**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Dec 29 02:59:57 2010 Dec 29 06:56:55 swalker * r24845 /packages/admin/sudo/ (Makefile patches/): Dec 29 06:56:55 [packages] sudo: update to 1.7.4p4 Dec 29 06:56:55 * disable zlib I/O log compression Dec 29 06:56:55 * build without lecture support since /var is a tmpfs mount Dec 29 06:56:55 * drop the local patch as upstream no longer strips binaries Dec 29 08:58:21 so I have a question, is it not possible to downlooad openwrt with git yet? Dec 29 08:58:30 alesan: yes it is Dec 29 08:58:44 I doi not find it on dev.openwrt.org Dec 29 08:58:50 alesan: git://nbd.name/openwrt.git Dec 29 08:59:04 and packages.git for packages, you can put it in feeds.conf Dec 29 08:59:10 and backfire.git for backfire branch Dec 29 08:59:11 https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/GetSource Dec 29 08:59:24 ah :) Dec 29 08:59:29 ok ok I need the dev part only Dec 29 08:59:35 not a release Dec 29 09:00:08 so it used to be that "kamikaze" was the trunk Dec 29 09:00:13 now backfire is not the trunk? Dec 29 09:00:40 trunk was never renamed Dec 29 09:00:55 so its still called kamikaze, until the devs agree on a code name for trunk Dec 29 09:01:12 backfire is the current release branch Dec 29 09:01:56 but backfire came after kamikaze Dec 29 09:02:21 doesn't matter Dec 29 09:02:50 we're all aware that still calling trunk "Kamikaze" is confusing Dec 29 09:02:56 what is best, git or svn? Dec 29 09:03:08 I mean, is git merely a "copy" of the svn? Dec 29 09:03:14 yes it is Dec 29 09:03:28 what Dec 29 09:03:37 it is a copy you mean Dec 29 09:03:43 openwrt's native vcs is svn, the git mirror at nbd.name is a clone, yes Dec 29 09:03:52 so the "main" is svn? Dec 29 09:03:54 its only a few minutes behind Dec 29 09:04:00 yes, main is svn Dec 29 09:04:01 any plan to move defnitely to git? Dec 29 09:04:04 no Dec 29 09:04:18 strange... Dec 29 09:04:35 I think it would be a good thing but stop talking now Dec 29 09:04:43 it's time to do things :) Dec 29 09:05:22 nobody could yet explain why moving the main repo to git would improve anything, aprart from the fact that git is the cool thing nowadays Dec 29 09:06:42 how can I say Dec 29 09:06:52 git would be perfect for a project like openwrt Dec 29 09:06:56 why? Dec 29 09:07:50 give me a second that I start the checkout Dec 29 09:10:51 oh Dec 29 09:11:02 actually I thought openwrt was "bigger" Dec 29 09:11:23 so xMff I know you are a very dedicated and enthusiast person Dec 29 09:11:28 if you have two hours Dec 29 09:11:56 have a look at two "google videos": one is Linux speaking, and he's very... well, interesting. Dec 29 09:12:04 only halve an hour at mx, have to get the train to budapest Dec 29 09:12:20 the other is a much more "rational" speech. Dec 29 09:12:36 both are extremely interesting and will give you the answers you need to decide. Dec 29 09:12:45 well you can watch when you want, I will give you the links Dec 29 09:13:16 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8 this is the first Dec 29 09:13:32 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dhZ9BXQgc4 the second Dec 29 09:13:51 in any case I thought openwrt's svn was much bigger Dec 29 09:14:05 it only gets bigger when it downloads all the toolchain and such Dec 29 09:14:39 openwrt is just a bunch of makefiles and patches, I would understand the need for git if we would maintain complete kernel trees and stuff but for the way we manage the sources atm I see no big advantage for git on the main repo. As for the client aspect, you can either use the mirrors or git-svn to work with git on the frontend. As most people have no commit access anyway and contributions happen through patches the choice of the backend repo does not m Dec 29 09:15:01 but now that you mention you need to take the train