**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Sep 27 02:59:57 2019
Sep 27 03:37:15 <pkgadd> lynxis: I'd be a little cautious about gcc-9 for the time being, until just 2 or 3 weeks ago I was seeing /lots/ of ICEs while just compiling kernel v5.2.x for i386 (at various/ changing places, no shuch issues for amd64)
Sep 27 03:45:15 <rmilecki> morning
Sep 27 03:45:30 <rmilecki> jow: could you take a look at my luci patches, please?
Sep 27 03:49:01 <aparcar[m]> rmilecki: morning
Sep 27 03:50:02 <aparcar[m]> pkgadd: is it the same for gcc8? I'd like to get rid of the buildpath within the binary files
Sep 27 03:53:25 <pkgadd> aparcar[m]: gcc-8 has been fine for me - and I don't see issues with gcc-9 anymore (Debian gcc-9 (9.2.1-8), Update to SVN 20190909 (r275519) from the gcc-9-branch.), just mentioning it because if i386 was broken until just a couple of days ago, I don't even want about the others architectures
Sep 27 03:53:49 <pkgadd> *know
Sep 27 03:55:01 <aparcar[m]> pkgadd: do you know more about the source path option?
Sep 27 03:55:13 <pkgadd> not really
Sep 27 03:56:47 <aparcar[m]> lynxis: can you help out here?
**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Sep 27 04:19:59 2019
Sep 27 09:17:55 <ynezz> aparcar[m]: maybe it's your matrix world? we've discussed this already here, didn't we? :)
Sep 27 09:18:27 <ynezz> aparcar[m]: https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/build-path/
Sep 27 09:46:12 <aparcar[m]> ynezz: oh did we? Sorry couldn't remember. With this 12 hour time shift I sometimes read stuff to early or late and forget about it after wards
Sep 27 09:53:11 <ynezz> aparcar[m]: http://logs.nslu2-linux.org/livelogs/openwrt-devel/openwrt-devel.20190924.txt
Sep 27 10:02:42 <aparcar[m]> I should start a diary but I guess i went to bed after ~9pm missing all the fun afterwards...
Sep 27 10:13:48 <jow> nbd: is flow offloading handling any conntrack stream or just udp/tcp traffic?
Sep 27 10:24:02 <aparcar[m]> jow: did you implement the TARGET_CFLAGS += -D'ASSERT_RTNL()=do{}while(0)' thing?
Sep 27 10:24:11 <jow> no
Sep 27 10:24:43 <aparcar[m]> may I?
Sep 27 10:25:29 <ynezz> BTW this is wrong approach
Sep 27 10:27:09 <aparcar[m]> ynezz: okay then rahter not
Sep 27 10:27:23 <ynezz> correct one is to bump gcc with support for that directory remaping
Sep 27 10:27:50 <ynezz> and probably use that map in the global host/target compiler flags
Sep 27 10:29:58 <aparcar[m]> oh yea that's what I wanted to do. I though this command is already part of it
Sep 27 10:30:15 <aparcar[m]> ynezz: could you help me raise gcc to 8?
Sep 27 10:34:15 <ynezz> aparcar[m]: gcc version bump example 61eee1adfbc9433b08b53f44804d4fb8d8d25f38
Sep 27 10:35:02 <aparcar[m]> ynezz: thanks, that looks dooable
Sep 27 10:35:32 <ynezz> build test it on some targets, fix possible breakage, send patch(es) to mailing list, profit :)
Sep 27 10:36:04 <aparcar[m]> sure simple as that
Sep 27 10:40:29 <ynezz> BTW I would like to start build testing (later add some run tests as well) the openwrt C based projects like procd natively on x86 with few gcc/clang combinations, for this I would like to create Docker image with all the ubus/libubox & friends deps precompiled, any idea how to name that image?
Sep 27 10:40:37 <ynezz> native ?
Sep 27 10:49:08 <jow> "frankenstein"
Sep 27 10:49:38 <ynezz> kind of
Sep 27 10:53:04 <aparcar[m]> ynezz: I think lynxis ported some tools to debian and build actual deb packages. maybe that helps?
Sep 27 10:53:22 <ynezz> ah, nice
Sep 27 10:54:07 <ynezz> I can't find libubus in debian :)
Sep 27 10:54:46 <aparcar[m]> https://code.fe80.eu/openwrt/ubus/tree/debian
Sep 27 10:55:34 <jow> gnarf, its Lua, not LUA
Sep 27 10:55:43 <jow> same as it is openWrt and not OPENWRT
Sep 27 10:55:49 <jow> *OpenWrt
Sep 27 10:56:04 <aparcar[m]> hehe
Sep 27 10:56:30 <ynezz> OpenWRT ftw!
Sep 27 10:56:35 <aparcar[m]> jow: please review my signing code and not some frankenstein graves
Sep 27 10:59:09 <jow> aparcar[m]: its there somewhere, far down on my todo list
Sep 27 11:00:18 <aparcar[m]> jow: can't you create a liberapay or whatever account so people just buy your time? (not me necessary)
Sep 27 11:04:35 <aparcar[m]> or, speaking of frankenstein, could this outdated bugbounty thing be reanimated?
Sep 27 11:06:19 <ynezz> you've some 0days on hand? :p
Sep 27 11:10:51 <aparcar[m]> ynezz: sure but Hawaii is expensive...
Sep 27 11:10:52 <aparcar[m]> https://www.bountysource.com/teams/openwrt/issues?tracker_ids=10101609
Sep 27 11:10:52 <aparcar[m]> this even still points to dev.openwrt.org
Sep 27 11:14:03 <aparcar[m]> ynezz: If I'm lucky this one get to 100% repro https://gitlab.com/aparcar/rebuild/-/jobs/305892472
Sep 27 11:14:50 <ynezz> good luck then :)
Sep 27 11:18:56 <aparcar[m]> good ninght for now
Sep 27 13:33:22 <blogic> lynxis: ping
Sep 27 13:33:31 <lynxis> blogic: pong
Sep 27 21:32:40 <ynezz> 7 frankensteins https://gitlab.com/ynezz/openwrt-libubox/-/jobs/306431141
Sep 27 22:15:19 <aparcar[m]> ynezz: do you know where in buildroot I can actually set extra global options?
Sep 27 22:18:50 <aparcar[m]> nevermind I can even set it in menuconfig
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Sep 28 02:59:59 2019