**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Apr 04 02:59:59 2014 Apr 04 03:36:15 build #35 of sunxi is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sunxi/builds/35 Apr 04 03:44:23 build #17 of pxa is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/pxa/builds/17 Apr 04 05:52:40 build #568 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/568 Apr 04 06:06:10 hehe e40fd3dd89a125a2fb0843e6c74cc3c20e634805 "[ar71xx] Revert all netdev performance patches" / "*netdev perf enhancement have brought a lot of unstabilities" Apr 04 06:09:02 017f447a9f4cc20e7cede72c10fc6c2019ae748c "[kernel] Add option for CONFIG_MODVERSIONS" ha! I proposed this a few months ago Apr 04 06:09:17 I wonder if they're using MODVERSIONS=y in the default configs now Apr 04 06:22:06 good morning Apr 04 06:24:21 hello Apr 04 06:24:52 what kind of device do you have Hopscotch? Apr 04 06:25:24 äh? the 5 inch one? Apr 04 06:26:56 what kind of router Apr 04 06:27:01 ah, right Apr 04 06:27:06 several linksys wrt54g Apr 04 06:27:18 wrt160nl (for which i did the initial port of openwrt) Apr 04 06:27:30 pc-engines alix Apr 04 06:27:37 mikrotik Apr 04 06:27:45 and some lancom... Apr 04 06:28:00 nice Apr 04 06:35:51 reading the wrt160nl port thread :) Apr 04 06:36:00 that was a long time ago Apr 04 06:36:59 back around r17264 heh Apr 04 06:39:15 yeah, that was for a special project Apr 04 06:39:22 i wanted to do internet via dvb-t Apr 04 06:40:46 heh, I want dvb-t via internet.. antenna reception at my apartment is very bad.. how does internet via dvb-t work? Apr 04 06:41:12 downlink via dvb-t with a receiver-dongle at the wrt160nl Apr 04 06:41:16 uplink via wlan Apr 04 06:41:38 canceling out the hidden-station problem by synchronizing the wrt160nl via the downlink Apr 04 06:42:25 sounds a bit like docsis.. downstream assigns tdma upstream slots Apr 04 06:42:56 is there a provider in your area that offers this service? Apr 04 06:44:08 i wanted to be that provider Apr 04 06:45:11 you would install custom wrt160nls at your customers Apr 04 06:45:16 yep Apr 04 06:52:47 build #17 of brcm2708 is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm2708/builds/17 Apr 04 07:07:36 build #17 of omap is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/omap/builds/17 Apr 04 08:04:58 build #17 of x86_64 is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86_64/builds/17 Apr 04 10:17:27 jogo r40374 trunk/target/linux/generic/config-3.14 * kernel: add missing config symbol for linux 3.14 Apr 04 10:17:29 jogo r40375 trunk/target/linux/generic/patches-3.14/620-sched_esfq.patch * kernel: make sched_esfq compile for 3.14 Apr 04 10:17:31 jogo r40376 trunk/target/linux/generic/patches-3.14/621-sched_act_connmark.patch * kernel: make sched_act_connmark compile for 3.14 Apr 04 10:17:33 jogo r40377 trunk/package/kernel/linux/modules/sound.mk * kernel: fix kmod-sound-core for 3.14 Apr 04 10:17:34 jogo r40378 trunk/package/kernel/linux/modules/usb.mk * kernel: fix usb module paths for 3.14 Apr 04 10:17:36 jogo r40379 trunk/package/kernel/linux/modules/other.mk * kernel: fix bluetooth and zsmalloc for 3.14 Apr 04 10:17:51 jogo r40380 trunk/target/linux/ (139 files in 2 dirs) * brcm63xx: update development kernel to linux 3.14 Apr 04 12:27:05 build #17 of mpc83xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc83xx/builds/17 Apr 04 15:34:08 anyone hve any suggestion on how my init script in build_dir/target/root/etc/init.d looks fine, but the one on the device (after sysupgrade -v -n) has extra .. characters in it? Apr 04 15:34:39 ohweird, it must be some weird character Apr 04 15:34:55 grep shows it as a space, vi shows it as .. and the shell clearly doesn't like it :| Apr 04 15:35:59 thanks for being my rubber ducky :) Apr 04 16:07:07 can somebody delete this wiki entry: http://wiki.openwrt.org/a-brief-guide-to-water-treatment-27992? Apr 04 16:44:48 I've copied the net-snmp package into my own feed, but now I get DEPENDS on BROKEN=y for any apps that use netsnmp? how does that happen? Apr 04 16:47:18 broken flag in the net-snmp makefile? Apr 04 16:47:27 not that I can see Apr 04 16:47:58 I've had my own versions of packages with the same name before, not sure why this would be any different Apr 04 16:48:23 I just have to be careful to install -p myfeed packagename to properly get the right one. Apr 04 16:57:21 I think these trees are