**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Apr 22 02:59:57 2020 Apr 22 03:02:35 build #329 of layerscape/armv8_64b is complete: Failure [failed dirupload] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/layerscape%2Farmv8_64b/builds/329 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar Apr 22 03:05:59 build #330 of archs38/generic is complete: Failure [failed updatefeeds] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/archs38%2Fgeneric/builds/330 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar Apr 22 03:12:19 build #328 of omap/generic is complete: Failure [failed updatefeeds] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/omap%2Fgeneric/builds/328 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar Apr 22 03:44:03 build #104 of mpc85xx/p2020 is complete: Failure [failed fetchrefs] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/mpc85xx%2Fp2020/builds/104 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar , Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant Apr 22 03:47:46 build #101 of ath79/tiny is complete: Failure [failed updatefeeds] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/ath79%2Ftiny/builds/101 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar , Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant Apr 22 04:06:50 build #296 of lantiq/xrx200 is complete: Failure [failed dirupload] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/lantiq%2Fxrx200/builds/296 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar Apr 22 04:34:11 build #283 of malta/be is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/malta%2Fbe/builds/283 Apr 22 04:56:31 build #278 of samsung/s5pv210 is complete: Failure [failed images] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/samsung%2Fs5pv210/builds/278 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar Apr 22 04:56:31 build #267 of lantiq/falcon is complete: Failure [failed images] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/lantiq%2Ffalcon/builds/267 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar Apr 22 04:56:32 build #297 of gemini/generic is complete: Exception [exception dlfindbinpl] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/gemini%2Fgeneric/builds/297 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar Apr 22 04:56:32 build #298 of imx6/generic is complete: Exception [exception dlfindbinpl] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/imx6%2Fgeneric/builds/298 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar Apr 22 04:56:33 build #294 of ramips/mt76x8 is complete: Exception [exception dlfindbinpl] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/ramips%2Fmt76x8/builds/294 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar Apr 22 04:56:33 build #292 of lantiq/xway is complete: Exception [exception dlfindbinpl] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/lantiq%2Fxway/builds/292 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar Apr 22 04:56:33 build #291 of armvirt/64 is complete: Exception [exception dlfindbinpl] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/armvirt%2F64/builds/291 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar Apr 22 04:56:34 build #289 of zynq/generic is complete: Exception [exception dlfindbinpl] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/zynq%2Fgeneric/builds/289 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar Apr 22 04:56:34 build #289 of mxs/generic is complete: Exception [exception dlfindbinpl] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/mxs%2Fgeneric/builds/289 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar Apr 22 04:56:35 build #273 of layerscape/armv7 is complete: Exception [exception dlfindbinpl] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/layerscape%2Farmv7/builds/273 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar Apr 22 04:56:35 build #279 of ath79/tiny is complete: Exception [exception dlfindbinpl] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/ath79%2Ftiny/builds/279 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar Apr 22 04:56:36 build #267 of ipq40xx/generic is complete: Exception [exception dlfindbinpl] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/ipq40xx%2Fgeneric/builds/267 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar Apr 22 04:56:36 build #273 of sunxi/cortexa8 is complete: Exception [exception dlfindbinpl] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/sunxi%2Fcortexa8/builds/273 