**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun Feb 24 02:59:58 2013
Feb 24 03:01:17 <seebs> So, last October, I submitted bitbake patches to make errors in build scripts more legible -- specifically, to get any kind of diagnostic at all from the script to indicate that it was exiting because a subprocess had exited with a non-zero status.
Feb 24 03:01:57 <seebs> So far as I can tell, these patches still apply cleanly, and I don't think I got any feedback on them. Should I resubmit? Nag? Change something and then resubmit?
Feb 24 03:08:13 <Crofton> seebs, did you send them to the bitbake list?
Feb 24 03:08:39 <Crofton> many of us are recovering from ELC also
Feb 24 03:08:43 <seebs> Yes. Which took me a while to figure out, since I went looking for them in the oe-core list. Although I may have just found a typo in them. Heh.
Feb 24 03:08:54 <Crofton> so you might want to wait until mid week
Feb 24 03:08:56 <Crofton> heh
Feb 24 03:09:07 <Crofton> anything to make error reporting clearer is very important
Feb 24 03:09:24 <seebs> Yeah, set -e sucks.
Feb 24 03:09:42 <seebs> Turns out, though, it still executes a trap handler for EXIT, so...
Feb 24 03:10:47 <seebs> But apparently, I had the index into BASH_LINENO wrong. (There's a test for BASH_VERSION, if it's set the script tries to indicate specifically what failed; I don't think most other shells let you query what command was being executed.)
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Mon Feb 25 02:59:57 2013