**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Aug 19 02:59:59 2014 Aug 19 03:26:08 build #60 of brcm47xx.mips74k is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm47xx.mips74k/builds/60 Aug 19 04:47:23 build #247 of mvebu is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mvebu/builds/247 Aug 19 05:39:37 cyrus r42213 branches/barrier_breaker/package/network/config/netifd/Makefile * bb: bump netifd Aug 19 05:51:51 cyrus r42214 packages/net/unbound * unbound: moved to github Aug 19 05:51:52 cyrus r42215 packages/lang/ruby * ruby: moved to github Aug 19 05:56:52 build #513 of octeon is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/octeon/builds/513 Aug 19 05:58:52 cyrus r42216 trunk/package/network/services/dnsmasq/files/dnsmasq.init * dnsmasq: respect option dhcpv4 disabled in dhcp-config Aug 19 05:58:59 cyrus r42217 trunk/package/network/services/odhcpd/Makefile * odhcpd: various DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 fixes Aug 19 06:00:15 cyrus r42218 branches/barrier_breaker/package/network/services/dnsmasq/files/dnsmasq.init * dnsmasq: respect option dhcpv4 disabled in dhcp-config Aug 19 06:00:18 cyrus r42219 branches/barrier_breaker/package/network/services/odhcpd/Makefile * odhcpd: bump for bugfixes Aug 19 07:58:30 /msg NickServ REGISTER infineon tobolff@gmx.net Aug 19 08:31:16 tobolff: lets just hope u already changed it;f Aug 19 08:50:14 RooTer: sure, but thanks Aug 19 09:59:48 blogic r42220 trunk/package/base-files/files/bin/board_detect * base-files: fix inverse logic in board_detect script Aug 19 14:26:39 I have a PCIe Intel 7260 wireless card. The driver iwlwifi is loaded but doesnt bond w/ the device. lspci shows the 7260 but doesnt list a kernel driver. I checked the pci.dev source for the driver and the pciid looked fine. The proper firmware is in /lib/firmware, but as iwlwifi is not picking up the PCI, thats not the issue. Any recomended next steps? Aug 19 17:18:55 Hauke: hi, could you try to backport bcma commit i mentioned in [PATCH][APPLY LATER] bcm53xx: add SPI controller driver Aug 19 17:20:31 zajec_: yes will do that Aug 19 17:24:45 i'm working on mtd backports Aug 19 17:25:00 i generated backport patches Aug 19 17:25:09 but now they don't want to apply because of some OpenWrt changes ;) Aug 19 17:25:13 will take me a bit more of time Aug 19 17:40:23 when I do 'make' I saw a few packages that I absolutely not selected that got built, such as " make[3] -C package/utils/ubi-utils compile", same for polarssl, iwinfo, px5g,etc, how does this happen? Aug 19 17:40:49 double checked under menuconfig, many packages that are not chosen are still been built Aug 19 17:42:30 build #661 of ppc44x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc44x/builds/661 Aug 19 17:43:47 some packages does seem familiar, could this be 'make distclean' is not clean enough? Aug 19 17:47:25 not chosen, or --- so, hard dep on soething else that was chosen? Aug 19 17:47:58 I checked it hard, it's not in .config and I also picked a few and looked carefully Aug 19 17:48:19 most of the packages I chose before, so I'm git clone again and see if that's because of 'make distclean' is not clean enough Aug 19 17:50:11 the image Makefile does not contain them either Aug 19 17:50:28 build_depends maybe? Aug 19 17:51:00 I don't know...how can I check that? Aug 19 17:54:10 will dig this out Aug 19 17:58:34 are they actually ending up in your image? or are you just "optimizing" your builds? Aug 19 18:03:04 they are not in packages, not in rootfs, but they're displayed via 'make' Aug 19 18:03:37 e.g. the gdb, I disabled it, but it's shown under 'make', though not been built Aug 19 18:04:09 trying a git-clone-clean build and see if this goes away Aug 19 18:08:41 Hauke: thats is not do-able Aug 19 18:09:16 Hauke: there is a patch that was rejected: http://pastebin.com/qv2znFsH Aug 19 18:10:08 it's part of the "mtd: m25p80: use the SPI nor framework" Aug 19 18:10:37 Hauke: it probably doesn't apply because OpenWrt does many modifications to m25p80 Aug 19 18:10:50 Hauke: and applying it by hand... will take a lot of time Aug 19 18:11:01 Hauke: i think we'll have to handle it differently Aug 19 18:11:18 Hauke: what about backporting spi-nor only? Aug 19 18:11:26 Hauke: without modifying m25p80 Aug 19 18:12:43 the other method it to backport m25p80 and spi-nor, *before* OpenWrt's