due for a good cleanup anyway, let's just do them from scratch Apr 04 16:57:58 unrelated, include/package-version-override.mk seems to cause whitespace warning errors beceuase line 22 has this "$(PKG_BASE_NAME) version as string..." text Apr 04 16:58:05 what's PKG_BASE_NAME meant tobe defined as? Apr 04 16:58:38 should that just be PKG_NAME ? Apr 04 16:59:42 it's only ever used in some lantiq packages as far as I can tell, Apr 04 17:13:34 yeah Apr 04 17:13:50 i think we can even drop that feature Apr 04 17:19:18 I like the source dir part, please lets' not drop that Apr 04 17:19:24 I don't think I've ever used the version bit though Apr 04 17:22:39 ok, so when does one do a "uci commit"? Apr 04 17:23:33 when you've finished doing uci set calls Apr 04 17:25:52 karlp: so just once at the end of a script setting a lot of parameters should be enough? Apr 04 17:26:03 yup Apr 04 17:28:36 thanks. Apr 04 17:39:29 when you opkg install a service, it isn't automatically enabled, but when it's built inot the image, it is. Can you easily build a daemon into your image but not have it be enabled? Apr 04 17:40:23 build #524 of rb532 is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/rb532/builds/524 Apr 04 17:41:05 build #493 of sibyte is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sibyte/builds/493 Apr 04 17:44:17 build #524 of ppc44x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc44x/builds/524 Apr 04 17:44:21 Pteridium: ping Apr 04 17:44:22 is the "right" way to drop a file into uci-defaults that just does "/etc/init.d/servername disable" ? Apr 04 17:44:30 yes? Apr 04 18:30:22 build #17 of adm8668 is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/adm8668/builds/17 Apr 04 18:32:51 luka, blogic: can you tell me how to enable the 4 FE ports in the ARV7519RW aka Livebox 2.1? Esteban and me tried a lot of combinations in te dts without luck. :( Apr 04 18:33:03 if you made them work, of course Apr 04 18:34:11 for now only ports 1 and 3 work, and GE Apr 04 18:35:38 build #431 of iop32x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/iop32x/builds/431 Apr 04 18:40:05 we didn't defined stp... :x Apr 04 18:42:21 build #503 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/503 Apr 04 18:52:51 build #553 of ramips is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ramips/builds/553 Apr 04 19:37:39 build #534 of uml is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/uml/builds/534 Apr 04 20:09:41 build #562 of cobalt is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/cobalt/builds/562 Apr 04 20:11:32 build #569 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/569 Apr 04 20:39:24 build #557 of lantiq is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/lantiq/builds/557 Apr 04 20:51:43 build #36 of sunxi is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sunxi/builds/36 Apr 04 21:02:03 build #18 of pxa is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/pxa/builds/18 Apr 04 21:47:00 build #18 of brcm2708 is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm2708/builds/18 Apr 04 21:57:00 build #18 of omap is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/omap/builds/18 Apr 04 22:09:31 build #18 of x86_64 is complete: Failure [failed shell compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86_64/builds/18 Apr 04 22:57:08 build #18 of mpc83xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc83xx/builds/18 Apr 05 00:05:38 build #18 of adm8668 is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/adm8668/builds/18 Apr 05 00:43:51 ath79_register_spi can only get called once, with all spi devices right? you can't call it again and again with different spi devices? Apr 05 00:55:05 or do I really need to fork/copy a mach- file for my own project? Apr 05 01:58:05 karlp: there is more than one SPI master on your SoC? Apr 05 02:38:54 eigma: no, just that the mach- file only has a call to ath79_register_m25p80, whichi has the spi devices inside it, Apr 05 02:39:41 so I would need to copy the flash devices from dev-m25p80.c into my board file just to add an entry to it, and then call ath79_register_spi with all the devices. Apr 05 02:40:06 which seems a little ugly, but this isn't an area I'm familiar with. Apr 05 02:40:22 (this is adding a spi 802.15.4 radio to a carambola2 board) **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Apr 05 02:59:58 2014