**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Apr 13 02:59:58 2013
Apr 13 07:16:07 <builder> build #220 of rb532 is complete: Failure [failed shell_12]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/rb532/builds/220
Apr 13 07:19:49 <builder> build #220 of ppc44x is complete: Failure [failed shell_12]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc44x/builds/220
Apr 13 08:49:57 <builder> build #210 of sibyte is complete: Failure [failed shell_12]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sibyte/builds/210
Apr 13 09:33:28 <builder> build #215 of xburst is complete: Failure [failed shell_12]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/xburst/builds/215
Apr 13 10:53:19 <Ginkgo> can someone tell me what is wrong in this patch? Of course there is a mix of fix and enhancements, but i can't find the other mistakes http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/3554/
Apr 13 10:53:43 <Ginkgo> maybe iceweasel and gmail are a bad mix
Apr 13 10:54:24 <danitool> maybe
Apr 13 10:55:01 <builder> build #247 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_8]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/247
Apr 13 10:56:19 <Ginkgo> thanks for you encouragement danitool
Apr 13 10:57:31 <blogic> 1) it is not generated properly
Apr 13 10:57:38 <blogic> 2) it mixes 2 things into 1 patch
Apr 13 10:57:47 <blogic> 3) half the patch is in the subject
Apr 13 10:57:52 <blogic> 4) the base path is wrong
Apr 13 10:58:03 <blogic> 5) its against AA which just saw its final release
Apr 13 10:58:21 <blogic> 6) the subject should contain a description of the content and not a essay about me
Apr 13 10:58:31 <blogic> 7) its whitespace mangled
Apr 13 11:01:45 <Ginkgo> a lot of thanks for your advices blogic
Apr 13 11:03:14 <Ginkgo> yes, it mixes two things
Apr 13 11:03:40 <blogic> the patch needs to be in a shape that we can do "git am 0001-foo.patch" and it just works
Apr 13 11:05:08 <danitool> AA won't accept more enhacements?
Apr 13 11:05:12 <danitool> only fixes?
Apr 13 11:06:49 <blogic> well
Apr 13 11:06:51 <blogic> its closed really
Apr 13 11:07:01 <blogic> there wont be any more binaries
Apr 13 11:08:09 <Ginkgo> and little fixes?
Apr 13 11:09:47 <KanjiMonster> Ginkgo: danitool: fixes will go into AA/12.09.1, but AA/12.09 is frozen
Apr 13 11:10:16 <Ginkgo> ok, thanks
Apr 13 11:11:07 <Ginkgo> so in the subject must be specified AA/12.09.1, no?
Apr 13 11:11:10 <KanjiMonster> and whether to accept enhancements depends on the maintainer; I would accept non intrusive ones like exposing leds, but not e.g. new board support
Apr 13 11:12:03 <Ginkgo> of course, only fixes and little enhancements, it is normal
Apr 13 11:12:24 <blogic> re
Apr 13 11:12:32 <blogic> what KanjiMonster says is correct
Apr 13 11:12:34 <danitool> then, the patch should be sent for AA, trunk, or both?
Apr 13 11:12:34 <KanjiMonster> Ginkgo: AA implies 12.09.1 now ;)
Apr 13 11:12:47 <blogic> KanjiMonster: it does not
Apr 13 11:12:53 <blogic> AA.1 == 12.09.1
Apr 13 11:12:55 <blogic> ;)
Apr 13 11:13:01 <blogic> AA = 12.09
Apr 13 11:13:04 <blogic> anyhow
Apr 13 11:13:14 <blogic> danitool: the patch wont apply to trunk
Apr 13 11:13:21 <blogic> it requires a different patch
Apr 13 11:13:35 <Ginkgo> then AA.1
Apr 13 11:13:36 <KanjiMonster> danitool: if it's broken in trunk then it needs to be fixed in trunk first, but if it doesn't apply to trunk, then for AA is fine
Apr 13 11:14:04 <KanjiMonster> usually maintainers will then do the backporting work if it needs to be fixed in AA, too
Apr 13 11:14:17 <Ginkgo> no, the patch for the arv4518 is only for AA
Apr 13 11:14:30 <KanjiMonster> I was talking about the general case ;)
Apr 13 11:14:39 <blogic> ok
Apr 13 11:15:08 <Ginkgo> of course
Apr 13 11:15:40 <Ginkgo> a lot of thanks for your advices, i'll try to do my best
Apr 13 11:16:01 <KanjiMonster> Ginkgo: oh, and don't use the gmail webinterface for sending patches; it won't work
Apr 13 11:16:30 <KanjiMonster> git send-email using the gmail smtp works fine, though
Apr 13 11:16:53 <blogic> Ginkgo: and try sending the patch to yourself first
Apr 13 11:16:56 <Ginkgo> yes, i was thinking in sendmail
Apr 13 11:17:02 <blogic> if it works, send it to the ML
Apr 13 11:17:21 <danitool> the last time I used gmail for sending a patch, in linux-tv mailing list, their patchwork got the patch
Apr 13 11:17:21 <Ginkgo> ¿ML?