mtd patches Aug 19 18:12:48 and put it in "generic" Aug 19 18:12:52 thiw would be much easier Aug 19 18:13:01 but I'm not sure if OpenWrt guys will want that Aug 19 18:16:35 why is Toolchain package larger than Imagebuilder especially SDK tarball? Aug 19 18:16:48 I thought Toolchain is part of SDK so SDK should be larger? Aug 19 18:20:51 Toolchain tarball is roughly twice the size of SDK tarball, odd to me Aug 19 18:21:55 ausjke: the image builder only contains precompiled binaries for the packages and kernel, but no compiler etc Aug 19 18:22:24 yes I can get that, but what about toolchain vs SDK? Aug 19 18:22:40 SDK should be a superset of Toolchain? what am I missing? Aug 19 18:35:51 do we really need OpenWrt-Toolchain-imx6-for-arm_cortex-a9+neon-gcc-4.8-linaro_eglibc-2.19_eabi/toolchain-arm_cortex-a9+neon_gcc-4.8-linaro_eglibc-2.19_eabi/initial? Aug 19 18:36:03 the initial subdir is 180MB Aug 19 18:37:11 also the libexec/gcc/arm-openwrt-linux-gnueabi/4.8.3/ which is another 200MB Aug 19 18:37:15 (unzipped) Aug 19 18:38:24 on the other hand, under SDK, the libexec is 40MB, and there is no "initial" directory at all Aug 19 18:40:12 found problem 1: toolchain's cc1 etc are not stripped Aug 19 18:40:18 SDK does Aug 19 18:40:36 problem2: toolchain contains initial directory which seems not needed Aug 19 18:41:06 zajec_: I can take care of m25p80, do you need the version from 3.17-rc1, or more recent? Aug 19 18:44:21 I will see if I can generate a patch to strip Toolchain and remove the gcc-initial directory Aug 19 18:46:16 i don't need m25p80 Aug 19 18:46:27 i need spi-nor only Aug 19 18:46:43 so I don't care how many m25p80 patches you backport ;) Aug 19 18:46:57 you may rm m25p80.c as well for me ;) Aug 19 18:50:28 karlp: a clean build still give me quite some packages on the 'make' output that does not exist in ipk nor in rootfs Aug 19 18:50:55 karlp: but they do exist in SDK, a global grep did not find why it's like that, but anyway I will live with it for now Aug 19 18:52:14 Hauke: sent you set of my commands Aug 19 18:53:13 I will look at them Aug 19 18:54:02 zajec_: I am not familiar with the flash subsystem Aug 19 18:54:33 so you wrote a generic spi driver and the m25p80 and the spi-nor driver are using this spi driver, is that correct? Aug 19 18:54:35 Hauke: m25p80 is a SPI driver for many NOR SPI flahes Aug 19 18:54:39 but not all of them ofc Aug 19 18:54:55 sec Aug 19 18:55:06 spi-nor is a helper API for any driver willing to use it Aug 19 18:55:12 currently spi-nor is used by two drivers Aug 19 18:55:32 by m25p80 and this new fsl-quadspi Aug 19 18:55:48 I wrote a new driver with some Broadcom-specific stuff also using this spi-nor layer Aug 19 18:55:51 to save some time Aug 19 18:55:53 and code Aug 19 18:55:56 build #267 of imx6 is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/imx6/builds/267 Aug 19 18:56:18 so right now "spi-nor" is a helper with 3 users: m25p80, fsl-quadspi and my driver Aug 19 18:56:41 we don't really care about m25p80 or fsl-quadspi as they don't support Broadcom flashes Aug 19 18:57:51 ah ok now I understand Aug 19 18:57:57 we're using spi-nor on imx6 here Aug 19 18:58:07 your driver needs the core from 3.17-rc1? Aug 19 18:58:13 ausjke: right, but i want to create patch for bcm53xx only :) Aug 19 18:58:22 yeah, i need the most recent spi-nor Aug 19 18:58:38 plus some extra not pushed patches, but I'll handle them Aug 19 18:59:01 ausjke: do you need spi-nor in OpenWrt? Aug 19 18:59:20 good question Aug 19 18:59:29 ausjke: spi-nor is quite new... it is not available in 3.14 Aug 19 18:59:41 not to mention 3.10 Aug 19 19:02:56 hold on, spi-nor, isn't it the spi-flash we used to call? that is replacing parallel NOR everywhere? Aug 19 19:06:37 not sure what is spi-flash Aug 19 19:06:54 well SPI NOR Flash Aug 19 19:07:14 spi nor flashes share a lot of common operations Aug 19 19:07:31 like... let's say every SPI NOR flash require WREN (Write Enable) to be set before writing Aug 19 19:07:36 and that is what spi-nor helps about Aug 19 19:07:44 also 90% of flashes support JEDEC Aug 19 19:07:57 and spi-nor helps you doing JEDEN read and identification Aug 19 19:08:16 which chip are we talking about Aug 19 19:08:31 SPI NOR flahes Aug 19 19:08:57 if you want me to list chips supporting JEDEC, don't expect that from me ;) Aug 19 19:09:23 Hauke: so what do