**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Nov 23 03:00:00 2016
Nov 23 06:09:14 <nitroshift> wigyori, morning :)
Nov 23 06:39:59 <wigyori> nitroshift: morning ;)
Nov 23 06:40:36 <nitroshift> wigyori, i've pushed some changes on wrt3200acm dts
Nov 23 07:02:22 <wigyori> yep, saw the PR - makes sense as long as you and Kaloz are ok with it
Nov 23 07:02:36 <wigyori> small nitpicking, can you update the commit message to something like 'mvebu: update wrt3200acm dts'
Nov 23 07:02:39 <wigyori> ?
Nov 23 07:02:53 <wigyori> aaaand signed-off-by
Nov 23 07:02:54 <wigyori> :)
Nov 23 07:15:41 <builder> build #302 of adm8668 is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/adm8668/builds/302
Nov 23 07:16:52 <nitroshift> wigyori, edited, SOB is already there
Nov 23 07:23:50 <nitroshift> wigyori, wrong place for SOB :|
Nov 23 07:23:53 <nitroshift> reworking
Nov 23 07:24:02 <wigyori> :)
Nov 23 07:41:10 <nitroshift> wigyori, since i was at it, i also added the wireless regulatory powertables
Nov 23 07:41:26 <nitroshift> waiting for Kaloz's OK
Nov 23 07:47:05 <wigyori> ack
Nov 23 07:47:47 <wigyori> this should be done for CC as well, right?
Nov 23 07:49:05 <nitroshift> wigyori, yes
Nov 23 07:51:02 <nitroshift> i still don't know whether a release will be made soon, in which case CC doesn't need it
Nov 23 07:53:11 <wigyori> i still have plans to do a cc.2
Nov 23 07:53:14 <wigyori> but that shouldn't be just me
Nov 23 07:53:35 <nitroshift> then yes, it needs to be done for CC too
Nov 23 07:54:25 <nitroshift> wigyori, i'd keep CC at a LTSI kernel level
Nov 23 07:54:34 <nitroshift> 4.1 for example
Nov 23 07:55:03 <wigyori> cc would stay on 3.18
Nov 23 07:55:09 <wigyori> ENOMANPOWER for an ltsi 4.1 upgrade
Nov 23 07:55:14 <wigyori> (at least in my plans)
Nov 23 07:55:25 <nitroshift> sounds good
Nov 23 07:56:58 <nbd> why LTSI?
Nov 23 08:01:47 <nitroshift> nbd, because most manufacturers are using it?
Nov 23 08:02:06 <nbd> they are? i didn't notice
Nov 23 08:02:12 <nbd> i just took a look at the LTSI patch tree
Nov 23 08:02:16 <nbd> and found nothing useful in there ...
Nov 23 08:02:19 <nbd> so i was wondering
Nov 23 08:02:30 <nitroshift> at least that's what ltsi web site says
Nov 23 08:03:16 <nitroshift> nbd, i do agree with you regarding its usage and i can only speak for marvell, they are still using 3.10.70
Nov 23 08:05:44 <nbd> i'd say most manufacturers use random crappy SDK kernels
Nov 23 08:26:09 <nitroshift> wigyori, nbd, what is your view on porting netmap-fwd in openwrt? https://github.com/Netgate/netmap-fwd
Nov 23 08:27:22 <nitroshift> i assume it will speed up network traffic since it bypasses the kernel (or so it's claimed)
Nov 23 08:44:48 <nbd> first of all, this thing is for freebsd
Nov 23 08:45:37 <nbd> i think performace of something like this will suck on embedded devices
Nov 23 08:46:14 <nbd> a big x86 machine might be able to handle it, because it has enough cache
Nov 23 08:46:39 <nbd> but on smaller devices, a lot of the cpu cache is already blown away by kernel <-> user context switches
Nov 23 08:46:45 <nbd> and there's probably going to be some copy overhead involved
Nov 23 08:48:46 <nitroshift> nbd, that makes sense, thanks
Nov 23 16:28:29 <builder> build #313 of uml is complete: Failure [failed compile_5]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/uml/builds/313
Nov 23 17:46:45 <builder> build #289 of omap is complete: Failure [failed compile_4]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/omap/builds/289
Nov 23 19:47:42 <builder> build #8 of arc770 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/arc770/builds/8
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Nov 24 03:00:00 2016