**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Jan 06 02:59:58 2011 Jan 06 10:42:25 * ogra twiddles thumbs ... omap3 kernel still building Jan 06 10:55:56 Hi Jan 06 10:56:31 I was wondering why the OMAP3 kernel symbols are available in http://ddebs.ubuntu.com repo but not the package for OMAP4 Jan 06 10:56:38 Is there a reason for this? Jan 06 10:56:55 ask #ubuntu-kernel, they do the packaging Jan 06 10:57:09 ogra: thanks Jan 06 10:57:10 theoretically omap4 should be there as well Jan 06 10:57:27 if the ddebs are missing for it we should build them Jan 06 10:57:37 ogra: I only see linux-image-2.6.35-22-omap-dbgsym Jan 06 10:57:50 yep Jan 06 10:58:50 berco, hmm, i see omap4 now that i'm looking Jan 06 10:58:54 http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/main/l/linux-ti-omap4/ Jan 06 11:05:44 ogra: I only added "deb http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/ maverick main" to my sources.list and I don't see it Jan 06 11:06:06 ogra: what is the proper syntax for sources.list? Jan 06 11:06:15 depends Jan 06 11:06:24 are you using the kernel from proposed ? Jan 06 11:06:35 or is there one in -updates you use Jan 06 11:06:59 if I want the one from 10.10 Jan 06 11:07:05 (and indeed, did you run apt-get update after changing sources.list) Jan 06 11:07:12 yep :) Jan 06 11:07:18 I did run update Jan 06 11:07:22 well, there is definitely a kernel in maverick-updates Jan 06 11:07:33 so you likely run that one Jan 06 11:07:49 which needs to be reflected in your sources.list entry i think Jan 06 11:08:21 dpkg -l|grep linux-image|grep omap4 Jan 06 11:08:33 see what version is installed Jan 06 11:08:44 worst case just wget it and dpkg -i Jan 06 11:09:02 ogra: yeah, I wanted to answer a partner is trying to get our kernel symbols Jan 06 11:09:10 (also note that the unstripped kernel is around 200M big) Jan 06 11:09:25 personnaly I run the kernel that we posted in omap-trunk public PPA Jan 06 11:09:37 ah Jan 06 11:12:40 so that makes me think we should also push the kernel symbols for our trunk version, right? Jan 06 11:12:57 there's no process on launchpad to do this automatically? Jan 06 11:13:47 i dont think so, it produces really huge packages ... you can just create a dbgsym package by default though Jan 06 11:13:57 (dont ask me how, never did that) Jan 06 11:14:01 ok, when I add maverick-updates, I see the OMAP4 kernel. Jan 06 11:14:07 right Jan 06 11:14:17 thats what i thought Jan 06 11:14:45 ogra: thanks Jan 06 11:15:04 http://wiki.debian.org/DebugPackage Jan 06 11:15:45 for your ppa kernel, you should be able to just change debian/control as described there Jan 06 11:29:30 ogra: it sounds good. I'll discuss with sebj Jan 06 12:54:46 i have downloaded ubuntu for beagleboard (mine is revision c4) and it works fine. The problem is that the usb hub does not power up. Does anyone know the solution for that? Jan 06 14:13:45 * rsalveti lunch Jan 06 14:23:14 G'day all Jan 06 14:23:31 ogra, have you seen persia at all this week? Jan 06 14:23:36 not at all Jan 06 14:23:44 i was already wondering yesterday Jan 06 14:25:06 I've been emailing and calling with no response Jan 06 14:26:55 damned Jan 06 14:27:05 hopefully he is well Jan 06 14:42:58 I hope so Jan 06 14:49:52 yeah, since the last week of december Jan 06 14:49:53 no news Jan 06 15:36:40 ogra, managed to get iwconfig running eventually on the panda . The order of the arguments matters, and I did not know that Jan 06 15:37:05 ah Jan 06 15:37:26 so mode, channel and then essid Jan 06 15:37:38 saw how nm does it via iwevent Jan 06 15:38:52 interesting, didn't know that Jan 06 15:42:28 lool, i was planning to upload a build from the debian git if you dont do it ... then we need the MIR for u-boot-tools approved and the package promoted Jan 06 15:42:37 and only then i can change jasper to a new dep Jan 06 15:44:56 (and then we have to pray for the archive to not be out of sync :) ) Jan 06 15:45:07 ogra: There is no reason to push for it quicker in Debian; it wont make it to squeeze anyway, so I don't have any reason to request faster handling of it; I don't know how long it will take, but I would probably upload next week if I don't get feedback Jan 06 15:45:34 but Ubuntu shouldn't block on Debian; the package name is agreed upon, so shouldn't be a big issue Jan 06 15:47:36 k Jan 06 15:47:49 * ogra sighs having to deal with git then Jan 06 15:48:07 i'll roll it tomorrow and upload an ubuntu0 package Jan 06 16:26:18 GrueMaster: just upgraded my natty rootfs and it seems fine, can also confirm that firefox is ok Jan 06 16:26:35 apparently no blocker bug Jan 06 16:26:39 I'm in the process of updating now. Jan 06 17:52:40 Ok. Finally was able to pull down all the updates since yesterday. Firefox is indeed working again (it was one of the updated packages). Jan 06 23:31:33 Quick question, is it normal that the netbook UI is rather slow on panda? Jan 06 23:47:52 hm, i have an imx51 system (lucid) where ureadahead doesn't seem to be running during boot. i have an upstart job, not sure why it's not firing Jan 06 23:49:10 ah, there we go, something in /var/log/boot.log -- terminated with status 5 Jan 06 23:52:03 rsalveti: Any idea as to why the ti-ppa doesn't install on Natty? Jan 06 23:53:53 looks like a mime issue with gnome-open. Jan 07 00:10:17 ah... Jan 07 00:10:27 looks like debugfs isn't enabled in my Kconfig, which ureadahead needs **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Jan 07 02:59:58 2011