**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Jul 22 02:59:58 2013
Jul 22 07:00:44 <morphis> morning
Jul 22 08:21:07 <morphis> JaMa: any idea why qtwebkit 5.1.0 isn't compiling?
Jul 22 08:22:11 <JaMa> no
Jul 22 08:22:30 <JaMa> but the same happens with 5.0.2 and 5.1.0+git when qtbase is 5.1.0
Jul 22 08:22:42 <JaMa> maybe its from those explicit deps commit
Jul 22 08:23:17 <JaMa> well some versions of qtwebkit were complainig about missing icu support in qtbase
Jul 22 08:23:32 <JaMa> maybe some other versions are just creating empty package without error
Jul 22 08:28:18 <morphis> JaMa: hm, there seems to be definitely something wrong with the explicit deps changes
Jul 22 08:28:31 <morphis> as for example -no-glib shoudn't be passed as default option
Jul 22 08:30:33 <morphis> and -webkit is missing in qtbase too
Jul 22 08:31:01 <morphis> or it was wrong before
Jul 22 08:34:40 <JaMa> morphis: webkit option doesn't exist in qtbase now
Jul 22 08:34:52 <morphis> ok, then it was wrong in 5.0.2 already
Jul 22 08:35:09 <JaMa> glib should be added to default PACKAGECONFIG
Jul 22 08:35:21 <JaMa> QT_WEBKIT variable wasn't used in any qtbase-5*
Jul 22 08:35:49 <JaMa> the same with QT_XML it was just left-over from monolitic qt4 build
Jul 22 08:36:15 <morphis> ok
Jul 22 08:36:50 <morphis> whats with sql-sqlite? it was default before too if I remember well
Jul 22 08:38:23 <JaMa> not sure if we need it enabled by default, is something depending on it?
Jul 22 08:38:44 <JaMa> default PACKAGECONFIG should be "minimal" because it's easier to add to it, then remove something from it
Jul 22 08:45:25 <morphis> ok
Jul 22 08:45:36 <morphis> I don't know about anything depending on it
Jul 22 08:47:05 <morphis> JaMa: somehow PACKAGECONFIG += in a bbappend doesn't work
Jul 22 08:47:16 <JaMa> why?
Jul 22 08:47:30 <JaMa> I have 3 more builds running atm, so I cannot check now
Jul 22 08:48:20 <morphis> JaMa: http://pastebin.com/7yMfA5y3
Jul 22 08:48:32 <morphis> look at the generated configure line
Jul 22 08:49:26 <JaMa> can you check bitbake -e?
Jul 22 08:54:04 <morphis> yes
Jul 22 08:56:28 <morphis> JaMa: http://pastebin.com/X0dCs8hj
Jul 22 09:00:27 <JaMa> ah right, because it's weakly assigned in qtbase.inc
Jul 22 09:02:07 <morphis> hm
Jul 22 09:04:20 <morphis> JaMa: so we're going to require the user to replace PACKAGECONFIG completely or better changing to ?= ?
Jul 22 09:13:56 <JaMa> ??= is common for PACKAGECONFIGs but I'll probably change it to normal assignment
Jul 22 09:27:50 <morphis> JaMa: or we shift all the options to a DEFAULT_PACKAGECONFIGS which the user can then reuse
Jul 22 09:37:41 <JaMa> see jansa/5.1.0
Jul 22 09:38:34 <morphis> ok
Jul 22 09:39:24 <morphis> JaMa: ok, looks good
Jul 22 12:34:51 <morphis> JaMa: about not compiling qtwebkit: http://pastebin.com/3b2c6XbV
Jul 22 12:39:25 <JaMa> good so it's easy to fix :)
Jul 22 12:39:44 <JaMa> 10:23:39 <+JaMa> well some versions of qtwebkit were complainig about missing icu support in qtbase
Jul 22 12:39:47 <JaMa> 10:23:54 <+JaMa> maybe some other versions are just creating empty package without error
Jul 22 12:45:51 <JaMa> morphis: qtwebkit also autodetects couple of deps, I need to make it explicit qtwebkit "glib-2.0 gstreamer libgstapp-0.10 libgstinterfaces-0.10 libgstpbutils-0.10 libgstvideo-0.10 libxslt"
Jul 22 13:06:22 <morphis> JaMa: yes
Jul 22 13:06:31 <morphis> JaMa: sorry forgot about your lines
Jul 22 13:07:04 <morphis> I am switching around a lot today between different activities so some parts are out of my brain very quickly :)
Jul 22 13:07:18 <JaMa> yes I have the same
Jul 22 13:07:34 <JaMa> finally I'm down to only a few packages with undeterministic deps
Jul 22 13:07:44 <stefan_schmidt_w> ts, ts, don't context switch to much. Brings your productivity down to 0 easily
Jul 22 13:08:01 <JaMa> which isn't so bad with test build still running on tahiti :)
Jul 22 13:08:36 <Ziginox> so many nasadmins oO
Jul 22 13:14:09 <morphis> stefan_schmidt_w: the biggest impact theses days which brings down the productivity is the summer ..
