16 KanjiMonster: hu? hm? Nov 29 12:46:37 KanjiMonster: you are? :) Nov 29 12:53:26 mirko_: I am looking for someone who could solder serial pins to boards for me since I can't solder (of course not for free), and I thought maybe I can ask you, assuming you know how (also, I am sitting at the zedat ;) Nov 29 12:54:01 ah Nov 29 12:54:08 yeah, should be no problem Nov 29 12:54:26 great Nov 29 12:55:46 just read tomorrow all my stuff got cancelled so i would have time there - not sure whether i'm going to cbase on wednesday.. Nov 29 13:29:58 build #32 of x86 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/x86/builds/32 Nov 29 13:38:47 build #33 of ar7 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/ar7/builds/33 Nov 29 14:53:42 ping Kaloz Nov 29 14:53:49 pong Kaloz I mean Nov 29 14:55:10 ping thepeople Nov 29 15:02:20 can someone please commit this trivial package patch? thanx http://openwrt.pastebin.ca/2005185 Nov 29 15:04:11 jow * r24193 /packages/net/ddns-scripts/ (4 files in 2 dirs): [packages] ddns-scripts: add editdns.net provider Nov 29 15:05:17 done Nov 29 15:05:17 thank you Nov 29 15:05:29 I accidentally committed some bugfixes as it seems... Nov 29 15:05:37 lol Nov 29 15:05:56 sn9: hmm....I couldn't get it to apply here, but Jo already got it... Nov 29 15:06:16 btw, luci still won't allow selecting "custom" Nov 29 15:07:51 in trunk? Nov 29 15:10:47 afaik its just a display bug, selecting custom causes option service_name to be empty and the dropdown list will revert to its intial value Nov 29 15:11:04 but that causes update_url to be hidden which in turn should remove the option Nov 29 15:23:12 however, should be fixed now Nov 29 15:23:28 jow_laptop: no, it actually causes the provider to change to changeip.com, or at least it did Nov 29 15:23:42 yep Nov 29 15:24:03 http://luci.subsignal.org/trac/changeset/6588 Nov 29 15:25:40 Does anyone know why the openwrt-kirkwood-Dockstar-jffs2-128k.img firmware is not available at http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/kirkwood/? Nov 29 15:26:31 raubvogel: the buildbots currently do not build subtargets Nov 29 15:26:42 raubvogel: and Kirkwood is a subtarget Nov 29 15:26:46 erm Dockstar Nov 29 15:27:30 jow_laptop: club mate @27c3? Nov 29 15:27:41 jow_laptop, but the sheevaplug is not considered a subtarget? Nov 29 15:27:50 danage: I'll not attend this year, sorry Nov 29 15:27:57 jow_laptop: :( Nov 29 15:29:53 Yesterday, I just did 'svn up; to r24191 and rebuild my local OpenWRT SVN Development trunk. It produced the openwrt-kirkwood-Sheevaplug-jffs2-128k.img fimrware without a problem. Nov 29 15:30:15 mazilo: the buildbots currently do not build subtargets Nov 29 15:30:33 mazilo: and Dockstar is a subtarget Nov 29 15:31:18 or Sheevaplug in your case Nov 29 15:32:02 I use scripts/env to handle all my builds. So, I had to manually delete all the build directories for marvell kirkwood. If anyone here knows how to do this with a single clean instructions, please let me know. 'make distclean' will remove all my builds from all enviroments, so it is not an option for me. Nov 29 15:32:20 jow_laptop: I selected sheeveplug. Nov 29 15:33:54 jow_laptop: My DockStar is still using the original u-boot. So, SheevaPlug subtarget will work just fine for my DockStar. Nov 29 15:34:53 Is it possible to support a 1-stage u-boot for DockStar? If so, what parameters should I change? Nov 29 15:38:52 mazilo: best is you ask Kaloz or larsc Nov 29 15:40:09 jow_laptop: Thanks. Nov 29 15:40:36 BTW, I just did another 'svnup' and noticed the 'livestats' has been removed from luci/Makefile. Why? Nov 29 15:40:52 because its in core now Nov 29 15:41:00 the new ones are way better Nov 29 15:41:04 jow_laptop: Thanks. Nov 29 15:41:18 well wifi snr is missing yet but I'll implement that later Nov 29 16:27:21 build #35 of sibyte is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/sibyte/builds/35 