Apr 13 11:17:28 <blogic> Mailing list
Apr 13 11:17:53 <danitool> with the web interface I mean
Apr 13 11:21:29 <KanjiMonster> danitool: the web interface converts tabs to spaces and force linebreaks; maybe the maintainer corrected it for you
Apr 13 11:21:51 <danitool> sure, only for me :P
Apr 13 11:23:00 <danitool> or just I was lucky
Apr 13 11:24:04 <Ginkgo> to summarize: NEVER use gmail webinterface
Apr 13 11:24:36 <Ginkgo> then sendmail would be the best choice
Apr 13 11:36:46 <blogic> no
Apr 13 11:36:49 <blogic> git send-email
Apr 13 11:40:43 <Ginkgo> ok
Apr 13 12:18:44 <danitool> gmail web interface now seems to  keep  right tabs an whitespaces, but it break some lines, definetilly it doesn't work
Apr 13 14:11:33 <builder> build #188 of iop32x is complete: Failure [failed shell_12]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/iop32x/builds/188
Apr 13 14:16:35 <builder> build #220 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/220
Apr 13 16:53:57 <dlorah> hi
Apr 13 16:54:09 <dlorah> is it possible to make dnsmasq generate reversedns for hosts automatically?
Apr 13 17:49:11 <Ginkgo> Is this patch correctly formatted? http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/3556/
Apr 13 17:51:07 <Ginkgo> and written?
Apr 13 19:28:45 <Guest99894> swalker r36331 packages/utils/oww/Makefile * [packages] oww: update to 0.86.3 (#13262)
Apr 13 19:35:30 <sungami> Ginkgo: your patch should have a very short description in its first line of comments, followed by a blank line and then a more complete description. That's what blogic meant  above (6. the subject should contain a desciption ... not an essay ...)
Apr 13 19:37:08 <Ginkgo> one moment please...
Apr 13 19:39:07 <Ginkgo> sungami: something like this? http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/2947/
Apr 13 19:40:28 <Ginkgo> sungami: understood, sorry
Apr 13 19:41:17 <Ginkgo> i go to rewrite it properly and send
Apr 13 19:42:03 <blogic> Ginkgo: no
Apr 13 19:42:06 <blogic> its ok
Apr 13 19:42:10 <blogic> you mailed anough versions
Apr 13 19:42:21 <blogic> just try to do it properly next time ;)
Apr 13 19:42:32 <blogic> i will merge that patch tomorrow
Apr 13 19:42:32 <sungami> Ginkgo: also, be more terse ans say something like "fixes #nnnnn" instead of "after applying ticket number nnnn should be closed"
Apr 13 19:42:54 <sungami> blogic: just trying to explain established uses of git.
Apr 13 19:43:06 <blogic> sungami: yes, thanks for the help
Apr 13 19:43:28 <blogic> i just opened my mails and saw 5 versions of the patch ;)
Apr 13 19:43:31 <Ginkgo> thanks for the advices
Apr 13 19:43:43 <Ginkgo> a lot of*
Apr 13 21:07:14 <builder> build #170 of octeon is complete: Failure [failed shell_12]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/octeon/builds/170
Apr 13 21:18:47 <builder> build #184 of gemini is complete: Failure [failed compile_8]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/gemini/builds/184
Apr 13 23:24:37 <builder> build #256 of at91 is complete: Exception [exception shell interrupted shell_19]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/at91/builds/256
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Apr 14 02:59:58 2013