**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Jul 25 02:59:58 2016 Jul 25 06:37:10 Hi. We're busy trying to get Debian running on the Linksys EA4500. The network implementation on OpenWRT is the same, except it is possible to create VLANs and get port status per-port. We can't seem to achieve this without going the DSA route on Debian. Does anyone know more about switches, and this one in particular? Jul 25 06:37:56 Debian and OpenWRT appear to use the same drivers, but in Debian there is only eth0 and eth1 and no control of port assignment. swconfig doesn't pick anything up Jul 25 07:01:50 megal0maniac: well there are 3 (?) different hw revisions of that unit - so you probably want to specify which one you are using - i doubt that debian and openwrt use the same driver if your revision is using the AR8337 one Jul 25 07:02:39 Sorry, yes. I'm using V1, the kirkwood based one Jul 25 07:03:11 http://forum.doozan.com/read.php?2,12096 Jul 25 07:07:49 On OpenWRT, there are eth0 and eth1 devices with preconfigured VLANs, but you can also make use of swconfig to change VLANs, see port status etc. We're trying to figure out how to expose that extra functionality (while simultaneously trying to implement DSA) Jul 25 07:07:53 megal0maniac: cannot help you with details on switch - but you could check out the changes that OpenWrt uses - for example target/linux/kirkwood/patches-4.4/160-ea4500.patch - and then Jul 25 07:08:10 the patches in target/linux/generic/patches-.../ Jul 25 07:08:30 Alright, I'll have a look. Thanks Jul 25 07:10:57 build #376 of bcm53xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/bcm53xx/builds/376 Jul 25 07:18:35 Hi, The openwrt.org cann't be accessed by ERR_CERT_DATE_INVALID Jul 25 07:21:41 fengling: this issue is known - it is unknown when this will be fixed Jul 25 07:22:20 fengling: yep, we know about it - will be fixed soon Jul 25 07:22:23 thanks Jul 25 07:24:58 Thank you all, you guys. Jul 25 07:44:43 thanks for the info Jul 25 07:58:23 build #24 of socfpga is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/socfpga/builds/24 Jul 25 08:12:13 build #382 of brcm47xx is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm47xx/builds/382 Jul 25 08:15:32 build #277 of ep93xx is complete: Failure [failed shell_13] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ep93xx/builds/277 Jul 25 08:24:18 build #267 of ar71xx.mikrotik is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ar71xx.mikrotik/builds/267 Jul 25 09:07:48 build #347 of lantiq is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/lantiq/builds/347 Jul 25 09:54:13 build #301 of xburst is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/xburst/builds/301 Jul 25 11:35:13 build #287 of lantiq.xrx200 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/lantiq.xrx200/builds/287 Jul 25 14:40:48 build #286 of octeon is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/octeon/builds/286 Jul 25 18:19:27 i'm making a new app, it's like strongswan that loads plugins, so should I build all plugins by default and let the user to choose which one to install, or should i just put it all in one package and the user can control what features to enable by make menuconfig options Jul 25 18:42:43 hojuruku: if you can package individual plugins do that, allows users to customize their installation without having to compile their own build Jul 25 18:46:14 KanjiMonster: that's what I'm doing. The openwrt buildroot bot will turn everything on for a package right? all options that can be enabled that don't conflict? Jul 25 18:47:06 I could submit something tomorrow but I'll wait a week and do functional testing. Jul 25 18:47:21 hojuruku: it will use the default values for config options (if it's a package, then it will use =m) Jul 25 18:49:03 how do you set default values, show an example. Jul 25 18:50:04 https://accel-ppp.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=682 that's the buildlog, but i'm going to work on the kitchen sink of plugins and a procd init script, not as kitchen sink as the last version though, try and do more with less. Jul 25 18:51:43 KanjiMonster: for basic stuff like authentication modules i should package them with the main package - just throw them in. Allegedly it has a non-ssl internal encryption mode, but i don't see the other distros using it (for chap/pap/md5 etc). It's safe to assume if you want to run an access concentrator you have more than 4mb flash and openssl :P Jul 25 20:02:22 hello all, just found out about this channel by reading a doc on Github Jul 25 20:02:54 I wonder if anyone here can give me pointers on "Adding support for a new target" Jul 25 20:03:21 i have a new folder with Makefile under target/linux Jul 25 20:03:23 look at the targets tree on github i guess. A new target is a new cross compiler. Do you mean a new board or a whole new target? Jul 25 20:03:42 how do i get the build system to go into that directory and build it? Jul 25 20:04:19 it is a whole new target Jul 25 20:04:28 it uses cross compiler Jul 25 20:04:52 the scan.mk is not picking it up Jul 25 20:05:56 i've only added new boards, out of my league, KanjiMonster help this guy out. Jul 25 20:07:22 oh, wait looks like scan.mk is looking for a Makefile at the top of the directory, of course it is supposed to do Jul 25 20:07:47 i think i need to reorganize the dir structure may be Jul 25 20:10:16 Actually i do have a Makefile at the top in the new target folder, but scan.mk is not picking it up. trying to figure out why Jul 25 20:20:43 thank you for your help hojuruku, KanjiMonster please help if you can Jul 25 20:28:30 Frank_____: https://github.com/openwrt/targets.git seen that? also see the built in targets. Most of my openwrt support comes from RTFMing the source and seeing how others did it to borrow ideas. That helped a bit when building new packages. Jul 25 20:32:49 Thaks hojuruku, I will take a look. I do believe in RTMF Jul 25 21:10:49 KanjiMonster: can i use BOTH include/package.mk and include/kernel.mk in the same Makefile? Jul 25 21:16:14 ah yes i can great. Jul 25 21:21:53 Frank_____: have you tried deleting tmp/ ? Jul 25 21:23:02 yes i did Jul 25 21:23:36 i guess it is missing some setting or such or there is a list of targets i need to update? Jul 25 21:24:35 Frank_____: I don't think so, else the targets feed would be pointless Jul 25 21:25:27 i have a make file in target/linux/newtarget Jul 25 21:25:36 and in the makefile i added arch etc Jul 25 21:25:45 Frank_____: can you paste your makefile? (pastebin etc) Jul 25 21:25:53 what else do i need to define? Jul 25 21:32:11 thank you KanjiMonster Jul 25 21:32:22 I took a different approach and it is building now Jul 25 21:49:41 I didn't even do anything ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Jul 26 01:31:36 build #369 of realview is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/realview/builds/369 Jul 26 01:59:55 build #377 of bcm53xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/bcm53xx/builds/377 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Jul 26 02:59:58 2016