**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon May 28 02:59:58 2012 May 28 10:22:07 hi all May 28 10:22:49 I want to try ubuntu 2.6.xx version of kernel on panda May 28 10:23:15 but I want to build it for myself ... also want comaptible u-boot ... Can anyone help ? May 28 10:35:42 can anyone point me to kernel source code repo for panda ubuntu May 28 10:35:42 ? May 28 10:35:42 * Aurum che connect May 28 10:46:01 I am using https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARMTeam which allows me to have image on my panda board but where can I find corresponding source code for bootloader and kernel ? May 28 11:37:11 sebjan : I checke out your branch for u-boot ... for omap4 panda. Unable to find USB EHCI driver and Ethernet river May 28 11:39:14 can anyone tell how to clone omap4 panda kernel ? I can find instructions for getting direct bins from http://omappedia.org/wiki/OMAP_Ubuntu_Core May 28 11:39:33 but I want the source from which these are compiled May 28 16:47:06 Hi :) I'm searching for a help with publishing a newer stable kernel for N900. Can anyone help? May 28 17:12:40 Aurum: Try this: http://elinux.org/BeagleBoardUbuntu. It will compile for the panda. May 28 17:37:22 janimo: Hi, as you hacked on ghc in the past, can you take a look at ghc on armel again? every build of haskell-* packages and also ghc itself fail on armel May 28 17:37:32 https://launchpadlibrarian.net/106320724/buildlog_ubuntu-quantal-armel.ghc_7.4.1-3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz May 28 17:38:03 Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode `movw r3,:lower16:stg_CHARLIKE_closure' (and more similar ones) May 28 17:44:45 rsalveti: ping May 28 20:25:32 geser, will check May 29 01:25:44 janimo: I'd assume it's because we moved the toolchain to ARMv5, but perhaps haven't told GHC about it. May 29 01:25:55 janimo: If you don't have the time to poke it, I can. May 29 01:30:00 janimo: My suspicion seems to be confirmed by the build log. Grabbing the source now to have a look. May 29 01:32:05 Don't forget you can ask #debian-haskell (OFTC) for advice re the ghc side of things May 29 01:33:15 ubuntu armel is armv5 again? May 29 01:38:22 suihkulokki: SOrt of. May 29 01:38:49 twb: I suspect it's actuall llvm that needs some love. Or maybe ghc just needs a violent re-bootstrap. May 29 01:39:28 Last time I looked (karmic?) GHC on arm went via C May 29 01:39:42 Didn't know they had transitioned to llvm May 29 01:40:10 Oh and (at least at the time) ghc didn't support arm, really, it was just the debian haskell team making it kinda-work May 29 01:56:56 infinity: you need to update the topic then :) May 29 02:11:36 suihkulokki: toolchain is armv5 but that does not mean that ubuntu/armel is armv5 again May 29 02:11:50 suihkulokki: no one rebuilt whole archive for it May 29 02:25:37 What does "toolchain is armv5" mean? That just those packages (presumably gcc, ld, etc) are compiled to run on armv5, though packages compiled WITH them target armv7? May 29 02:40:55 twb: right May 29 02:41:19 twb: ubuntu/armel was armv7 so most of packages still are. new ones will be armv5 May 29 02:44:17 Hi. Looks like we have a newer somewhat stable kernel for the Nokia N900. Can someone help with packaging it and publishing on some server, better in the official repository? May 29 02:47:23 hrw: why the backflip? Just because of raspberry? May 29 02:49:20 twb: there is now armhf so having two armv7 ports doesn't make much sense May 29 02:52:07 Oh. May 29 02:52:17 twb: who care about r/pi? May 29 02:53:12 hrw: exactly May 29 02:56:41 armhf branch isn't mentioned anywhere on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM btw **** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue May 29 02:59:58 2012