**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun Mar 16 02:59:59 2014
Mar 16 05:42:54 <builder_> build #473 of sibyte is complete: Failure [failed shell_10 shell_15]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sibyte/builds/473
Mar 16 06:08:25 <builder_> build #528 of ppc40x is complete: Failure [failed compile_5]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc40x/builds/528
Mar 16 06:28:48 <builder_> build #102 of mxs is complete: Failure [failed compile_3]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mxs/builds/102
Mar 16 06:58:31 <builder_> build #578 of brcm63xx is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm63xx/builds/578
Mar 16 08:10:39 <builder_> build #548 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_8]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/548
Mar 16 08:20:09 <builder_> build #547 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_8]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/547
Mar 16 08:20:25 <builder_> build #469 of xburst is complete: Failure [failed shell compile_3]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/xburst/builds/469
Mar 16 10:33:54 <russell--> cyrusff: i found it
Mar 16 10:34:34 <russell--> if i remove network.pub.ip6assign=60, my olsrd damage goes away
Mar 16 10:44:18 <Hopscotch> good morning
Mar 16 11:47:16 <russell--> how does uci import work?
Mar 16 11:48:26 <builder_> build #213 of mpc85xx is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc85xx/builds/213
Mar 16 11:51:37 <slachta> russell--: uci export network > asd; cat asd | uci import
Mar 16 11:52:15 * russell-- is trying to recreate /etc/config/httpd from uci-defaults
Mar 16 11:52:34 <russell--> i guess busybox httpd is deprecated
Mar 16 11:53:46 <russell--> uci show httpd gives me:
Mar 16 11:53:48 <russell--> httpd.@httpd[0]=httpd
Mar 16 11:53:49 <russell--> httpd.@httpd[0].port=80
Mar 16 11:53:49 <russell--> httpd.@httpd[0].home=/www
Mar 16 11:55:21 <russell--> but uci set'ing them back fails on port=80
Mar 16 11:55:43 <russell--> "uci: Invalid argument"
Mar 16 11:56:58 <slachta> russell--: how does your uci set command looks like?
Mar 16 11:57:59 <russell--> ah, i'm on to the solution, i need a uci add first
Mar 16 11:58:06 <russell--> uci add httpd httpd
Mar 16 11:58:29 <russell--> uci set httpd.@httpd[0].port=80
Mar 16 11:58:31 <russell--> etch
Mar 16 12:00:22 <slachta> do not forget to commit :)
Mar 16 12:01:16 <builder_> build #380 of mpc52xx is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc52xx/builds/380
Mar 16 12:02:15 <russell--> right
Mar 16 12:08:58 <russell--> also, spell httpd right
Mar 16 12:09:35 <russell--> and touch the file before uci'ing on it
Mar 16 12:18:03 <russell--> hmm. httpd isn't started on boot, no init script.  maybe the path of least resistance is just to use uhttpd instead of the busybox version?
Mar 16 12:22:58 <builder_> build #91 of mvebu is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mvebu/builds/91
Mar 16 12:43:42 <builder_> build #540 of cobalt is complete: Failure [failed compile_8]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/cobalt/builds/540
Mar 16 12:48:14 <cyrusff> russel--: ok. But ip6assign merely assigns an ipv6 address on that interface
Mar 16 12:48:34 <cyrusff> So well still sounds like an olsr quirk for me
Mar 16 12:59:56 <russell--> we've already assigned in ipv6 address manually, maybe that's screwing things up
Mar 16 13:02:06 <russell--> olsrd.conf needs an HNA6 declaration, which we set up staticly
Mar 16 13:07:46 <russell--> cyrusff: where does it get the address to assign?
Mar 16 13:09:02 <builder_> build #109 of imx6 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/imx6/builds/109
Mar 16 13:11:32 <builder_> build #397 of mcs814x is complete: Failure [failed compile_5]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mcs814x/builds/397
Mar 16 13:15:36 <builder_> build #513 of uml is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/uml/builds/513
Mar 16 13:51:43 <lynxis> jow_laptop: Is there any reason why masquerade is only supported by zones and not by a 'config' like redirect for snat/dnat?
Mar 16 14:27:21 <builder_> build #541 of cobalt is complete: Failure [failed compile_8]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/cobalt/builds/541
Mar 16 14:56:33 <builder_> build #16 of sunxi is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sunxi/builds/16
Mar 16 14:57:12 <builder_> build #361 of octeon is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/octeon/builds/361
Mar 16 15:39:25 <builder_> build #503 of x86 is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86/builds/503
Mar 16 15:41:58 <slachta> jow_laptop: ping
Mar 16 16:42:46 <dtaht_puck> I think this is the first time I have ever seen the buildbot "caught up"
Mar 16 16:42:47 <dtaht_puck> http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/buildslaves
Mar 16 16:57:15 <jow_laptop> lynxis: huh?
