**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Apr 17 03:00:00 2012 Apr 17 03:13:33 build #137 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/137 Apr 17 03:25:56 build #127 of iop32x is complete: Failure [failed compile_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/iop32x/builds/127 Apr 17 06:12:18 build #128 of iop32x is complete: Failure [failed compile_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/iop32x/builds/128 Apr 17 07:39:36 hello Apr 17 07:41:46 I try to build a new package for openwrt (nut), I have created all needed directories and the Makefile Apr 17 07:42:13 but when I run "./scripts/feeds list", I don't see my package Apr 17 07:42:51 Anyone known what I have missing ? Apr 17 09:02:54 sorry, I have found a error in my Makefile, i work fine now. Apr 17 10:02:06 jow * r31327 /trunk/target/imagebuilder/Makefile: [imagebuilder] don't overwrite version.mk, substitute REVISION instead Apr 17 10:08:23 jow * r31328 /branches/backfire/target/imagebuilder/Makefile: [backfire] merge r31327 Apr 17 10:57:42 \o/ got wpa working with the broadcom 4.12 software running with an openwrt userspace Apr 17 11:04:34 nice Apr 17 11:04:49 merbanan: is the 4.12 imagetag patch still needed? Apr 17 11:05:00 no Apr 17 11:05:04 okay Apr 17 11:05:06 bad code Apr 17 11:05:10 dropped Apr 17 11:05:14 I need it though :) Apr 17 11:30:00 KanjiMonster: anyway I'm not sure how to upstream this work Apr 17 11:32:41 <[florian]> what exactly are you using from openwrt? Apr 17 11:32:45 <[florian]> just the rootfs I assume? Apr 17 11:34:21 yes Apr 17 11:34:51 but I need the proprietary wifi driver Apr 17 11:35:21 with it's wpa supplicant Apr 17 11:35:31 nas and friends Apr 17 11:35:52 before the nas was used through the command line Apr 17 11:36:15 the 4.12 release nas doesn't have that interface Apr 17 11:36:29 it uses the libnvram.so api Apr 17 11:36:37 ugh Apr 17 11:37:19 so I wrote a libnvram2uci wrapper lib and figured out how set the proper parameters Apr 17 11:37:53 so the proprietary driver in openwrt does not work? Apr 17 11:38:15 might work Apr 17 11:38:20 I can't use it though Apr 17 11:38:31 why? Apr 17 11:38:47 new wifi chip Apr 17 11:38:54 might work on old ones Apr 17 11:39:00 I need the latest and greatest Apr 17 11:39:04 ok Apr 17 11:52:14 is 6368 support merged now ? Apr 17 11:53:09 <[florian]> yes, starting with 3.3 Apr 17 11:53:18 <[florian]> which will very soon become the default kernel version Apr 17 12:18:36 jogo * r31329 /packages/net/igmpproxy/ (3 files in 2 dirs): Apr 17 12:18:36 packages: igmpproxy: send IGMP packets with IP Router Alert Option Apr 17 12:18:36 This is required by IGMPv2. Apr 17 12:18:38 jogo * r31330 /packages/net/igmpproxy/ (2 files in 2 dirs): packages: igmpproxy: change default inferface state to disabled Apr 17 12:18:40 jogo * r31331 /packages/net/igmpproxy/ (3 files in 2 dirs): packages: igmpproxy: prevent leakage of e.g. UPnP servers to upstream Apr 17 12:18:43 jogo * r31332 /packages/net/igmpproxy/ (2 files in 2 dirs): Apr 17 12:18:43 packages: igmpproxy: use monotonic clock Apr 17 12:18:43 Prevents issues when time changes during runtime of igmpproxy. Apr 17 12:18:43 Contributed by T-Labs, Deutsche Telekom Innovation Laboratories Apr 17 12:18:45 jogo * r31333 /packages/net/igmpproxy/ (4 files in 2 dirs): Apr 17 12:18:45 packages: igmpproxy: Add configuration of igmpproxy through uci Apr 17 12:18:45 Signed-off-by: Viktar Palstsiuk Apr 17 12:19:21 yay Apr 17 12:40:04 marek * r31334 /packages/net/batman-adv/files/lib/batman-adv/config.sh: Apr 17 12:40:05 batman-adv: make bat_load_module() compatible with pre-"lib-crc16" times Apr 17 12:40:05 Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner Apr 17 12:46:15 can uci handle . in the key part of the kev/value relation ? Apr 17 12:46:44 hm? Apr 17 12:46:54 for example 'wl.0_wpa_key' '1234567890' Apr 17 12:47:05 no Apr 17 12:47:10 key must not contain dots Apr 17 12:47:11 for me the first . makes everything choke Apr 17 12:47:50 k, tnx Apr 17 13:21:43 jogo * r31335 /trunk/ (80 files in 4 dirs): kernel: update linux 3.2 to 3.2.15 Apr 17 13:21:51 jogo * r31336 /trunk/ (78 files