often to go back home, git would be so much superior than svn because it's distributed Dec 29 09:15:08 see above Dec 29 09:15:59 of course you can use git-svn but if you do that it means you like git more that svn :) Dec 29 09:16:06 anyway Dec 29 09:16:21 I am not here to defend git and I am not even an expert of git Dec 29 09:16:29 :) Dec 29 09:16:50 personally I can work very efficiently with svn and still need to lookup any operation for git, so my choice is clear :P Dec 29 09:38:50 oh I think there is a little bug Dec 29 09:39:20 # make FORCE=1 .... Build dependency: Please do not compile as root. Prerequisite check failed. Use FORCE=1 to override. Dec 29 09:41:56 jow * r24846 /trunk/tools/missing-macros/ (Makefile src/README src/m4/as-ac-expand.m4): [tools] missing-macros: add as-ac-expand.m4 Dec 29 09:53:15 is there a canonical place to configure sysconf stuff in uci land? Dec 29 09:53:34 no Dec 29 09:54:03 okay, thanks Dec 29 09:54:14 * russell-- can stop looking ;) Dec 29 10:09:48 <[florian]> cshore_: kmod-switch does not handle SPI switches right now Dec 29 10:11:13 back on november 9th, it was suggested to remove kmod-usb-ohci for WGT634U, this works for me: http://www.pastebin.ca/2032998 Dec 29 10:11:52 (was discussed briefly on the openwrt-devel ml) Dec 29 10:12:57 it's not used, just throws errors during boot. the native usb port uses kmod-usb2 instead. Dec 29 10:32:31 hello Dec 29 11:53:16 xMff: I am now back to where I got with bernhard's patches, i.e. booting to serial console; but this time I understand all changes to the code since I did them myself ;) Now I have to make some design desitions and put it into sensible commits. Dec 29 12:29:22 Kanji what you changing ? Dec 29 12:37:06 vot: trying to get the new bcm47xx to work, in an upstream compatible way Dec 29 12:41:17 Ah Dec 29 13:27:06 acoul * r24847 /trunk/target/linux/generic/patches-2.6.37/ (21 files): target/linux: sync to kernel 2.6.37-rc8, refresh patches Dec 29 14:53:40 acoul * r24848 /trunk/package/e2fsprogs/Makefile: package/e2fsprogs: update to version 1.41.14 Dec 29 15:45:58 build #50 of rb532 is complete: Failure [failed shell_9] Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/rb532/builds/50 Dec 29 16:06:25 build #55 of ppc40x is complete: Failure [failed shell_9] Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/ppc40x/builds/55 Dec 29 16:22:48 florian * r24849 /trunk/target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-2.6.35/240-spi.patch: Dec 29 16:22:48 [brcm63xx] multiple SPI driver fixes Dec 29 16:22:48 - fix platform device registration Dec 29 16:22:48 - fix chipselect, command register defines, add missing clock Dec 29 16:22:48 - make slave select proper Dec 29 16:22:48 - fix multibytes transferts Dec 29 16:22:48 Signed-off-by: Tanguy Bouzéloc Dec 29 17:31:49 juhosg * r24850 /trunk/target/linux/generic/ (5 files): generic: add CONFIG_DEBUG_ICEDCC symbol Dec 29 17:41:36 acoul * r24851 /trunk/tools/e2fsprogs/ (Makefile patches/004-big_endian_compile_fix.patch): tools/e2fsprogs: update to version 1.41.14 Dec 29 17:43:47 hello Dec 29 17:45:51 have some troubles to make OpenWRT running as Xen domU with PCI passthrough Dec 29 17:46:15 it seems that xen pci frontend driver is not included into kernel. Is there any available patch ? Dec 29 18:11:57 juhosg * r24852 /trunk/target/linux/generic/ (5 files): generic: add missing CONFIG_KEYBOARD_* symbols Dec 29 18:11:57 juhosg * r24853 /trunk/package/kernel/modules/other.mk: package/kernel: enable CONFIG_INPUT_KEYBOARD for gpio-keys Dec 29 20:04:31 juhosg * r24854 /trunk/target/linux/generic/ (5 files in 5 dirs): generic: update ARM mach-types Dec 30 01:13:23 I can't access to http://wiki.openwrt.org site. Is it currently down? **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Dec 30 02:59:58 2010