**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Aug 17 02:59:57 2011 Aug 17 09:07:28 morning all Aug 17 11:57:40 morning tom Aug 17 15:11:51 * fray is back from vacation... Aug 17 15:16:20 fray: hope you had a good one (somewhat interrupted though I guess) Aug 17 15:17:32 nope.. I read email in the morning.. and then wet and did stuff around the house :) Aug 17 15:17:48 mostly relaxing Aug 17 15:29:21 hi fray Aug 17 15:29:46 bluelightning: in oe-core there is something different wrt RDEPENDS_kernel-base = "kernel-image" Aug 17 15:30:04 in that core-image-minimal does not respect it Aug 17 15:30:26 and that the symlink to KERNEL_IMAGETYPE is missing Aug 17 15:30:38 in /boot Aug 17 15:31:17 my grep pointed just to kernel.bbclass Aug 17 15:33:47 Good Morning all ! Aug 17 15:36:20 Hello everyone, is there anyone here who succesfully installed ADT on Fedora 15? I'm having some problems with command "bitbake adt-installer" and I'm running out of ideas what am I doing wrong Aug 17 15:37:40 ant_work: don't know about that I'm afraid, you'd have to look into our kernel classes Aug 17 15:43:03 bluelightning: ping Aug 17 15:43:18 hi sgw Aug 17 15:44:06 bluelightning: Afternoon, I am trying to setup a layer with a .bbappend for base-files and ran into a problem., Richard suggested I check with you. Aug 17 15:44:49 sgw: sure, what's happening? Aug 17 15:45:08 Darth_: that command completes fine for me Aug 17 15:48:26 incandescant: For me... not. I'm constantly getting error messages, when I fix one error, I get another and another. Now I'm on fifth iteration and I'm still getting nothing. Aug 17 15:57:38 Darth_: sorry to hear that, what sort of error messages? Is this Bernard or latest git master? Aug 17 16:01:02 bluelightning: thanks for your help FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}:" did the trick Aug 17 16:02:49 laverne-4.0.1, well it's a long story. First there was no $BBLAYERS set, fixed, then was something I don't remember what (it was 2 AM in my timezone), fixed and left. Today some file was missing, i commented the line in bblayer.conf that required it, and now it says, that in local.conf I set distro: none (which isn't true) and that I shouldn't use SDKMASCHINE=i586, but only other option is x86_64 and my PC is 32bit. Aug 17 16:06:31 Darth_: I think the error messages should suggest using SDKMACHINE=i686 ? Aug 17 16:06:36 Right. Now I see, that downloading tarball from Poky's site wasn't my best idea. I'll try 5.0 version, and see what happens. Should've checked yoctos site for newer version first, sorry for bothering you. My bad. Aug 17 16:07:00 no, that's our bad - we need to keep that site up to date too Aug 17 16:07:14 Darth_: you want 5.0.1 Aug 17 16:07:29 it may not be linked to as prominently but does exist Aug 17 16:08:37 incandescant: likely, but in the comments it was mentioned, that there are two options: i586 and x86_64, but you're right, I'll try 5.0 version. I simply thought that Poky's site would have the newest version. Thanks for your time Aug 17 16:09:59 Darth_: http://www.yoctoproject.org/download/yocto/yocto-project-1.0.1-release-notes-poky-5.0.1 is latest stable Aug 17 16:10:24 Darth_: I'll try and gett Poky's site updated, sorry for time wasted Aug 17 16:10:45 Thanks, I already found it after you mentioned it :) Aug 17 16:12:10 cool Aug 17 16:12:20 let us know if you have problems, we want to help :-) Aug 17 16:13:15 I will. I want to avoid eclipse at all cost, after several projects in Java my hate towards it grew beyond any measures :P Aug 17 16:16:04 hehe Aug 17 16:20:15 What is Pseudo? It is not a package, it isn't mentioned in any handbook... but it says it is required. Aug 17 16:23:24 it's provided by the build system Aug 17 16:23:30 a fakeroot replacement Aug 17 16:23:33 Right, sanity disabled, instanity is good. Let's where will it take me. Aug 17 16:23:46 sanity disabled? you're on your own there ... Aug 17 16:24:45 I know. But it looks like it's working. Aug 17 16:25:01 how are you running bitbake? Aug 17 16:25:12 have you sourced the oe-init-build-env script? Aug 17 16:25:27 yes Aug 17 16:26:19 pseudo should be built for you then, what error did you see? Aug 17 16:26:47 "Psuedo is required but missng" Aug 17 16:27:36 I know switching off sanity shouldn't have worked. But it... did Aug 17 16:27:47 but pseudo *is* required Aug 17 16:28:29 how did you invoke bitbake, the pattern should be that once you've sourced the init script there's a bitbake wrapper script added to your PATH that ensures pseudo is built before the main build runs Aug 17 16:28:50 if you don't have pseudo you can't create files with root privileges Aug 17 16:29:24 source poky-init-build-env Aug 17 16:30:07 Let's wait what's gonna happen. I'm at 17th task out of 96 Aug 17 16:30:31 heh, that's actually build pseudo then Aug 17 16:32:37 Since the installer is running i guess i was created but not seen i have no idea why, but now the installer is running smoothly Aug 17 16:42:44 hi all. just wondering if glibc