Jul 22 13:14:49 <stefan_schmidt_w> morphis: which is ok :)
Jul 22 13:15:02 <morphis> depends :)
Jul 22 17:19:59 <morphis> JaMa: ok, I have one issue left with luna-sysmgr-common and qt 5.1.0
Jul 22 17:20:23 <morphis> OE_QMAKE_PATH_HEADERS points to ${includedir} but headers are in ${includedir}/qt5
Jul 22 17:22:10 <JaMa> morphis: use OE_QMAKE_PATH_QT_HEADERS luke
Jul 22 17:22:19 <morphis> yes
Jul 22 17:22:33 <morphis> but I am hitting the case with just using inherit qmake5
Jul 22 17:23:14 <morphis> which is using ${OE_QMAKE_PATH_HEADERS} instead of OE_QMAKE_PATH_QT_HEADERS
Jul 22 17:24:40 <JaMa> add OE_QMAKE_PATH_HEADERS = "${OE_QMAKE_PATH_QT_HEADERS}" into that recipe
Jul 22 17:25:18 <Herrie> Anyone seen the Ubuntu Edge phone? Looks quite slick!
Jul 22 17:26:02 <morphis> JaMa: yes, but shouldn't that be the std.?
Jul 22 17:26:21 <morphis> Herrie: yes, but quite expensive :)
Jul 22 17:26:27 <Herrie> Yes that too :(
Jul 22 17:26:39 <Herrie> Not sure my employer is happy that they chose the name Edge as well :P
Jul 22 17:26:54 <Herrie> Might see some lawsuits about it I guess....
Jul 22 17:28:17 <JaMa> morphis: we already talked about it.. see https://github.com/meta-qt5/meta-qt5/wiki/Building-with-OE#bad-include-paths-and-build-failing-to-find-qt5-headers
Jul 22 17:29:15 <morphis> :(
Jul 22 17:29:27 <morphis> JaMa: sorry ..
Jul 22 17:29:28 <JaMa> morphis: have you ever seen SDL_systhread.c:88:26: error: 'RTLD_DEFAULT' undeclared when building libsdl?
Jul 22 17:29:40 <morphis> no
Jul 22 17:29:41 <JaMa> morphis: it doesn't detect platform as linux and doesn't define __LINUX__
Jul 22 17:30:04 <morphis> thats interesting
Jul 22 17:30:07 <JaMa> morphis: I've reproduced it in dylan as well as master builds
Jul 22 17:30:33 <JaMa> can you share your workdir after building upto that point where libtool is failing for you?
Jul 22 17:30:44 <morphis> JaMa: btw. forgive me when I remember things bad theses days ... shifting between to much different areas
Jul 22 17:30:45 <JaMa> I would be interested to see where it differes from mine
Jul 22 17:30:54 <morphis> JaMa: yes, can do
Jul 22 17:31:02 <morphis> JaMa: how looks your latest recipe?
Jul 22 17:31:06 <JaMa> morphis: no problem
Jul 22 17:31:23 <JaMa> morphis: same as yours + that libtool removal in do_configure_prepend
Jul 22 17:31:40 <JaMa> morphis: ah and with autogen.sh in use it also fails to find libtool
Jul 22 17:38:57 <morphis> JaMa: btw. morphis/work of meta-wop contains now support for qt 5.1.0
Jul 22 17:41:48 <morphis> JaMa: ok, cmake is left to fix to work with qt 5.1.0: http://pastebin.com/ry0mt7c6
Jul 22 17:42:42 <JaMa> have you already removed cmake from meta-webos?