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar Apr 22 05:22:10 build #79 of bcm47xx/mips74k is complete: Exception [exception interrupted] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/bcm47xx%2Fmips74k/builds/79 Apr 22 05:22:33 build #79 of bcm27xx/bcm2711 is complete: Exception [exception interrupted] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/bcm27xx%2Fbcm2711/builds/79 Apr 22 05:28:25 build #108 of x86/generic is complete: Failure [failed dirupload] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/x86%2Fgeneric/builds/108 blamelist: Petr ?tetiar , Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant Apr 22 06:26:23 hopefully this is the last failure on those fsf builders, I took the liberty and removed all of them temporarily, there seems to be some network issue, zorun has kindly notified them about the issue, hopefully fixed soon Apr 22 06:31:50 build #73 of bcm63xx/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/bcm63xx%2Fgeneric/builds/73 Apr 22 07:26:20 blocktrron: ping Apr 22 07:31:32 build #372 of lantiq/ase is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/lantiq%2Fase/builds/372 Apr 22 07:34:01 build #371 of sunxi/cortexa53 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/sunxi%2Fcortexa53/builds/371 Apr 22 08:13:03 build #329 of mpc85xx/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/mpc85xx%2Fgeneric/builds/329 Apr 22 08:36:50 build #330 of layerscape/armv8_64b is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/layerscape%2Farmv8_64b/builds/330 Apr 22 09:46:17 build #331 of archs38/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/archs38%2Fgeneric/builds/331 Apr 22 09:55:15 build #329 of omap/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/omap%2Fgeneric/builds/329 Apr 22 10:00:46 build #300 of x86/legacy is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/x86%2Flegacy/builds/300 Apr 22 10:10:31 jow: ping :) Apr 22 10:34:18 build #297 of lantiq/xrx200 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/lantiq%2Fxrx200/builds/297 Apr 22 11:08:50 Borromini: pong? Apr 22 11:11:37 build #279 of samsung/s5pv210 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/samsung%2Fs5pv210/builds/279 Apr 22 11:14:44 build #268 of lantiq/falcon is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/lantiq%2Ffalcon/builds/268 Apr 22 11:17:41 blocktrron: hi! is there a way to get https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/2588 moving? :) Apr 22 11:25:26 thanks :) Apr 22 12:41:02 build #151 of octeontx/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/octeontx%2Fgeneric/builds/151 Apr 22 13:35:08 build #144 of cns3xxx/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/cns3xxx%2Fgeneric/builds/144 Apr 22 13:35:10 build #145 of mediatek/mt7622 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/mediatek%2Fmt7622/builds/145 Apr 22 13:41:16 build #147 of mediatek/mt7623 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/mediatek%2Fmt7623/builds/147 Apr 22 13:58:42 build #144 of mvebu/cortexa9 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/mvebu%2Fcortexa9/builds/144 Apr 22 14:15:49 so, I connected to the web page on a freshly installed OpenWrt, went to the Network->DHCP and DNS page, and do not see a way to disable DNS. Apr 22 14:16:02 "disable DNS" ? Apr 22 14:16:05 sorry, disable DHCP I mean Apr 22 14:16:16 * greearb woke up too early Apr 22 14:16:39 network -> interfaces -> lan -> dhcp server -> [x] ignore interface Apr 22 14:17:21 ok, but why not on the DHCP and DNS page, that seems the obvious place to look Apr 22 14:17:47 because the other half of the users expected it on the lan interface Apr 22 14:17:57 or rather the per interface config pages Apr 22 14:18:02 its been this way since ten years or so now Apr 22 14:18:11 or maybe 5, rather long in any case Apr 22 14:19:08 I think there should be a global enable/disable on the DHCP and DNS page, with link pointing back to the per-interface settings for users that want lower level control. Apr 22 14:19:25 there is, just stop the dnsmasq service Apr 22 14:20:34 I see no checkbox for that. Apr 22 14:21:49 system -> startup -> dnsmasq, click enabled Apr 22 14:21:59 and then stop it Apr 22 14:22:55 there is no way a new user is going to figure that out, dnsmasq doesn't even have dhcp in the name. There should be a checkbox on the DHCP and DNS page at the very top I think. Apr 22 14:23:04 ok Apr 22 14:24:23 If I want the AP to act as a simple bridge, should I just enable the LAN interface and then connect one of the