**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Apr 25 02:59:57 2011 Apr 25 03:37:57 build #16 of pxcab is complete: Failure [failed compile_3] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/pxcab/builds/16 Apr 25 05:09:27 join #dorkbotpdx Apr 25 05:09:46 oops, sry Apr 25 08:02:01 build #19 of s3c24xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/s3c24xx/builds/19 Apr 25 09:51:56 build #19 of brcm63xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_6] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm63xx/builds/19 Apr 25 10:08:49 build #16 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_7] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/16 Apr 25 11:44:04 build #15 of au1000 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/au1000/builds/15 Apr 25 12:14:37 build #18 of brcm47xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_6] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm47xx/builds/18 Apr 25 12:16:33 build #17 of cobalt is complete: Failure [failed shell] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/cobalt/builds/17 Apr 25 12:23:31 build #16 of lantiq is complete: Failure [failed compile_6] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/lantiq/builds/16 Apr 25 14:03:08 build #16 of ramips is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ramips/builds/16 Apr 25 17:46:24 build #16 of uml is complete: Failure [failed compile_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/uml/builds/16 Apr 25 18:21:38 nbd * r26752 /trunk/package/mac80211/patches/ (300-revert_regd_breakage.patch 406-regd_no_assoc_hints.patch): cfg80211: revert upstream regdomain handling breakage Apr 25 18:21:43 nbd * r26753 /trunk/package/mac80211/patches/530-ath9k_fix_reported_signal_strength.patch: ath9k: remove the signal strength fix, it causes a lot of confusion and seems to be just as inaccurate as the original version of the code Apr 25 18:22:09 I agree Apr 25 19:09:49 build #16 of rb532 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/rb532/builds/16 Apr 25 20:28:51 build #17 of x86 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86/builds/17 Apr 25 20:36:38 luka * r26754 /packages/utils/lvm2/ (Makefile patches/100-readline-link.patch): upgrade lvm2 package Apr 25 20:37:23 luka * r26755 /packages/utils/mdadm/ (Makefile patches/001-makefile-fixes.patch): upgrade mdadm package Apr 25 21:21:02 build #13 of mpc52xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc52xx/builds/13 Apr 25 21:24:16 luka * r26756 /packages/utils/lvm2/patches/100-cross_compile.patch: add lvm2 cross compile fix Apr 25 21:24:52 jow * r26757 /packages/utils/mdadm/Makefile: [packages] mdadm: fix typo in r26755 Apr 25 21:28:01 Olipro: isc dhcpv6? I don't recall any recent changes on that - whats wrong with it? Apr 25 21:28:45 er, do you remember the stuff I showed you a while back in the ISC tars? Apr 25 21:28:56 newer daemon + config files Apr 25 21:29:13 and some support stuff for OpenWRT too (although you said it was ugly and needed fixing up) Apr 25 21:29:33 oh yes I do Apr 25 21:29:45 I had no time working on that, anybody else did something? Apr 25 21:48:30 luka * r26758 /packages/utils/lm-sensors/Makefile: upgrade lm-sensors package Apr 25 21:49:32 xMff: got a question about allowing IPsec passthru by default in the firewall config. Apr 25 21:51:05 philipp64|laptop: I disagree with it being platform specific, and most people disagree with it being default. I could offer a commented example Apr 25 21:57:27 luka * r26759 /packages/utils/mdadm/patches/100-cross_compile.patch: rename mdadm patch Apr 25 22:00:58 jow_laptop: thanks for mdadm fix :) Apr 25 22:01:58 luka12345|wiik: np, I did not notice you're still active Apr 25 22:02:26 why? did i miss something Apr 25 22:02:50 * russell-- thought he'd just mention http://patchwork.midlink.org/patch/926/ in passing Apr 25 22:03:07 no, I just try to avoid interfering with other peoples commits, you never know what is yet to come Apr 25 22:05:05 that is ok, but i clearly did not see typo that jow fixed in r26757 Apr 25 22:05:53 * xMff = jow ... just to avoid further confusion Apr 25 22:06:02 can somebody here add my commit rights to mc package? Apr 25 22:06:24 you must ask thepeople so he can tell the admin Apr 25 22:06:26 i would like to commit a patch that would close some tickets... Apr 25 22:06:45 xMff: i did a week ago Apr 25 22:06:58 but things are going slowly :) Apr 25 22:07:10 yeah, one week sounds like a usual timeframe Apr 25 22:07:14 might take a few days more Apr 25 22:08:08 i'll send it now on the list so somebody can commit in the meantime Apr 25 22:08:13 okay Apr 25 22:10:32 xMff: back... yeah, I was wondering if there's an easy way to add stuff to existing UCI files but have it be commented out. Apr 25 22:10:35 xMff: alright I'll have a pop at it myself in that case, just promise me that if I do it, the package won't end up sat on the back burner :) Apr 25 22:11:11 luka * r26760 /packages/utils/mdadm/patches/001-makefile-fixes.patch: remove old mdadm patch Apr 25 22:11:37 philipp64|laptop: someone proposed disable options for firewall rules, that'd allow for such constructs. But it is not implemented yet Apr 25 22:15:18 yeah, or even having a "prefix" command for UCI which would allow sections to be prefixed with an indent or a comment marker, etc. Apr 25 22:24:19 philipp64|laptop: you can add comments to an uci file by putting a hash (#) in the first column, you just have to do it for the entire section (i.e. you can comment within a used section AFAIK but you can have an entire commented section) Apr 25 22:24:36 (you can't comment, I mean) Apr 25 22:32:55 I'm thinking of the case where there's a default /etc/config/firewall file, and through the use of a files/etc/uci-defaults/xxx file I want to add new sections to it... but be disabled or commented out. Apr 25 22:34:02 well for the ipsec pass-through I see no reason not to do that as a commented out section globally Apr 25 22:40:11 works for me. Apr 25 23:14:01 xMff: please commit the mc patch i have sent on the list: https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2011-April/010637.html Apr 25 23:14:18 thanks Apr 26 01:23:36 nbd * r26761 /trunk/package/mac80211/patches/ (300-pending_work.patch 300-revert_regd_breakage.patch): mac80211: replace the regd revert patch with a proper fix, add some more pending patches Apr 26 01:55:05 build #20 of at91 is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/at91/builds/20 Apr 26 02:14:01 build #20 of ubicom32 is complete: Failure [failed compile_3] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ubicom32/builds/20 Apr 26 02:57:41 build #16 of sibyte is complete: Failure [failed shell compile_6] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sibyte/builds/16 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Apr 26 02:59:57 2011