is available as default lib in git version of poky? Aug 17 16:52:19 d4s: poky has switched to eglibc as the default Aug 17 16:53:13 incandescant: yes, I see it in sources. But I can not find glibc even as an option. Aug 17 16:55:24 d4s: I'm not sure why you'd want it over eglibc? Aug 17 16:56:22 d4s: also, that's not the question you asked ;-) It *is* available in an extra layer: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/experimental/meta-x32/tree/glibc Aug 17 16:57:50 Oh! thank you very much - will try it. Aug 17 16:58:41 d4s: don't expect it to remain maintained though. Is there a reason you want/need glibc over eglibc? Aug 17 17:00:56 hm... not sure. just trying to find out why 'rpmbuild -bb' works well in do_ functions but 'rpmbuild -bp' fails without notification Aug 17 17:02:34 and interesting thing - it is works if started with 'ltrace rpmbuild -bp' Aug 17 17:03:33 hmm, weird Aug 17 17:03:37 and you suspect eglibc? Aug 17 17:04:34 mI said - not sure. but as one of the reasons it could be. Aug 17 17:06:57 fair enough Aug 17 19:14:06 NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies Aug 17 19:14:07 NOTE: Runtime target 'ttf-dejavu-sans' is unbuildable, removing... Aug 17 19:14:07 Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['ttf-dejavu-sans'] Aug 17 19:14:07 NOTE: Runtime target 'x11vnc' is unbuildable, removing... Aug 17 19:14:07 Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['x11vnc', 'avahi', 'gtk+', 'ttf-dejavu-sans'] Aug 17 19:14:09 NOTE: Runtime target 'task-poky-x11-sato' is unbuildable, removing... Aug 17 19:14:11 Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['task-poky-x11-sato', 'x11vnc', 'avahi', 'gtk+', 'ttf-dejavu-sans'] Aug 17 19:14:14 NOTE: Runtime target 'oprofileui-server' is unbuildable, removing... Aug 17 19:14:16 Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['oprofileui-server', 'avahi', 'gtk+', 'ttf-dejavu-sans'] Aug 17 19:14:18 NOTE: Runtime target 'task-poky-tools-testapps' is unbuildable, removing... Aug 17 19:14:21 Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['task-poky-tools-testapps', 'oprofileui-server', 'avahi', 'gtk+', 'ttf-dejavu-sans'] Aug 17 19:14:24 NOTE: Runtime target 'qemu-config' is unbuildable, removing... Aug 17 19:14:25 Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['qemu-config', 'oprofileui-server', 'avahi', 'gtk+', 'ttf-dejavu-sans'] Aug 17 19:14:28 NOTE: Runtime target 'task-base-extended' is unbuildable, removing... Aug 17 19:14:30 Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['task-base-extended', 'qemu-config', 'oprofileui-server', 'avahi', 'gtk+', 'ttf-dejavu-sans'] Aug 17 19:14:33 NOTE: Runtime target 'task-base' is unbuildable, removing... Aug 17 19:14:35 Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['task-base', 'qemu-config', 'op Aug 17 19:14:50 * I 'm sorry * for such a long post !! --- What is the problem with this...?? Aug 17 19:15:43 I got this while creating a new image "$ bitbake -k poky-image-sato" Aug 17 21:45:47 RP_: ping Aug 17 21:51:19 jzhang-demo: pong? Aug 17 21:55:38 RP_: I'm debugging the pseudo segfault issue which is due to PSEUDO env variable is removed after one bake, but after I do source oe-init-build-env, and then env, I don't see the PSEUDO variables are in the EXTRAWHITE list... Aug 17 21:57:22 is that the "hob" bug? Aug 17 21:58:14 fray: yes, I do see we're trying to extend the PSEUDO variables to the EXTRAWHITE at beginning of bitbake script... Aug 17 21:59:00 did you verify with Joshua that it "should" be working? Aug 17 21:59:14 last I heard it was thought there were environment bugs in hob still Aug 17 22:00:41 fray: I don't think hob is messed up with env vars, is rely on underline bitbake to handle what env vars to preserve and the WHITELIST is the mechanism to make the env vars into the preserve list... Aug 17 22:01:32 ok... last I had heard RP thought there was some kind of a "reload" problem in the way hob was using bitbake Aug 17 22:04:34 fray: I'm not testing using hob atm, just commandline bitbake and I wrapped the export BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE with the 2 echo to check the BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE, I do see the PSEUDO_BUILD is added to the WHITE list right after the export, but after I do bitbake, it's gone from the BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE, seems sth wrong with bitbake Aug 17 22:05:18 ahh I see Aug 17 22:05:37 on a fork/exec pseudo should restore it to the environment... Aug 17 22:05:59 you won't necessarily see it in the calling process, but you should in the child Aug 17 22:08:36 fray: ok, but I still want us to figure out why the bitbake white list mechanism is not working here...seems the BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE always ended up what is set in the oe-buildenv-intenarl Aug 17 22:09:19 ok.. just wanted to make sure you weren't duplicating effort thats all **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Aug 18 02:59:56 2011