LAN ports to the upstream network? Apr 22 14:24:36 or, rather, is that the easiest way to do such a thing? Apr 22 14:24:55 isn't that the default config? Apr 22 14:25:13 seems to be Apr 22 14:26:09 The radios weren't enabled out of the box, so I first went in and twiddled /etc/config/wireless before I thought to try the web interface Apr 22 14:27:02 so, no way to do initial config over wifi? Apr 22 14:27:14 nope Apr 22 14:27:22 Not by default but you can add your uci-defaults script to enable wireless to the image you selfbuild. Apr 22 14:27:25 on purpose? Apr 22 14:27:29 yes Apr 22 14:27:37 what Paul said Apr 22 14:28:22 I find it frustrating such a nice piece of engineering is so difficult for new users to use. Apr 22 14:29:05 I can of course customize stuff if I self build, but why make the upstream images difficult to use? Apr 22 14:29:08 greearb: have you tried mikrotik? Their UI is also "quite challenging" to new users. Apr 22 14:29:14 never Apr 22 14:29:33 wifi is off by default because there is no way to ensure secure defaults Apr 22 14:29:34 greearb: because default wireless has no password, and ssh has no password too. Apr 22 14:29:38 but modern commerical APs are very easy to start using, at least if you ignore their bugs Apr 22 14:29:50 yes, because theri firmware is tailored for the hardware Apr 22 14:30:02 greearb: what do you have in mind? Professional cisco gear? Apr 22 14:30:03 and does not need to cater to the lowest common denominator Apr 22 14:30:20 it can also use things like factory flashed unique default passwords Apr 22 14:30:28 and thus enable wifi by default Apr 22 14:30:47 consumer grade APs, cisco is a royal pain Apr 22 14:31:08 you can make openwrt equally simple and work ootb, if you throw out 99% of the supported devices Apr 22 14:31:43 greearb: consumer grade APs are all different and annoying in their unique ways... Apr 22 14:31:51 So that's not a good reference to use Apr 22 14:32:23 Here's an example script to enable wireless https://oldwiki.archive.openwrt.org/doc/uci#uci-defaults Apr 22 14:32:51 there is no reason we could not have a 'simple new user' page Apr 22 14:33:19 https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-developer/uci-defaults is there too of course, but doesn't have the wifi example specifically. Apr 22 14:33:49 greearb: apart from time and resources, no reason Apr 22 14:33:55 there already is such a page, https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-quick-start/start Apr 22 14:34:00 I've got to go..about to flash OpenWrt with some open-sync driven thing, so will be using that anyway. Apr 22 14:43:13 build #372 of sunxi/cortexa53 is complete: Failure [failed pkgbuild] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/sunxi%2Fcortexa53/builds/372 blamelist: Felix Fietkau Apr 22 14:47:04 PaulFertser, self-documenting UI is way more fun to use than finding and following some web page Apr 22 14:47:32 anyway, it gives room for folks to make a business around making their own UI for OpenWrt. Apr 22 14:49:08 greearb: it's work-in-progress (although it's taking more time than I anticipated) Apr 22 14:49:14 a simple interface, I mean Apr 22 14:49:22 complementary to the current interface Apr 22 14:49:51 glad to hear it, ping me when you have something...I'll have forgotten things again by then and can be a new dumb user to try it out :) Apr 22 14:50:20 I'll also have forgotten ;) there will be a call for testing on the mailing list Apr 22 14:50:34 sounds good Apr 22 14:50:48 greearb: I think it depends on the context and target audience a lot. Professional tools usually require one to read some documentation with plenty of "overviews" and "sidenotes". I almost always configure OpenWrt by editing files in /etc/config/ and when I use LuCI on someone else's device I find it pretty neat and intuitive. Guess because I have the background. But do you really want to have Apr 22 14:50:50 greearb: btw, why do you want to disable dnsmasq? is it to use the device as a simple wifi bridge? Apr 22 14:50:54 plenty of people without background to configure routers and other networking equipment? Apr 22 14:51:10 zorun: yes, as regular AP Apr 22 14:51:47 I'm building a test rig, and need to serve DHCP outside of the AP DUT as otherwise the target DUT will run out of leases Apr 22 14:52:09 I wanted to do a basic test on stock OpenWrt before moving to a customized build Apr 22 14:52:22 oh ok, so not exactly a common end-user setup Apr 22 14:53:39 no, but it should still be easier to figure out how to