Nov 29 16:30:47 mazilo: do you by any chance have any ar7 devices you can test openwrt images on? Nov 29 16:36:52 ping thepeople Nov 29 16:36:58 hi Nov 29 16:44:25 sn9: Yes. I have a Fry's Electronics FR-54RTR. The problem is the build does no longer produce firmware image for the DLink DIR-600 Rev. A1. Nov 29 16:46:57 mazilo: which cpu and switch chip does that have? Nov 29 16:48:16 and i have never seen a fry's-branded ar7 device. the fry's stores here carry ar7 devices under several brands, though, especially actiontec Nov 29 16:49:59 wait, both the fry's and the d-link are ar7? Nov 29 16:50:09 sn9: AFAIK, it is a DLink DIR-600 rev.A1 that uses AR7 chipset. I have it flashed with OpenWRT built firmware for DLink DIR-600 rev.A1 back in 2010/09 and it works. But, since then, a lot of improvements have been committed to the latest trunk. Nov 29 16:50:58 do you know which exact cpu is in the d-link and the fry's? Nov 29 16:52:13 sn9: no and I don't know. But, I just followed posts in this discussion thread (https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=23626) to flash my Fry's Electronics FR-54RTR NAT/Firewall Router sans any problems. Nov 29 16:53:25 oh, you have one device by two different names... Nov 29 16:53:32 sn9: If you read the OP on that discussion thread, the 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' reveals it has an Atheros AR7240 rev 2 CPU/ Nov 29 16:53:54 then it has nothing to do with ar7 Nov 29 16:54:22 ar71xx and ar7 are unrelated Nov 29 16:54:26 sn9: Argh. I see your point. I am sorry that I got mixed up with ar7xx. Nov 29 16:55:20 sn9: I do have some Linksys/Vonage PAP2v2 as well as Linksys/Vonage WRTP54G VoIP WiFi routers based on the TI-AR7 chipset. Nov 29 16:56:11 sn9: But, I never bothered with flashing OpenWRT on my WRTP54G because it doesn't seem to support its Voice Module. Nov 29 16:56:47 for example, that wrtp54g-er has a tnetv1060zdw, but that is a titan chip, and titan support is currently incomplete. i want to make sure vlynq and cpmac work in various configs of the sangam (7300) and ohio (7100/7200) chips first Nov 29 16:57:33 the wrtp54g has the same voice module as the wag54gp2, which has the 7300 cpu Nov 29 16:58:05 that device may be a test case for it once cpmac and vlynq are established working Nov 29 16:58:53 we had a guy actually get a chip driver for that voice module, but the vlynq interface to that chip still needs to be reverse-engineered Nov 29 17:00:56 sn9: IIRC, the Voice Module uses a chipset from Legarity(?) which has GPLed its source code if I am not mistaken. Nov 29 17:00:59 hm. are these tp-link devices any good? 741 and such? Nov 29 17:02:37 yes, the company that bought legerity, whose name escapes me atm, gpl'ed legerity's driver Nov 29 17:03:43 and they did so upon the request of the person to whom i refer, whose irc nick also escapes me atm Nov 29 17:03:45 sn9: According to what you said above, the GPLed source codes won't work without the vlying interface? Nov 29 17:03:56 e.g. http://www.kmelektronik.de/shop/index.php?show=product_info&GID=301&MID=22&ArtNr=28941 Nov 29 17:04:49 the driver is for just the chip, with the host interface part to be provided by a board driver Nov 29 17:04:49 sn9: I am hoping this isn't the case. This way, OpenWRT can start exploiting the GPLed source codes to support Voice Module. Nov 29 17:10:23 mazilo: so, do any of your ti-ar7 devices have a 7[123]00 cpu? Nov 29 17:10:50 sn9: Honestly, I wouldn't know. Nov 29 17:11:14 sn9: BTW, do you know if there is any work in progress to reverse engineer the vlying codes? Nov 29 17:12:42 sn9: For a Linksys/Vonage WRTP54G, I thought it does have a 7x00 CPU, doesn't it? Nov 29 17:12:59 i do not know about efforts made since my initial work to make the vlynq bus driver not simply hang when seeing the voice module, but you could probably ask DagMoller in #wrtp54g Nov 29 17:13:29 the wrtp54g