in 5 dirs): kernel: update linux 3.3 to 3.3.2 Apr 17 13:24:51 KanjiMonster: on a spree ? :) Apr 17 13:26:11 stintel: I haven't broken anything recently, so I thought I should try to change that ;) Apr 17 13:27:21 KanjiMonster: :DF Apr 17 13:27:22 :D* Apr 17 13:43:03 jogo * r31337 /trunk/target/linux/ (14 files in 14 dirs): Apr 17 13:43:03 kernel: also update the targets to use 3.2.15 Apr 17 13:43:03 Thanks Gabor for spotting it. Apr 17 13:43:50 stintel: ah, there, now that I have broken lantiq (and fixed it again), I can go back to lurking ;D Apr 17 13:54:20 can you easily but lantiq-based ADSL boxes outside .de? Apr 17 13:54:33 s/but/buy/ Apr 17 13:55:18 * dwmw2 is wondering why his ISP is screwing with the Technicolor TG582N (for its IPv6-capable firmware) rather than just getting something else and putting OpenWRT on it. Apr 17 13:57:45 dwmw2: the netgear dgn3500 is lantiq based and should be available outside of germany (buffalo has a similar model) Apr 17 13:59:56 dwmw2: i could send you few sx763 boards Apr 17 13:59:56 ta Apr 17 14:00:09 they are lantiq danube based - http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/gigaset/sx76x Apr 17 14:00:30 luka12345: might be interesting; I could make sure everything is working nicely for the ISP (aa.net.uk) and then suggest that they switch to using openwrt. Apr 17 14:00:39 Technicolor's firmware seems to be a PITA Apr 17 14:01:07 * luka12345 is working at ISP and wants to do the same thing ;) Apr 17 14:01:24 you doing IPv6 support over the ADSL? Apr 17 14:01:31 no Apr 17 14:01:38 and i think we wont any time soon Apr 17 14:02:09 :( Apr 17 14:03:06 if you want isp to take you seriously you will need tr069 client Apr 17 14:03:17 it just happens that i coded one :) Apr 17 14:03:21 http://176.9.180.148/ Apr 17 14:03:32 * luka12345 will need to set up dns for that one Apr 17 14:12:20 luka12345: cute. Apr 17 14:13:01 They've been playing with TR-069 I think. Apr 17 14:13:13 just starting to implement it at their end, on the FB6000 LNS Apr 17 14:15:20 luka12345: do you get the IPv6 and Legacy IP ranges that way, so you know what to route to the internal network? Apr 17 14:15:26 or is that done separately with DHCPv6 etc.? Apr 17 14:15:55 i do not use ipv6 at all Apr 17 14:16:08 ^^ at my home Apr 17 14:16:24 but thing is that we can not switch easily to ipv6 Apr 17 14:16:46 because none of our routers (cpe) does not support ipv6 Apr 17 14:18:21 if you are using FB6000 LNS then you/they are configuring server, not the client Apr 17 14:47:28 luka12345: we have a tr69 client also Apr 17 14:47:54 build #166 of at91 is complete: Failure [failed compile_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/at91/builds/166 Apr 17 14:51:19 merbanan: where? Apr 17 14:51:50 merbanan: is it foss? Apr 17 14:52:03 well that was the plan Apr 17 14:52:15 but this changes a few things Apr 17 14:52:44 luka12345: they use (and develop) the FB6000 LNS. They are playing with both server and client :) Apr 17 14:53:18 i'm going to develop a server as well ;) Apr 17 14:54:14 how far did you get with the server/client development? Apr 17 14:54:43 we have already few people using freecwmp Apr 17 14:58:22 luka12345: the client can communicate some things Apr 17 14:58:36 but it's not complete for our use Apr 17 14:59:20 then you should check out freecwmp Apr 17 15:00:48 since you joinded #freecwmp lets continue our chat there Apr 17 18:48:26 build #120 of rdc is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/rdc/builds/120 Apr 17 19:41:40 Hey guys, I'd like to get openwrt support for my Cisco e4200. dd-wrt runs fine on it, but I really do prefer openwrt. I'm not very familiar with openwrt and embedded systems in general yet. Do you think it is still possible to get it working? If I would donate the hardware, would it be ported for sure and how long would it take (just a rough estimation; two weeks or six months)? Apr 17 19:43:34 more like six months Apr 17 19:43:42 wifi support is there Apr 17 19:43:47 platform support is easy to do Apr 17 19:43:54 but there are no usable ethernet drivers Apr 17 19:44:13 a spec has been written but someone has to implement