disable dhcp at the least Apr 22 14:54:01 greearb Gargoyle issimple to use Apr 22 14:54:25 It is a build ontop of openwrt with a better userinterface Apr 22 14:54:57 I used it for a long time, but now devwork in openwrt mooves to fast for gargoyle to keep up Apr 22 14:59:09 Oh, since you're doing plenty of certification-related work probably you have a minute to answer my question regarding HT40. I know there's a special flag in beacon that APs can use to signal they're "HT40-intolerant". Why does hostapd refuses to run in HT40 even when no nearby APs set that flag? Apr 22 15:07:04 build #131 of at91/sam9x is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/at91%2Fsam9x/builds/131 Apr 22 15:24:36 build #130 of ipq806x/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/ipq806x%2Fgeneric/builds/130 Apr 22 15:33:51 build #130 of brcm47xx/mips74k is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/brcm47xx%2Fmips74k/builds/130 Apr 22 15:40:39 build #131 of arc770/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/arc770%2Fgeneric/builds/131 Apr 22 15:55:03 build #133 of tegra/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/tegra%2Fgeneric/builds/133 Apr 22 15:58:07 PaulFertser, I don't know about that specific hostapd issue. I have patched it to force it to not do pri/sec channel switching which is useful in some cases, but maybe against spec or at least best practices in general. Apr 22 16:00:16 greearb: :) thank you for the answer. For the reference, OpenWrt ships hostapd with patches that allow ignoring presence of HT20 stations to force HT40 unconditionally (with just a uci config switch, no custom image needed). I think Mikrotik allows that as well. Apr 22 16:00:40 But what makes me wonder is that explicit ht40-intolerant flag that I've never seen used in the wild. Apr 22 16:01:43 I do not think it's a hostapd issue though, seems to be interpretation of the standard. But the wording in the standard is quite confusing (to me). Apr 22 16:12:36 ldir: heh; I see you kept yourself busy ;) Apr 22 16:13:06 you're discovery echoes with me: i noticed as well that running cake in diffserv mode shows very little (if any) traffic being actually tagged Apr 22 16:13:10 lol - yes Apr 22 16:13:17 and when looking at ingress, it's simply washed; nothing useful. Apr 22 16:13:46 thus I eventually told myself that there was no point, and that the single bucket was probably more efficient cpu/mem wise Apr 22 16:13:54 yes, nothing useful in ingress... nothing goes end to end. Apr 22 16:14:23 Which is why invented act_ctinfo Apr 22 16:14:27 i think the only traffic that I see reliably and correctly tagged is SIP Apr 22 16:15:18 but all that confirms what I had been told over the year, and which boils down to: "diffserv is broken/useless because nobody implements it" Apr 22 16:15:35 at least not on public traffic Apr 22 16:15:45 over the years* Apr 22 16:17:43 * ldir goes to ride the bike for a bit - maybe work off some annoyance Apr 22 16:18:01 hf :) Apr 22 16:22:03 build #120 of x86/legacy is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/x86%2Flegacy/builds/120 Apr 22 16:23:10 build #132 of ar71xx/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/ar71xx%2Fgeneric/builds/132 Apr 22 16:33:39 build #119 of imx6/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/imx6%2Fgeneric/builds/119 Apr 22 16:35:32 PaulFertser, at least ath10k clients have no way to disable 40Mhz if AP can do 40+, and AC explicitly prohibits stations from supporting less than 80Mhz. Apr 22 16:36:35 ynezz: who knows the netfilter makefiles well? Apr 22 16:38:11 greearb: that's interesting. But I'm talking about hostapd refusing to start in HT40 at all if it sees any "conflicting" HT20 APs on the same channel on startup. Apr 22 16:39:08 ok, I guess you looked at the verbose logs? Normally that would give you something to grep for in code to figure out why it is unhappy Apr 22 16:40:08 build #120 of lantiq/xrx200 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/lantiq%2Fxrx200/builds/120 Apr 22 16:53:58 greearb: I know why it's unhappy, I studied the code enough, and I think I've read the relevant portion of the 802.11n standard too :) My question is rather why they decided to make it unhappy about it, given that the standard is not too explicit (afaict). Apr 22 16:54:51 ok, sorry then...you already know more about it than me. Jouni might remember Apr 22 16:55:52 build #122 of octeon/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/octeon%2Fgeneric/builds/122 Apr 