has a 10x0 Nov 29 17:13:32 sn9: Thanks for that information. Nov 29 17:13:59 sn9: so, that is a complete different chipset. Nov 29 17:14:09 no, it is still ar7 Nov 29 17:14:47 sn9: oh IC what you meant. Nov 29 17:15:05 but the 10x0 series (the "titan" chips) have some internal differences, and support for them is far less complete atm Nov 29 17:17:54 after vlynq and cpmac are verified working correctly on different configs of 7x00, more work can be done on 10x0 Nov 29 17:18:17 sn9: IC your points now. Nov 29 17:20:30 once openwrt boots properly and consistently on 10x0 devices, the vlynq interfaces for the voice module on the wrtp54g and the wag54gp2 can be compared to each other as the first step for reverse engineering the host interface linksys used for the voice module Nov 29 17:22:29 sn9: Right now, my WRTP54G is in operation (being used) with my asterisk as extensions. So, I can't test this, unfortunately. Nov 29 17:22:51 only looking for 7x00 devices to test atm Nov 29 17:23:04 sn9: I hope someone will be able to salvage a WRTP54G to make this test happens. Nov 29 17:23:39 7x00 has to work first Nov 29 18:05:03 loswillios: ping Nov 29 19:13:13 build #35 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed shell_4] Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/35 Nov 29 21:19:29 build #32 of ixp4xx is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/ixp4xx/builds/32 Nov 29 21:33:49 build #31 of etrax is complete: Failure [failed compile_3] Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/etrax/builds/31 Nov 30 00:40:51 tripolar: pong Nov 30 00:41:55 thepeople hello, could i get write access to tor and privoxy? Nov 30 00:42:16 id like to maintain these packages too Nov 30 00:42:26 tripolar: ok, I will get you access to them Nov 30 00:42:32 thanks Nov 30 00:43:15 and could u also update openssl to 1.0.0b - i submitted a patch to the ml Nov 30 00:43:45 1.0.0b doesnt need the ocf patch anymore - its already included Nov 30 00:43:54 tripolar: I can look at it, I don't have time to test it tonight Nov 30 00:44:14 no need to hurry - i already use it ;) Nov 30 00:44:27 :-) Nov 30 00:44:29 but you have to rebuild all progs that need openssl Nov 30 00:44:47 need/are linked to Nov 30 00:45:22 I wish the buildsystem would do that automatically :) Nov 30 00:45:41 Or does it? Nov 30 00:46:27 Probably does it, if the version info changes... now sure. hm Nov 30 00:46:30 not Nov 30 00:50:42 mb__: I think it does Nov 30 00:50:51 but yea not 100% Nov 30 00:50:57 sure Nov 30 00:54:40 jow * r24194 /trunk/package/base-files/files/lib/network/config.sh: [package] base-files: disable ipv6 on bridge ports, this prevents stray RA assigned and link local addresses on bridge member devices Nov 30 01:50:37 build #32 of kirkwood is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/kirkwood/builds/32 Nov 30 02:01:11 jow * r24195 /trunk/target/linux/generic/ (14 files in 7 dirs): Nov 30 02:01:11 [kernel] backport two changes from kernel.org: Nov 30 02:01:11 65e9b62d4503849b10bedfc29bff0473760cc597 Nov 30 02:01:11 ipv6: add special mode accept_ra=2 to accept RA while configured as router Nov 30 02:01:11 c3bccac2fa76f1619dfe4fb7b9bee69de7f066d8 Nov 30 02:01:11 ipv6: add special mode forwarding=2 to send RS while configured as router Nov 30 02:13:16 jow * r24196 /trunk/target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile: [ar71xx] add a new image for the TEW-652BRP which can be used with the bootloader recovery option Nov 30 02:14:02 jow * r24197 /branches/backfire/target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile: [backfire] merge r24196 Nov 30 02:23:33 build #35 of ar71xx is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/ar71xx/builds/35 Nov 30 02:32:35 does anyone know if there is some way to read the original registers of rtl8366s ? **** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Nov 30 02:59:57 2010