a driver according to it Apr 17 19:44:51 well how does dd-wrt do it then? shouldn't there be drivers already? Apr 17 19:45:09 binary drivers Apr 17 19:45:14 ok Apr 17 19:45:26 which carry a fat "trade secret" disclaimer in the license header Apr 17 19:45:36 so obviously no choice for openwrt Apr 17 19:46:22 Alright.... Not really what I like to use either :/ But then I'll have to stick with dd-wrt... Apr 17 19:46:38 thanks for the information! Apr 17 19:47:26 yw Apr 17 20:56:02 build #130 of iop32x is complete: Failure [failed compile_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/iop32x/builds/130 Apr 17 21:21:37 jow_laptop: you didn't update geos to 3.3.2 because you didn't want more than one 3.3.x release, right? Apr 17 21:21:59 but r31336 updates to 3.3.2 and leaves geos behind at 3.3.1 :) Apr 17 21:32:36 jogo * r31338 /trunk/target/linux/x86/ (alix2/target.mk geos/target.mk net5501/target.mk): kernel: x86: also update subtarget kernel versions Apr 17 21:32:41 dwmw2_gone: better? ;) Apr 17 21:58:45 KanjiMonster: ta :) Apr 17 21:59:12 if the minor release is expected to just track what's supported, why don't we just set that in the target.mk files? Apr 17 22:05:59 nbd * r31339 /trunk/package/netifd/Makefile: netifd: update to latest, fixes ppp reconnect issues Apr 17 22:06:03 nbd * r31340 /trunk/package/ (7 files in 4 dirs): ppp: move ppp-{up,down} from the netifd package to pppd Apr 17 22:17:24 dwmw2_gone: I don't quite follow what you want to do Apr 17 22:18:07 targets set KERNEL_PATCHVER isntead of LINUX_VERSION perhaps Apr 17 22:18:10 then Apr 17 22:18:16 in include/kernel-version.sh Apr 17 22:18:33 ifeq ($(KERNEL_PATCHVER),3.3) Apr 17 22:18:40 LINUX_VERSION=3.3.2 Apr 17 22:18:47 ah Apr 17 22:18:49 LINUX_KERNEL_MD5SUM=xxx Apr 17 22:18:51 endif Apr 17 22:18:52 etc. Apr 17 22:19:01 yeah, something like that might make sense Apr 17 22:19:11 just looking at it now Apr 17 23:06:02 KanjiMonster: do we want to permit a target to insist on an older revision (like 3.3 or 3.3.1 instead of 3.3.2)? Apr 17 23:07:34 dwmw2_gone: usually not; sometimes .N -> .N+1 steps require modifiying patches in a way that they can only apply to either version, but not both Apr 17 23:08:22 that makes life somewhat simpler; we really *can* just let them set something like KERNEL_PATCHVER and then set LINUX_VERSION automatically Apr 17 23:20:16 KanjiMonster: http://david.woodhou.se/centrally-set-minor-ver.patch ? Apr 17 23:28:01 dwmw2_gone: might work; but it's late here, so I'm going to bed Apr 17 23:28:03 good night Apr 17 23:28:09 yeah, fine plan :) **** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Apr 17 23:46:14 2012 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Apr 17 23:48:17 2012 Apr 18 00:25:21 build #168 of s3c24xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/s3c24xx/builds/168 Apr 18 01:08:50 build #154 of pxcab is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/pxcab/builds/154 Apr 18 01:26:26 Is there a license on the documentation in the OpenWRT Wiki? Apr 18 01:26:57 I've found http://wiki.openwrt.org/about/license but this does not explicitly define any license on the documentation available in the wiki, only the project itself Apr 18 01:29:21 i know that Wikipedia itself is covered under the GNU-FDL; I am wondering if such a license applies, or if I am "allowed" to put my own work under such a license (a rather long tutorial that introduces a new user to openwrt, and as an example provides basic setup instructions for the WNDR3800) Apr 18 01:29:52 alternatively, creativecommons attribution, or simply public domain may be considered as well Apr 18 01:41:09 mirko * r31341 /trunk/toolchain/eglibc/patches/2.12/100-do-not-use-implicit-rules.patch: Apr 18 01:41:09 [toolchain/eglibc] remove patch '100-do-not-use-implicit-rules.patch' for eglibc 2.12 Apr 18 01:41:09 Mentioned patch got obsoleted by commit 31300, since it went upstream meanwhile Apr 18 01:41:26 mirko * r31342 /trunk/toolchain/eglibc/Config.in: [toolchain/eglibc] when choosing eglibc select eglibc version 2.13 by default **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Apr 18 02:59:58 2012