**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed May 20 02:59:58 2020 May 20 04:14:28 build #80 of lantiq/ase is complete: Failure [failed updatefeeds] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-18.06/images/builders/lantiq%2Fase/builds/80 blamelist: Adrian Schmutzler May 20 04:18:56 build #81 of x86/64 is complete: Failure [failed updatefeeds] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-18.06/images/builders/x86%2F64/builds/81 blamelist: Adrian Schmutzler May 20 06:17:02 build #116 of bcm47xx/generic is complete: Failure [failed] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/bcm47xx%2Fgeneric/builds/116 blamelist: Jason A. Donenfeld May 20 06:52:12 mangix: fair enough, bring that on mailing list May 20 07:01:34 aparcar[m]: `make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'package/busybox/compile'. Stop.` strikes again :p May 20 08:00:20 build #117 of bcm63xx/smp is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/bcm63xx%2Fsmp/builds/117 May 20 09:12:06 build #408 of at91/sam9x is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/at91%2Fsam9x/builds/408 May 20 09:34:01 PaulFertser: a minor update, "cat foo.pdf | nc 192.168.26.2 9100" works for MOST of pdf documents but not all May 20 09:34:02 for some PDFs Brother prints "Unsupported PDF data for Direct Print:1000" which apparently means Broher doesn't support PDF fully :| May 20 09:34:21 i googled some people complaining about it too May 20 09:35:23 (also OpenWrt ships some poor "nc" version - not BSD one - that doesn't support "-w" for timeout properly) May 20 09:35:53 That's not surprising unfortunately. I hope you do not need to print such PDFs from OpenWrt without being able to get it processed through some filter to make it edible for the specific printer. May 20 09:36:26 funny thing is, it's the same PDF template on server side, just few table rows more May 20 09:36:26 Yeah, it ships busybox nc by default. But you can install proper socat. May 20 09:37:05 PaulFertser: oh, I don't mean busybox one, I did "opkg install netcat" and it's still not the BSD "nc" May 20 09:41:06 take a look at ncat from nmap May 20 09:42:03 ynezz: i use that :) May 20 09:42:21 it has a nice -i option for stdin timeout May 20 09:47:25 stintel, ping May 20 09:47:59 nitroshift: pong May 20 10:32:21 jow: hi, does that sound serious enough to hold off the 19.07.3 release a bit? https://github.com/openwrt/luci/issues/4077 May 20 10:32:36 or should we just mention that in the release notes? (not that everybody will read them, but well...) May 20 10:46:12 zorun: no, yes (already did) May 20 11:25:04 jow: great, thanks! May 20 11:29:52 jow: can you update https://downloads.openwrt.org/ ? I plan to send the announce emails today May 20 11:48:43 zorun: now? May 20 11:53:44 jow: I'm waiting to hear from tmomas to bulk-update the dataentries, but I guess it doesn't hurt to update the download page now May 20 12:09:28 zorun: done. archive is syncing yet May 20 12:11:25 thanks! May 20 13:17:47 build #362 of layerscape/armv8_64b is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/layerscape%2Farmv8_64b/builds/362 May 20 13:57:01 pkgadd: btw I've just bumped hostapd again to the latest master in my staging tree, can you retest please? May 20 13:58:28 pkgadd: I'll then add your Tested-by and push it finally May 20 16:06:11 https://forum.openwrt.org/t/openwrt-19-07-3-service-release/64306 May 20 16:36:03 ynezz: thanks :) May 20 18:21:35 ynezz: should I push the update of mac80211? May 20 18:21:44 I am not aware of any regressions May 20 18:56:06 build #305 of ath79/tiny is complete: Failure [failed updatefeeds] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/ath79%2Ftiny/builds/305 blamelist: Rosen Penev , Jeffery To , Jason A. Donenfeld , Petr ?tetiar , Alberto Bursi , May 20 18:56:06 Thibaut VAR?NE , Richard Huynh , ?lvaro Fern?ndez Rojas , Eneas U de Queiroz , Karel Ko?? May 20 19:29:21 I just wondered whether it would make sense to set ath79/tiny to source-only ... But it seems like at least a few of the non-TP-Link devices is still built correctly? May 20 19:39:06 Hauke: sure, go ahead May 20 19:40:43 adrianschmutzler: this build failure "failed updatefeeds" is unrelated, it's some hiccup at f00b4r0 network :p May 20 19:41:05 fatal: unable to access 'https://git.openwrt.org/project/luci.git/': Could not resolve host: git.openwrt.org May 20 19:45:33 ynezz: yup sorry. router reboot. I thought it would get by unnoticed ;P May 20 20:51:38 build #117 of bcm47xx/generic is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/bcm47xx%2Fgeneric/builds/117 May 20 21:25:24 hauke: thanks, I'm aware. I was just considering this on a general basis ... May 20 21:25:58 err, ynezz, not hauke, sorry May 20 22:24:21 will there be another point release for 19.07? May 20 22:49:32 ynezz: o.k., I'll start a test build now May 20 22:53:13 Hauke: I've been using your 5.7-rc3 backports for a almost 3 weeks now, it's working fine with both ath10k and ath10k-ct. contrary to the 4.19/ 5.4 based backports, the new version fixes ath10k on nbg6817/ qca9984 and map-ac2200/ ipq4019+qca9986 (ath10k-ct is fine on any version) May 20 23:02:38 * mamarley has also been running the 5.7-rc3 backports, also without any problems. May 20 23:43:45 aparcar[m]: seems safe to assume there will. Bugfree releases are unheard of :) May 21 00:26:30 join #node.js May 21 01:32:48 ynezz: successfully runtime Tested-by: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann [ipq8065, NBG6817; ipq40xx, MAP-AC2200] r13314-5ff4b0d024+mac80211+hostapd, also build-tested on ath79, ath79-tiny and lantiq May 21 02:59:08 build #372 of kirkwood/generic is complete: Failure [failed kmodconfig] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/kirkwood%2Fgeneric/builds/372 blamelist: Rosen Penev , Eneas U de Queiroz , Thibaut VAR?NE **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu May 21 02:59:57 2020