22 16:58:00 build #122 of lantiq/falcon is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/lantiq%2Ffalcon/builds/122 Apr 22 17:02:19 build #123 of layerscape/armv7 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/layerscape%2Farmv7/builds/123 Apr 22 17:22:17 build #120 of ar71xx/tiny is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/ar71xx%2Ftiny/builds/120 Apr 22 17:33:26 build #119 of mpc85xx/p1020 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/mpc85xx%2Fp1020/builds/119 Apr 22 17:34:51 build #118 of ramips/rt305x is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/ramips%2Frt305x/builds/118 Apr 22 17:45:16 build #116 of ar71xx/nand is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/ar71xx%2Fnand/builds/116 Apr 22 17:50:46 build #116 of ramips/mt76x8 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/ramips%2Fmt76x8/builds/116 Apr 22 18:09:59 build #115 of lantiq/xway is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/lantiq%2Fxway/builds/115 Apr 22 18:41:39 I keep hitting this issue that needs a reboot to fix: [80804.953183] unregister_netdevice: waiting for wan to become free. Usage count = 100 Apr 22 18:41:52 any suggestions on how to debug this would be much appreciated Apr 22 18:42:08 I already disabled the nf_conntrack_rtcache module, it's not the problem Apr 22 18:42:25 last time I hit this, this was because of the flowoffload stuff Apr 22 18:43:09 this was then fixed by https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=v4.19.51&id=028b3d8d549e276ffa34835aeb2c2a18c98e7ca3 Apr 22 18:43:34 but later it appeared again in 4.19 and seems to be still there in 5.4 Apr 22 18:49:44 I'll start by disabling flowoffload again, might help narrowing it down, but I would really like to know a better way to debug this Apr 22 18:50:03 because disabling random stuff is not very convenient Apr 22 18:50:17 or efficient Apr 22 20:44:27 nbd: this patch is cuasing the problems with debugfs: https://git.kernel.org/linus/52e04b4ce5d03775b6a78f3ed1097480faacc9fd Apr 22 20:44:38 is this already from on the wireless mailing list? Apr 22 20:44:40 build #373 of sunxi/cortexa53 is complete: Exception [exception interrupted] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/sunxi%2Fcortexa53/builds/373 blamelist: Felix Fietkau Apr 22 20:44:50 s/from/known/ Apr 22 21:26:12 back in 2017, i ran into a problem with serial nor flash and 4k erases taking a *long* time, particularly on 16MB parts during sysupgrades. i recall wondering why the kernel wasn't aggregating wholesale erases into 64k chunks. does anyone know if the situation has improved in the last 3 years? Apr 22 21:27:22 russell--: yes, 4k sectors are not enabled by default at all :) Apr 22 21:27:37 russell--: and where they're enabled, they're limited to 4 MiB flashes by default. Apr 22 22:29:15 build #116 of zynq/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/zynq%2Fgeneric/builds/116 Apr 22 22:32:13 build #118 of bcm53xx/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/bcm53xx%2Fgeneric/builds/118 Apr 22 22:32:45 build #119 of omap/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/omap%2Fgeneric/builds/119 Apr 22 22:41:10 PaulFertser: awesome. thank you. Apr 22 22:51:14 build #105 of ath79/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/ath79%2Fgeneric/builds/105 Apr 22 22:51:28 build #111 of gemini/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/gemini%2Fgeneric/builds/111 Apr 22 22:58:02 build #109 of samsung/s5pv210 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/samsung%2Fs5pv210/builds/109 Apr 22 22:58:12 build #110 of ipq40xx/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/ipq40xx%2Fgeneric/builds/110 Apr 22 22:59:51 build #108 of sunxi/cortexa8 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/sunxi%2Fcortexa8/builds/108 Apr 22 23:07:55 build #109 of brcm63xx/smp is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/brcm63xx%2Fsmp/builds/109 Apr 22 23:14:26 build #113 of ramips/mt7620 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/ramips%2Fmt7620/builds/113 Apr 22 23:29:33 build #102 of ath79/tiny is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/ath79%2Ftiny/builds/102 Apr 22 23:33:13 build #105 of mpc85xx/p2020 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/mpc85xx%2Fp2020/builds/105 Apr 22 23:55:23 build #109 of x86/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-19.07/images/builders/x86%2Fgeneric/builds/109 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Apr 23 02:59:58 2020