**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun May 18 02:59:59 2014 May 18 06:12:27 <5EXAA8SU8> build #592 of ppc40x is complete: Failure [failed compile_8 shell_15] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc40x/builds/592 May 18 06:47:21 <5EXAA8SU8> build #622 of brcm47xx is complete: Failure [failed shell] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm47xx/builds/622 May 18 07:29:44 <5EXAA8SU8> build #535 of xburst is complete: Failure [failed shell] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/xburst/builds/535 May 18 09:10:33 <5EXAA8SU8> build #473 of ep93xx is complete: Failure [failed shell] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ep93xx/builds/473 May 18 09:37:58 <5EXAA8SU8> build #461 of gemini is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/gemini/builds/461 May 18 12:02:30 nbd jow_laptop are you in there ? May 18 12:02:47 i just wanna ask if in /etc/config/network May 18 12:03:24 in device section ifname is supported just the @openwrt_interface_name notation May 18 12:03:38 or also wlan0 eth0 etc etc May 18 14:55:13 from openwrt init script: #!/bin/sh /etc/rc.common why better this way than include /etc/rc.common ? May 18 14:55:56 because this way the shell will execute rc.common May 18 14:56:07 which in turn executes the procedures defined in the init script May 18 15:04:39 jow_laptop: http://pastebin.com/yDhHjvNa May 18 15:04:52 (another problem..) May 18 15:05:37 nbd: did you ever seen an oops like that? ^ May 18 15:06:02 seems to be ath9k related but the stacktrace is not really meaningful to me May 18 15:37:06 jow_laptop: could you by any chance explain how ht_capab works after this change? https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/40682/trunk May 18 15:37:28 it doesn't work automagically for HT20 networks anymore, and for HT40 it fails to detect a couple of flags May 18 15:38:26 and i either don't understand how to set them manually, or it plain doesn't work (for example, option ldpc '1' wouldn't add the flag to the hostapd config) May 18 15:54:55 jow_laptop: why better this than include /etc/rc.common from init script? could you please explain? May 18 15:59:52 updated openwrt/upstream, https://home.comcast.net/~sdwalker/uscan/index.html May 18 16:20:31 phr3ak: necause then you'd need to duplicate common code in all init scripts to actually call the procedures May 18 16:20:43 phr3ak: which is more effort May 18 16:21:01 and not as nice as simply having to declare a few callback procedures May 18 16:57:00 jow_laptop: I'm talking about "include" internal bash command May 18 16:57:55 or . sorry May 18 16:59:03 again; #!/bin/sh /etc/rc.local includes *and* executes rc.local May 18 16:59:33 look at how rc.local is implemented, its sourcing back the calling scripts and executes the procedures in it May 18 17:00:06 this wouldn't be possible with a simple include, at least you'd need to put the include at the end of each init file after the procedures got declared which is ugly and error prone May 18 17:40:19 <5EXAA8SU8> build #568 of rb532 is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/rb532/builds/568 May 18 17:52:27 <5EXAA8SU8> build #537 of sibyte is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sibyte/builds/537 May 18 18:19:51 <5EXAA8SU8> build #63 of mpc83xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc83xx/builds/63 May 18 18:27:45 <5EXAA8SU8> build #568 of ppc44x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc44x/builds/568 May 18 19:29:06 <5EXAA8SU8> build #61 of pxa is complete: Failure [failed shell_15] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/pxa/builds/61 May 18 20:45:28 does trac not have anything that would've caught all of the same links in #16528 (amongst others)? May 18 20:48:46 maybe the anti-spam parser will only crash trac faster May 18 20:49:42 <5EXAA8SU8> build #548 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/548 May 18 20:51:25 <5EXAA8SU8> build #475 of iop32x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/iop32x/builds/475 May 18 21:14:20 nbd r40775 trunk/package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-hcd/Makefile * ltq-hcd: disable mips16 support May 18 21:14:24 nbd r40776 trunk/package/kernel/mac80211/files/lib/netifd/wireless/mac80211.sh * mac80211: fix ht capabilities for HT20 May 18 21:34:04 nbd: that patch doesn't fix things unfortunately :( May 18 21:50:41 nbd: actually wait. it does work. except it's missing TX-STBC May 18 21:50:47 but yeah, this is better :) May 18 23:02:27 hi there! just sent my first (very easy) patch to developer mailing list. And wanted to join to dev.openwrt.org. However strange error "Missing or invalid form token. Do you have cookies enabled?" occures. Any ideas? May 18 23:10:01 Anyone familiar with the Lantiq VR9, specifically its NAND controller? My board's (allegedly supported) NAND controller fails to init; and I don't really have a proper reference on the hardware (bug: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/16411) May 18 23:10:13 The kernel tree is a mess, ideally I'd have a SoC datasheet, but alas.. May 19 02:49:18 <5EXAA8SU8> build #593 of ppc40x is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc40x/builds/593 May 19 02:54:27 <5EXAA8SU8> build #614 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/614 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Mon May 19 02:59:58 2014