**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Oct 04 02:59:58 2011
Oct 04 09:18:12 <CIA-73> florian * r28363 /trunk/target/linux/malta/ (be/config-default le/config-default): [malta] add missing kernel config symbols
Oct 04 15:39:30 <Chocks> nbd: pingy
Oct 04 15:41:31 <nbd> Chocks: pong
Oct 04 15:41:49 <Chocks> nbd: suggest that latest mac80211 changes have given me a stable connection.
Oct 04 15:42:07 <nbd> cool
Oct 04 15:42:11 <Chocks> hawwwt
Oct 04 17:32:02 <cshore> hmmm...I've been asked if there have been any new 'features' in the openwrt base system since a six-month-old revision.  There's been a lots of improvements and enhancements, but not so sure about 'feature' though (depends on your definition I suppose).
Oct 04 17:42:46 <jow_laptop> cshore: not really, mostly little things
Oct 04 17:43:24 <cshore> Thanks Jo, that's what I thought....it's been a busy six months, eh?
Oct 04 17:45:13 <cshore> Ah, it seems they really want to know about the ath9k and wifi...and any improvements other than stability
Oct 04 17:45:27 <cshore> they already know about that :)
Oct 04 17:45:33 <cshore> and are happy with it
Oct 04 19:44:49 <slonopotamus> mb__: ping?
Oct 04 19:45:59 <mb__> slonopotamus: pong
Oct 04 19:47:51 <slonopotamus> mb__: copying from #openwrt: i was playing with openwrt kernel patches for n810 support and, to be honest, you rock. sadly, i have n800 here and its support is much worse. most important missing things are keypad and touchscreen (TSC2301). any chance its support could be added? tsc2301 was present in linux-omap around 2.6.27 but then was removed when they did a reset against mainline.
Oct 04 19:48:46 <mb__> sure those things can be added. But I don't have such a device.
Oct 04 19:49:48 <mb__> So you may prepare patches
Oct 04 19:49:48 <mb__> I'd also like to update to 3.0 or something, but didn't have the time, yet
Oct 04 19:52:45 <slonopotamus> mb__: meh, connectivity issues. if you have answered smth, i missed it :(
Oct 04 19:54:51 <mb__> (09:46:10 PM) mb__: sure those things can be added. But I don't have such a device.
Oct 04 19:54:51 <mb__> (09:46:16 PM) mb__: So you may prepare patches
Oct 04 19:54:51 <mb__> (09:46:32 PM) mb__: I'd also like to update to 3.0 or something, but didn't have the time, yet
Oct 04 19:55:22 <mb__> There are quite some updates to cbus in the omap tree that are wat
Oct 04 19:55:25 <mb__> waiting, too
Oct 04 19:55:42 <mb__> but I'm planning to get to those things
Oct 04 19:57:20 <slonopotamus> So you may prepare patches << as if that was easy to do :)
Oct 04 19:58:02 <mb__> Well I don't think it's too hard, if you are a programmer
Oct 04 19:58:18 <mb__> Those old drivers just have to be ported to the new kernel.
Oct 04 19:58:26 <slonopotamus> i am, though not a kernel one
Oct 04 19:58:46 <mb__> Ok, yeah then there might be a steep learning curve
Oct 04 19:59:26 <mb__> So what's missing? Just the touchscreen and the keypad?
Oct 04 19:59:31 <mb__> Does the display work?
Oct 04 20:00:46 <mb__> I'm actually currently having a hard time with the DSP on the n810, too. There's no driver. But the bootloader leaves it in an unfortunate state so that it drains more power than needed.
Oct 04 20:00:47 <slonopotamus> mb__: https://github.com/slonopotamus/n8x0-overlay/wiki/modern-kernel shortly describes current status. display, wifi, mmc - all work. but touchscreen/keypad/sound (all served by single chip) do not.
Oct 04 20:01:14 <slonopotamus> i don't care about sound much but touchscreen/keypad are the only n800 inputs
Oct 04 20:01:28 <mb__> Yeah but sound is an issue
Oct 04 20:01:50 <mb__> It needs to be turned off properly, at least
Oct 04 20:02:15 <slonopotamus> well, i got your point. will try to mess with it myself
Oct 04 20:02:29 <mb__> cool
Oct 04 20:02:30 <slonopotamus> prepare for loads of kernel questions :)
Oct 04 20:03:24 <mb__> I'm fine ;)
Oct 04 20:04:08 <slonopotamus> mb__: wrt sound - diablo kernel has all code for n8x0 hw, i'm planning to take stuff from there and adopt it to recent kernel
Oct 04 20:05:08 <slonopotamus> mb__: btw, dunno if you're the right person but p54spi BUGs when CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled
Oct 04 20:05:31 <mb__> oh
Oct 04 20:05:42 <slonopotamus> works perfectly when it is disabled
Oct 04 20:05:44 <mb__> I run preempt kernel and it doesn't do that for me
Oct 04 20:05:52 <mb__> Do you have a backtrace?
Oct 04 20:06:09 <mb__> (Well I also didn't test for some time, so there might have been changes)
Oct 04 20:06:37 <slonopotamus> i could get a backtrace, yep (it's saved in dmesg, right?)
Oct 04 20:06:52 <mb__> yeah
Oct 04 20:18:23 <slonopotamus> mb__: oh, what should i do to enable charging stuff? i compiled charging support into kernel but plugging charger in/out leaves no traces in dmesg
Oct 04 20:19:36 <mb__> The driver for changing is not finished, yet
Oct 04 20:20:28 <mb__> The calibration stuff is still missing. The original nokia driver uses software floating point for that and the disassembly screws my brains. I should probably run those parts in an emulator and find out that way what they are doing...
