**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Dec 05 02:59:57 2009
Dec 05 03:24:12 <rcn-ee> powderluv, a lot of packages are in flux so keep it minimal.. although 'xfce4,gdm' worked on this morning's build..
Dec 05 03:38:39 <powderluv> rcn-ee: fyi, ubuntu-minimal works. ubuntu-desktop failed on gedit. so these packages are all built with thumb2 already ?
Dec 05 03:41:09 <rcn-ee> powderluv, until atleast alpha-1 but it could be later it's really going to be very hit and miss with missing packages/dependices..  Yeap, everything should be thumb2, unless the package is broken..  It's still really early thou, i still haven't successfully built a kernel in a native lucid chroot for the beagleboard
Dec 05 03:44:43 <powderluv> ohh because of thumb2 or just churn in the packages ?
Dec 05 03:45:53 <rcn-ee> powderluv, both..  ubuntu has a tinkerbox style build status log, don't remember the address, lots of red for armel..
Dec 05 03:48:12 <powderluv> ok i see. i will dig for it. have you tried running any of the lucid rootfs on a system. is it at a bootable state ?
Dec 05 03:48:33 <rcn-ee> powderluv, found it: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/
Dec 05 03:50:09 <powderluv> thanks. we are leading the way in number of package failures :)
Dec 05 03:50:45 <rcn-ee> well i have a chroot setup for lucid on my beagleboard i use to build stuff, but lots of "illegal instructions" and random hardlocks.  It would be interesting to run it on a another cortex-aX platform..
Dec 05 03:53:06 <rcn-ee> i even have to rule out thumb mode, since i ran the gcc testsuite with it enabled and disabled, not much difference.  which just leaves bad packages...
Dec 05 03:53:16 <powderluv> i will try them out let you know
Dec 05 03:53:48 <powderluv> do you recompile those packages independently with thumb disabled?
Dec 05 03:54:28 <rcn-ee> powderluv, full gcc bootstrap..  digs for the two reports..
Dec 05 03:56:28 <rcn-ee> thumb: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-11/msg02447.html
Dec 05 03:56:47 <rcn-ee> nonthumb: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-11/msg02538.html
Dec 05 09:09:21 <OSS542> Good Evening All
Dec 05 09:09:56 <OSS542> anyone here using Zubuntu  ?
Dec 05 10:19:50 <rek> i want an application like skype
Dec 05 10:20:04 <rek> can i have a flash player?
Dec 05 10:25:50 <armin76> rek: you already asked that yesterday
Dec 05 10:39:33 <rek> really?
Dec 05 10:39:54 <rek> iis there a solution?
Dec 05 10:48:36 <kblin> yeah, reverse engineer the skype protocol and write an app supporting said protocol that compiles on arm
Dec 05 11:35:34 <OSS542> anyone here using Zubuntu  ?
Dec 05 13:23:12 <rek> hi i need an application to refresh my ip,i need also an application to manage a ftp server
Dec 05 13:47:30 <fta> asac, could you copy the codecs package to the arm ppa too? it's needed (dep)
Dec 05 18:17:11 <Stskeeps> g w00t
Dec 05 18:17:13 <Stskeeps> err.
Dec 05 18:59:04 <asac> fta: why is it a dep if its not needed during build. should at most be recommends
Dec 05 19:12:58 <fta> asac, because it's loaded dynamically and is not a build-dep, but i made chromium depends in either the free or non-free set of codecs
Dec 05 19:22:22 <fta> asac, depends vs recommends because upstream didn't want us to change the user experience, that whole free vs non-free is just to give users the choice
Dec 05 20:55:29 <asac> fta: we already change upstream experience by allowing free/non-free, right? i think that recommends should be similarly ok.
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Dec 06 02:59:58 2009