Jul 22 17:43:08 <JaMa> not that it will fix this issue, but something which I plan to build world with for test
Jul 22 17:44:12 <morphis> yes
Jul 22 17:44:17 <morphis> it's part of morphis/work
Jul 22 17:44:44 <JaMa> great, thanks
Jul 22 18:01:55 <morphis> JaMa: btw. for qtwayland we will use https://github.com/mer-packages/qtwayland in meta-wop
Jul 22 18:03:03 <morphis> JaMa: any idea about the cmake issue?
Jul 22 18:03:38 <JaMa> is there high level diff between this qtwayland and upstream?
Jul 22 18:03:58 <JaMa> morphis: I can find you the link where we discussed it on oe-core :)
Jul 22 18:03:59 <morphis> no
Jul 22 18:04:22 <morphis> JaMa: most changes are merged upstream but I would like to carry around a lot of patches in OE and they are doing the same work than we
Jul 22 18:04:44 <JaMa> OK
Jul 22 18:07:27 <HaDAk> EricBlade: thanks for jumping in on that email thread
Jul 22 18:45:33 <EricBlade> sure thing
Jul 22 19:12:06 <morphis> JaMa: I remember which thread that was
Jul 22 19:12:11 <morphis> tagged it somewhere
Jul 22 19:15:39 <morphis> found it
Jul 23 00:14:49 <Ziginox> scoutcamper: yo
Jul 23 00:14:55 <scoutcamper> ?
Jul 23 00:15:05 <Ziginox> you might find this slightly interesting https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3570226/DSC/DSC05372.JPG
Jul 23 00:15:12 <Ziginox> emphasis on might :\
Jul 23 00:16:21 <scoutcamper> Ziginox, nice find. although i must admit dvt-3 was essentially the same as production
Jul 23 00:16:31 <Ziginox> yeah
Jul 23 00:16:38 <Ziginox> the motherboard is exactly the same
Jul 23 00:17:05 <Ziginox> only differences I can find are labeling and the ROM version
Jul 23 00:17:20 <Ziginox> scoutcamper: is the case colour the same as a normal T|T?
Jul 23 00:17:31 <scoutcamper> looks like it
Jul 23 00:17:32 <Ziginox> I don't have one to compare it to
Jul 23 00:17:57 <Ziginox> going by the pics the oslo seems to be a tad bit darker though
Jul 23 00:18:06 <Ziginox> I'll just have to hunt down a T eventually...
Jul 23 00:18:09 <scoutcamper> my one to compare to is in a box somewhere in my storage closet
Jul 23 00:18:19 <Ziginox> heh
Jul 23 00:18:29 <Ziginox> mine are all currently in a box on the floor
Jul 23 00:18:35 <Ziginox> I need to put said box back on the shelf
Jul 23 00:18:41 <Ziginox> scoutcamper: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3570226/DSC/DSC05366.JPG
Jul 23 00:18:54 <scoutcamper> :)
Jul 23 00:19:02 <scoutcamper> you are just missing the Foleo
Jul 23 00:19:08 <Ziginox> I know :L
Jul 23 00:19:18 <Ziginox> I wish I could find a lifedrive...
Jul 23 00:19:35 <scoutcamper> tbh lifedrive sucked....
Jul 23 00:19:43 <Ziginox> it would be cool to find some of the prototypes like the X420 and Zepplin and such
Jul 23 00:19:53 <Ziginox> battery life and slowness?
Jul 23 00:20:12 <scoutcamper> specifically the slowness
Jul 23 00:20:16 <Ziginox> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3570226/DSC/DSC05373.JPG https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3570226/DSC/DSC05375.JPG <-- the oslo's mobo btw
Jul 23 00:20:20 <scoutcamper> the battery life is acceptable
Jul 23 00:20:32 <Ziginox> well, I plan to replace the microdrive with a larger CF card
Jul 23 00:20:32 <Ziginox> so
Jul 23 00:21:45 <Ziginox> Tungsten C is another on the list due to the keyboard
Jul 23 00:22:20 <scoutcamper> for its time the tungsten c was awesome
Jul 23 00:22:24 <Ziginox> yeah
Jul 23 00:22:33 <Ziginox> I just hope the case isn't as fragile as the W...
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Jul 23 02:59:58 2013