you think about backporting just spi-nor to bcm53xx? Aug 19 19:10:57 I am currently look at the diff Aug 19 19:11:07 ok Aug 19 19:11:10 but just adding spi-nor should also work Aug 19 19:11:15 right Aug 19 19:11:21 we will just have some code duplicated Aug 19 19:11:32 but that shouldn't matter as we don't use m25p80 anyway in bcm53xx Aug 19 19:12:21 Hauke: another topic: what is the state of bgmac? Aug 19 19:12:25 does it work on bcm53xx? Aug 19 19:12:32 yes it works Aug 19 19:12:35 nice :) Aug 19 19:12:38 and the switch driver? Aug 19 19:12:52 the bgmac specific changes are upstream Aug 19 19:12:59 it works too Aug 19 19:13:04 nice! Aug 19 19:13:11 nice work Aug 19 19:13:15 I was able to route traffic from a wifi client to the internet Aug 19 19:13:30 did you run b43? Aug 19 19:13:31 so surfing the internet already works ;-) Aug 19 19:13:32 wow Aug 19 19:13:34 yes Aug 19 19:13:36 b43 Aug 19 19:14:17 the initramfs image works with b43 Aug 19 19:14:26 you jzst have to manually assign it a mac address Aug 19 19:14:37 ok Aug 19 19:14:41 thanks for info Aug 19 19:14:43 :) Aug 19 19:15:03 let me know about m25p80/spi-nor result :) Aug 19 19:35:06 build #672 of uml is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/uml/builds/672 Aug 19 19:38:49 build #630 of sibyte is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sibyte/builds/630 Aug 19 19:41:00 zajec_: it compiles Aug 19 19:41:48 Hauke: just spi-nor backport? Aug 19 19:41:56 will you share it / push it? Aug 19 19:42:12 and M25P80 and your spi patch Aug 19 19:42:17 nice Aug 19 19:42:20 waiting for the push :) Aug 19 19:42:57 Hauke: how did you backport this damn "mtd: m25p80: use the SPI nor framework" ?! Aug 19 19:44:09 I did a diff between Openwrt kernel and linux mainline kernel Aug 19 19:44:21 oh, the easy way :) Aug 19 19:44:23 ok Aug 19 19:44:24 I still have to check what OpenWrt adds which is not in mainline Aug 19 19:44:29 well, if that is working Aug 19 19:44:31 that's cool Aug 19 19:45:59 Hauke: i guess OpenWrt modifies some code in m25p80 that is no longer there Aug 19 19:46:06 (it was probably moved to the spi-nor) Aug 19 19:46:22 still not sure why do you care so much about m25p80 on bcm53xx ;) Aug 19 19:46:38 and I really hope we will switch to some 3.18 ;) Aug 19 19:46:50 maintaining this m25p80 may be a mess Aug 19 19:47:01 imagine someone will add a new m25p80 patch into generic... :| Aug 19 19:47:14 maybe you should still consider ignoring m25p80 changes Aug 19 19:47:24 we won't use them anyway after aall Aug 19 19:47:46 https://github.com/hauke/openwrt/tree/bcm53xx-mtd Aug 19 19:50:06 Hauke: do you really see any sense in having m25p80 for bcm53xx? Aug 19 19:50:09 it will never be used Aug 19 19:50:22 no I will remove it again Aug 19 19:50:45 001-spi-nor.patch looks cool :) Aug 19 19:51:13 should we name it 400- maybe? Aug 19 19:51:19 to match generic? Aug 19 19:51:27 i don't really care :) just asking Aug 19 19:52:04 it is backporting stuff already in mainline kernel so 0xx Aug 19 19:52:24 ok Aug 19 19:52:25 righ Aug 19 19:52:27 correct Aug 19 19:53:26 when the backport patches are applied at first the other patches can depend on it and are better matching the stuff in mainline kernel Aug 19 19:53:40 i agree Aug 19 19:56:19 did you take spi-nor from 3.17-rc1? Aug 19 19:56:42 what was the last patch you backported? Aug 19 19:57:12 yes I used 3.17-rc1 Aug 19 19:57:40 this is the last commit: 7d1311b93e58ed55f3a31cc8f94c4b8fe988a2b9 Aug 19 20:06:33 hauke r42221 trunk/target/linux/ (5 files in 4 dirs) * kernel: update bcma to code from v3.17-rc1 Aug 19 20:12:44 hauke r42222 trunk/target/linux/ bcm53xx/patches-3.14/001-mtd-spi-nor.patch bcm53xx/config-3.14 * bcm53xx: backport spi nor code form kernel v3.17-rc1. Aug 19 20:14:15 hauke r42223 trunk/target/linux/ bcm53xx/config-3.14 bcm53xx/patches-3.14/180-spi-bcm53xx-driver-for-SPI-controller-on-Broadcom-bc.patch * bcm53xx: add SPI controller driver Aug 19 20:27:38 Hauke: thanks a lot :) Aug 19 20:27:49 Hauke: i'll provide driver tomorrow Aug 19 20:27:54 nice Aug 19 20:27:55 Hauke: btw. any idea about this NAND thing? Aug 19 20:27:59 this really looks wrong :| Aug 19 20:28:07 no idea Aug 19 20:28:38 is this nand ecc stuff standardized? Aug 19 20:28:58 yes i believe so Aug 19 20:29:06 there are different layouts Aug 19 20:29:12 but they layout depends on the OOB size