Mar 16 16:57:33 <jow_laptop> lynxis: no, not really. should be easy to extend rule sections with a masq target
Mar 16 16:57:46 <jow_laptop> or redirect ones
Mar 16 16:57:58 <jow_laptop> since masq is basically a generalized form of snat
Mar 16 17:10:19 <swalker_> updated openwrt/upstream, https://home.comcast.net/~sdwalker/uscan/index.html
Mar 16 17:26:02 <cyrusff> russel--: it gets them from the prefixes in your v6 uplink (dhcpv6 or 6in4)
Mar 16 17:31:18 <cyrusff> Though i wonder why olsr behaves so strangely when addresses are added
Mar 16 17:38:38 <builder_> build #505 of rb532 is complete: Failure [failed shell_10]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/rb532/builds/505
Mar 16 17:38:38 <builder_> build #504 of x86 is complete: Failure [failed compile_1]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86/builds/504
Mar 16 17:40:01 <builder_> build #412 of iop32x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/iop32x/builds/412
Mar 16 17:40:08 <builder_> build #505 of ppc44x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc44x/builds/505
Mar 16 17:40:27 <builder_> build #474 of sibyte is complete: Failure [failed shell_10]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sibyte/builds/474
Mar 16 18:02:46 <eigma> jow_laptop: could you take a look at http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/4931/? it's been in the queue for almost 4 weeks
Mar 16 18:37:22 <builder_> build #536 of lantiq is complete: Failure [failed compile_5]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/lantiq/builds/536
Mar 16 19:05:42 <tohojo> when converting an init script to use procd, what is the idiomatic way of killing a daemon that forks off from the main process when it starts up?
Mar 16 19:11:47 <blogic> pid files
Mar 16 19:12:11 <blogic> tohojo: what daemon ?
Mar 16 19:13:26 <tohojo> radsecproxy
Mar 16 19:14:05 <tohojo> it does have a pid file option, but for some reason it records the wrong PID when spawned from procd
Mar 16 19:14:37 <tohojo> (I assume you mean daemon-supported pid files when you say that?)
Mar 16 19:14:56 <blogic> can you patch it to not daemonize ?
Mar 16 19:15:38 <tohojo> hmm, it has an option to do that, but that also overrides the logging behaviour (forcing logging to stderr), which is not so helpful
Mar 16 19:15:50 <tohojo> suppose I can patch it to not do that
Mar 16 19:16:58 <tohojo> would that be a workable solution?
Mar 16 19:31:15 <Igel_> it returns the child or parent pid?
Mar 16 19:31:40 <Igel_> i have an offbeat question -- its buildroot and toolchain related..
Mar 16 19:35:46 <Igel_> i want to patch ~/openwrt/toolchain/uClibc/config-0.9.33.2/mips
Mar 16 19:35:55 <Igel_> +UCLIBC_HAS_SSP=y
Mar 16 19:35:55 <Igel_> +UCLIBC_BUILD_PIE=y
Mar 16 19:36:11 <Igel_> can i do this (without patching) with ~/openwrt/.config
Mar 16 19:36:58 <Igel_> should we look at bringing "enable stack smashing protection for uClibc" out to buildroot? and even positional indepentdent execution?
Mar 16 19:51:07 * Igel_ looking into http://buildroot.org/downloads/manual/manual.html#uclibc-custom
Mar 16 19:52:55 <builder_> build #462 of ixp4xx is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ixp4xx/builds/462
Mar 16 20:01:43 <builder_> build #484 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/484
Mar 16 20:07:23 <tohojo> blogic: right, posted a patch for radsecproxy to the mailing list, with the patching approach you suggested :)
Mar 16 20:08:01 <builder_> build #455 of kirkwood is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/kirkwood/builds/455
Mar 16 20:15:41 <Igel_> http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=808cc0a5e17af2c9cd2210cdcbf0d98e79b6e157
Mar 16 22:34:18 <builder_> build #395 of gemini is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/gemini/builds/395
Mar 17 02:17:54 <builder_> build #529 of ppc40x is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc40x/builds/529
Mar 17 02:20:29 <builder_> build #549 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_8]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/549
Mar 17 02:33:43 <builder_> build #103 of mxs is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mxs/builds/103
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Mon Mar 17 02:59:58 2014