Oct 04 20:20:40 <slonopotamus> as in "use at your own risk and say you wasn't warned" or it isn't enabled yet?
Oct 04 20:20:54 <mb__> It doesn't work, yet
Oct 04 20:20:59 <slonopotamus> i see
Oct 04 20:21:02 <mb__> Also, the charger algorithm is not tested, yet.
Oct 04 20:21:21 <mb__> Charging is fully software based, so it's a bit hairy.
Oct 04 20:23:29 <slonopotamus> yep, i know
Oct 04 20:23:54 <mb__> The stuff for reading the calibration data is already there. But there is some code that processes the data in some way and that is not implemented, yet.
Oct 04 20:25:43 <slonopotamus> hmm... p54spi doesn't BUG anymore :-/
Oct 04 20:25:55 <mb__> :/
Oct 04 20:26:21 <mb__> If it does it again, it would be cool if you can capture it in some way.
Oct 04 20:26:32 <mb__> digital camera or something is good enough
Oct 04 20:27:24 <slonopotamus> woah, i even get gpio events when pull n800 camera in/out :D
Oct 04 20:28:11 <cshore> hey jow you ever going to update the subsignal HTTPS cert?
Oct 04 20:29:12 <jow_laptop> uh?
Oct 04 20:29:24 <cshore> says it's expired....has for months
Oct 04 20:29:45 <jow_laptop> wasn't aware of that
Oct 04 20:29:53 <cshore> heh, no one told you?
Oct 04 20:30:18 <jow_laptop> no and firefox is happy about it... which is unusual given the fact that it whines about everything
Oct 04 20:30:37 <cshore> well it's only the svn one AFAICT
Oct 04 20:30:42 <jow_laptop> I see
Oct 04 20:30:54 <jow_laptop> I'll contact my admin
Oct 04 20:31:23 <cshore> there probably aren't many people pulling the svn I guess
Oct 04 20:31:29 <slonopotamus> mb__: so... good luck with charger stuff (and try talking to people on #maemo, some of them digged into bme). I'll mess with tsc2301.
Oct 04 20:31:30 <jow_laptop> not via https
Oct 04 20:31:40 <cshore> oh, I though that was all you had?
Oct 04 20:32:02 <cshore> or maybe that's just what's up on the Trac or wherever I read it
Oct 04 20:32:10 <cshore> or old
Oct 04 20:32:51 <jow_laptop> wie offer https for svn since some ISPs mangle the http stream bad enough for svn to fail
Oct 04 20:32:54 <jow_laptop> *we
Oct 04 20:33:13 <cshore> ah, I see
Oct 04 20:33:18 <jow_laptop> but in openwrt its http, and we advertise http only, too
Oct 04 20:34:25 <cshore> hmm....ok, not sure where I got the https info from....it's just 'always been that way'
Oct 04 20:42:26 <slonopotamus_> mb__: there's currently a single board file for n800/n810. what's the best way to separate tsc2005/tsc2301 setup in it?
Oct 04 20:43:51 <slonopotamus_> or it can setup both?
Oct 04 20:46:52 <mb__> slonopotamus_: Oh, I don't know.
Oct 04 20:47:24 <mb__> I think one can check what board we're running on, but I don't remember how that works
Oct 04 20:48:29 <mb__> But there should be similar checks already in place
Oct 04 20:48:29 <mb__> So just look through the file
Oct 04 20:49:45 <slonopotamus_> oh, there is "machine_is_nokia_n800" :)
Oct 04 20:52:16 <mb__> yeah that's it
Oct 04 21:07:28 <Chocks> mb__: wooooo
Oct 04 21:21:57 <mb__> Chocks: hm?
Oct 04 21:22:08 <Chocks> mb: been a long time
Oct 04 21:22:43 <Chocks> used to harass you back in, um, 2008ish
Oct 04 21:23:37 <mb__> oh cool. Nice to meed you :)
Oct 04 21:23:43 <mb__> meet
Oct 04 21:25:29 <mb__> But I've been here for most of the time anyway, since then ;)
Oct 04 22:00:42 <Chocks> I know
Oct 04 22:00:57 <Chocks> but not as responsive :p
Oct 04 23:13:15 <CIA-73> jow * r28364 /trunk/package/ppp/ (Makefile files/ppp.sh files/pppoe.sh): [package] ppp: add workaround for ignored rp_pppoe_ac and rp_pppoe_service options by appending the nic-xxx argument last
Oct 04 23:15:14 <CIA-73> jow * r28365 /branches/backfire/package/ppp/ (Makefile files/ppp.sh files/pppoe.sh): [backfire] backport r28364
Oct 04 23:40:31 <CIA-73> jow * r28366 /trunk/package/ppp/files/pppoe.sh: [package] ppp: implement pppoe specific uci options "ac" and "service" which map to "rp_pppoe_ac" and "rp_pppoe_service"
Oct 04 23:41:43 <CIA-73> jow * r28367 /branches/backfire/package/ppp/files/pppoe.sh: [backfire] merge r28366
Oct 04 23:43:51 <CIA-73> jow * r28368 /trunk/package/ppp/files/pppoe.sh: [package] ppp: move the rp_pppoe_* options behind the plugin argument
Oct 04 23:44:12 <CIA-73> jow * r28369 /branches/backfire/package/ppp/files/pppoe.sh: [backfire] merge r28368
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Oct 05 02:59:58 2011