Aug 19 20:29:15 *the Aug 19 20:29:35 so if have have chips with 64 B OOB, we always should use the same ECC layout Aug 19 20:29:38 I just read the wikipdeia article Aug 19 20:30:17 it says the ecc size depends on the page size Aug 19 20:30:25 that's the same ;) Aug 19 20:30:31 OOB size depends on the page size too Aug 19 20:36:42 build #642 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/642 Aug 19 20:45:49 zajec_: does OpenWrt now contain all your pending patches? Aug 19 20:47:58 i think so Aug 19 20:48:31 well Aug 19 20:48:33 [PATCH] kernel: add own Kconfig for OpenWrt mtdsplit drivers Aug 19 21:05:31 Hauke: ok, i've a pready ready driver using spi-nor layer Aug 19 21:05:43 nice Aug 19 21:05:43 i'll backport some experimenta spi-nor patches Aug 19 21:05:48 and then add my driver Aug 19 21:05:52 but have to go sleep now Aug 19 21:05:54 not enough time Aug 19 21:05:57 good night :) Aug 19 21:06:03 we will hack again tomorr ;) Aug 19 21:06:18 night, will go to sleep too soon Aug 19 21:48:54 build #156 of pxa is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/pxa/builds/156 Aug 19 22:12:03 build #719 of brcm47xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm47xx/builds/719 Aug 19 22:12:42 build #709 of atheros is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/atheros/builds/709 Aug 19 23:00:18 build #702 of cobalt is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/cobalt/builds/702 Aug 19 23:06:33 build #707 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/707 Aug 19 23:17:00 build #739 of brcm63xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm63xx/builds/739 Aug 19 23:21:13 build #158 of realview is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/realview/builds/158 Aug 19 23:21:36 build #661 of ar7 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ar7/builds/661 Aug 19 23:21:39 build #687 of ppc40x is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc40x/builds/687 Aug 19 23:31:40 build #41 of x86.kvm_guest is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86.kvm_guest/builds/41 Aug 19 23:35:13 build #566 of iop32x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/iop32x/builds/566 Aug 19 23:43:12 build #663 of rb532 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/rb532/builds/663 Aug 19 23:43:41 build #668 of x86 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86/builds/668 Aug 19 23:48:52 build #157 of malta is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/malta/builds/157 Aug 19 23:49:27 build #46 of ar71xx.nand is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ar71xx.nand/builds/46 Aug 19 23:49:47 build #45 of ramips.rt3883 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ramips.rt3883/builds/45 Aug 19 23:51:39 build #161 of x86_64 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86_64/builds/161 Aug 19 23:51:52 build #69 of brcm47xx.legacy is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm47xx.legacy/builds/69 Aug 19 23:52:09 build #697 of lantiq is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/lantiq/builds/697 Aug 20 00:01:49 build #692 of ramips is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ramips/builds/692 Aug 20 00:45:58 build #613 of kirkwood is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/kirkwood/builds/613 Aug 20 00:51:22 build #61 of brcm47xx.mips74k is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm47xx.mips74k/builds/61 Aug 20 01:07:42 build #161 of cns21xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/cns21xx/builds/161 Aug 20 01:09:16 build #46 of brcm63xx.smp is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm63xx.smp/builds/46 Aug 20 01:36:27 build #248 of mvebu is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mvebu/builds/248 Aug 20 02:20:06 build #263 of mxs is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mxs/builds/263 Aug 20 02:34:30 build #514 of octeon is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/octeon/builds/514 Aug 20 02:36:48 build #619 of ixp4xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ixp4xx/builds/619 Aug 20 02:37:53 build #160 of bcm53xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/bcm53xx/builds/160 Aug 20 02:47:20 build #634 of xburst is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/xburst/builds/634 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Aug 20 02:59:59 2014